Search

Objective : To examine the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and genotype among pre-symptomatic carriers of different pathogenic variants associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Methods : C9orf72+ carriers, SOD1+ carriers, and pathogenic variant negative controls (Gene-Negatives) were included from 3 largely independent cohorts: ALS Families Project (ALS-Families); Dominantly inherited ALS (DIALS); and Pre-symptomatic Familial ALS ( Pre-fALS ). First reported ( ALS-Families ) or measured ( DIALS and Pre-fALS ) weight and height were used to calculate BMI. Age at weight measurement, self-reported sex (male vs. female), and highest education (high school or below vs. college education vs . graduate school or above) were extracted. The associations between BMI and genotype in each cohort were examined with multivariable linear regression models, adjusted for age, sex, and education. Results : A total of 223 C9orf72+ carriers, 135 SOD1+ carriers, and 191 Gene-Negatives were included, deriving from ALS-Families ( n  = 114, median age 46, 37% male), DIALS ( n  = 221, median age 46, 30% male), and Pre-fALS ( n  = 214, median age 44, 39% male). Adjusting for age, sex, and education, the mean BMI of C9orf72+ carriers was lower than Gene-Negatives by 2.4 units (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3-4.6, p  = 0.02) in ALS-Families ; 2.7 units (95% CI = 0.9-4.4, p  = 0.003) in DIALS ; and 1.9 units (95% CI = 0.5-4.2, p  = 0.12) in Pre-fALS . There were no significant differences in BMI between SOD1+ carriers and Gene-Negatives in any of the 3 cohorts. Conclusions : Compared to Gene-Negatives, average BMI is lower in asymptomatic C9orf72+ carriers across 3 cohorts while no significant difference was found between Gene-Negatives and SOD1+ carriers.

Background: Fasudil is a small molecule inhibitor of Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) and is approved for the treatment of subarachnoid haemorrhage. In preclinical studies, fasudil has been shown to attenuate neurodegeneration, modulate neuroinflammation, and foster axonal regeneration. We aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fasudil in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis., Methods: ROCK-ALS was a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 19 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis centres in Germany, France, and Switzerland. Individuals (aged 18-80 years) with at least probable amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (as per the revised El Escorial criteria), a disease duration of 6-24 months, and a slow vital capacity greater than 65% of predicted normal were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 30 mg (15 mg twice daily) or 60 mg (30 mg twice daily) fasudil or matched placebo intravenously for 20 days over a 4-week period. Follow-up assessments were performed at 45, 90, and 180 days after treatment initiation. The co-primary endpoints were safety until day 180 (defined as the proportion without drug-related serious adverse events) and tolerability during the treatment period (defined as the proportion who did not discontinue treatment due to suspected drug-related adverse events). The primary analyses were carried out in the intention-to-treat population, which included all participants who entered the treatment phase. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03792490) and Eudra-CT (2017-003676-31) and is now completed., Findings: Between Feb 20, 2019, and April 20, 2022, 120 participants were enrolled and randomised; two individuals assigned fasudil 30 mg withdrew consent before the baseline visit. Thus, the intention-to-treat population comprised 35 in the fasudil 30 mg group, 39 in the fasudil 60 mg group, and 44 in the placebo group. The estimated proportion without a drug-related serious adverse event was 1·00 (95% CI 0·91 to 1·00) with placebo, 1·00 (0·89 to 1·00) with fasudil 30 mg, and 1·00 (0·90 to 1·00) with fasudil 60 mg; the difference in proportions was 0·00 (95% CI -0·11 to 0·10; p>0·99) for fasudil 30 mg versus placebo and 0·00 (-0·10 to 0·10; p>0·99) for fasudil 60 mg versus placebo. Treatment tolerability (the estimated proportion who did not discontinue) was 0·93 (95% CI 0·81 to 0·99) with placebo, 1·00 (0·90 to 1·00) with fasudil 30 mg, and 0·90 (0·76 to 0·97) with fasudil 60 mg; the difference in proportions was 0·07 (95% CI -0·05 to 0·20; p=0·25) for fasudil 30 mg versus placebo, and -0·03 (-0·18 to 0·10; p=0·70) for fasudil 60 mg versus placebo. Eight deaths occurred: two in the placebo group, four in the fasudil 30 mg group, and two in the fasudil 60 mg group. The most common serious adverse events were respiratory failure (seven events), gastrostomy (five events), pneumonia (four events), and dysphagia (four events). No serious adverse events or deaths were attributed to study treatment. Adverse events, which were mainly related to disease progression, occurred in 139 participants in the placebo group, 108 in the fasudil 30 mg group, and 105 in the fasudil 60 mg group., Interpretation: Fasudil was well tolerated and safe in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The effect of fasudil on efficacy outcomes should be explored in larger clinical trials with a longer treatment duration, oral administration, and potentially higher dose of the trial drug., Funding: Framework of the E-Rare Joint Transnational Call 2016 "Clinical research for new therapeutic uses of already existing molecules (repurposing) in rare diseases"., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JCK reports a grant from the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Muskelkranke and consulting fees from AbbVie, Biogen, Ipsen, Roche, and