Search

Background: Neoadjuvant association of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) and dose dense chemotherapy is promising for triple negative breast cancers (TNBC). However, response rates vary from one study to another. Timing, best chemotherapy partner and efficacy in less immunogenic breast cancer (BC), like luminal B tumors, should be further investigated. This study evaluates for TNBC and luminal B HER2(-) BC the neoadjuvant treatment with paclitaxel followed by a short combination of an anti-PD-L1 antibody with anthracyclines. Method B-IMMUNE (NCT03356860), a multicentric phase Ib/II prospective trial, included patients with stage I to III luminal B HER2(-) or TNBC treated with paclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly from week 1 to 12 followed by 4 cycles of epirubicine 90mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (EC) Q2W in a neoadjuvant setting. Phase Ib evaluated a single infusion of durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) combined with the 3rd cycle of EC. Phase II evaluated infusions of durvalumab with the 1st and 3rd EC cycles. Surgery was planned 3 weeks after the last EC cycle. Primary objectives were safety and pathological complete response (pCR) rate compared to a historical control. Secondary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) based on breast MRI. Eleven patients were enrolled in a control arm without durvalumab, exclusively for translational research purposes. Based on a 2-stage Simon design with an α = 0.1 and β = 0.1, 22 TNBC patients were needed in the phase II to test a null hypothesis of 30% pCR rate against a one-side alternative of 60%, and 24 luminal B BC patients to test a null hypothesis of 15% pCR rate against a one-side alternative of 40% (including an additional accrual margin of 10% for eventual dropouts). At least 9 pCRs had to be observed among the first 20 evaluable TNBC patients and 6 among the first 22 evaluable luminal B patients to rule out the null hypothesis. Results This analysis concerns the 50 patients treated with the experimental treatment, 3 from the phase Ib and 47 from the phase II part. Median age was 51 y-old (31 to 72y), tumor subtypes were 24 TNBC, 25 Luminal B and one sarcoma excluded from the efficacy analysis. Seven (14%) patients had a stage I tumor, 17 (34%) a stage IIA, 13 (26%) a stage IIB, 8 (16%) a stage IIIA, 4 (8%) a stage IIIB and 1 (2%) a stage IIIC. Concerning safety, 232 AEs were reported on 39/50 patients and 34 (14,6%) were graded ≥ 3. The 5 most frequent all-grade AEs were fatigue (8,2%), diarrhea (5,6%), neutropenia (5,2%), anemia and nausea (4,3%). Most frequent grade 3 AEs were anemia and neutropenia (14,7%). Among 4 immune-related adverse events, all were thyroid disorders. One patient died 10 months after the end of treatment due to progressive disease in the liver. Forty-six of the 47 phase II patients were evaluable for efficacy. pCR was reported in 12/22 TNBC patients (55%) and 8/24 luminal B HER2(-) patients (33%). Subgroup analyses based on PD-L1 expression and TILs score are planned. Conclusions The B-IMMUNE study met its primary objective showing a significant improvement in pCR versus the historical control in both TNBC and in Luminal B HER2(-) BC cohorts with the addition of only 2 doses of durvalumab to the anthracyclines. The safety profile is comparable to those previously described with reported immune related adverse events limited to thyroid endocrine disorders. Citation Format: Alix Devaux, Gabriela Beniuga, Claire Quaghebeur, Stéphanie Henry, Mieke Van Bockstal, Christine Galant, Paul Delrée, Jean-Luc Canon, Brigitte Honhon, Dominique Korman, Vincent Verschaeve, Christophe Lonchay, Sarah Lefevre, Lionel D’Hondt, Martine Berlière, Sophie Delmarcelle, Jean-Michel Mine, Timour Willems, Gebhard Müller, Nathalie Myant, Isabelle Bar, Sandy Haussy, Pierre G. Coulie, François P. Duhoux, Javier Carrasco. B-IMMUNE final analysis: a phase Ib/II study of durvalumab combined with dose-dense EC in a neoadjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced luminal B HER2(-) or triple negative breast cancers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-16.

This study aims to describe end-of-life (EOL) care in older patients with cancer and investigate the association between geriatric assessment (GA) results and specialized palliative care (SPC) use. Older patients with a new cancer diagnosis (2009–2015) originally included in a previous multicentric study were selected if they died before the end of follow-up (2019). At the time of cancer diagnosis, patients underwent geriatric screening with Geriatric 8 (G8) followed by GA in case of a G8 score ≤14/17. These data were linked to the cancer registry and healthcare reimbursement data for follow-up. EOL care was assessed in the last three months before death, and associations were analyzed using logistic regression. A total of 3546 deceased older patients with cancer with a median age of 79 years at diagnosis were included. Breast, colon, and lung cancer were the most common diagnoses. In the last three months of life, 76.3% were hospitalized, 49.1% had an emergency department visit, and 43.5% received SPC. In total, 55.0% died in the hospital (38.5% in a non-palliative care unit and 16.4% in a palliative care unit). In multivariable analyses, functional and cognitive impairment at cancer diagnosis was associated with less SPC. Further research on optimizing EOL healthcare utilization and broadening access to SPC is needed.

Background: The association of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) and dose dense chemotherapy is a promising combination in a neoadjuvant setting for triple negative breast cancers (TNBC). However, response rates vary from one study to another and timing, best chemotherapy partner and efficacy in breast cancer subtypes considered as less immunogenic, like luminal B tumors, should be further investigated. The B-immune study evaluates a neoadjuvant treatment with paclitaxel followed by a short combination of an anti-PD-L1 antibody with anthracyclines for TNBC and luminal B breast cancers (BC). Method: B-immune (NCT03356860), a multicentric phase Ib/II prospective trial, includes patients with stage I to III luminal B or TNBC treated with paclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly from week 1 to 12 followed by 4 cycles of epirubicine 90mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (EC) Q2W in a neoadjuvant setting. The phase Ib evaluated a single infusion of durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) combined with the 3rd cycle of EC. The phase II, in progress, evaluates 2 infusions of durvalumab with the 1st and 3rd cycle of EC respectively. Surgery is planned 3 weeks after the last preoperative treatment. Primary objectives are safety and efficacy based on pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Considering a 2-stage Simon design, 22 TNBC patients are needed in the phase II to detect a pCR rate increase from 30% to 60% and 24 luminal B BC patients are needed to detect a pCR rate increase from 15% to 40% (α = 0.1 and β = 0.1). At least 3 pCRs must be observed among 8 TNBC patients and 2 among 10 Luminal B patients treated in the 1st stage to move to the 2nd stage. Results: This analysis concerns 3 treated patients from phase Ib and 18 from phase II who received the experimental treatment (median age 55 y-old, 10 TNBC, 11 Luminal B, 14% stage I, 67% stage II, 19% stage III). Overall, 169 AEs were reported and 22 (13%) were graded > 2 on 10/21 patients, including 27% of neutropenia (6/22), 22% of anemia (5/22), 13% of severe asthenia (3/22) and 9% of diarrhea (2/22). Four patients (19%) developed thyroid immune endocrine disorders. Efficacy was evaluated on 18 patients included in the 1st stage of phase II (8 TNBC and 10 luminal B). Five among 8 TNBC patients (62%) and 2 among 10 luminal B patients (20%) had a pCR. Conclusions: The B-immune interim analysis reveals an acceptable global safety profile. Reported immune related adverse events were limited to thyroid endocrine disorders. Observed pCR rate after neoadjuvant paclitaxel followed by 2 durvalumab infusions combined to EC chemotherapy warrants pursuing the trial for the TNBC and luminal B cohorts. Citation Format: Javier Carrasco, Claire Quaghebeur, Stephanie Henry, Christine Galant, Mieke Van Bockstal, Paul Delrée, Brigitte Honhon, Dominique Korman, Vincent Verschaeve, Christophe Lonchay, Sarah Levefre, Lionel D'hondt, Martine Berliere, Sophie Delmarcelle, Jean-Michel Mine, Timour Willems, Gebhard Müller, Nathalie Myant, Isabelle Bar, Manuel Constant, Sandy Haussy, Alix Devaux, Pierre Coulie, Jean-Luc Canon, François Duhoux. B-immune interim analysis: A phase Ib/II study of durvalumab combined with dose-dense EC in a neoadjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced luminal B HER2(-) or triple negative breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-12.

Introduction: Functional status (FS) and frailty are significant concerns for older adults, especially those with cancer. Data on FS (Activities of Daily Living [ADL]; Instrumental Activities of Daily Living [IADL]) and its evolution during cancer treatment in older patients and a frailty risk profile are scarce. Therefore, this study examines FS and its evolution in older patients with cancer and a frailty risk profile and investigates characteristics associated with functional decline. Material and Methods: This secondary data-analysis, focusing on FS, uses data from a large prospective multicenter observational cohort study. Patients =70 years with a solid tumor and a frailty risk profile based on the G8 screening tool (score = 14) were included. A geriatric assessment was performed including evaluation of FS based on ADL and IADL. At approximately three months of follow-up, FS was reassessed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictive factors for functional decline in ADL and IADL. Results: Data on ADL and IADL were available at baseline and follow-up in 3388 patients. At baseline 1886 (55.7%) patients were dependent for ADL, whereas 2085 (61.5%) patients were dependent at follow-up. Functional decline was observed in 23.6% of patients. For IADL 2218 (65.5%) patients were dependent for IADL, whereas 2591 (76.5%) patients were dependent at follow-up. Functional decline in IADL was observed in 41.0% of patients. In multivariable analysis, disease stage III or IV, comorbidities, falls history in the past twelve months, and FS measured by IADL were predictive factors for functional decline in both ADL and IADL. Other predictive factors for functional decline in ADL were polypharmacy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupPerformance Status (ECOG-PS) score 2-4, and cognitive impairment, and for functional decline in IADL were female sex, fatigue, and risk for depression. Discussion: Functional impairments are frequent in older persons with cancer and a frailty risk profile, and several characteristics are identified that are significantly associated with functional decline. Therefore, FS is an essential part of the geriatric assessment which should be standard of care for this patient population. Next step is to proceed with directed interventions with the aim to limit the risk of functional decline as much as possible.