Search

Risdiplam is a once-daily oral, survival of motor neuron 2 (SMN2) splicing modifier approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). JEWELFISH (NCT03032172) investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship of risdiplam in non-treatment-naïve patients with SMA. JEWELFISH enrolled adult and pediatric patients (N = 174) with confirmed diagnosis of 5q-autosomal recessive SMA who had previously received treatment with nusinersen (n = 76), onasemnogene abeparvovec (n = 14), olesoxime (n = 71), or were enrolled in the MOONFISH study (NCT02240355) of the splicing modifier RG7800 (n = 13). JEWELFISH was an open-label study with all participants scheduled to receive risdiplam. The most common adverse event (AE) was pyrexia (42 patients, 24%) and the most common serious AE (SAE) was pneumonia (5 patients, 3%). The rate of AEs and SAEs decreased by > 50% from the first to the second year of treatment, and there were no treatment-related AEs that led to withdrawal from treatment. An increase in SMN protein in blood was observed following risdiplam treatment and sustained over 24 months of treatment irrespective of previous treatment. Exploratory efficacy assessments of motor function showed an overall stabilization in mean total scores as assessed by the 32-item Motor Function Measure, Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded, and Revised Upper Limb Module. The safety profile of risdiplam in JEWELFISH was consistent with previous clinical trials of risdiplam in treatment-naïve patients. Exploratory efficacy outcomes are reported but it should be noted that the main aim of JEWELFISH was to assess safety and PK/PD, and the study was not designed for efficacy analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered (NCT03032172) on ClinicalTrials.gov on January 24, 2017; First patient enrolled: March 3, 2017., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The aim of this study was to establish whether bumetanide can abort an acute attack of weakness in patients with HypoPP. This was a randomised, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial. Focal attack of weakness was induced by isometric exercise of ADM followed by rest (McManis protocol). Participants had two study visits and received either placebo or 2 mg bumetanide at attack onset (defined as 40 % decrement in the abductor digiti minimi CMAP amplitude from peak). CMAP measurements assessed attack severity and duration. Nine participants completed both visits. CMAP percentage of peak amplitudes in the bumetanide (40.6 %) versus placebo (34.9 %) group at 1hr following treatment did not differ significantly (estimated effect difference 5.9 % (95 % CI: (-5.7 %; 17.5 %), p = 0.27, primary outcome). CMAP amplitudes assessed by the area under the curve for early (0-2hr post-treatment) and late (2-4 h post-treatment) efficacy were not statistically different between bumetanide and placebo (early effect estimate 0.043, p = 0.3; late effect estimate 0.085, p = 0.1). Two participants recovered from the attack following bumetanide intake; none recovered following placebo. Bumetanide was well tolerated but not efficacious to rescue a focal attack in an immobilised hand in the majority of patients, although data supports further studies of this agent., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest I certify that all the co-authors have seen and agreed with the contents of this manuscript, and none of the authors have any financial interest to disclose. This manuscript has not been submitted to any other journal., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The European registry for individuals with GSD5 and other muscle glycogenosis (EUROMAC) was launched to register rare muscle glycogenosis in Europe, to facilitate recruitment for research trials and to learn about the phenotypes and disseminate knowledge about the diseases. A network of twenty collaborating partners from eight European countries and the US contributed data on rare muscle glycogenosis in the EUROMAC registry., Methods: Following the initial report on demographics, neuromuscular features and comorbidity (2020), we here present the data on social participation, previous and current treatments (medication, supplements, diet and rehabilitation) and limitations. Furthermore, the following questionnaires were used: Fatigue severity scale (FSS), WHO Disability Assessment Scale (DAS 2.0), health related quality of life (SF36) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)., Results: Of 282 participants with confirmed diagnoses of muscle glycogenosis, 269 had GSD5. Of them 196 (73%) completed all questionnaires; for the others, the data were incomplete. The majority, 180 (67%) were currently working. Previous medical treatments included pain medication (23%) and rehabilitation treatment (60%). The carbohydrate-rich diet was reported to be beneficial for 68%, the low sucrose diet for 76% and the ketogenic diet for 88%. Almost all participants (93%) reported