Search

Introduction: COVID-19, an emerging infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, continues to be a global public health threat. The development of a colorimetric reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) can extend the availability of simple, reliable molecular tests for the rapid detection of COVID-19., Methodology: The RT-LAMP assay was developed using a new primer set targeting a portion of SARS-CoV-2 orf8. The method was validated at 63 ºC for 60 minutes with naked-eye visualization of the color change. The clinical performance was compared to a real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR) using 273 RNA samples extracted from nasopharyngeal swab specimens., Results: The developed RT-LAMP was specific to SARS-CoV-2 with a limit of detection at 15 RNA copies per reaction. The assay demonstrated diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 90.48% (95% CI: 86.36-93.68%), 87.00% (95% CI: 81.53-91.33%), 100% (95% CI: 95.07-100%), 100% (95% CI: not available), and 73.74% (95% CI: 66.22-80.07%), respectively, compared to the rtRT-PCR. The greatest sensitivity of 98.03% (95% CI: 94.34-99.59%) was demonstrated in samples with the cycle threshold (Ct) values < 30 cycles., Conclusions: The RT-LAMP method in this study showed good performance. The assay can increase the scope of laboratory testing for rapidly detecting SARS-CoV-2 in Thailand. Due to a decrease in COVID-19 cases, its application is beneficial when commercial alternatives are unavailable., Competing Interests: No Conflict of Interest is declared, (Copyright (c) 2024 Wiphat Klayut, Thanee Wongchai, Nattagarn Chuenchom, Payu Bhakdeenuan, Supranee Bunchoo, Sopa Srisungngam, Sirilada Suphankong, Benjawan Phetsuksiri, Ballang Uppapong, Janisara Rudeeaneksin.)

Introduction Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is an enormous reservoir for tuberculosis (TB), and healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk for TB infection. QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is an alternative to the tuberculin skin test for LTBI detection, but data on its application and LTBI detected by QFT-Plus in high TB burden countries are limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of LTBI and its risk factors, and to investigate the QFT-Plus results in Thai HCWs. Methods A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among HCWs at a secondary care hospital in Health Region 5, Thailand. Eligible HCWs were enrolled and underwent QFT-Plus testing. Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) values in tubes were analysed. The prevalence and associated risk factors for LTBI were assessed based on laboratory and sociodemographic data. Logistic regression analyses were applied to calculate odds ratios (OR, aOR) reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Of the 269 participants enrolled, their median age was 42 years and 93.31% (n = 251/269) were female. The majority (n = 178/269, 66.17%) were nurses or nurse assistants and 42.75% (n = 115/269) worked in the inpatient medical wards. Overall, the QFT-Plus results showed 110 (40.89%) positive with good agreement (93.68%; κ 0.87) and high correlation (Spearman's ρ 0.91) of IFN-γ concentrations in the two antigen tubes. A true difference in IFN-γ values for predicting a recent infection was found about 7.81% (n = 21/269). By univariate and multivariate analyses, the participants' age > 40 years (OR = 3.21, 95% CI: 1.84-5.64%; aOR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.07-3.96%), and employment duration > 10 years (OR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.66-6.37%; aOR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.05-5.21%) were significantly associated with the increased risk of LTBI (p - value < 0.05). Conclusions The prevalence of LTBI among these HCWs was high, and the increased risk factors for LTBI according to QFT-Plus positivity were age over 40 years and working time in the hospital for more than 10 years. It is important to screen HCWs in this setting for LTBI, particularly those with long employment durations and older ages. The high prevalence of LTBI suggests that LTBI management, such as regular screening and treatment, should be considered together with strengthening preventive measures, especially in high-risk groups., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Klayut et al.)

Background: Rapid antigen testing (RAT) is one of the most powerful tools for SARS-CoV-2 detection. The OnSite COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test is an antigen-based, point-of-care test approved by the WHO for Emergency Use Listing. The Nucleocapsid ( N ) gene mutations found in the emerging Omicron sublineages lead to the question of RAT performance., Objective: To ensure the diagnostic performance of the study RAT during rapidly mutated Omicron variants., Results: We independently evaluated the performance of this assay in 1098 archived samples collected in Thailand during October 2022-February 2023, which were 798 and 300 COVID-19 real-time RT-PCR positive and negative, respectively. The assay performed with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity using a cycle threshold (Ct) of <20 for the RT-PCR. The sensitivity decreased to 88% when using Ct <30. Most of the SARS-CoV-2 found were Omicron BA.2 (99%), harboring six known N mutations (P13L, E31del, S33del, R203K, G204R and S413R). Eight samples containing hybrid variants (XBB.1*, XBB.2 and XBJ) were detected by the study RAT. This RAT detects all Omicron sublineages known to be circulating in Thailand., Conclusions: These results confirmed the good performance of the study RAT for detecting Omicron variants and its appropriateness for individual diagnosis and for genomic surveillance.

