Search

Abstract This study aimed to measure relative telomere length (RTL) in blood leukocytes of advanced-stage NSCLC patients either with or without Osimertinib-induced ADRs and determine whether RTL could serve as a biomarker of Osimertinib-induced ADRs. Blood leukocytes RTL were measured in 63 advanced-stage NSCLC patients and 62 age-matched healthy controls using real-time polymerase chain reaction. In patients with advanced-stage NSCLC, RTL was significantly shorter than that in healthy controls (P

Introduction: Previous results from the phase 3 ALESIA study (NCT02838420) revealed that alectinib (a central nervous system [CNS]-active, ALK inhibitor) had clinical benefits in treatment-naïve Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, consistent with the global ALEX study. We present updated data after more than or equal to 5 years of follow-up from the “last patient in” date. Methods: Adult patients with treatment-naïve, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC from mainland China, South Korea, and Thailand were randomized 2:1 to receive twice-daily 600 mg alectinib (n = 125) or 250 mg crizotinib (n = 62). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary or exploratory endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, time to CNS progression, and safety. Results: At the data cutoff (May 16, 2022), the median survival follow-up was 61 and 51 months in the alectinib and crizotinib arms, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 41.6 months with alectinib versus 11.1 months with crizotinib (stratified hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.23–0.49). Overall survival data remain immature; 5-year overall survival rates were 66.4% (alectinib arm) versus 56.1% (crizotinib arm). Objective response rate was 91.2% versus 77.4% with alectinib and crizotinib, respectively. CNS progression was delayed with alectinib versus crizotinib (cause-specific hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.08–0.32). Median treatment duration was longer with alectinib versus crizotinib (42.3 versus 12.6 mo). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: With four additional years of follow-up, these updated results confirm the clinical benefit and manageable safety of alectinib in Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, and confirm alectinib as a standard-of-care treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.

Background: Osimertinib has shown greater efficacy than standard epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and fewer grade 3 or higher adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, the clinical outcomes of osimertinib treatment vary depending on the patient’s ethnicity. Therefore, further research is necessary to evaluate the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in cytochrome P450 (CYP450) and drug transporters on the therapeutic outcomes and ADRs to osimertinib in Thai patients, to provide improved pharmacological treatments for cancer patients.Methods: This retrospective and prospective cohort study enrolled 63 Thai patients with NSCLC treated with 80 mg of osimertinib once daily as monotherapy. Seventeen SNPs in candidate genes related to drug metabolism and transport pathways were analyzed in each patient. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used to evaluate the associations between SNPs and clinical outcomes, including ADR incidence and objective response rate (ORR). In addition, the correlation between the genotype and median time to treatment failure (TTF) or progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a log-rank test.Results: We identified six SNPs (rs2231142 and rs2622604 in ABCG2, rs762551 in CYP1A2, rs1057910 in CYP2C9, rs28371759 in CYP3A4, and CYP2A6 deletion polymorphism (CYP2A6*4)) that significantly increased the incidence of ADRs. In addition, we found two SNPs (rs2069514 in CYP1A2 and rs1057910 in CYP2C9) that significantly decreased the median TTF, and two SNPs (rs28399433 in CYP2A6 and rs1057910 in CYP2C9) that significantly decreased the median progression-free survival (PFS). Specifically, we found that one of these SNPs (rs1057910 in CYP2C9) influenced ADRs, TTF, and PFS. Additionally, SNPs in the CYP2A6 heterozygous variant (non4/*4) significantly increased ADR incidence, leading to a high frequency of dose reduction (27.0%).Conclusion: Our study demonstrated significant SNPs associated with increased ADR incidence, decreased PFS, and decreased TTF in Thai patients with NSCLC treated with osimertinib. The CYP2C9 (*3) and CYP2A6 (*4) allele frequencies differed between ethnicities and were associated with an increased incidence of ADRs. These findings highlight the importance of considering genetic factors in NSCLC treatment and may facilitate personalized medicine approaches. Moreover, our study showed a higher incidence of ADRs than the previous trials, including FLAURA and AURA2, and a higher frequency of dose reduction than reported in the AURA 3 trial, possibly due to genetic differences among the study populations.