Zambon. RG reports grants from the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Muskelkranke, Initiative SMA, and Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, as well as consulting fees from Biogen, Roche, ITF Pharma, and Zambon. DZ has received consulting fees from Novartis and Angelini Pharma and has served on an advisory board for Biogen. NB has received compensations from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. PC serves on the editorial advisory boards of ALS and The Revue Neurologique; reports consultancy work or participation on advisory boards for Amylyx, Biogen, Cytokinetics, Ferrer, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, VectorY, and Zambon; serves on the drug safety monitoring board for Quralis, and has received a research grant from Biogen. EDLC has received travel grants from Biogen and EFFIK. PW reports grants from the Boris Canessa Foundation and the Bundesministerium für Bildung and Forschung; and has received consulting fees from ITF Pharma, Zambon, Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. TM reports institutional grants from Cytokinetics, Ferrer, AL-S Pharma, Sanofi, Amylyx, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Apellis Pharmaceuticals, as well as personal fees from Biogen, Amylyx, and ITF Pharma; and is co-founder and shareholder of the Ambulanzpartner Soziotechnologie APST. JG has received personal fees from UCB, Alexion, Amylyx, Roche, and Zambon; and is a member of advisory boards of the European Network to Cure ALS, Neuroimaging Society in amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, EU ALS coalition, and the World Federation of Neurology Motoneuron Disease group. M-HS received compensations for consulting from Amylyx, Zambon, EFFIK-Italfarmaco, and SOS Oxygene. M-LR reports grants from FightMND, MND Research Australia and the US National Institutes of Health. CN has received fees for non-related services for Biogen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Roche, and Argenx. JW reports grants from the US National Institutes of Health. JS has received payments for participation on advisory boards, talks, travel, and research projects from Abcuro, Alnylam, Argenx, Biotest, CSL Behring, Grifols, Johnson & Johnson, Kezar, LFB, Lupin, Momenta, Novartis, Octapharma, and UCB, all unrelated to the present study. TF has received personal fees from Actimed, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, CSLBehring, Daiichi Sankyo, Galapagos, Immunic, KyowaKirin, LivaNova, Minoryx, Novartis, RECARDIO, Relaxera, Roche, Servier, Viatris, Vifor, Fresenius Kabi, PINK gegen Brustkrebs, Aslan, BionsenseWebster, Enanta, VICO Therapeutics, Pharmaceutical Product Development, and IQVIA, as well as institutional grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, and the European Commission. MB reports grants from the US National Institutes of Health, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, and the ALS Association; as well as consulting fees for Alector, Alexion, Annexon, Arrowhead, Biogen, Cartesian, Denali, Eli Lilly, Horizon, Immunovant, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, and uniQure; the University of Miami has licensed intellectual property to Biogen to support the design of the ATLAS trial (NCT04856982), for which MB is academic lead. PL reports grants from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amylyx, Bial, Desitin, ITF Pharma, Novartis, Stadapharm, Raya Therapeutic, Woolsey Pharmaceuticals, and Zambon; and is co-inventor on a patent for the use of fasudil in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (EP 2825175 B1, US 9.980,972 B2). All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: With increasing recognition of the value of incorporating prognostic markers into amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) trial design and analysis plans, there is a pressing need to understand which among the prevailing clinical and biochemical markers have real value, and how they can be optimally used., Methods: A subset of patients with ALS recruited through the multi-center Phenotype-Genotype-Biomarker study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02327845) was identified as "trial-like" based on meeting common trial eligibility criteria. Clinical phenotyping was performed by evaluators trained in relevant assessments. Serum neurofilament light (NfL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy (pNfH), urinary p75 ECD , plasma microRNA-181, and an array of biochemical and clinical measures were evaluated for their prognostic value. Associations with functional progression were estimated by random-slopes mixed models of ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) score. Associations with survival were estimated by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression. Potential sample size savings from adjusting for given biomarkers in a hypothetical trial were estimated., Findings: Baseline serum NfL is a powerful prognostic biomarker, predicting survival and ALSFRS-R rate of decline. Serum NfL <40 pg/mL and >100 pg/mL correspond to future ALSFRS-R slopes of ∼0.5 and ∼1.5 points/month, respectively. Serum NfL also adds value to the best available clinical predictors, encapsulated by the European Network to Cure ALS (ENCALS) predictor score. In models of functional decline, the addition of NfL yields ∼25% sample size saving above those achieved by inclusion of either clinical predictors or ENCALS score alone. The prognostic value of serum pNfH, urinary p75 ECD , and plasma miR-181ab is more limited., Interpretation: Among the multitude of biomarkers considered, only blood NfL adds value to the ENCALS prediction model and should be incorporated