Search

Angiodysplasias (AGD) are common sites of bleeding in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract after Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device (CF-LVAD) implantation. We sought to investigate whether AGDs are formed as a result of LVAD physiology or preexist as a consequence of heart failure. Thirty-six subjects with HF reduced EF (HFrEF) underwent video capsule endoscopy (VCE) to assess for the presence of AGD. Fifty-three subjects without HF who underwent VCE for a nonbleeding indication formed a control group. The prevalence of AGD was significantly higher in the HFrEF compared to the non-HF controls (50% vs 13%, p = 0.0002). This association persisted after controlling for age and comorbidities. Within the HFrEF cohort, higher Ang2, NT-proBNP and BUN were associated with the presence of AGD. AGD in the GI tract are associated with HFrEF. This is the first description of a new pathology associated with HFrEF and adds to our understanding of CF LVAD associated GI bleeding.

The trends and outcomes of multiorgan heart-transplantation (HT) using hepatitis C virus (HCV) donors in the contemporary era are sparsely known. Using UNOS registry, 1322 adult multiorgan-HTs (n = 986 heart-kidney, n = 155 heart-lung, n = 181 heart-liver) between August-2015 and August-2020 were identified, of which 109 were performed using HCV-donors (n = 77 HCV nucleic-acid-amplification testing [NAT] positive irrespective of antibody status [HCV-viremic]; and n = 32 HCV Ab+/NAT-[HCV antibody + nonviremic]). The percentage of HCV-donors used for multiorgan-HT increased from 0% in 2015 to 14% in 2020 (p < 0.001), but there was wide variation across UNOS regions and center volumes. Recipients of multiorgan heart-kidney transplants from HCV-donors (n = 90) and HCV-naive (HCV Ab-/NAT-) donors (n = 896) had similar 1-year survival using unadjusted and adjusted Cox-proportional hazards-regression models including in propensity-score matched cohorts. Post-HT rates of cardiac-allograft-vasculopathy (5.4% vs 5.8%) and chronic-dialysis (7.3% vs 4.9%) at 1-year were also similar. Use of HCV-donors (HCV-viremic, HCV Ab+ nonviremic) for multiorgan-HT has increased significantly. Encouraging 1-year outcomes in heart-kidney recipients from HCV-donors should support further expansion of heart-kidney transplantation using HCV-donors.

Anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for Coronovirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be performed by direct or indirect thrombin inhibitors but differences in outcomes with these agents are uncertain. A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted. All consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 placed on ECMO between March 1, 2020 and April 30, 2021 in participating centers, were included. Patients were divided in groups receiving either a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) or an indirect thrombin inhibitor such as unfractionated heparin (UFH). Overall, 455 patients with COVID-19 from 17 centers were placed on ECMO during the study period. Forty-four patients did not receive anticoagulation. Of the remaining 411 patients, DTI was used in 160 (39%) whereas 251 (61%) received UFH. At 90-days, in-hospital mortality was 50% (DTI) and 61% (UFH), adjusted hazard ratio: 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-1.32. Deep vein thrombosis [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.60, 95% CI: 0.90-6.65], ischemic (aOR: 1.58, 95% CI: 0.18-14.0), and hemorrhagic (aOR:1.22, 95% CI: 0.39-3.87) stroke were similar with DTI in comparison to UFH. Bleeding requiring transfusion was lower in patients receiving DTI (aOR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18-0.87). Anticoagulants that directly inhibit thrombin are associated with similar in-hospital mortality, stroke, and venous thrombosis and do not confer a higher risk of clinical bleeding in comparison to conventional heparin during ECMO for COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced access to solid organ transplantation, compounding organ shortages and waitlist mortality. A continued area of uncertainty is the safety of transplanting organs recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infected donors, as autopsies of patients who died with COVID-19 show that the virus can be found in extra-pulmonary organs1. Case reports and series on transplantation of these organs have been published 2, 3, but population-level data is lacking.We queried a national transplant database for recipients of organs recovered from donors recently infected by SARS-CoV-2. For organs with more than 50 cases, these were then propensity-score matched at a ratio of 1:10 to similar recipients of organs recovered from donors who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 (controls). Data were extracted from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR - v2203 - updated March 2022), which collects detailed information on all solid organ transplants in the United States since 1986.Cases were defined as adult (≥ 18 years) recipients of organs recovered from deceased donors who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by nasopharyngeal or lower respiratory sample polymerase chain reaction or antigen assay within 7 days of organ transplantation. Multiple organ transplants were excluded.There were 775 kidney, 330 liver, 123 heart, 44 kidney-pancreas, 16 lung, 5 pancreas, and 3 small bowel transplants of organs recovered from 393 deceased donors recently infected by COVID-19. For kidney, liver, and heart transplants, Kaplan-Meier curves of both overall and graft survival at 90 days were similar between cases and controls.Our data shows that transplanting kidneys, livers, and hearts recovered from deceased donors recently infected by SARS-CoV-2 was not associated with increased recipient mortality or worse graft-survival. This should help transplant providers make decisions regarding acceptance of these organs, and counsel transplant candidates on the safety of receiving them. The limited number of kidney-pancreas, lung, pancreas, and intestinal cases precludes significant conclusions for these organs. Our data also strongly supports the notion that donors with recent COVID-19 infection should not be automatically excluded from the donor pool. The limited number of kidney-pancreas, lung, pancreas, and intestinal cases precludes significant conclusions for these organs.Limitations include lack of data on donor infection timeline and estimates of viral load (PCR cycle thresholds), description of donor COVID-19 symptomatology at organ procurement, donor or recipient vaccination or prior COVID-19 infection status, which are not tracked in the database. We did not have information regarding transmission of COVID-19 to transplant recipients. Future analysis of updated versions of the database should help address. Our data strongly support the notion that donors with recent COVID infection should not be automatically excluded from the donor pool. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings and provide insights on optimal post-transplant management of these recipients.