difficulties climbing stairs. The median FSS score was 5.22, indicating severe fatigue. The data from the WHODAS and IPAQ was not of sufficient quality to be interpreted., Conclusions: The EUROMAC registry have provided insight into the functional and social status of participants with GSD5: most participants are socially active despite limitations in physical and daily life activities. Regular physical activity and different dietary approaches may alleviate fatigue and pain., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by reduced levels of survival of motor neuron (SMN) protein due to deletions and/or mutations in the SMN1 gene. Risdiplam is an orally administered molecule that modifies SMN2 pre-mRNA splicing to increase functional SMN protein., Methods: SUNFISH Part 1 was a dose-finding study conducted in 51 individuals with types 2 and 3 SMA aged 2-25 years. A dose-escalation method was used to identify the appropriate dose for the subsequent pivotal Part 2. Individuals were randomized (2:1) to risdiplam or placebo at escalating dose levels for a minimum 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period, followed by treatment for 24 months. The dose selection for Part 2 was based on safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic data. Exploratory efficacy was also measured., Results: There was no difference in safety findings for all assessed dose levels. A dose-dependent increase in blood SMN protein was observed; a median twofold increase was obtained within 4 weeks of treatment initiation at the highest dose level. The increase in SMN protein was sustained over 24 months of treatment. Exploratory efficacy showed improvement or stabilization in motor function. The pivotal dose selected for Part 2 was 5 mg for patients with a body weight ≥20 kg or 0.25 mg/kg for patients with a body weight <20 kg., Conclusions: SUNFISH Part 1 demonstrated a twofold increase in SMN protein after treatment with risdiplam. The observed safety profile supported the initiation of the pivotal Part 2 study. The long-term efficacy and safety of risdiplam are being assessed with ongoing treatment., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Risdiplam is an oral, survival of motor neuron 2 (SMN2) pre-mRNA splicing modifier approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). SUNFISH (NCT02908685) Part 2, a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, investigated the efficacy and safety of risdiplam in type 2 and non‑ambulant type 3 SMA. The primary endpoint was met: a significantly greater change from baseline in 32-item Motor Function Measure (MFM32) total score was observed with risdiplam compared with placebo at month 12. After 12 months, all participants received risdiplam while preserving initial treatment blinding. We report 24-month efficacy and safety results in this population. Month 24 exploratory endpoints included change from baseline in MFM32 and safety. MFM‑derived results were compared with an external comparator. At month 24 of risdiplam treatment, 32% of patients demonstrated improvement (a change of ≥ 3) from baseline in MFM32 total score; 58% showed stabilization (a change of ≥ 0). Compared with an external comparator, a treatment difference of 3.12 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-4.57) in favor of risdiplam was observed in MFM-derived scores. Overall, gains in motor function at month 12 were maintained or improved upon at month 24. In patients initially receiving placebo, MFM32 remained stable compared with baseline (0.31 [95% CI - 0.65 to 1.28]) after 12 months of risdiplam; 16% of patients improved their score and 59% exhibited stabilization. The safety profile after 24 months was consistent with that observed after 12 months. Risdiplam over 24 months resulted in further improvement or stabilization in motor function, confirming the benefit of longer-term treatment., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Risdiplam is a survival of motor neuron 2 (SMN2) splicing modifier for the treatment of patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The JEWELFISH study (NCT03032172) was designed to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of risdiplam in previously treated pediatric and adult patients with types 1-3 SMA. Here, an analysis was performed after all patients had received at least 1 year of treatment with risdiplam., Methods: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of 5q-autosomal recessive SMA between the ages of 6 months and 60 years were eligible for enrollment. Patients were previously enrolled in the MOONFISH study (NCT02240355) with splicing modifier RG7800 or treated with olesoxime, nusinersen, or onasemnogene abeparvovec. The primary objectives of the JEWELFISH study were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of risdiplam and investigate the PK after 2 years of treatment., Results: A total of 174 patients enrolled: MOONFISH study (n = 13), olesoxime (n = 71 patients), nusinersen (n = 