Search

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are known to frequently suffer from comorbid cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). There are abundant data on cytokine levels and their role in the pathogenesis of SLE, while growth factors have received much less attention. The aim of this study was to analyze growth factor levels in SLE patients and their association with the presence of comorbid CVDs. The serum concentrations for the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), nerve growth factor β (NGFβ), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and neuregulin-1 β (NRG-1β) were determined in the SLE patients (n = 35) and healthy individuals (n = 38) by a Luminex multiplex assay. The NGFβ and NRG-1β concentrations were shown to be significantly higher in the total group of SLE patients (median [Q1-Q3]: 3.6 [1.3-4.5] and 52.5 [8.5-148], respectively) compared with the healthy individuals (2.9 [1.3-3.4] and 13.7 [4.4-42] ng/mL, respectively). The GM-CSF and GDNF levels did not differ. Interestingly, elevated NRG-1β levels were associated with the presence of CVDs, as SLE patients with CVDs had significantly higher NRG-1β levels (99 [22-242]) compared with the controls (13.7 [4.4-42]) and patients without CVDs (19 [9-80] ng/mL). The model for the binary classification of SLE patients with and without CVDs based on the NRG-1β level had an average predictive ability (AUC = 0.67). Thus, altered levels of growth factors may be associated with comorbid CVDs in SLE patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Netakimab has shown high efficacy in controlled clinical trials in the treatment of AS patients. This article presents results of an observational study of netakimab using in routine clinical practice., Objective: : To evaluate retention rates and safety of netakimab in patients with AS in real-world clinical practice. Additionally, the efficacy of netakimab was evaluated at 1-year follow-up., Materials and Methods: : Patients were recruited for the study from August 2020 to December 2021 at 23 centers in the Russian Federation. The study included patients who were prescribed netakimab therapy before enrollment, so clinical and medical history data for the first visit were entered retrospectively, and following visits at 12, 24, and 52 weeks of therapy were collected within the study. Drug survival rate was calculated according to Kaplan-Meier analysis., Results: : The study included 137 (93 men and 44 women) patients with AS. The average age of patients was 42.3 (11.9) years, 34.3% of patients had previously received therapy with bDMARD, mainly TNF inhibitors. At the end of the analyzed period (52 weeks of therapy), 90.4% (95% CI, 85.4-95.7) of patients continued treatment with netakimab. The BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP showed statistically significant decreases in scores from baseline at all time points. Netakimab was well tolerated by patients; AEs, related to therapy according to the investigator's opinion, were reported in 7 (5.1%) patients. Two patients stopped taking netakimab due to AEs (terminal ileitis and chronic colitis)., Conclusions: : In real-world clinical practice, netakimab demonstrated high retention rates, a favorable safety profile, and sustained efficacy throughout the first year of therapy., (© 2024. Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.)

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed the understanding of the safety profile of therapies for immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). This is primarily due to the negative impact of a number of basic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and genetically engineered biological drugs (biological DMARDs, or biologics) on the course and outcomes of a new coronavirus infection. A number of studies have shown that anti-B-cell therapy (rituximab) gave a statistically significant increase in the risk of severe COVID-19 and an increase in mortality. At the same time, the analysis of real clinical practice data dictated the need to establish a number of restrictions on the use of certain classes of biologics and to search for alternative therapy programs to maintain control over disease activity., Purpose of the Study: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug Artlegia® (olokizumab), solution for subcutaneous injection, 160 mg/ml-0.4 ml, manufactured by R-Pharm JSC, Russia) for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real clinical practice after switching with rituximab during the COVID-19 pandemic., Materials and Methods: The study included 14 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who were previously on rituximab therapy at a dose of 1000-500 mg twice with an interval of 2 weeks, who received at least one course of therapy with this drug. As RA worsened, patients were switched to olokizumab against the background of standard DMARDs. On weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 after the switch, the severity of pain was assessed on the VAS scale, the number of tender and swollen joints (TJC28 and SJC28), the level of acute-phase inflammation markers, the DAS28 (disease activity score), ESR, CRP, CDAI (clinical activity index), and the functional state index HAQ (Health Assessment Questionnaire) were determined, as well as the safety profile of therapy was assessed., Results: Data analysis was performed using median values (Me) were used for data analysis. A significant decrease in TJC28 was detected after 8 and 12 weeks of treatment with olokizumab (Artlegia®) (Me baseline = 10, Me 8 weeks = 4, Me 12 weeks = 4, p < 0.05) and a decrease in TSC28 was detected after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment (Me baseline = 9, Me 4 weeks = 3.5, Me 8 weeks = 2.5, Me 12 weeks = 2.0, p < 0.05). Laboratory markers of inflammation showed a decrease in CRP and ESR levels after 4 weeks of treatment (CRP: Me4 weeks = 21, Me4 weeks = 1, p < 0.05, ESR: Mesno = 31, Me4 weeks = 7, p < 0.05). Positive dynamics persisted on 8 and 12 weeks (CRP: Me 8 weeks = 1, Me 12 weeks = 0; ESR: Me 8 weeks = 4, Me 12 weeks = 5). The level of CRP by week 4 became within the normal range, regardless of the initial values. All activity indices improved from week 4 in each evaluation period compared to baseline: DAS28-ESR: Me baseline = 5.52, Me 4 weeks = 3.59, Me 8 weeks = 3.33, Me 12 weeks = 3.22, p < 0.05; DAS28CRP: Me baseline = 5.39, Me 4 weeks = 3.71, Me 8 weeks = 3.35, Me 12 weeks = 3.45, p < 0.05; CDAI: Me baseline = 28.5, Me 4 weeks = 18.0, Me 8 weeks = 16.5, Me 12 weeks = 16.0, p < 0.05. All patients showed a reduction in pain (VAS scale) by week 8. The functional status of patients, according to the HAQ index, showed a significant decrease only by week 12 of the study: Me baseline = 1.62, Me 12 weeks = 1.31, p < 0.05., Conclusions: The study found that switching from rituximab to olokizumab was effective and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic., (© 2024. Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.)