Objectives Cardiac injury has been reported in up to 20-30% of COVID-19 patients and severe disease can lead to cardiopulmonary failure. The role of mechanical circulatory support in these cases remains undetermined. We aimed to determine characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) or veno-arterial-venous (VAV) ECMO support. Design and Setting A multicenter, retrospective case series. Participants The cohort consisted of adult patients (18 years of age and older) with confirmed COVID-19 requiring VA- or VAV-ECMO support in the period from March 1, 2020 to April 30, 2021. Outcomes were recorded until July 31, 2021. Measurements and Main Results To show factors related to death during hospitalization, patients were grouped as survivors and non-survivors. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to estimate 90-day in-hospital mortality. Overall, 37 patients from 12 centers comprised the study cohort. Patients were 44 (IQR, 35-52) years old, 12 (32%) were female. Duration of ECMO support ranged from 2 to 132 days. At the end of the follow-up period, 13 patients (35%) were discharged or transferred alive, and 24 patients (65%) died during the hospitalization. The cumulative in-hospital mortality at 90-days was 64% (95% CI: 47-81). Time from intubation to VA- or VAV-ECMO initiation (1 IQR 0-7.5 vs. 6 IQR 2.5-14 days, p=0.0383), body mass index (32 IQR 26-36 vs. 37 IQR 33-40, p=0.009) and baseline C-reactive protein (7.15 vs. 38.9 mg/dL, p=0.009) were higher in those that expired. Conclusions Only one-third of the patients with COVID-19 requiring VA- or VAV-ECMO survived to discharge. Close monitoring of at-risk patients with early initiation of ECMO with circulatory support may further improve outcomes., Graphical abstract Image, graphical abstract

IntroductionCOVID-19 first struck New York City in the spring of 2020, resulting in an unprecedented strain on our healthcare system and triggering multiple changes in public health policy governing hospital operations as well as therapeutic approaches to COVID-19. We examined inpatient mortality at our centre throughout the course of the pandemic.MethodsThis is a retrospective chart review of clinical characteristics, treatments and outcome data of all patients admitted with COVID-19 from 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2021. Patients were grouped into 3-month quartiles. Hospital strain was assessed as per cent of occupied beds based on a normal bed capacity of 1491.ResultsInpatient mortality decreased from 25.0% in spring to 10.8% over the course of the year. During this time, use of remdesivir, steroids and anticoagulants increased; use of hydroxychloroquine and other antibiotics decreased. Daily bed occupancy ranged from 62% to 118%. In a multivariate model with all year’s data controlling for demographics, comorbidities and acuity of illness, percentage of bed occupancy was associated with increased 30-day in-hospital mortality of patients with COVID-19 (0.7% mortality increase for each 1% increase in bed occupancy; HR 1.007, CI 1.001 to 1.013, p=0.004)ConclusionInpatient mortality from COVID-19 was associated with bed occupancy. Early reduction in epicentre hospital bed occupancy to accommodate acutely ill and resource-intensive patients should be a critical component in the strategic planning for future pandemics.