Search

To understand perioperative practices for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) among academic medical centers. An electronic cross-sectional survey was distributed to fellows and program directors participating in 49 American Head and Neck Society fellowships. Operative decisions, medical and swallowing management, and disposition planning were assessed. Thirty-eight responses were collected (77.6%). Twenty-three centers (60.5%) performed 25 cases annually with the remainder performing fewer. The da Vinci Si was the most commonly used platform (n = 28, 73.7%). A majority of institutions advocated tailored resection to adequate margins (n = 27, 71.1%) over fixed subunit-based resection (n = 11, 28.9%). Most surgeons (n = 29, 76.3%) performed neck dissection concurrent with TORS, and 89.5% (n = 34) routinely ligated external carotid artery branches. A minority of institutions (n = 17, 45.9%) endorsed a standardized TORS care pathway. Antibiotic choices and duration varied, the most common choice being ampicillin/sulbactam (n = 21, 55.3%), and the most common duration being 24 h or less (n = 22, 57.9%). Multimodal analgesia was used at 36 centers (94.7%), steroids at 31 centers (81.6%), and pharmacologic venous thromboembolic prophylaxis at 29 centers (76.3%). Nasogastric feeding tubes were placed during surgery at 20 institutions (54.1%). Speech-language pathologists routinely performed postoperative swallow evaluations at 29 (78.4%) sites. Practice patterns are variable among institutions performing TORS. While certain surgical and postoperative practices were quite common, many institutions reported no standard TORS care pathway. Further understanding of the impact of individual practices on outcomes is necessary to develop evidence-based perioperative protocols for TORS. more...

Supplemental Table 1. Criteria for Unresectable Disease Supplemental Table 2. Modified RECIST Criteria for Head and Neck Cancer. Supplemental Table 3. Summary of Serum Analyte Levels. Supplemental Figure 1. Study Schematic Supplemental Figure 2. Time to locoregional failure for all eligible and treated patients (a) and by tumor HPV status (b). Log rank test comparing time to failure for HPV+ versus HPV- p value provided. Supplemental Figure 3. Representative tissue cores with high or low expression levels of XPF or ERCC1 as assessed by AQUA. Tumors were stained for cytokeratin (CK) to create a tumor mask and with DAPI to define the nuclear compartment. Supplemental Figure 4. Representative tumor IHC molecular correlates ERCC1, XPF and MET. more...

List of Supplemental Materials: Supplemental Table 1. Criteria for Unresectable Disease Supplemental Table 2. Modified RECIST Criteria for Head and Neck Cancer. Supplemental Table 3. Summary of Serum Analyte Levels. Supplemental Figure 1. Study Schematic Supplemental Figure 2. Time to locoregional failure for all eligible and treated patients (a) and by tumor HPV status (b). Log rank test comparing time to failure for HPV+ versus HPV- p value provided. Supplemental Figure 3. Representative tissue cores with high or low expression levels of XPF or ERCC1 as assessed by AQUA. Tumors were stained for cytokeratin (CK) to create a tumor mask and with DAPI to define the nuclear compartment. Supplemental Figure 4. Representative tumor IHC molecular correlates ERCC1, XPF and MET. more...

Purpose: Treatment with cisplatin or cetuximab combined with radiotherapy each yield superior survival in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCCHN) compared with radiotherapy alone. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E3303 evaluated the triple combination.Experimental Design: Patients with stage IV unresectable LA-SCCHN received a loading dose of cetuximab (400 mg/m2) followed by 250 mg/m2/week and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 q 3 weeks ×3 cycles concurrent with standard fractionated radiotherapy. In the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, patients continued maintenance cetuximab for 6 to 12 months. Primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). Patient tumor and blood correlates, including tumor human papillomavirus (HPV) status, were evaluated for association with survival.Results: A total of 69 patients were enrolled; 60 proved eligible and received protocol treatment. Oropharyngeal primaries constituted the majority (66.7%), stage T4 48.3% and N2-3 91.7%. Median radiotherapy dose delivered was 70 Gy, 71.6% received all three cycles of cisplatin, and 74.6% received maintenance cetuximab. Median PFS was 19.4 months, 2-year PFS 47% [95% confidence interval (CI), 33%–61%]. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 66% (95% CI, 53%–77%); median OS was not reached. Response rate was 66.7%. Most common grade ≥3 toxicities included mucositis (55%), dysphagia (46%), and neutropenia (26%); one attributable grade 5 toxicity occurred. Only tumor HPV status was significantly associated with survival. HPV was evaluable in 29 tumors; 10 (all oropharyngeal) were HPV positive. HPV+ patients had significantly longer OS and PFS (P = 0.004 and P = 0.036, respectively).Conclusions: Concurrent cetuximab, cisplatin, and radiotherapy were well tolerated and yielded promising 2-year PFS and OS in LA-SCCHN with improved survival for patients with HPV+ tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 20(19); 5041–51. ©2014 AACR. more...

ImportancePrior investigations in social determinants of health (SDoH) in pediatric head and neck cancer (HNC) have only considered a narrow scope of HNCs, SDoH, and geography while lacking inquiry into the interrelational association of SDoH with disparities in clinical pediatric HNC.ObjectivesTo evaluate the association of SDoH with disparities in HNC among children and adolescents and to assess which specific aspects of SDoH are most associated with disparities in dynamic and regional sociodemographic contexts.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study included data about patients (aged ≤19 years) with pediatric HNC who were diagnosed from 1975 to 2017 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to October 2022.ExposuresOverall social vulnerability and its subcomponent contributions from 15 SDoH variables, grouped into socioeconomic status (SES; poverty, unemployment, income level, and high school diploma status), minority and language status (ML; minoritized racial and ethnic group and proficiency with English), household composition (HH; household members aged ≥65 and ≤17 years, disability status, single-parent status), and housing and transportation (HT; multiunit structure, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle, group quarters). These were ranked and scored across all US counties.Main Outcomes and MeasuresRegression trends were performed in continuous measures of surveillance and survival period and in discrete measures of advanced staging and surgery receipt.ResultsA total of 37 043 patients (20 729 [55.9%] aged 10-19 years; 18 603 [50.2%] male patients; 22 430 [60.6%] White patients) with 30 different HNCs in SEER had significant relative decreases in the surveillance period, ranging from 23.9% for malignant melanomas (mean [SD] duration, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 170 [128] months to 129 [88] months) to 41.9% for non-Hodgkin lymphomas (mean [SD] duration, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 216 [142] months vs 127 [94] months). SES followed by ML and HT vulnerabilities were associated with these overall trends per relative-difference magnitudes (eg, SES for ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors: mean [SD] duration, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 114 [113] months vs 86 [84] months; P P = .43) to 61.4% for gliomas not otherwise specified (NOS) (mean [SD] survival, lowest vs highest vulnerability: 44 [84] months to 17 [28] months; P P Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study of patients with pediatric HNC, significant decreases in receipt of care and survival time were observed with increasing SDoH vulnerability. more...