An HPMC-based nasal spray solution containing human IgG1 antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 (nasal antibody spray or NAS) was developed to strengthen COVID-19 management. NAS exhibited potent broadly neutralizing activities against SARS-CoV-2 with PVNT 50 values ranging from 0.0035 to 3.1997 μg/ml for the following variants of concern (ranked from lowest to highest): Alpha, Beta, Gamma, ancestral, Delta, Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.4/5, and BA.2.75. Biocompatibility assessment showed no potential biological risks. Intranasal NAS administration in rats showed no circulatory presence of human IgG1 anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies within 120 h. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCT05358873) was conducted on 36 healthy volunteers who received either NAS or a normal saline nasal spray. Safety of the thrice-daily intranasal administration for 7 days was assessed using nasal sinuscopy, adverse event recording, and self-reporting questionnaires. NAS was well tolerated, with no significant adverse effects during the 14 days of the study. The SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies were detected based on the signal inhibition percent (SIP) in nasal fluids pre- and post-administration using a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test. SIP values in nasal fluids collected immediately or 6 h after NAS application were significantly increased from baseline for all three variants tested, including ancestral, Delta, and Omicron BA.2. In conclusion, NAS was safe for intranasal use in humans to increase neutralizing antibodies in nasal fluids that lasted at least 6 h., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 necessitated the rapid deployment of tests to diagnose COVID-19. To monitor the accuracy of testing across the COVID-19 laboratory network in Thailand, the Department of Medical Sciences under the Ministry of Public Health launched a national external quality assessment (EQA) scheme using samples containing inactivated SARS-CoV-2 culture supernatant from a predominant strain in the early phase of the Thailand outbreak. All 197 laboratories in the network participated; 93% (n=183) of which reported correct results for all 6 EQA samples. Ten laboratories reported false-negative results, mostly for samples with low viral concentrations, and 5 laboratories reported false-positive results (1 laboratory reported false positives and false negatives). An intralaboratory investigation of 14 laboratories reporting incorrect results revealed 2 main causes of error: (1) RNA contamination of the rRT-PCR reaction and (2) poor-quality RNA extraction. Specific reagent combinations were significantly associated with false-negative reports. Thailand's approach to national EQA for SARS-CoV-2 can serve as a roadmap for other countries interested in implementing a national EQA program to ensure laboratories provide accurate testing results, which is crucial in diagnosis, prevention, and control strategies. A national EQA program can be less costly and thus more sustainable than commercial EQA programs. National EQA is recommended to detect and correct testing errors and provide postmarket surveillance for diagnostic test performance.

Between the first case of COVID-19 in January 2020 and the end of 2021, Thailand experienced four waves of the epidemic. The third and fourth waves were caused by the alpha and delta strains from April 2021 to November 2021. Serosurveillance studies provide snapshots of the true scale of the outbreak, including the asymptomatic infections that could not be fully captured by a hospital-based case detection system. We aimed to investigate the distribution of SARs-CoV-2 seroprevalence in unvaccinated adults after the delta wave outbreak. From November to December 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional survey study in 12 public health areas (PHAs) across Thailand. A total of 26,717 blood samples were collected and tested for SARs-CoV-2 antibodies (anti-S IgG) using a qualitative immunoassay. The results showed that seropositive prevalence in this cohort was 1.4% (95% CI: 1.24 to 1.52). The lowest prevalence was in the northern region (PHA 1) and in central Thailand (PHA 3) at 0.4% (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.95), while the highest was in the southern region of Thailand (PHA 12) at 5.8% (95% CI: 4.48 to 7.29). This seropositive prevalence was strikingly lower than the reports from other countries. Our serosurveillance results suggest that the vaccination of unvaccinated groups should be accelerated, especially in the public health areas with the lowest seroprevalence.

Background: Thailand National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for HbA1c was established to evaluate the quality of HbA1c assays in Thailand in 2016., Methods: HbA1c results from participating laboratories were compared to the target value assigned by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) reference system., Results: The pass rates of participating laboratories during 2016-2020 were72-88%. The mean bias ranged between -0.19 and 0.20% of HbA1c. SD ranged from 0.30 to 1.08% of HbA1c. The overall coefficients of variation ranged from 4.46-15.66%., Conclusions: Performance evaluation using IFCC assigned values indicated that different assay methods had an effect on HbA1c results. Participation in external quality assessment programs for HbA1c analysis is essential for improving laboratory quality and benefiting patient management., (© 2022 The Authors.)