Search

Although inguinal hernia repair in female patients is less common than in male patients, it remains a frequent procedure. The decision to divide or preserve the round ligament has largely been left to surgeon preference, but little data exists about its impact on outcomes. This study aimed to describe current practices for round ligament management and identify the impact of division on surgical and patient-reported outcomes.The 2013 to 2021 Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database was queried for all female patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair with 30-day patient-reported outcome data available. Comparison groups were created based on round ligament management: round ligament division (RLD) or round ligament preservation (RLP).We identified 1365 female patients who underwent open (36.3%), laparoscopic (34.5%), or robotic (28.2%) repair. Most were non-recurrent (93%) and unilateral (82.6%). The round ligament was divided in 868 (63.6%) and preserved in 497 (36.4%) cases. There were no significant differences in overall complications (RLD 7.1%, RLP 5.2%, p = 0.17), reoperation (RLD 0.5%, RLP 0.2%, p = 0.4), or recurrence (RLD 0.1%, RLP 0.4%, p = 0.28). Mean European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias quality of life summary scores were not significantly different at 30 days (RLD 27.2, RLP 27.8) or 6 months (RLD 12.8, RLP 17.1). However, a significant difference was found in terms of mean pain-specific scores at 6 months, with lower pain scores in the RLD group (3 vs 4.7, p0.01), which persisted on multivariable analysis (p = 0.02).RLD is a common practice and is not associated with increased complications or recurrence. Although there is some evidence that RLD may result in decreased pain at 6 months, this must be balanced with potential functional complications of division that are not fully studied in this paper.

Patients with non-familial, unilateral breast cancer have a low risk of contralateral breast cancer. Thus, clinical studies have shown no survival benefit for patients who undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) compared to those undergoing unilateral surgeries for non-familial unilateral breast cancers. Despite this evidence, there has been a steady increase in rates of CPM in the U.S. Patient factors influencing this choice have been identified in previous studies, but seldom in a prospective manner. This prospective study was designed to assess emotion and any association with a patient's decision to ultimately undergo CPM.We recruited patients with newly diagnosed, unilateral, non-metastatic breast cancer, who had not yet had surgery, to participate in a prospective, longitudinal study to examine the impact of emotions on CPM decision-making.Among the 86 final participants, all completed the pre-visit survey (100%) and 52 patients completed the post-visit survey (60%). Patients undergoing CPM were significantly younger than those who did not. There was no statistically significant association between emotion and receipt of CPM. There was a trend towards undergoing CPM in patients with a less open personality type and those with more negative emotion, though not statistically significant.This study found a trend toward increased CPM receipt in those with less open personality types and more negative emotion, especially post-consultation, but none of these findings was significant. Future work should include development of cancer-specific emotion scales and larger studies of possible connections between emotion, personality type and surgical decision-making for breast cancer patients.

The association of frailty on postoperative outcomes after elective and emergency general surgery procedures has been widely studied. However, this association has not been examined in the geriatric population stratified by emergency general surgery procedural risk.A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2012 to 2017 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. We identified geriatric patients (age ≥65 years) undergoing an emergency general surgery procedure within 48 hours of admission stratified by the procedural risk. Frailty was accessed using Modified 5-item Frailty Index, and the patients were divided into 4 groups Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 0, 1, 2, and ≥3. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the impact of increasing Modified 5-item Frailty Index score on postoperative complications, failure-to-rescue, and readmissions.In the study, 16,911 low risk procedure emergency general surgery patients were grouped as (33.3%) Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 0, (45.1%) Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 1, (18.7%) Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 2, and (2.9%) Modified 5-item Frailty Index ≥3 respectively. After multivariable analyses, increasing Modified 5-item Frailty Index score (versus Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 0) was associated with complications (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]; Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 2: 2.1 [1.3-3.5], Modified 5-item Frailty Index ≥ 3: 2.2 [1.2-4.2]), failure-to-rescue (Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 2: 2.3 [1.3-4.0], Modified 5-item Frailty Index ≥ 3: 2.3 [1.2-4.6]), readmission (Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 2: 1.4 [1.2-1.7], Modified 5-item Frailty Index ≥ 3: 1.5 [1.1-2.1]). In addition, 30,305 high-risk patients undergoing procedure emergency general surgery were grouped as (24.1%) Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 0, (44.9%) Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 1, (24.0%) Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 2, and (7.0%) Modified 5-item Frailty Index ≥3, respectively. After multivariable analyses, increasing Modified 5-item Frailty Index score (versus Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 0) was associated with complications (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]; Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 2: 1.2 [1.2-1.3], Modified 5-item Frailty Index ≥3: 1.7 [1.5-2.0]), failure-to-rescue (Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 2: 1.3 [1.2-1.5], Modified 5-item Frailty Index ≥3: 1.5 [1.3-1.7]), readmission (Modified 5-item Frailty Index = 2: 1.3 [1.2-1.4], Modified 5-item Frailty Index ≥3: 1.6 [1.4-1.9]).Increasing levels of frailty in geriatric emergency general surgery patients are associated with higher levels of postoperative complications, failure-to-rescue, and readmission. Clinicians should consider frailty in assessing the risk of even low-risk surgeries in this population.