Search

The need for gender parity within academic surgery has resulted in an analysis of the trends in female authorship in the American general surgery literature.Original articles from five American surgical journals from 1997, 2007, and 2017 were reviewed. Trends in the proportion of female authors were evaluated.There was an incremental increase in female first authors over the three time periods (15% in 1997, 32.2% in 2007, and 52.7% in 2017; P 0.001). The proportion of articles by female senior authors also increased over the study periods (18.7% in 1997, 28.8% in 2007, and 52.6% in 2017; P 0.001). However, there were fewer female authors with basic science research publications than males (17.4% vs. 82.6%, P 0.001).The academic productivity of female surgeons have increased over time likely due to an increase in the number of female academic surgeons in recent years. These findings are encouraging and demonstrate progress in female representation in surgery.

There has been an alarming increase in the number of young adults (YA) diagnosed with cancer. The emotional, psychosocial, and financial distress experienced by newly diagnosed YA undergoing cancer surgery remains largely unknown.A validated biopsychosocial distress screening tool (SupportScreen) was administered to patients diagnosed with cancer before surgery between 2009 and 2017 in a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center. Patients were stratified into YA less than or equal to 45 years and older adults (OA) above 45 years. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to analyze distress outcomes.In total, 4297 patients were identified, with YA comprising 13.3% (n=573) of the cohort. YA reported higher emotional distress, including increased anxiety (33.8% vs 27.4%, P =0.002), greater fear of procedures (26.7% vs 22%, P =0.018), and difficulty managing emotions (26% vs 20.7%, P =0.006). YA struggled more frequently to manage work/school (29.5% vs 19.3%, P0.001), finding resources (17.8% vs 11.8%, P0.001), changes in physical appearance (22.2% vs 13.4%, P0.001), fatigue (36% vs 27.3%, P0.001), and ability to have children (18.4% vs 3%, P0.001). Financial toxicity was significantly higher in the YA group (40.5% vs 28%, P0.001). While income level was strongly protective against emotional distress and financial toxicity in OAs, it was less protective against the risk of financial toxicity in YA. Younger age was an independent predictor of financial toxicity in a model adjusted to income (odds ratio=1.52, P =0.020).YA in the prime of their personal and professional years of productivity require special attention when undergoing surgical evaluation for cancer. Resource allocation and counseling interventions should be integrated as part of their routine care to expedite their return to optimal physical and holistic health and mitigate psychosocial distress and financial toxicity.

Background Cholecystectomy in patients with hematologic malignancies remains poorly understood. Methods We retrospectively evaluated patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent cholecystectomy at a single institution. Results Of 313 patients who presented for evaluation of abdominal pain, 64 underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (34.4%), gangrenous cholecystitis (21.9%), chronic cholecystitis (23.4%), and cholelithiasis (20%). Most had a history of hematopoietic cell transplantation (62.5%) and/or immunosuppressive medication within 30 days of consultation (82.8%). Ultrasound had a 39% false-negative rate for acute nongangrenous cholecystitis. Operative time was 92 ± 39 min, 7 were performed open, 10 had intraoperative transfusions, and 4 had grade 3+ complications. Intraoperative transfusion was associated with increased postoperative length of stay (p = 0.03). Open procedure, operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative transfusion, and complications were not associated with timing of surgery. Conclusions Patients with hematologic malignancies can safely undergo cholecystectomy. Length of postoperative stay for inpatients is associated with intraoperative blood transfusion.

Background Well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) is a low-grade soft tissue sarcoma with a propensity for local recurrence. The necessity of obtaining microscopically free surgical margins (R0) to minimize local recurrence is not clear. This study evaluates recurrence-free survival (RFS) of extremity WDLPS in relation to resection margin status. Methods A retrospective review of adult patients with primary extremity WDLPS at seven US institutions from 2000 to 2016 was performed. Patients with recurrent tumors or incomplete resection (R2) were excluded. Clinicopathologic factors were analyzed to assess impact on local RFS. Results 97 patients with primary extremity WDLPS were identified. The majority of patients had deep, lower extremity tumors. Mean tumor size was 18.2±8.9cm. Patients were treated with either radical (76.3%) or excisional (23.7%) resections; 64% had R0 and 36% had microscopically positive (R1) resection margins. Ten patients received radiation therapy with no difference in receipt of radiation between R0 vs R1 groups. Thirteen patients (13%) developed a local recurrence with no difference in RFS between R0 vs R1 resection. Five-year RFS was 59.5% for R0 vs 85.2% for R1. Only one patient died of disease after developing dedifferentiation and distant metastasis despite originally having an R0 resection. Discussion In this large multi-institutional study of surgical resection of extremity WDLPS, microscopically positive margins were not associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Positive microscopic margin resection for extremity WDLPS may yield similar rates of local control while avoiding a radical approach to obtain microscopically negative margins.

