Search

Introduction: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) may be useful in treating disorders characterized by chronic parasympathetic disinhibition. Acute taVNS decreases resting heart rate in healthy individuals, but little is known regarding the effects of taVNS on the cardiac response to an acute stressor. To investigate effects on the acute stress response, we investigated how taVNS affected heart rate changes during a cold pressor test (CPT), a validated stress induction technique that reliably elicits a sympathetic stress response with marked increases in heart rate, anxiety, stress, and pain., Materials and Methods: We recruited 24 healthy adults (ten women, mean age = 29 years) to participate in this randomized, crossover, exploratory trial. Each subject completed two taVNS treatments (one active, one sham) paired with CPTs in the same session. Order of active versus sham stimulation was randomized. Heart rate, along with ratings of anxiety, stress, and pain, was collected before, during, and after each round of taVNS/sham + CPT., Results: In both stimulation conditions, heart rate was elevated from baseline in response to the CPT. Analyses also revealed a difference between active and sham taVNS during the first 40 seconds of the CPT (Δ heart rate [HR] = 12.75 ± 7.85 in the active condition; Δ HR = 16.09 ± 11.43 in the sham condition, p = 0.044). There were no significant differences in subjective ratings between active and sham taVNS., Conclusions: In this randomized, sham-controlled study, taVNS attenuated initial increases in HR in response to the CPT. Future studies are needed to investigate the effects of various taVNS doses and parameters on the CPT, in addition to other forms of stress induction., Clinical Trial Registration: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT00113453., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Mark S. George is currently Principal Investigator on multisite clinical trials in contract with LivaNova and Neurolief; is editor-in-chief of Brain Stimulation, an Elsevier journal; has received consulting fees from Sooma, Neurolief, Mictrotransponder, and Abbott (Boston Scientific); has Intellectual Property pending with the MUSCFoundation for Research related to transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) and infant feeding, taVNS, and motor recovery; participates on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Microtransponder, Brainsway (no compensation), and Magnus Medical (no compensation); and has received transcranial magnetic stimulation equipment from Magstim on loan. All other authors reported no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is a key node of the brain reward circuit driving reward-related behavior. Dysregulation of NAc has been demonstrated to contribute to pathological markers of addiction in substance use disorder (SUD) making it a potential therapeutic target for brain stimulation. Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is an emerging non-invasive brain stimulation approach that can modulate deep brain regions with a high spatial resolution. However, there is currently no evidence showing how the brain activity of NAc and brain functional connectivity within the reward network neuromodulated by tFUS on the NAc., Methods: In this pilot study, we carried out a single-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the underlying mechanism of tFUS neuromodulating the reward network through NAc in ten healthy adults. Specifically, the experiment consists of a 20-min concurrent tFUS/fMRI scan and two 24-min resting-state fMRI before and after the tFUS session., Results: Firstly, our results demonstrated the feasibility and safety of 20-min tFUS on NAc. Additionally, our findings demonstrated that bilateral NAc was inhibited during tFUS on the left NAc compared to sham. Lastly, increased functional connectivity between the NAc and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) was observed after tFUS on the left NAc, but no changes for the sham group., Conclusion: Delivering tFUS to the NAc can modulate brain activations and functional connectivity within the reward network. These preliminary findings suggest that tFUS could be potentially a promising neuromodulation tool for the direct and non-invasive management of the NAc and shed new light on the treatment for SUD and other brain diseases that involve reward processing., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Peng, Connolly, Sutton, Robinson, Baker-Vogel, Short and Badran.)

