Search

The leaf photosynthesis models developed by Farquhar et al. (1980, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386231) (FvCB) and Goudriaan et al. (1985, https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐1‐4899‐3665‐3%5f10) (G85) are both used in Earth system and weather models to quantify ecosystem carbon assimilation. Despite their common role, a systematic comparison between these two photosynthesis models is currently lacking in scientific literature. In this technical report we compared the two models in a systematic way. Hereto we performed a comparative analysis of the model structures as well as the modeled responses of photosynthesis to light and CO2 at leaf level. To facilitate future model comparison, we also constructed a lookup table that presents FvCB model parameters fitted to CO2‐response curves from G85 in a wide natural range in photosynthetic capacity at standardized temperature. The structure of the FvCB model differs fundamentally from the G85 model as the FvCB model considers rate‐limiting processes due to Rubisco capacity, electron transport and triose phosphate utilization in parallel, whereas the G85 model considers Rubisco activity and triose phosphate utilization limitation to act in series scaled with quantum use efficiency. The models also differ fundamentally in terms of the parametrization of dark respiration. Still, both models calculate near‐similar responses of photosynthesis to changes in light and CO2 across a wide range in photosynthetic capacity with only two free parameters each. Our work thereby highlights functional similarities between these model approaches despite fundamental differences in model structure. Hence, standardized parameter sets that yield similar photosynthesis responses to light and CO2 may facilitate intercomparison of Earth system and weather models. Plain Language Summary: In Earth system and weather models the exchange of CO2 between the vegetation and the atmosphere is primarily determined by photosynthesis at leaf level. Two commonly applied representations of leaf photosynthesis are based on the models of Farquhar et al. (1980, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386231) (FvCB) and Goudriaan et al. (1985, https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐1‐4899‐3665‐3%5f10) (G85). A systematic comparison between the two model approaches is currently lacking in scientific literature. The objective of our technical report is to provide such a comparison and thereby to contribute to an exchange of ideas, data and applications between users of the respective models. We found that the two models calculate a similar response of net photosynthesis to light and CO2, despite having considerable differences in their model structure and representation of physiological processes. The main difference in model structure is that the limitations to photosynthesis in the FvCB model are applied in parallel, whereas in the G85 model they are in series. We also present a lookup table to express parameters from the G85 model in terms of their equivalent FvCB parameters. This technical report thereby contributes to the comparison of models used across the Earth system and weather modeling communities. Key Points: We compare two leaf photosynthesis models, based on different biophysical assumptions, that are both used in Earth system and weather modelingThe two models calculate a near‐similar response of net photosynthesis to light and CO2 despite having considerable differences in their structure and process representation. This finding is significant across a wide range of naturally occurring photosynthetic capacities in vegetationThrough a flowchart, a comparison of photosynthetic response to light and CO2 and a parameter conversion table, we aim to enable more communication and exchange of data between users of the two models within the Earth system and weather modeling communities [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vegetation and atmosphere processes are coupled through a myriad of interactions linking plant transpiration, carbon dioxide assimilation, turbulent transport of moisture, heat and atmospheric constituents, aerosol formation, moist convection, and precipitation. Advances in our understanding are hampered by discipline barriers and challenges in understanding the role of small spatiotemporal scales. In this perspective, we propose to study the atmosphere-ecosystem interaction as a continuum by integrating leaf to regional scales (multiscale) and integrating biochemical and physical processes (multiprocesses). The challenges ahead are (1) How do clouds and canopies affect the transferring and in-canopy penetration of radiation, thereby impacting photosynthesis and biogenic chemical transformations? (2) How is the radiative energy spatially distributed and converted into turbulent fluxes of heat, moisture, carbon, and reactive compounds? (3) How do local (leaf-canopy-clouds, 1 m to kilometers) biochemical and physical processes interact with regional meteorology and atmospheric composition (kilometers to 100 km)? (4) How can we integrate the feedbacks between cloud radiative effects and plant physiology to reduce uncertainties in our climate projections driven by regional warming and enhanced carbon dioxide levels? Our methodology integrates fine-scale explicit simulations with new observational techniques to determine the role of unresolved small-scale spatiotemporal processes in weather and climate models., (© 2023 The Authors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of New York Academy of Sciences.)

Numerical simulations of the tropical mesoscales often exhibit a self-reinforcing feedback between cumulus convection and shallow circulations, which leads to the self-aggregation of clouds into large clusters. We investigate whether this basic feedback can be adequately captured by large-eddy simulations (LESs). To do so, we simulate the non-precipitating, cumulus-topped boundary layer of the canonical "BOMEX" case over a range of numerical settings in two models. Since the energetic convective scales underpinning the self-aggregation are only slightly larger than typical LES grid spacings, aggregation timescales do not converge even at rather high resolutions (<100 m). Therefore, high resolutions or improved sub-filter scale models may be required to faithfully represent certain forms of trade-wind mesoscale cloud patterns and self-aggregating deep convection in large-eddy and cloud-resolving models, and to understand their significance relative to other processes that organize the tropical mesoscales., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union.)

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from forests are important chemical components that affect ecosystem functioning, atmospheric chemistry, and regional climate. Temperature differences between a forest and an adjacent river can induce winds that influence VOC fate and transport. Quantitative observations and scientific understanding, however, remain lacking. Herein, daytime VOC datasets were collected from the surface up to 500 m over the "Rio Negro" river in Amazonia. During time periods of river winds, isoprene, α-pinene, and β-pinene concentrations increased by 50, 60, and 80% over the river, respectively. The concentrations at 500 m were up to 80% greater compared to those at 100 m because of the transport path of river winds. By comparison, the concentration of methacrolein, a VOC oxidation product, did not depend on river winds or height. The differing observations for primary emissions and oxidation products can be explained by the coupling of timescales among emission, reaction, and transport. This behavior was captured in large-eddy simulations with a coupled chemistry model. The observed and simulated roles of river winds in VOC fate and transport highlight the need for improved representation of these processes in regional models of air quality and chemistry-climate coupling.

Global warming increases the number and severity of deadly heatwaves. Recent heatwaves often coincided with soil droughts that intensify air temperature but lower air humidity. Since lowering air humidity may reduce human heat stress, the net impact of soil desiccation on the morbidity and mortality of heatwaves remains unclear. Combining weather balloon and satellite observations, atmospheric modelling, and meta-analyses of heatwave mortality, we find that soil droughts—despite their warming effect—lead to a mild reduction in heatwave lethality. More specifically, morning dry soils attenuate afternoon heat stress anomaly by ~5%. This occurs because of reduced surface evaporation and increased entrainment of dry air aloft. The benefit appears more pronounced during specific events, such as the Chicago 1995 and Northern U.S. 2006 and 2012 heatwaves. Our findings suggest that irrigated agriculture may intensify lethal heat stress, and question recently proposed heatwave mitigation measures involving surface moistening to increase evaporative cooling.