Objective: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, dosing and administration, and place in therapy of avatrombopag for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia and chronic liver disease-associated thrombocytopenia. Summary: Avatrombopag is an orally administered thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia and is the first oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of perioperative thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease in adults. The efficacy and safety of avatrombopag has been demonstrated in a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled phase III study in the setting of immune thrombocytopenia and in 2 identically designed, multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled phase III trials in the setting of thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease. The most common adverse events reported in the clinical trials were headache, fatigue, and gastrointestinal toxicities. The incidence of bleeding events was comparable between the avatrombopag and placebo treatment groups in each study. Avatrombopag has not been shown to be associated with hepatoxicity and does not require food restriction like the other oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist for immune thrombocytopenia, eltrombopag. Also, unlike eltrombopag for immune thrombocytopenia, it can be dosed less frequently than once daily. Conclusion: Avatrombopag offers another safe and effective oral option for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia without food restrictions and an alternative, transfusion-sparing option for thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease patients undergoing surgery.

This investigation described clinicopathological features and outcomes of extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) patients.EMC patients were identified from the United States Sarcoma Collaborative database between 2000 and 2016. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated, and prognostic factors were analyzed.Sixty individuals with a mean age of 55 years were included, and 65.0% (n = 39) were male. 73.3% (n = 44) had a primary tumor. A total of 41.6% (n = 25) developed tumor relapse following resection. The locoregional recurrence rate was 30.0% (n = 18/60), and mean follow-up was 42.7 months. The 5-year OS was 71.0%, while the 5-year RFS was 41.4%. On multivariate analysis for all EMC, chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 6.054; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-27.7; p = 0.020) and radiation (HR, 5.07, 95% CI, 1.3-20.1; p = 0.021) were independently predictive of a worse RFS. Among patients with primary EMC only, the 5-year OS was 85.3%, with a 30.0% (n = 12) locoregional recurrence rate, though no significant prognostic factors were identified.Long-term survival with EMC is probable, however there exists a high incidence of locoregional recurrence. While chemotherapy and radiation were associated with a worse RFS, these findings were likely confounded by recurrent disease as significance was lost in the primary EMC-only subset.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate patient satisfaction scores as a function of physician and patient race and sex. BACKGROUND Patient satisfaction is increasingly used as a surrogate for physician performance. How patient and surgeon race and ethnicity affect perceptions of surgeon communication and care is not widely explored. METHODS Press Ganey patient satisfaction surveys collected from January 2019 to September 2020 were studied. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with favorable surgeon performance as a function of patient and surgeon demographics. RESULTS A total of 4732 unique outpatient satisfaction survey responses were analyzed. The majority of patients were White (60.5%), followed by Asian (8.6%), Black (4.2%), and Hispanic (4.3%). URM accounted for 8.9% of the 79 surgeons evaluated, and 34% were female. Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients were more likely to report unfavorable experiences than their White counterparts (P < 0.01). Spanish-speaking patients were most likely to perceive that surgeon show less respect for patient concerns (13.9% vs 9.3%, P = 0.004) and inadequate time spent explaining health concerns (12.6% vs 9.2%, P < 0.001). Female surgeons were more likely to achieve the highest overall ratings for effective communication, whereas Asian surgeons received lower scores. Asian surgeons were more likely than non-Asian surgeons to receive lower scores in explanation (37.3% vs 44.1%, P = 0.003). After adjusting for confounding factors, Asian surgeons had 26% lower odds of receiving favorable scores for overall communication (odds ratio: 0.736, 95% confidence interval: 0.619-0.877, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Both patient and surgeon race and sex drive negative perceptions of patient-physician communication. As URM report more negative experiences, further studies should focus on effects of surgeon cultural awareness on underrepresented patient satisfaction.