into analysis plans for all ongoing and future ALS trials. Defined thresholds of NfL might also be used in trial design, for enrichment or stratified randomisation, to improve trial efficiency., Funding: NIH (U01-NS107027, U54-NS092091). ALSA (16-TACL-242)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MB reports grants from the NIH (U01NS107027, U54NS092091) and the ALS Association (16-TACL-242) in support of this work. He is also an unpaid member of the Board of Trustees for the ALS Association. He has served as a consultant to Alector, Alexion, Annexon, Arrowhead, Biogen, Cartesian, Denali, Eli Lilly, Horizon, Immunovant, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, and UniQure. EAM reports grants from the NIH (U01NS107027, U54NS092091). He also serves as a consultant to Annexon, Biogen, Bial Biotech, Cortexyme, Chase Therapeutics, Enterin, nQ Medical, Partner Therapeutics, Stoparkinson Healthcare, and UCB. He has served on DSMBs for NeuroSense Therapeutics, Novartis, and Sanofi. AM reports grants from the NIH (U01NS107027). He has also provided consulting services to Roche, Pfizer, and Accure Therapeutics. MLR reports support from grants from the NIH (U01NS107027, U54NS092091) and FightMND. EH has nothing to declare. VL has nothing to declare. DR has nothing to declare. SS has nothing to declare. IM has nothing to declare. YC has nothing to declare. VG currently is an employee of Biohaven Pharmaceutical Inc. JS receives research funding from the NIH < MDA, FSHD Society, Friends of FSH Research, and FSHD Canada. He also serves as a consultant or on scientific advisory boards for Avidity, Fulcrum, Dyne, Armatus, Epic Bio, Roche, Lupin, and Entrada. JH has nothing to declare. RR reports grants from the NIH (U54NS092091) in support of this work. She is also an unpaid member of the Medical Advisory Board of the Association for Frontotemporal Dementias (AFTD) and a paid member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Kissick Family Foundation FTD Grant Program. CAM reports funding from the ALS Association and the NIH (U54NS092091). LP reports support from the Mayo Clinic Foundation and grants from the National Institute on Aging (5P30AG0062677, U19AG063911) the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS123743, R35NS097273, P01NS084974) and Target ALS Foundation. CM reports grants from the NIH (AG066597, AG076411, AG066152, AG072979, NS109260, NS092091), Department of Defense, and support from the Penn Institute on Aging, Decrane Family PPA Fund, and Newhouse Fund.2. JW reports funding from the NIH (U01NS107027, U54NS092091) and the ALS Association (16-TACL-242) in support of this work. The CReATe Consortium (U54NS092091) is part of the NIH Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN), an initiative of the Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR), NCATS. This Consortium is funded through a collaboration between NCATS and the NINDS. This work was also supported by a Clinical Trial Readiness grant (U01NS107027) from NINDS and by a grant from the ALS Association to support the CReATe Biorepository (grant ID 16-TACL-242)., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: The term "ALS Reversal" describes patients who initially meet diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or had clinical features most consistent with progressive muscular atrophy (PMA) but subsequently demonstrated substantial and sustained clinical improvement. The objective of this genome-wide association study (GWAS) was to identify correlates of this unusual clinical phenotype., Methods: Participants were recruited from a previously created database of individuals with the ALS Reversal phenotype. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data were compared with ethnicity-matched patients with typically progressive ALS enrolled through the CReATe Consortium's Phenotype-Genotype-Biomarker (PGB) study. These results were replicated using an independent ethnically matched WGS data set from Target ALS. Significant results were further explored with available databases of genetic regulatory markers and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis., Results: WGS from 22 participants with documented ALS Reversals was compared with the PGB primary cohort (n = 103) and the Target ALS validation cohort (n = 140). Two genetic loci met predefined criteria for statistical significance (two-sided permutation p ≤ 0.01) and remained plausible after fine-mapping. The lead single nucleotide variant (SNV) from the first locus was rs4242007 (primary cohort GWAS OR = 12.0, 95% CI 4.1 to 34.6), which is in an IGFBP7 intron and is in near-perfect linkage disequilibrium with a SNV in the IGFBP7 promoter region. Both SNVs are associated with decreased frontal cortex IGFBP7 expression in eQTL data sets. Notably, 3 Reversals, but none of the typically progressive individuals (n = 243), were homozygous for rs4242007. The importance of the second locus, located near GRIP1 , is uncertain given the absence of an associated effect on nearby gene transcription., Discussion: We found a significant association between the Reversal phenotype and an IGFBP7 noncoding SNV that is associated with IGFBP7 expression. This is biologically relevant as IGFBP7 is a reported inhibitor of the insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor that activates the possibly neuroprotective IGF-1 signaling pathway. This finding is limited by small sample size but suggests that there may be merit in further exploration of IGF-1 pathway signaling as a therapeutic mechanism for ALS., Trial Registration Information: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03464903) on March 14, 2018. The first participant was enrolled on June 22, 2018.