76), onasemnogene abeparvovec (n = 14). Most patients (78%) had three SMN2 copies. The median age and weight of patients at enrollment was 14.0 years (1-60 years) and 39.1 kg (9.2-108.9 kg), respectively. About 63% of patients aged 2-60 years had a baseline total score of less than 10 on the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded and 83% had scoliosis. The most common adverse event (AE) was upper respiratory tract infection and pyrexia (30 patients each; 17%). Pneumonia (four patients; 2%) was the most frequently reported serious AE (SAE). The rates of AEs and SAEs per 100 patient-years were lower in the second 6-month period compared with the first. An increase in SMN protein was observed in blood after risdiplam treatment and was comparable across all ages and body weight quartiles., Conclusions: The safety and PD of risdiplam in patients who were previously treated were consistent with those of treatment-naïve patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disease caused by homozygous deletion or loss-of-function mutations of the survival of motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene, resulting in reduced levels of SMN protein throughout the body. Patients with SMA may have multiple tissue defects, which could present prior to neuromuscular symptoms., Objective: To assess the signs, comorbidities and potential extraneural manifestations associated with SMA in treatment-naïve patients., Methods: This observational, retrospective and matched-cohort study used secondary insurance claims data from the US IBM® MarketScan® Commercial, Medicaid and Medicare Supplemental databases between 01/01/2000 and 12/31/2013. Treatment-naïve individuals aged≤65 years with≥2 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) SMA codes were stratified into four groups (A-D), according to age at index (date of first SMA code recorded) and type of ICD-9 code used, and matched with non-SMA controls. The occurrence of ICD-9 codes, which were converted to various classifications (phecodes and system classes), were compared between groups in pre- and post-index periods., Results: A total of 1,457 individuals with SMA were included and matched to 13,362 controls. Increasing numbers of SMA-associated phecodes and system classes were generally observed from pre- to post-index across all groups. The strongest associations were observed in the post-index period for the youngest age groups. Endocrine/metabolic disorders were associated with SMA in almost all groups and across time periods., Conclusions: This exploratory study confirmed the considerable disease burden in patients with SMA and identified 305 unique phecodes associated with SMA, providing a rationale for further research into the natural history and progression of SMA, including extraneural manifestations of the disease.

Background: ANCHOVY was a global, multicenter, chart-review study that aimed to describe the natural history of Type 1 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) from a broad geographical area and provide further contextualization of results from the FIREFISH (NCT02913482) interventional study of risdiplam treatment in Type 1 SMA., Methods: Data were extracted from medical records of patients with first symptoms attributable to Type 1 SMA between 28 days and 3 months of age, genetic confirmation of SMA, and confirmed survival of motor neuron 2 copy number of two or unknown. The study period started on 1 January 2008 for all sites; study end dates were site-specific due to local treatment availabilities. Primary endpoints were time to death and/or permanent ventilation and proportion of patients achieving motor milestones. Secondary endpoints included time to initiation of respiratory and feeding support., Results: Data for 60 patients from nine countries across Asia, Europe and North and South America were analyzed. The median age (interquartile range [IQR]) for reaching death or permanent ventilation was ~ 7.3 (5.9-10.5) months. The median age (IQR) at permanent ventilation was ~ 12.7 (6.9-16.4) months and at death was ~ 41.2 (7.3-not applicable) months. No patients were able to sit without support or achieved any level of crawling, standing or walking., Interpretation: Findings from ANCHOVY were consistent with published natural history data on Type 1 SMA demonstrating the disease's devastating course, which markedly differed from risdiplam-treated infants (FIREFISH Part 2). The results provide meaningful additions to the literature, including a broader geographical representation., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction/aims: Data regarding weight, height/length, and growth status of patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) who have received only supportive care are limited. This cross-sectional study describes these measurements in patients with Type 1 and Types 2/3 SMA and compares them with reference values from typically developing children., Methods: Retrospective baseline data from three