Search

Abstract Purpose To propose a new quality scoring tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), to assess and improve research quality of radiomics studies. Methods We conducted an online modified Delphi study with a group of international experts. It was performed in three consecutive stages: Stage#1, item preparation; Stage#2, panel discussion among EuSoMII Auditing Group members to identify the items to be voted; and Stage#3, four rounds of the modified Delphi exercise by panelists to determine the items eligible for the METRICS and their weights. The consensus threshold was 75%. Based on the median ranks derived from expert panel opinion and their rank-sum based conversion to importance scores, the category and item weights were calculated. Result In total, 59 panelists from 19 countries participated in selection and ranking of the items and categories. Final METRICS tool included 30 items within 9 categories. According to their weights, the categories were in descending order of importance: study design, imaging data, image processing and feature extraction, metrics and comparison, testing, feature processing, preparation for modeling, segmentation, and open science. A web application and a repository were developed to streamline the calculation of the METRICS score and to collect feedback from the radiomics community. Conclusion In this work, we developed a scoring tool for assessing the methodological quality of the radiomics research, with a large international panel and a modified Delphi protocol. With its conditional format to cover methodological variations, it provides a well-constructed framework for the key methodological concepts to assess the quality of radiomic research papers. Critical relevance statement A quality assessment tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), is made available by a large group of international domain experts, with transparent methodology, aiming at evaluating and improving research quality in radiomics and machine learning. Key points • A methodological scoring tool, METRICS, was developed for assessing the quality of radiomics research, with a large international expert panel and a modified Delphi protocol. • The proposed scoring tool presents expert opinion-based importance weights of categories and items with a transparent methodology for the first time. • METRICS accounts for varying use cases, from handcrafted radiomics to entirely deep learning-based pipelines. • A web application has been developed to help with the calculation of the METRICS score ( https://metricsscore.github.io/metrics/METRICS.html ) and a repository created to collect feedback from the radiomics community ( https://github.com/metricsscore/metrics ). Graphical Abstract

Objectives: To develop a mutation-based radiomics signature to predict response to imatinib in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs). Methods: Eighty-two patients with GIST were enrolled in this retrospective study, including 52 patients from one center that were used to develop the model, and 30 patients from a second center to validate it. Reference standard was the mutational status of tyrosine-protein kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor α (PDGFRA). Patients were dichotomized in imatinib sensitive (group 0 - mutation in KIT or PDGFRA, different from exon 18-D842V), and imatinib non-responsive (group 1 - PDGFRA exon 18-D842V mutation or absence of mutation in KIT/PDGFRA). Initially, 107 texture features were extracted from the tumor masks of baseline computed tomography scans. Different machine learning methods were then implemented to select the best combination of features for the development of the radiomics signature. Results: The best performance was obtained with the 5 features selected by the ANOVA model and the Bayes classifier, using a threshold of 0.36. With this setting the radiomics signature had an accuracy and precision for sensitive patients of 82 % (95 % CI:60–95) and 90 % (95 % CI:73–97), respectively. Conversely, a precision of 80 % (95 % CI:34–97) was obtained in non-responsive patients using a threshold of 0.9. Indeed, with the latter setting 4 patients out of 5 were correctly predicted as non-responders. Conclusions: The results are a first step towards using radiomics to improve the management of patients with GIST, especially when tumor tissue is unavailable for molecular analysis or when molecular profiling is inconclusive.

Goal: Artificial intelligence applied to medical image analysis has been extensively used to develop non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic signatures. However, these imaging biomarkers should be largely validated on multi-center datasets to prove their robustness before they can be introduced into clinical practice. The main challenge is represented by the great and unavoidable image variability which is usually addressed using different pre-processing techniques including spatial, intensity and feature normalization. The purpose of this study is to systematically summarize normalization methods and to evaluate their correlation with the radiomics model performances through meta-analyses. This review is carried out according to the PRISMA statement: 4777 papers were collected, but only 74 were included. Two meta-analyses were carried out according to two clinical aims: characterization and prediction of response. Findings of this review demonstrated that there are some commonly used normalization approaches, but not a commonly agreed pipeline that can allow to improve performance and to bridge the gap between bench and bedside.