Background: With increasing recognition of the value of incorporating prognostic markers into amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) trial design and analysis plans, there is a pressing need to understand which among the prevailing clinical and biochemical markers have real value, and how they can be optimally used., Methods: A subset of patients with ALS recruited through the multi-center Phenotype-Genotype-Biomarker study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02327845) was identified as "trial-like" based on meeting common trial eligibility criteria. Clinical phenotyping was performed by evaluators trained in relevant assessments. Serum neurofilament light (NfL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy (pNfH), urinary p75 ECD , plasma microRNA-181, and an array of biochemical and clinical measures were evaluated for their prognostic value. Associations with functional progression were estimated by random-slopes mixed models of ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) score. Associations with survival were estimated by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression. Potential sample size savings from adjusting for given biomarkers in a hypothetical trial were estimated., Findings: Baseline serum NfL is a powerful prognostic biomarker, predicting survival and ALSFRS-R rate of decline. Serum NfL <40pg/ml and >100pg/ml correspond to future ALSFRS-R slopes of ~0.5 and 1.5 points/month, respectively. Serum NfL also adds value to the best available clinical predictors, encapsulated by the European Network to Cure ALS (ENCALS) predictor score. In models of functional decline, the addition of NfL yields ~25% sample size saving above those achieved by inclusion of either clinical predictors or ENCALS score alone. The prognostic value of serum pNfH, urinary p75 ECD , and plasma miR-181ab is more limited., Interpretation: Among the multitude of biomarkers considered, only blood NfL adds value to the ENCALS prediction model and should be incorporated into analysis plans for all ongoing and future ALS trials. Defined thresholds of NfL might also be used in trial design, for enrichment or stratified randomisation, to improve trial efficiency., Funding: NIH (U01-NS107027, U54-NS092091). ALSA (16-TACL-242)., Competing Interests: MB reports grants from the NIH (U01NS107027, U54NS092091) and the ALS Association (16-TACL-242) in support of this work. He is also an unpaid member of the Board of Trustees for the ALS Association. He has served as a consultant to Alector, Alexion, Annexon, Arrowhead, Biogen, Cartesian, Denali, Eli Lilly, Horizon, Immunovant, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, and UniQure. EAM reports grants from the NIH (U01NS107027, U54NS092091). He also serves as a consultant to Annexon, Biogen, Bial Biotech, Cortexyme, Chase Therapeutics, Enterin, nQ Medical, Partner Therapeutics, Stoparkinson Healthcare, and UCB. He has served on DSMBs for NeuroSense Therapeutics, Novartis, and Sanofi. AM reports grants from the NIH (U01NS107027). He has also provided consulting services to Roche, Pfizer, and Accure Therapeutics. MLR reports support from grants from the NIH (U01NS107027, U54NS092091) and FightMND. EH has nothing to declare. VL has nothing to declare. DR has nothing to declare. SS has nothing to declare. IM has nothing to declare. YC has nothing to declare. VG currently is an employee of Biohaven Pharmaceutical Inc. JS receives research funding from the NIH< MDA, FSHD Society, Friends of FSH Research, and FSHD Canada. He also serves as a consultant or on scientific advisory boards for Avidity, Fulcrum, Dyne, Armatus, Epic Bio, Roche, Lupin, and Entrada JH has nothing to declare. RR reports grants from the NIH (U54NS092091) in support of this work. She is also an unpaid member of the Medical Advisory Board of the Association for Frontotemporal Dementias (AFTD) and a paid member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Kissick Family Foundation FTD Grant Program CAM reports funding from the ALS Association and the NIH (U54NS092091). LP reports support from the Mayo Clinic Foundation and grants from the National Institute on Aging (5P30AG0062677, U19AG063911) the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS123743, R35NS097273, P01NS084974) and Target ALS Foundation. CM reports grants from the NIH (AG066597, AG076411, AG066152, AG072979, NS109260, NS092091), Department of Defense, and support from the Penn Institute on Aging, Decrane Family PPA Fund, and Newhouse Fund.2 JW reports funding from the NIH (U01NS107027, U54NS092091) and the ALS Association (16-TACL-242) in support of this work. The CReATe Consortium (U54NS092091) is part of the NIH Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN), an initiative of the Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR), NCATS. This Consortium is funded through a collaboration between NCATS and the NINDS. This work was also supported by a Clinical Trial Readiness grant (U01NS107027) from NINDS and by a grant from the ALS Association to support the CReATe Biorepository (grant ID 16-TACL-242).

Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder leading to muscle weakness and respiratory failure. Arimoclomol, a heat-shock protein-70 (HSP70) co-inducer, is neuroprotective in animal models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, with multiple mechanisms of action, including clearance of protein aggregates, a pathological hallmark of sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of arimoclomol in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis., Methods: ORARIALS-01 was a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial done at 29 centres in 12 countries in Europe and North America. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older and met El Escorial criteria for clinically possible, probable, probable laboratory-supported, definite, or familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; had an ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised score of 35 or more; and had slow vital capacity at 70% or more of the value predicted on the basis of the participant's age, height, and sex. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) in blocks of 6, stratified by use of a stable dose of riluzole or no riluzole use, to receive oral arimoclomol citrate 1200 mg/day (400 mg three times per day) or placebo. The Randomisation sequence was computer generated centrally. Investigators, study personnel, and study participants were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the Combined Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS) rank score over 76 weeks of treatment. The primary outcome and safety were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03491462, and is completed., Findings: Between July 31, 2018, and July 17, 2019, 287 patients were screened, 245 of whom were enrolled in the trial and randomly assigned. The modified intention-to-treat population comprised 239 patients (160 in the arimoclomol group and 79 in the placebo group): 151 (63%) were male and 88 (37%) were female; mean age was 57·6 years (SD 10·9). CAFS score over 76 weeks did not differ between groups (mean 0·51 [SD 0·29] in the arimoclomol group vs 0·49 [0·28] in the placebo group; p=0·62). Cliff's delta comparing the two groups was 0·039 (95% CI -0·116 to 0·194). Proportions of participants who died were similar between the treatment groups: 29 (18%) of 160 patients in the arimoclomol group and 18 (23%) of 79 patients in the placebo group. Most deaths were due to disease progression. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal. Adverse events were more often deemed treatment-related in the arimoclomol group (104 [65%]) than in the placebo group (41 [52%]) and more often led to treatment discontinuation in the arimoclomol group (26 [16%]) than in the placebo group (four [5%])., Interpretation: Arimoclomol did not improve efficacy outcomes compared with placebo. Although available biomarker data are insufficient to preclude future strategies that target the HSP response, safety data suggest that a higher dose of arimoclomol would not have been tolerated., Funding: Orphazyme., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MB reports grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, and the ALS Association; as well as consulting fees from Alector, Alexion, Annexon, Arrowhead, Biogen, Cartesian, Denali, Eli Lilly, Horizon, Immunovant, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, and UniQure. The University of Miami licensed some of MB's research data to Biogen to aid in the design of the ATLAS trial; MB receives a royalty payment received by the University of Miami as part of this licensing agreement. DR received consulting fees from Orphazyme for biostatistical consulting services for the ORARIALS-01 protocol. LHvdB reports consulting fees from Amylyx, Biogen, Ferrer, Corcept, Orion, and Orphazyme, as well as payment for scientific advisory board activities from Takeda. AC reports grants from the Italian Ministry of Health, the Italian Ministry of University and Research, the European Commission, Biogen, and the ALS Association; as well as consulting fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe, Biogen, Roche, Sanofi, Denali Pharma, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, and Amylyx Pharmaceuticals; he has received a research grant from Biogen. PMA report grants from the Swedish Research Council, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Ulla-Carin Lindquist Foundation, NEURO, the Brain Foundation, and the European Commission; as well as consulting fees from Biogen, Avrion, Arrowhead, Regeneron, uniQure, Orphazyme, and Roche. P-FP reports meeting and travel support from Orphazyme. PVD reports grant from CSL Behring; speakers fees from Biogen and Amylyx; and participation in advisory boards for Biogen, CSL Behring, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Ferrer, QurAlis, Cytokinetics, Argenx, UCB, Muna Therapeutics, Alector, Augustine Therapeutics, and VectorY. SP reports grants from Cytokinetics, Biogen, and Roche; consulting fees from Cytokinetics, Amylyx, Biogen, Roche, and Zambon; payment or honoraria from Biogen, Zambon, Roche, Amylyx, Italfarmaco, and Desitin; meeting and travel support from Biogen, Desitin, Zambon, Amylyx, Italfarmaco, PTC Therapeutics, and Ferrer; and participation in data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for ORION Pharma, Amylyx, Biogen, Roche, and Zambon. SL reports consulting fees from Biogen and Amylyx; and participation in a data safety monitoring board (chair) for Neurosense Therapeutics. NAG reports grants from Abcuro, Amylyx, Alexion, Annelixis, Annexon, Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics, Calico, Cytokinetics, Fulcrum, Healey, Janssen, Kezar, Medicinova, MT Pharma, Octapharma, PTC, Sanofi, and Transposon; consulting fees from Abcuro, Alexion, Amylyx, Annexon, Argenx, Astrazeneca, CSL Behring, Fulcrum, Kezar, MT Pharma, Sanofi Genzyme, Sarepta, and UCB; and speakers fees from Argenx and CSL. CQ reports grants from Sanofi, Biogen, and Amylyx; consultant fees from Amylyx and Biogen; and honoraria from Seattle Science Foundation. AG reports consulting fees from Medtronic, Atlantic Research Group, Calico, Apellis, Anexon, ALS Pharmaceuticals, QurAlis, Orion, Sanofi Genzyme, Ionis, Wave Life Therapies, Anelixis, Roche, Cytokinetics, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Amylyx, Alexion, UCB, Ra Pharmaceuticals (now UCB Biosciences), Biogen, Eli Lilly, and Amicus Therapeutics; support for attending meetings and travel from Amylyx, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, QurAlis, Alexion, and ALS Pharmaceuticals; has a leadership role in ALS Canada; has stock or stock options in QurAlis; and has received equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from Amylyx. LZ reports grants from ALS Canada, Amylyx, Biogen, and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma; consulting fees from Amylyx, Cytokinetics, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Neurosense, and Biogen; and participation in a data safety monitoring board (chair) for Amylyx. CS reports speakers fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Canada; participation in an advisory board for Biogen; and unpaid roles in Canadian ALS Research Consortium and Scientific Medical Advisory Board for ALS Canada. CN received compensation for consultant fees and training activities by Biogen, Roche, Genzyme, and Mitsubishi Tanabe. JMS reports grants from NINDS, ALS Association, AB Sciences, Acorda Therapeutics, Alector, Amylyx, Biogen, Cytokinetics Incorporated, Ionis, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America, Quralis, PTC, Sanofi, Wave, and Myolex; consulting fees from Amylyx, Cytokinetics, Denali, GSK, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America, Neurosense, Orthogonal, Pinteon, RRD, Acurastem, Revalasio, Apellis, Novartis, Sanofi, and Immunity Pharma; participation in data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for Swanbio and Braingate; and stock or stock options in Aural Analytics. MRT reports salary support from the Motor Neurone Disease Association; royalties or licences from Oxford University Press, Oneworld, and Karger; speakers' honoraria from University of Miami; and participation in advisory board for Biogen and Novartis. JW reports grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, and the ALS Association. TH, MAG, TB, RB, HD, and CS are previous employees of Orphazyme. MK-K reports research support from the JPND by the National Center for Research and Development, and from E-Rare by the National Science Center of Poland. MK-K also reports paid consulting fees from Amylyx, Ferrer, and Cytokinetics. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Increasing appreciation of the phenotypic and biological overlap between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia, alongside evolving biomarker evidence for a pre-symptomatic stage of disease and observations that this stage of disease might not always be clinically silent, is challenging traditional views of these disorders. These advances have highlighted the need to adapt ingrained notions of these clinical syndromes to include both the full phenotypic continuum - from clinically silent, to prodromal, to clinically manifest - and the expanded phenotypic spectrum that includes ALS, frontotemporal dementia and some movement disorders. The updated clinical paradigms should also align with our understanding of the biology of these disorders, reflected in measurable biomarkers. The Miami Framework, emerging from discussions at the Second International Pre-Symptomatic ALS Workshop in Miami (February 2023; a full list of attendees and their affiliations appears in the Supplementary Information) proposes a classification system built on: first, three parallel phenotypic axes - motor neuron, frontotemporal and extrapyramidal - rather than the unitary approach of combining all phenotypic elements into a single clinical entity; and second, biomarkers that reflect different aspects of the underlying pathology and biology of neurodegeneration. This framework decouples clinical syndromes from biomarker evidence of disease and builds on experiences from other neurodegenerative diseases to offer a unified approach to specifying the pleiotropic clinical manifestations of disease and describing the trajectory of emergent biomarkers., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Cognitive and behavioural dysfunction may occur in people with motor neuron disease (MND), with some studies suggesting an association with the C9ORF72 repeat expansion. Their onset and progression, however, is poorly understood. We explored how cognition and behaviour change over time, and whether demographic, clinical and genetic factors impact these changes., Methods: Participants with MND were recruited through the Phenotype-Genotype-Biomarker study. Every 3-6 months, the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) was used to assess amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) specific (executive functioning, verbal fluency, language) and ALS non-specific (memory, visuospatial) functions. Informants reported on behaviour symptoms via semi-structured interview., Results: Participants with neuropsychological data at ≥3 visits were included (n=237, mean age=59, 60% male), of which 18 (8%) were C9ORF72 positive. Baseline cognitive impairment was apparent in 18 (8%), typically in ALS specific domains, and associated with lower education, but not C9ORF72 status. Cognition, on average, remained stable over time, with two exceptions: (1) C9ORF72 carriers declined in all ECAS domains, (2) 8%-9% of participants with baseline cognitive impairment further declined, primarily in the ALS non-specific domain, which was associated with less education. Behavioural symptoms were uncommon., Conclusions: In this study, cognitive dysfunction was less common than previously reported and remained stable over time for most. However, cognition declines longitudinally in a small subset, which is not entirely related to C9ORF72 status. Our findings raise questions about the timing of cognitive impairment in MND, and whether it arises during early clinically manifest disease or even prior to motor manifestations., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JS reports grants from National Institute of Health (NIH), Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) Society, Friends of FSH Research, and Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) and is a consultant or on the advisory board for Dyne, Avidity, Fulcrum and Sarepta. JW reports grants from the National Institutes of Health and the ALS Association. MB reports grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, and the ALS Association; as well as consulting fees for Alector, Alexion, Annexon, Arrowhead, Biogen, Cartesian, Denali, Eli Lilly, Horizon, Immunovant, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB and UniQure. The University of Miami has licensed intellectual property to Biogen to support design of the ATLAS study., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Objectives: In clinical practice, we have observed that patients with Parkinson disease (PD) often have blepharoclonus, but its prevalence is not well described in the literature. Understanding the relative frequencies of blepharoclonus in PD and atypical parkinsonian syndromes may shed light on the diagnostic utility of this clinical sign. We aimed to assess (1) the frequency of blepharoclonus in patients with PD in a single-center cohort; (2) the