Search

Real-world data on the management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are so far scarce in Germany. Therefore, we aimed to establish a nationwide registry and describe the clinical characteristics and therapy of PBC patients.Three different cohorts defined as ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) responders, as inadequate responders according to Paris II criteria, and as newly diagnosed patients were prospectively recruited.This manuscript includes the baseline data of the project.In total, 33/77 (43%) contacted centres (58% of university hospitals, 38% of non-university hospitals, and 24% of private practices) recruited 515 patients including 204 UDCA responders, 221 inadequate responders to UDCA, and 90 newly diagnosed patients.All patients were treated with UDCA; however, a UDCA dosage below the recommended dosage of 13 mg/kg/d was observed in 38.5% of individuals after 12 months of treatment. UDCA dosages were lower in nonacademic compared to academic centres.Only 75/219 (38.5%) of inadequate responders to UDCA received a second-line therapy with obeticholic acid (OCA) and/or bezafibrate (BZF). OCA (13% vs. 4.5%) and BZF (14% vs. 6.5%) were significantly more often prescribed by academic vs. nonacademic centres.Pruritus (27% vs. 15.5%), fatigue (23% vs. 4.5%), and sicca syndrome (14% vs. 1%) were significantly more often reported by academic centres.The German PBC registry could be established, which indicates suboptimal therapy in a relevant proportion of patients and shows significant differences between academic and nonacademic centres. Results are fundamental to improving clinical management at different levels of care., Competing Interests: JW: Lecturer and advisory board member for Intercept/Advanz Pharma, GSK, Ipsen TM: Ssupported by the German Research Foundation Grants MU 2864/1-3 and MU 2864/3- 1.KS: Receipt of speaker´s honoraria or advisory board: Gilead, Intercept/Advanz Pharma, Abbvie, Falk, Novo Nordisk HB: Consultant: Intercept/Advance Pharma, Ipsen GD: Consultant / speaker: AbbVie, Advanz/Intercept, Alexion, Falk Foundation, Gilead, Novartis, Orphalan, Univar PAR: Consulting and lectures fees: Astra Zeneca, BMS, Boston Scientific, CSL Behring, Gilead, Pfizer, Abbvie, Norgine JMS: Consultant: Astra Zeneca, Apollo Endosurgery, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Inventiva Pharma, Madrigal, MSD, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Siemens Healthineers. Research Funding: Gilead Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Siemens Healthcare GmbH. Stock Options: AGED diagnostics, Hepta Bio. Speaker Honorarium: Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, MedPublico GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Histoindex, MedPublico GmbH SZ: Speakers bureau and/or consultancy: Abbvie, BioMarin, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, GSK, Intercept, Ipsen, Janssen, Madrigal, MSD/Merck, NovoNordisk, SoBi, Theratechnologies KGS: Consultant: Advance Pharma, Speaker Honorarium: AbbVie, GileadJT has received speaking and/or consulting fees from Versantis, Gore, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Falk, Grifols, Genfit and CSL Behring. WPH: Consultant or Speaker Honorarium: Intercept /Advanz, Ipsen, NovoNordisk, Gilead, Abbvie, Norgine CS: Consultant, Study support or Speaker Honorarium: Calliditas, Falk, Intercept/Advanz, Ipsen, Mirum ER: Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees/advisory board: Abbvie, Amgen, Intercept, Medac, Merz, Norgine, Falk Foundation, Gilead, Pfizer, Repha, Takeda AEK: Research grant: Intercept. Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Advanz, AOP Orphan, Bayer, BMS, CMS, CymaBay, Falk, Gilead, GSK, Intercept, Ipsen, Newbridge, Novartis, Lilly, Mirum, MSD, Roche, Zambon. Consultant: Abbvie, Advanz, Alentis, AlphaSigma, AstraZenca, Avior, Bayer, BioNTech, CymaBay, Eisai, Escient, Falk, FMC, Gilead, GSK, Guidepoint, Intercept, Ipsen, Mirum, Medscape, MSD, Myr, Roche, Takeda, Viofor MR: Consultant, or Speaker Honorarium: Intercept/Advanz, Gilead, Abbvie AT: Speaker Honorarium: Intercept/Advanz VK: Consultant Astra Zeneca, Speaker’s Honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead, Falk, Mirum, Albireo/Ipsen, Merck, MedUpdate GmbH, Sanofi, CSL Behring ER: Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees/advisory board: Abbvie, Amgen, Intercept, Medac, Merz, Norgine, Falk Foundation, Gilead, Pfizer, Repha, Takeda FT: Research grant: Allergan, BMS, Inventiva, Gilead. Speakers bureau: Gilead, Abbvie, Falk, Merz, Orphalan, Advanz. Consultant: Allergan, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Abbvie, Alnylam, BMS, Intercept / Advanz, Inventiva, Pfizer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi. CT: Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees/advisory board: Intercept/Advanz Pharma TB: Receipt of grants/research supports: Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, MSD/Merck, Humedics, Intercept, Merz, Norgine, Novartis, Orphalan, Sequana Medical; Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees/advisory board: Abbvie, Alexion, Albireo, Bayer, Gilead, GSK, Eisai, Enyo Pharma, HepaRegeniX GmbH, Humedics, Intercept, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD/Merck, Novartis, Orphalan, Roche, Sequana Medical, SIRTEX, SOBI, and Shionogi; Participation in a company sponsored speaker’s bureau: Abbvie, Advance