Search

The article examines the constitutionality of the U.S. federal court's independent exercise of inherent powers (IP) in multidistrict litigations (MDL) despite the lack of authorization by Congress. Also cited are the claim by the Supreme Court that the Constitution allows the use of IP in the exercise of judicial power under Article III, and the need to ensure the parties' due process rights when exercising IPs.

The article examine the practice of forced fee transfers in Multi-District Litigations (MDLs) and whether the law of restitution and unjust enrichment supports such fee awards. It argues that MDL procedures often violate the law and judges regulate fees more aggressively in MDLs than in other types of litigation. It further highlights that judges in MDLs has the authority to override the contractual entitlements of individually retained plaintiffs attorneys (IRPAs).