association of blepharoclonus with disease stage, tremor severity, and non-motor symptoms; and (3) the frequency of blepharoclonus in synucleinopathy vs non-synucleinopathy-associated parkinsonism., Methods: We prospectively enrolled 85 patients, 75 with PD and 10 with atypical parkinsonism. Blepharoclonus was considered present if eyelid fluttering was sustained for >5 seconds after gentle eye closure. For each patient, demographics were collected, and we completed selected questions from the MDS-UPDRS (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) part 2, REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Questionnaire, and MDS-UPDRS part 3 tremor assessments and recorded the presence/absence of dyskinesia., Results: 63 of 75 patients with PD (84%) had blepharoclonus. Among the 10 patients with atypical parkinsonism, 5 had synucleinopathy syndromes. Blepharoclonus was present in 3 of 5 patients with synucleinopathy and 0 of 5 patients with non-synucleinopathy-associated parkinsonian syndromes., Discussion: Blepharoclonus is prevalent in our PD cohort, suggesting possible utility as a clinical marker for PD. The absence of blepharoclonus in a patient with parkinsonism may suggest a non-synucleinopathy (e.g., tauopathy). Analysis of a larger cohort of both PD and atypical parkinsonism would be needed to establish whether blepharoclonus distinguishes PD from atypical parkinsonism, or synucleinopathy from non-synucleinopathy., Competing Interests: J. Margolesky reports research funding/salary support from NIH/NINDS. D.Shpiner reports support from the Parkinson Foundation. C. Luca received educational grants and consulting fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. H. Moore received compensation due to participation in Advisory Boards from Ipsen Pharma. He has received research funding/salary support from MODUS Outcomes LLC, TEVA Pharmaceuticals, Sage Therapeutics, Bukwang Pharmaceutical, Neurocrine Biosciences, CHDI Foundation, and Impax Laboratories LLC. He has received foundation grants from the American Parkinson's Disease Association (APDA) and the Huntington's Disease Society of America (HDSA). C. Singer received honoraria form the Movement Disorders Society and research support from the Parkinson's Foundation. J. Wuu reports research support from the NIH, ALSA, and MDA. I. Haq has consulted for compensation for Medtronics, Boston Scientific, and Abbott DBS. He has received research funding and/or salary support from the NINDS, NIA, NIMH, Parkinson's Foundation, American Parkinson's Foundation of America, Parkinson's Study Group, and the Michael J Fox Foundation. M. Benatar reports grants from the NIH, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, and the ALS Association; as well as consulting fees for Alector, Alexion, Annexon, Arrowhead, Biogen, Cartesian, Denali, Eli Lilly, Horizon, Immunovant, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, and UniQure. The University of Miami has licensed intellectual property to Biogen to support design of the ATLAS study. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: To explore whether the utility of neurofilament light chain (NfL), as a biomarker to aid amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) therapy development, would be enhanced by obtaining formal qualification from the US Food and Drug Administration for a defined context-of-use., Methods: Consensus discussion among academic, industry, and patient advocacy group representatives., Results: A wealth of scientific evidence supports the use of NfL as a prognostic, response, and potential safety biomarker in the broad ALS population, and as a risk/susceptibility biomarker among the subset of SOD1 pathogenic variant carriers. Although NfL has not yet been formally qualified for any of these contexts-of-use, the US Food and Drug Administration has provided accelerated approval for an SOD1-lowering antisense oligonucleotide, based partially on the recognition that a reduction in NfL is reasonably likely to predict a clinical benefit., Interpretation: The increasing incorporation of NfL into ALS therapy development plans provides evidence that its utility-as a prognostic, response, risk/susceptibility, and/or safety biomarker-is already widely accepted by the community. The willingness of the US Food and Drug Administration to base regulatory decisions on rigorous peer-reviewed data-absent formal qualification, leads us to conclude that formal qualification, despite some benefits, is not essential for ongoing and future use of NfL as a tool to aid ALS therapy development. Although the balance of considerations for and against seeking NfL biomarker qualification will undoubtedly vary across different diseases and contexts-of-use, the robustness of the published data and careful deliberations of the ALS community may offer valuable insights for other disease communities grappling with the same issues. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:211-216., (© 2023 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Objective : The identification of effective therapeutics for ALS necessitates valid and responsive outcome measures to track disease progression and therapeutic gain in clinical trial settings. The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-Health Index (ALS-HI) is a multifaceted, disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PRO) designed to measure ALS symptomatic disease burden in adults with ALS. Methods: Through a national cross-sectional study of individuals with ALS, we identified the most important symptoms in ALS. These symptoms were incorporated into the ALS-HI, a measure that quantifies the multifaceted disease burden in ALS. We performed factor analysis, qualitative patient interviews, test-retest reliability assessment, and known groups analysis to evaluate and validate the ALS-HI. Results: The cross-sectional study included 497 participants with ALS who identified the most important symptoms to include in the ALS-HI. Fifteen participants beta tested the ALS-HI and found it to be clear, easy to use, and relevant. Twenty-one participants engaged in a test-retest reliability study, which indicated the reliability of the instrument (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.952 for full instrument). The final ALS-HI and its subscales demonstrated a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.981 for full instrument) and an ability to differentiate between groups with dissimilar disease severity. Conclusions: This research supports use of the ALS-HI as a valid, sensitive, reliable, and relevant PRO to assess the multifactorial disease burden faced by adults with ALS. The ALS-HI has potential as a mechanism to track disease progression and treatment efficacy during therapeutic trials.