Abstract Background Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is achieved in 15–30% of cases. Our aim was to implement and externally validate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics pipeline to predict response to treatment and to investigate the impact of manual and automatic segmentations on the radiomics models. Methods Ninety-five patients with stage II/III LARC who underwent multiparametric MRI before chemoradiotherapy and surgical treatment were enrolled from three institutions. Patients were classified as responders if tumour regression grade was 1 or 2 and nonresponders otherwise. Sixty-seven patients composed the construction dataset, while 28 the external validation. Tumour volumes were manually and automatically segmented using a U-net algorithm. Three approaches for feature selection were tested and combined with four machine learning classifiers. Results Using manual segmentation, the best result reached an accuracy of 68% on the validation set, with sensitivity 60%, specificity 77%, negative predictive value (NPV) 63%, and positive predictive value (PPV) 75%. The automatic segmentation achieved an accuracy of 75% on the validation set, with sensitivity 80%, specificity 69%, and both NPV and PPV 75%. Sensitivity and NPV on the validation set were significantly higher (p = 0.047) for the automatic versus manual segmentation. Conclusion Our study showed that radiomics models can pave the way to help clinicians in the prediction of tumour response to chemoradiotherapy of LARC and to personalise per-patient treatment. The results from the external validation dataset are promising for further research into radiomics approaches using both manual and automatic segmentations.

High-resolution intraoperative PET/CT specimen imaging, coupled with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) molecular targeting, holds great potential for the rapid ex vivo identification of disease localizations in high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing surgery. However, the accurate analysis of radiotracer uptake would require time-consuming manual volumetric segmentation of 3D images. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of using machine learning to perform automatic nodal segmentation of intraoperative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT specimen images. Six (n = 6) lymph-nodal specimens were imaged in the operating room after an e.v. injection of 2.1 MBq/kg of 68Ga-PSMA-11. A machine learning-based approach for automatic lymph-nodal segmentation was developed using only open-source Python libraries (Scikit-learn, SciPy, Scikit-image). The implementation of a k-means clustering algorithm (n = 3 clusters) allowed to identify lymph-nodal structures by leveraging differences in tissue density. Refinement of the segmentation masks was performed using morphological operations and 2D/3D-features filtering. Compared to manual segmentation (ITK-SNAP v4.0.1), the automatic segmentation model showed promising results in terms of weighted average precision (97–99%), recall (68–81%), Dice coefficient (80–88%) and Jaccard index (67–79%). Finally, the ML-based segmentation masks allowed to automatically compute semi-quantitative PET metrics (i.e., SUVmax), thus holding promise for facilitating the semi-quantitative analysis of PET/CT images in the operating room.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a growing role in the clinical workup of prostate cancer. However, manual three-dimensional (3D) segmentation of the prostate is a laborious and time-consuming task. In this scenario, the use of automated algorithms for prostate segmentation allows us to bypass the huge workload of physicians. In this work, we propose a fully automated hybrid approach for prostate gland segmentation in MR images using an initial segmentation of prostate volumes using a custom-made 3D deep network (VNet-T2), followed by refinement using an Active Shape Model (ASM). While the deep network focuses on three-dimensional spatial coherence of the shape, the ASM relies on local image information and this joint effort allows for improved segmentation of the organ contours. Our method is developed and tested on a dataset composed of T2-weighted (T2w) MRI prostatic volumes of 60 male patients. In the test set, the proposed method shows excellent segmentation performance, achieving a mean dice score and Hausdorff distance of 0.851 and 7.55 mm, respectively. In the future, this algorithm could serve as an enabling technology for the development of computer-aided systems for prostate cancer characterization in MR imaging.