Search

Abstract Background Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) drive lung function decline in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). While the respiratory microbiota is clearly associated with RTI pathogenesis in infants without CF, data on infants with CF is scarce. We compared nasal microbiota development between infants with CF and controls and assessed associations between early-life nasal microbiota, RTIs, and antibiotic treatment in infants with CF. Methods We included 50 infants with CF and 30 controls from two prospective birth cohorts followed throughout the first year of life. We collected 1511 biweekly nasal swabs and analyzed the microbiota after amplifying the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. We conducted structured weekly interviews to assess respiratory symptoms and antibiotic treatment. We calculated generalized additive mixed models and permutational analysis of variance. Results Here, we show that the nasal microbiota is already altered before the first RTI or antibiotic treatment in infants with CF. Microbiota diversity differs between infants with CF and controls following RTIs and/or antibiotic treatment. CF infants with lower α-diversity have a higher number of subsequent RTIs. Conclusions Early nasal microbiota alterations may reflect predisposition or predispose to RTIs in infants with CF, and further change after RTIs and antibiotic treatment. This highlights the potential of targeting the nasal microbiota in CF-related RTI management, while also questioning current practices in the era of novel modulator therapies.

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) results from complex hypersensitivity reactions to Aspergillus fumigatus, which often occur in patients with asthma, cystic fibrosis (CF), or CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-related disorders. Genetic predisposition, particularly variants of the CFTR gene, probably plays a significant role in the development of ABPA. We present the case of a 20-year-old male with ABPA and bronchiectasis that was initially misdiagnosed as a result of normal sweat chloride values and negative first-level genetic testing results. Comprehensive CFTR gene sequencing revealed 2 pathogenic variants, R347H and D1152H, which together with the clinical phenotype and functional tests, supported the diagnosis of CF. Treatment with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor resulted in significant clinical and functional improvement, including a marked decrease in total IgE levels, suggesting a potential role for CFTR modulators in controlling ABPA. This case illustrates the evolving understanding of CF as a spectrum of disorders in which CFTR dysfunction may manifest subtly and variably, necessitating a high index of suspicion and a comprehensive diagnostic approach to ensure timely treatment in the era of highly effective CFTR modulators.

In the last 10 years, the care of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has been revolutionized with the introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator drugs, with a major impact on symptoms and life expectancy, especially considering the newest and highly effective elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) therapy. Conversely, adverse effects are relatively frequent, with some being life-threatening, such as severe hepatitis. Clinical trials on children starting CFTR modulators have reported transaminase elevations >3× upper limit of the norm in 10%–20% of patients, whereas real-life studies have reported discontinuation rates three times higher than those observed in phase 3 trials. We report the case of a 10-year-old boy with CF who developed severe acute hepatitis 2 weeks after starting ELX/TEZ/IVA therapy. An extensive screening for potential causes led to the identification of heterozygous alpha1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency with genotype MZ. The Z allele of SERPINA1 gene, encoding AAT, is known as a risk factor for CF liver disease. We hypothesized that it may act as a risk factor for drug-induced liver injury from CFTR modulators, notably ELX/TEZ/IVA. Therefore, checking AAT before starting CFTR modulator therapy can be suggested, in particular for children with previous, even transient, liver disease.

Lower respiratory tract infections lead to significant morbidity and mortality. They are increasingly caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens, notably in individuals with cystic fibrosis, hospital-acquired pneumonia and lung transplantation. The use of bacteriophages (phages) to treat bacterial infections is gaining growing attention, with numerous published cases of compassionate treatment over the last few years. Although the use of phages appears safe, the lack of standardisation, the significant heterogeneity of published studies and the paucity of robust efficacy data, alongside regulatory hurdles arising from the existing pharmaceutical legislation, are just some of the challenges phage therapy has to overcome. In this review, we discuss the lessons learned from recent clinical experiences of phage therapy for the treatment of pulmonary infections. We review the key aspects, opportunities and challenges of phage therapy regarding formulations and administration routes, interactions with antibiotics and the immune system, and phage resistance. Building upon the current knowledge base, future pre-clinical studies using emerging technologies and carefully designed clinical trials are expected to enhance our understanding and explore the therapeutic potential of phage therapy.

Drugs modulating the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, namely ivacaftor, lumacaftor, tezacaftor, and elexacaftor, are currently revolutionizing the management of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), particularly those with at least one F508del variant (up to 85% of patients). These “caftor” drugs are mainly metabolized by cytochromes P450 3A, whose enzymatic activity is influenced by environmental factors, and are sensitive to inhibition and induction. Hence, CFTR modulators are characterized by an important interindividual pharmacokinetic variability and are also prone to drug–drug interactions. However, these CFTR modulators are given at standardized dosages, while they meet all criteria for a formal therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program that should be considered in cases of clinical toxicity, less-than-expected clinical response, drug or food interactions, distinct patient subgroups (i.e., pediatrics), and for monitoring short-term adherence. While the information on CFTR drug exposure–clinical response relationships is still limited, we review the current evidence of the potential interest in the TDM of caftor drugs in real-life settings.