Search

We investigated the effect of exercise intensity and tolerable duration on the development of exercise-induced diaphragm and expiratory muscle fatigue. Ten healthy adults (25 ± 5 yr; 2 females) cycled to intolerance on three separate occasions: 1) 5% below critical power (tw) and gastric (Pgatw) twitch pressures, respectively. Exercise time was 34.5 ± 6.2 min, 10.2 ± 2.6 min, and 4.9 ± 0.7 min for 2) at end-exercise was lower during 2peak) relative to Δ25 (97 ± 4% V̇ o 2peak) and Δ50 (99 ± 4% V̇ o 2peak) (P < 0.001). The pre- to postexercise decrease in Pditw was greater after Δ25 (−22 ± 12%) versus tw from pre- to postexercise was not different between trials ( 0.05). In conclusion, the magnitude of exercise-induced diaphragm fatigue was greater after longer-duration severe exercise than after shorter-duration severe and heavy exercise. By contrast, the magnitude of exercise-induced expiratory muscle fatigue was unaffected by exercise intensity and tolerable duration. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: Exercise-induced respiratory muscle fatigue contributes to limiting exercise tolerance. Accordingly, better understanding the exercise conditions under which respiratory muscle fatigue occurs is warranted. Although heavy-intensity as well as short- and long-duration severe-intensity exercise performed to intolerance elicit diaphragm and expiratory muscle fatigue, we find, for the first time, that the relationship between exercise intensity, exercise duration, and the magnitude of exercise-induced fatigue is different for the diaphragm compared with the expiratory muscles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reduced exercise capacity has been suggested as a cardinal sequela of COVID-19. However, only cross-sectional approaches that either do not consider individuals with concomitant cardiorespiratory disease or account for exercise capacity before infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) support this assumption. Is reduced exercise capacity a sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with concomitant cardiorespiratory disease? We retrospectively reviewed cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) data collected across three hospitals between October 2018 and March 2022. Forty-two patients who completed a CPET before and after COVID-19 and 25 patients who performed two separate CPETs but did not contract COVID-19 (CTL) were included. Within each patient, the same test protocol was performed at the first and second CPETs. The time between CPETs was similar between the groups (COVID-19 489 ± 534 vs. CTL 534 ± 257 days, P = 0.662). The COVID-19 group performed the CPETs 312 ± 232 days before and 176 ± 110 days after infection. Exercise time, peak heart rate, peak systolic pressure, oxygen uptake (V̇o 2 ) at anaerobic threshold, peak ventilation, and ventilatory efficiency were not different between the CPETs in both groups. Peak V̇o 2 was reduced from before to after SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the change in V̇o 2peak from the first to the second CPET was not different between COVID-19 vs. CTL. Accounting for V̇o 2peak before COVID-19 and including a group of control patients, we find limited evidence for reduced exercise capacity as a sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with concomitant cardiorespiratory disease. NEW & NOTEWORTHY There is accumulating evidence that reduced exercise capacity is, or can be, an outcome following COVID-19. However, evidence to date relies upon cross-sectional approaches that either do not consider patients with concomitant cardiorespiratory disease or account for pre-infection exercise capacity data. Accounting for V̇o 2peak before COVID-19 and including a group of control patients, we find limited evidence for reduced exercise capacity as a sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with concomitant cardiorespiratory disease.