Background: Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a common and consequential disorder. When applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) reduces craving across substance use disorders and may have therapeutic clinical effects when applied in serial-sessions. The present study sought to preliminarily determine whether serial-sessions of rTMS applied to the DLPFC had a therapeutic effect in CUD., Methods: This study was a two-site, phase-2, double-blind, randomized-controlled-trial. Seventy-two treatment-seeking participants (37.5% Women, mean age 30.2±9.9SD) with ≥moderate-CUD were randomized to active or sham rTMS (Beam-F3, 10Hz, 20-total-sessions, two-sessions-per-visit, two-visits-per-week, with cannabis cues) while undergoing a three-session motivational enhancement therapy intervention. The primary outcome was the change in craving between pre- and post- treatment (Marijuana Craving Questionnaire Short-Form-MCQ-SF). Secondary outcomes included the number of weeks of abstinence and the number of days-per-week of cannabis use during 4-weeks of follow-up., Results: There were no significant differences in craving between conditions. Participants who received active-rTMS reported numerically, but not significantly, more weeks of abstinence in the follow-up period than those who received sham-rTMS (15.5%-Active; 9.3%-Sham; rate ratio = 1.66 [95% CI: 0.84, 3.28]; p=0.14). Participants who received active-rTMS reported fewer days-per-week of cannabis use over the final two-weeks of the follow-up period than those receiving sham-rTMS (Active vs. Sham: -0.72; Z=-2.33, p=0.02)., Conclusions: This trial suggests rTMS is safe and feasible in individuals with CUD and may have a therapeutic effect on frequency of cannabis use, though further study is needed with additional rTMS-sessions and a longer follow-up period., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest GLS has collaborated with MagVenture and MECTA as part of investigator-initiated trials. He additionally consults for and has equity in the company Trial Catalyst. TJF is employed by Magnus Medical and holds stock/equity options. NRW is a named inventor on Stanford-owned intellectual property relating to accelerated TMS pulse pattern sequences and neuroimaging-based TMS targeting; he has served on scientific advisory boards for Otsuka, NeuraWell, Magnus Medical, and Nooma as a paid advisor; and he has equity/stock options in Magnus Medical, NeuraWell, and Nooma. EBS is a paid consultant for Neuronetics and is an equity holder of Bodhi Neurotech. MSG has the following disclosures; Babystrong (patent co-holder), Brainsway (unpaid consultant, research grant, donated equipment for research trials), Magnus Medical (unpaid scientific Advisor), Magstim (unpaid consultant, donated equipment for research trials), MECTA (unpaid consultant, research grant, donated equipment for research grant), Microtransponder (DSMB member), Neuronetics (unpaid consultant, research grant, donated equipment for research), NeoSync (unpaid consultant, DSMB member), Neuralief (scientific advisory board, research grant, and Sooma (scientific advisory board), and he is an editor of the Elsevier journal Brain Stimulation. ALM has received research support from PleoPharma. None of the other authors have any relevant conflicts to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Implanted vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) have been primarily administered clinically to the unilateral-left vagus nerve. This left-only convention has proved clinically beneficial in brain disorders. However, in stroke survivors, the presence of a lesion in the brain may complicate VNS-mediated signaling, and it is important to understand the laterality effects of VNS in stroke survivors to optimize the intervention., Objective: To understand whether taVNS delivered to different ear targets relative to the lesion (ipsilesional vs contralesional vs bilateral vs sham) impacts blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal propagation in stroke survivors., Methods: We enrolled 20 adults with a prior history of stroke. Each participant underwent a single visit, during which taVNS was delivered concurrently during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) acquisition. Each participant received three discrete active stimulation conditions (ipsilesional, contralesional, bilateral) and one sham condition in a randomized order. Stimulation-related BOLD signal changes in the active conditions were compared to sham conditions to understand the interaction taVNS and laterality effects., Results: All active taVNS conditions deactivated the contralesional default mode network related regions compared to sham, however only ipsilesional taVNS enhanced the activations in the ipsilesional visuomotor and secondary visual cortex. Furthermore, we reveal an interaction in task activations between taVNS and cortical visuomotor areas, where ipsilesional taVNS significantly increased ipsilesional visuomotor activity and decreased contralesional visuomotor activity compared to sham., Conclusion: Laterality of taVNS relative to the lesion is a critical factor in optimizing taVNS in a stroke population, with ipsilesional stimulation providing largest direct brain activation and should be explored further when designing taVNS studies in neurorehabilitation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Non-invasive brain stimulation is designed to target accessible brain regions that underlie many psychiatric disorders. One such method, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is commonly used in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, for non-responders, the choice of an alternative therapy is unclear and often decided empirically without detailed knowledge of precise circuit dysfunction. This is also true of invasive therapies, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), in which responses in TRD patients are linked to circuit activity that varies in each individual. If the functional networks affected by these approaches were better understood, a theoretical basis for selection of interventions could be developed to guide psychiatric treatment pathways. The mechanistic understanding of TMS is that it promotes long-term potentiation of cortical targets, such as dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), which are attenuated in depression. DLPFC is highly interconnected with other networks related to mood and cognition, thus TMS likely alters activity remote from DLPFC, such as in the central executive, salience and default mode networks. When deeper structures such as subcallosal cingulate cortex (SCC) are targeted using DBS for TRD, response efficacy has depended on proximity to white matter pathways that similarly engage emotion regulation and reward. Many have begun to question whether these networks, targeted by different modalities, overlap or are, in fact, the same. A major goal of current functional and structural imaging in patients with TRD is to elucidate neuromodulatory effects on the aforementioned networks so that treatment of intractable psychiatric conditions may become more predictable and targeted using the optimal technique with fewer iterations. Here, we describe several therapeutic approaches to TRD and review clinical studies of functional imaging and tractography that identify the diverse loci of modulation. We discuss differentiating factors associated with responders and non-responders to these stimulation modalities, with a focus on mechanisms of action for non-invasive and intracranial stimulation modalities. We advance the hypothesis that non-invasive and invasive neuromodulation approaches for TRD are likely impacting shared networks and critical nodes important for alleviating symptoms associated with this disorder. We close by describing a therapeutic framework that leverages personalized connectome-guided target identification for a stepwise neuromodulation paradigm., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Idlett-Ali, Salazar, Bell, Short and Rowland.)