Anti-DNA antibodies are known to be classical serological hallmarks of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In addition to high-affinity antibodies, the autoantibody pool also contains natural catalytic anti-DNA antibodies that recognize and hydrolyze DNA. However, the specificity of such antibodies is uncertain. In addition, DNA binding to a surface such as the cell membrane, can also affect its recognition by antibodies. Here, we analyzed the hydrolysis of short oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ODNs) immobilized on the microarray surface and in solution by catalytic anti-DNA antibodies from SLE patients. It has been shown that IgG antibodies from SLE patients hydrolyze ODNs more effectively both in solution and on the surface, compared to IgG from healthy individuals. The data obtained indicate a more efficient hydrolysis of ODNs in solution than immobilized ODNs on the surface. In addition, differences in the specificity of recognition and hydrolysis of certain ODNs by anti-DNA antibodies were revealed, indicating the formation of autoantibodies to specific DNA motifs in SLE. The data obtained expand our understanding of the role of anti-DNA antibodies in SLE. Differences in the recognition and hydrolysis of surface-tethered and dissolved ODNs need to be considered in DNA microarray applications.

Changes in cytokine profiles and cytokine networks are known to be a hallmark of autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and multiple sclerosis (MS). However, cytokine profiles research studies are usually based on the analysis of a small number of cytokines and give conflicting results. In this work, we analyzed cytokine profiles of 41 analytes in patients with SLE and MS compared with healthy donors using multiplex immunoassay. The SLE group included treated patients, while the MS patients were drug-free. Levels of 11 cytokines, IL-1b, IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-15, MCP-1/CCL2, Fractalkine/CX3CL1, MIP-1a/CCL3, MIP-1b/CCL4, and TNFa, were increased, but sCD40L, PDGF-AA, and MDC/CCL22 levels were decreased in SLE patients. Thus, changes in the cytokine profile in SLE have been associated with the dysregulation of interleukins, TNF superfamily members, and chemokines. In the case of MS, levels of 10 cytokines, sCD40L, CCL2, CCL3, CCL22, PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB/BB, EGF, IL-8, TGF-a, and VEGF, decreased significantly compared to the control group. Therefore, cytokine network dysregulation in MS is characterized by abnormal levels of growth factors and chemokines. Cross-disorder analysis of cytokine levels in MS and SLE showed significant differences between 22 cytokines. Protein interaction network analysis showed that all significantly altered cytokines in both SLE and MS are functionally interconnected. Thus, MS and SLE may be associated with impaired functional relationships in the cytokine network. A cytokine correlation networks analysis revealed changes in correlation clusters in SLE and MS. These data expand the understanding of abnormal regulatory interactions in cytokine profiles associated with autoimmune diseases.

Background: Currently, observations are accumulating indicating the negative effect of therapy with a number of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) drugs on the course of COVID-19. These facts determine the relevance of studying the factors of severe course and unfavorable outcome in immuno-inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IIRD) patients treated with bDMARDs in order to develop tactics for managing this category of patients in a pandemic., Aim: To evaluate the influence of clinical and demographic factors on the risk of development, severity of the course and clinical outcomes of a new coronavirus infection in patients suffering from IIRD and receiving therapy with genetically engineered biological drugs., Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the database of the register of patients with IIRD receiving bDMARDs in the Novosibirsk region was performed, which included 318 patients, 94 of whom had indications of having suffered viral infection/pneumonia for the period from 01.04.2020 to 31.12.2020., Results: According to the data obtained, at the time of the analysis, 94 people out of 318 patients with IIRD had a new coronavirus infection. Most (53%) of the patients had a mild infection. At the same time, the nosological form, the use of anti-rheumatic drugs and glucocorticoids did not increase the risks of severe coronavirus infection. When using bDMARDs, only anti-B-cell therapy (rituximab) associated with statistically significant increase in the risk of severe/extremely severe COVID-19. The mortality rate according to the analysis of the register was 6,38%., Conclusion: Patients with IIRD have a high risk of severe coronavirus infection, while the severity of the disease is associated with the type of therapy performed.

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is known to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). SLE patients suffer from CVD 3.5 times more often than healthy people. Cytokine-mediated inflammation is actively involved in the development of cardiovascular pathology., Objective: Here, we analyzed serum levels of nine cytokines of steroids-treated SLE patients depending on the presence of concomitant CVD., Methods: The levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-21, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), B-cell activating factor (BAFF), and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) were analyzed using multiplex immunoassay., Results: In the total group of SLE patients (n=29), the concentrations of IL-6 and IL-10 were higher, and the APRIL level decreased compared to healthy donors (n=39, p<0.05). The same changes were observed in the group of patients without CVD (n=15); the levels of IL-6 and IL- 10 were found to be increased, and the level of APRIL was lower than in healthy individuals (p<0.05). In the group of SLE patients with CVD (n=14), the concentrations of IL-4, IL-6, IL- 10, and TNFα were found to be increased (p<0.05). Interestingly, the levels of TNFα and BAFF in SLE patients with CVD were higher than in patients without cardiovascular pathology. Thus, TNFα and BAFF levels were significantly altered in SLE with concomitant CVD compared to SLE without CVD., Conclusion: These findings suggest that cytokine profiles in SLE with concomitant CVD and SLE without CVD are different, which should be considered in further research with large samples., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)