1. Dose prediction of CyberKnife Monte Carlo plan for lung cancer patients based on deep learning: robust learning of variable beam configurations
- Author
-
Yuchao Miao, Jiwei Li, Ruigang Ge, Chuanbin Xie, Yaoying Liu, Gaolong Zhang, Mingchang Miao, and Shouping Xu
- Subjects
Automatic planning ,Deep learning ,Dose prediction ,Monte Carlo ,CyberKnife ,Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine ,R895-920 ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Abstract Background Accurate calculation of lung cancer dose using the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm in CyberKnife (CK) is essential for precise planning. We aim to employ deep learning to directly predict the 3D dose distribution calculated by the MC algorithm, enabling rapid and accurate automatic planning. However, most current methods solely focus on conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy and assume a consistent beam configuration across all patients. This study seeks to develop a more versatile model incorporating variable beam configurations of CK and considering the patient’s anatomy. Methods This study proposed that the AB (anatomy and beam) model be compared with the control Mask (only anatomy) model. These models are based on a 3D U-Net network to investigate the impact of CK beam encoding information on dose prediction. The study collected 86 lung cancer patients who received CK′s built-in MC algorithm plans using different beam configurations for training/validation (66 cases) and testing (20 cases). We compared the gamma passing rate, dose difference maps, and relevant dose-volume metrics to evaluate the model’s performance. In addition, the Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) were calculated to assess the spatial correspondence of isodose volumes. Results The AB model demonstrated superior performance compared to the Mask model, particularly in the trajectory dose of the beam. The DSCs of the AB model were 20–40% higher than that of the Mask model in some dose regions. We achieved approximately 99% for the PTV and generally more than 95% for the organs at risk (OARs) referred to the clinical planning dose in the gamma passing rates (3 mm/3%). Relative to the Mask model, the AB model exhibited more than 90% improvement in small voxels (p
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF