Search

Background: An increased focus on quality and patient safety has led to the evolution of hospitalists. The number of hospitalists covering ward and outpatient care is on the rise in Japan. However, it is unclear what roles hospital workers themselves consider important in their practice. Therefore, this study investigated what hospitalists and non-hospitalist generalists in Japan consider important for the practice of their specialty. Methods: This was an observational study that included Japanese hospitalists (1) currently working in a general medicine (GM) or general internal medicine department and (2) working at a hospital. Using originally developed questionnaire items, we surveyed the items important to hospitalists and non-hospitalist generalists. Results: There were 971 participants (733 hospitalists, 238 non-hospitalist) in the study. The response rate was 26.1%. Both hospitalists and non-hospitalists ranked evidence-based medicine as the most important for their practice. In addition, hospitalists ranked diagnostic reasoning and inpatient medical management as the second and third most important roles for their practice, while non-hospitalists ranked inpatient medical management and elderly care as second and third. Conclusions: This is the first study investigating the roles Japanese hospitalists consider important and comparing those to that of non-hospitalist generalists. Many of the items that hospitalists considered important were those that hospitalists in Japan are working on within and outside academic societies. We found that diagnostic medicine and quality and safety are areas that are likely to see further evolution as hospitalists specifically emphasized on them. In the future, we expect to see suggestions and research for further enhancing the items that hospital workers value and emphasise upon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and complications of secondary hepatolithiasis following choledochoenterostomy to guide suitable management., Methods: The study analyzed 127 patients from a 2017 national survey conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. The 2023 cohort study assessed residual stones, recurrences, cholangitis, cholangiocarcinoma, and prognosis., Results: The median follow-up duration was 48 months. Balloon endoscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (BE-ERC) was the most common treatment, achieving complete stone clearance in 84.4% of patients. Anatomical hepatectomy was the most common surgery. Predictors of residual stones were stone number ≥10 (odds ratio [OR], 7.480; p = .028) and stone diameter ≥10 mm (OR, 5.280; p = .020). Predictors of stone recurrence during follow-up were biliary strictures (hazard ratio [HR], 3.580; p = .005) and cholangitis (HR, 2.700; p = .037). Predictors of cholangitis during follow-up were biliary stricture (HR, 5.016; p = .006) and dilatation (HR, 3.560; p = .029). Any treatment for hepatolithiasis reduced cholangitis occurrence (HR, 0.168; p = .042). Balloon dilation combined with stenting for ≥3 months improved biliary strictures in 57.1% of patients., Conclusion: This study recommends BE-ERC as the first-choice treatment for secondary hepatolithiasis. Stone removal and relief of biliary strictures and dilatation are crucial to prevent stone recurrence and cholangitis after treatment., (© 2024 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery.)