Pharma, Alexion, Albireo, Bayer, Gilead, Eisai, Falk Foundation, Intercept, Ipsen, Janssen, MedUpdate GmbH, MSD/Merck, Novartis, Orphalan, Sequana Medica, SIRTEX, and SOBI Nothing to disclose: AF, RG, UN, TB, AW, MH, RG, CB, TTW, RB, HG, ND, MM, PM, JUM, AK, KP, NKB, (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) are the standard and mostly lifelong treatment for chronic HBeAg-negative hepatitis B, as functional cure (loss of HBsAg) is rarely achieved. Discontinuation of NUC treatment may lead to functional cure; however, to date, the evidence for this has been based on small or non-randomized clinical trials. The STOP-NUC trial was designed with the aim of increasing the HBsAg loss rate using a NUC treatment interruption approach., Methods: In this multicenter, randomized-controlled trial, 166 HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B on continuous long-term NUC treatment, with HBV DNA <172 IU/ml (1,000 copies/ml) for ≥4 years, were randomized to either stop (Arm A) or continue NUC treatment (Arm B) for a 96-week observation period. In total, 158 patients were available for final analysis, 79 per arm. The primary endpoint was sustained HBsAg loss up to week 96., Results: Our study met its primary objective by demonstrating HBsAg loss in eight patients (10.1%, 95% CI 4.8%-19.5%) in Arm A and in no patient in Arm B (p = 0.006). Among patients with baseline HBsAg levels <1,000 IU/ml, seven (28%) achieved HBsAg loss. In Arm A, re-therapy was initiated in 11 (13.9%) patients, whereas 32 (40.5%) patients achieved sustained remission. A decrease of HBsAg >1 log IU/ml was observed in 16 patients (20.3%) in Arm A and in one patient (1.3%) in Arm B. No serious adverse events related to treatment cessation occurred., Conclusions: Cessation of NUC treatment was associated with a significantly higher rate of HBsAg loss than continued NUC treatment, which was largely restricted to patients with end of treatment HBsAg levels <1,000 IU/ml., Impact and Implications: As HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) rarely achieve functional cure, treatment is almost always lifelong. The STOP-NUC trial was conducted to investigate whether discontinuing long-term NUC treatment can increase the cure rate. We found that some patients achieved functional cure after stopping NUCs, which was especially pronounced in patients with HBsAg levels <1,000 at the end of NUC treatment, and that many did not need to resume therapy. The results of the Stop-NUC trial provide evidence for the concept of stopping NUC treatment as a therapeutic option that can induce functional cure., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This study uses social identity theory and communication accommodation theory as lenses to examine former cancer patients' perspectives of the "survivor" label, replacement labels for their experience, and use of survivor services. Semi-structured interviews of 43 former cancer patients offer insight into their unique cancer experiences and explain how these events influence their perceptions of the term survivor. Coders used constant comparison methods to capture six themes related to the participants' impressions of the survivor label. When sharing perceptions of the survivor label, participants expressed language that illustrated convergence ( It means everything to me) , divergence ( I don't like to be called anything) , convergence and divergence ( Part of me is happy … Part of me is kind of aggravated ), and apathy ( I have no feelings toward the label) . Participants also generated new labels that captured their cancer experiences and six unique themes emerged from these responses. Most of the former cancer patients were aware of survivorship programs; however, relatively few used these programs regularly and cited reasons for nonuse explained by social identity theory.

Using data from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (Deutsche Hepatitis C-Register, DHC-R), we report the real-world safety and effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) treatment and its impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in underserved populations who are not typically included in clinical trials, yet who will be crucial for achieving hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination. The DHC-R is an ongoing, non-interventional, multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study on patients treated for chronic HCV infection in Germany. The data cutoff was 17 January 2021. The primary effectiveness endpoint was sustained virologic response at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12). Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients receiving GLE/PIB. PROs were assessed using the SF-36 survey. Of 2354 patients, 1964 had valid SVR12 data (intention-to-treat analysis). Of these, 1905 (97.0%) achieved SVR12 with rates similar across the comorbidities analyzed, except for people who actively use drugs (PWUD (active)) (86.4%). Excluding those who discontinued treatment and did not achieve SVR12, or were reinfected with HCV, the rate was 99.3%, with similar results regardless of comorbidity. PWUD (active) and those with psychiatric disorders had the most meaningful improvements in PROs. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 631/2354 patients (26.8%), and serious AEs in 44 patients (1.9%). GLE/PIB was highly effective and well tolerated in this real-world study of patient groups key to HCV elimination.