sites in the Pediatric Neuromuscular Clinical Research Network (Boston, New York, Philadelphia) were used. Descriptive statistics for weight, height/length, body mass index-for-age, as well as weight-for-length and absolute and relative deviations from reference values (ie, 50th percentile from World Health Organization/Centers for Disease Control growth charts) were calculated. Furthermore, growth status was reported., Results: A total of 91 genetically confirmed patients with SMA receiving optimal supportive care and without any disease-modifying treatment were stratified into Types 1 (n = 28) and 2/3 SMA (n = 63). Patients with Type 1 SMA weighed significantly less (median = -7.5%) compared with reference values and patients with Types 2/3 SMA were significantly shorter (mean = -3.0%) compared with reference values. The median weight was considerably below the 50th percentile in both groups of patients, even if they received a high standard of care and proactive feeding support., Discussion: More research is needed to understand which factors influence growth longitudinally, and how to accurately capture growth in patients with SMA. Further research should investigate the best time to provide feeding support to avoid underweight, especially in patients with Type 1, and how to avoid the risk of overfeeding, especially in patients with Types 2/3 SMA., (© 2022 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Muscle & Nerve published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Risdiplam is an oral small molecule approved for the treatment of patients with spinal muscular atrophy, with approval for use in patients with type 2 and type 3 spinal muscular atrophy granted on the basis of unpublished data. The drug modifies pre-mRNA splicing of the SMN2 gene to increase production of functional SMN. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of risdiplam in patients with type 2 or non-ambulant type 3 spinal muscular atrophy., Methods: In this phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients aged 2-25 years with confirmed 5q autosomal recessive type 2 or type 3 spinal muscular atrophy were recruited from 42 hospitals in 14 countries across Europe, North America, South America, and Asia. Participants were eligible if they were non-ambulant, could sit independently, and had a score of at least 2 in entry item A of the Revised Upper Limb Module. Patients were stratified by age and randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either daily oral risdiplam, at a dose of 5·00 mg (for individuals weighing ≥20 kg) or 0·25 mg/kg (for individuals weighing <20 kg), or daily oral placebo (matched to risdiplam in colour and taste). Randomisation was conducted by permutated block randomisation with a computerised system run by an external party. Patients, investigators, and all individuals in direct contact with patients were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the 32-item Motor Function Measure total score at month 12. All individuals who were randomly assigned to risdiplam or placebo, and who did not meet the prespecified missing item criteria for exclusion, were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Individuals who received at least one dose of risdiplam or placebo were included in the safety analysis. SUNFISH is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02908685. Recruitment is closed; the study is ongoing., Findings: Between Oct 9, 2017, and Sept 4, 2018, 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive risdiplam (n=120) or placebo (n=60). For analysis of the primary endpoint, 115 patients from the risdiplam group and 59 patients from the placebo group were included. At month 12, the least squares mean change from baseline in 32-item Motor Function Measure was 1·36 (95% CI 0·61 to 2·11) in the risdiplam group and -0·19 (-1·22 to 0·84) in the placebo group, with a treatment difference of 1·55 (0·30 to 2·81, p=0·016) in favour of risdiplam. 120 patients who received risdiplam and 60 who received placebo were included in safety analyses. Adverse events that were reported in at least 5% more patients who received risdiplam than those who received placebo were pyrexia (25 [21%] of 120 patients who received risdiplam vs ten [17%] of 60 patients who received placebo), diarrhoea (20 [17%] vs five [8%]), rash (20 [17%] vs one [2%]), mouth and aphthous ulcers (eight [7%] vs 0), urinary tract infection (eight [7%] vs 0), and arthralgias (six [5%] vs 0). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar between treatment groups (24 [20%] of 120 patients in the risdiplam group; 11 [18%] of 60 patients in the placebo group), with the exception of pneumonia (nine [8%] in the risdiplam group; one [2%] in the placebo group)., Interpretation: Risdiplam resulted in a significant improvement in motor function compared with placebo in patients aged 2-25 years with type 2 or non-ambulant type 3 spinal muscular atrophy. Our exploratory subgroup analyses showed that motor function was generally improved in younger individuals and stabilised in older individuals, which requires confirmation in further studies. SUNFISH part 2 is ongoing and will provide additional evidence regarding the long-term safety and efficacy of risdiplam., Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests EM has received fees for serving on scientific advisory boards; speaker fees from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Biogen, AveXis/Novartis, Scholar Rock, and Cytokinetics; and grants from Biogen during the conduct of the study. ND served on scientific advisory boards for F Hoffmann-La Roche and Novartis pharmaceuticals; he has received personal fees from Biogen for congress and travel support. ESM reports that she has served on advisory boards for Biogen and Scholar Rock. She has received consulting fees, travel support, and speaker honoraria as an independent contractor from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Biogen, AveXis, and Scholar Rock. AN has received fees for serving on scientific advisory boards and speaker fees from F Hoffmann-La Roche. MO reports grants from F Hoffmann-La Roche during the conduct of the study and has received grants as a clinical trial investigator from Biogen. KS reports grants from F Hoffman-La Roche/Chugai Pharmaceutical during the conduct of the study and grants from Biogen Japan and lecture fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. CV reports personal fees and financial support to her institution from F Hoffmann-La Roche for activities outside the submitted work. GB received consultancy fees and speaker honoraria from F Hoffmann-La Roche and AveXis and speaker fees from PTC Therapeutics. NG reports fees for serving on advisory boards and presentations at symposia from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Biogen, and AveXis. JK received grants or contracts from Novartis Gene Therapies and Biogen. He has received consulting and speaker fees from F Hoffmann La Roche, Biogen, and Novartis Gene Therapies and consulting fees from Scholar Rock. AK-P reports that she received an institutional support grant from Biogen; serving on scientific advisory boards for and receiving speaker honoraria from Biogen, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, and PTC Therapeutics; and receiving personal fees from Biogen and F Hoffmann-La Roche for travel support. LS received grants and personal fees from F Hoffman-La Roche, Biogen, and AveXis/Novartis Gene Therapy and personal fees from Cytokinetics, outside the submitted work. OK reports that he was previously an employee and stockholder in F Hoffmann-La Roche during the submitted work and that he now holds the position of honorary chief medical officer at The Spinal Muscular Atrophy Foundation. JWD has received fees for serving on scientific advisory boards from Biogen, Novartis, Sarepta, and Avidity; has received consulting fees from Affinia Therapeutics and Shift Therapeutics for a therapeutic platform; and has received grant support for clinical trials from F Hoffman-La Roche, Biogen, Novartis Gene Therapies, Cytokinetics, Scholar Rock, and Sarepta. CM, PF, MG, KG, HK, HS, RSS, and WYY report that they are current employees and stockholders in F Hoffmann-La Roche. OB-T declared no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Whether the modified shuttle test (MST) achieves maximal effort in children and adolescents with asthma is unclear. The aim was to compare the physiological responses of MST to the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in pediatric patients with asthma, to observe its convergent validity., Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study with volunteers with asthma (6-17 years of age) under regular treatment. The MST is an external-paced test, and the participants were allowed to walk/run. CPET was performed on a cycle ergometer to compare with MST. Gas exchange (VO 2 , VCO 2 , and VE) and heart rate (HR) were the outcomes and were continuously assessed in both tests., Results: Forty-seven volunteers were included, normal lung function expiratory forced volume at 1st second/forced vital capacity (FEV 1 /FVC) 88.6 (7.7). VO 2peak was higher at MST (2.0 ± 0.6 L/min) compared to CPET (1.6 ± 0.5 L/min), p < 0.001. Similar results was observed to VE at MST (50 ± 16 L/min) versus VE at CPET (40 ± 13 L/min), and to VCO 2 at MST (2.1 ± 0.8 L/min) versus VCO 2 at CPET (1.7 ± 0.6 L/min), p < 0.001. HR was also higher at MST (94 ± 6%pred) versus CPET (87 ± 8%pred), p = 0.002. VO 2peak in MST correlated to the CPET (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). The ICC of VO 2peak between tests was 0.73 (0.06-0.89), p < 0.001, and VO 2peak Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of 0.46 L/min., Conclusion: The MST showed a maximal physiologic response in children and adolescents with asthma. It is a valid test and can be used as an alternative to evaluating exercise capacity., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)