Surgical techniques targeting behavioral disorders date back thousands of years. In this review, the authors discuss the history of neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders, starting with trephination in the Stone Age, progressing through the fraught practice of prefrontal lobotomy, and ending with modern neurosurgical techniques for treating psychiatric conditions, including ablative procedures, conventional deep brain stimulation, and closed-loop neurostimulation. Despite a tumultuous past, psychiatric neurosurgery is on the cusp of becoming a transformative therapy for patients with psychiatric dysfunction, with an ever-increasing evidence base suggesting reproducible and ethical therapeutic benefit.

Background: Findings from correlative neuroimaging studies link increased frontoparietal network (FPN) activation and default mode network (DMN) deactivation to enhanced high cognitive demand processing. To causally investigate FPN-DMN contributions to high cognitive demand processing, the current interleaved TMS-fMRI study simultaneously manipulated and indexed neural activity while tracking cognitive performance during high and low cognitive load conditions., Methods: Twenty participants completed an n-back task consisting of four conditions (0-back, 0-backTMS, 2-back, 2-backTMS) while undergoing interleaved TMS-fMRI. During TMS concurrent with n-back blocks, TMS single pulses were delivered to the left DLPFC at 100% motor-threshold every 2.4s., Results: TMS delivered during high cognitive load strengthened cognitive processing. FPN node activations and DMN node deactivations were increased in the high versus low cognitive load TMS condition. Contrary to our hypothesis, TMS did not increase high load related activation in FPN nodes. However, as hypothesized, increased DMN node deactivations emerged as a function of TMS during high load (right angular gyrus) and from interactions between cognitive load and TMS (right middle temporal gyrus). Load and TMS combined to dampen activation within the DMN at trend level (p = .058). Deactivation in a dorsomedial DMN node was associated with TMS driven improvements in high load cognitive processing., Conclusions: Exogenous perturbation of the DLPFC via single pulse TMS amplified DMN node deactivations and enhanced high cognitive demand processing. Neurobehavioral findings linking these effects hint at a promising, albeit preliminary, cognitive control substrate requiring replication in higher-powered studies that use control stimulation., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

(Appeared originally in Brain Stimulation 2020; 13:1805-1812) Reprinted with permission from Elsevier., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Psychiatric Association.)