Abstract Introduction Difference in clinical responses to cancer therapy in each patient is from several factors. Gastrointestinal microbiota is one of the reasons. However, this correlation remains unknown. This study aims to explore correlation between gastrointestinal microbiota profile and clinical outcomes in Thai advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status. Methods We enrolled 13 patients with advanced EGFR–wild-type (WT) NSCLC who received chemotherapy and 15 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We collected fecal samples at baseline and first disease evaluation and performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing by NGS to assess microbiota profile. The correlations between gastrointestinal microbiota and clinical variables were studied. Results The clinical characteristics were balanced between the cohorts, excluding significantly higher albumin levels in the EGFR-mutant group. Albumin was the only significant clinical factor affecting the treatment response in multivariate analysis (ORR 15.6%, P = 0.03). Proteobacteria counts were higher in the EGFR-WT group, whereas Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes counts were higher in the EGFR-mutant group. The alpha diversity of the gastrointestinal microbiome was significantly higher in the EGFR-mutant group (Shannon index: 3.82 vs. 3.25, P = 0.022). Following treatment, Proteobacteria counts were lower and Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes counts were higher in both cohorts; the changes were more prominent in the EGFR-WT cohort. No significant correlation between microbiota profile and treatment response were demonstrated in our study. However, beta diversity was significantly different according to severity of adverse events. Enrichment of Clostridia and Bacteroidia was associated with higher adverse event risk in the EGFR-WT cohort. Conclusions Proteobacteria was dominant in Thai lung cancer patients both EGFR-WT and EGFR-mutant, and this phylum maybe associate with lung cancer carcinogenesis. Chemotherapy altered the gastrointestinal microbiota, whereas EGFR-TKIs had less effects. Our findings highlight the potential predictive utility of the gastrointestinal microbiota for lung cancer carcinogenesis. Studies with larger cohorts and comparison with the healthy Thai population are ongoing to validate this pilot study.

BackgroundDespite significant benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, access remains limited in Thailand and elsewhere.MethodsRetrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced/recurrent NSCLC and known EGFR mutation (EGFRm) status treated at Ramathibodi Hospital (2012–2017). Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), including treatment type and healthcare coverage, were analyzed using Cox regression.ResultsOf 750 patients, 56.3% were EGFRm-positive. After first-line therapy (n=646), 29.4% received no subsequent (second-line) treatment. EGFR-TKI-treated EGFRm-positive patients survived significantly longer than EGFRm-negative patients without EGFR-TKIs (median OS [mOS] 36.4 vs. 11.9 months; hazard ratio HR=0.38 [95%CI 0.32–0.46], P

BackgroundThe two common methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms 677G>A and 1298A>C may have been affecting 5-FU toxicity in cancer patients for decades. Drug efficacy has also been shown by previous studies to be affected. In this study, we investigated the effects of these polymorphisms on 5-FU hematological toxicity and treatment efficacy, to provide enhanced pharmacological treatment for cancer patients.MethodsThis is a retrospective study involving 52 Thai colorectal cancer patients who were treated with 5-FU based therapy, using TaqMAN real-time PCR to genotype the MTHFR polymorphisms (677G>A and 1298A>C). The toxicity and response rate were assessed using standardized measures.ResultsNeutropenia was significantly more likely to be experienced (P=0.049, OR=7.286, 95% CI=0.697-76.181) by patients with the MTHFR 677G>A polymorphism, in the same way as leukopenia (P =0.036, OR=3.333, 95%CI=2.183-5.090) and thrombocytopenia (PC polymorphism had no statistical association with hematological toxicity in 5-FU treatment. The response rate to 5-FU was not significantly affected by these two polymorphisms.ConclusionThe MTHFR polymorphism 677G>A is a significant risk factor for developing leukopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia as toxic effects of 5-FU therapy in cancer patients. Therefore, patients receiving 5-FU-based therapy should be aware of their polymorphisms as one risk factor for experiencing severe toxicity.