Purpose of Review: Significant progress in characterizing presymptomatic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is ushering in an era of potential disease prevention. Although these advances have largely been based on cohorts of deep-phenotyped mutation carriers at an elevated risk for ALS, there are increasing opportunities to apply principles and insights gleaned, to the broader population at risk for ALS [and frontotemporal dementia (FTD)]., Recent Findings: The discovery that blood neurofilament light chain (NfL) level increases presymptomatically and may serve as a susceptibility biomarker, predicting timing of phenoconversion in some mutation carriers, has empowered the first-ever prevention trial in SOD1 -ALS. Moreover, there is emerging evidence that presymptomatic disease is not uniformly clinically silent, with mild motor impairment (MMI), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and/or mild behavioral impairment (MBI) representing a prodromal stage of disease. Structural and functional brain abnormalities, as well as systemic markers of metabolic dysfunction, have emerged as potentially even earlier markers of presymptomatic disease. Ongoing longitudinal studies will determine the extent to which these reflect an endophenotype of genetic risk., Summary: The discovery of presymptomatic biomarkers and the delineation of prodromal states is yielding unprecedented opportunities for earlier diagnosis, treatment, and perhaps even prevention of genetic and apparently sporadic forms of disease., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Interest in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) biomarkers has grown exponentially over the course of the last 25 years, with great hope that they might serve as tools to facilitate the development of meaningful therapies for this otherwise inexorably progressive and invariably fatal disease. Effective use of biomarkers, however, requires an understanding of what it means for them to be 'fit-for-purpose' as well as an appreciation of the nuances of the clinical context(s) in which they will be applied. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) has emerged as a leading candidate with enormous potential to aid ALS therapy development; it is, however, also profoundly misunderstood. Within the conceptual framework of the BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource, developed by the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration in the USA, we consider the evidence supporting the use of NfL for a variety of purposes in different clinical contexts. We conclude that: (i) it may serve as a susceptibility/risk biomarker in populations at elevated risk for ALS; (ii) it has value as a prognostic biomarker when measured early in the course of established disease, empowering stratification or dynamic randomization to amplify the signal-to-noise ratio of promising therapeutics; and (iii) there is sufficient evidence to support the use of a reduction in NfL in response to an experimental therapeutic as a pharmacodynamic biomarker that may aid in phase 2 trial go/no-go decisions. Moreover, the basis for expecting that a reduction in NfL is a reasonably likely surrogate end-point (i.e. reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit-which may be more than simply survival) is nuanced, and depends on when in the course of disease the experimental therapeutic is administered., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Background and Objectives: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a degenerative condition of the brain and spinal cord in which protein-coding variants in known ALS disease genes explain a minority of sporadic cases. There is a growing interest in the role of noncoding structural variants (SVs) as ALS risk variants or genetic modifiers of ALS phenotype. In small European samples, specific short SV alleles in noncoding regulatory regions of SCAF4 , SQSTM1 , and STMN2 have been reported to be associated with ALS, and several groups have investigated the possible role of SMN1 / SMN2 gene copy numbers in ALS susceptibility and clinical severity., Methods: Using short-read whole genome sequencing (WGS) data, we investigated putative ALS-susceptibility SCAF4 (3'UTR poly-T repeat), SQSTM1 (intron 5 AAAC insertion) , and STMN2 (intron 3 CA repeat) alleles in African ancestry patients with ALS and described the architecture of the SMN1 / SMN2 gene region. South African cases with ALS (n = 114) were compared with ancestry-matched controls (n = 150), 1000 Genomes Project samples (n = 2,336), and H3Africa Genotyping Chip Project samples (n = 347)., Results: There was no association with previously reported SCAF4 poly-T repeat, SQSTM1 AAAC insertion, and long STMN2 CA alleles with ALS risk in South Africans ( p > 0.2). Similarly, SMN1 and SMN2 gene copy numbers did not differ between South Africans with ALS and matched population controls ( p > 0.9). Notably, 20% of the African samples in this study had no SMN2 gene copies, which is a higher frequency than that reported in Europeans (approximately 7%)., Discussion: We did not replicate the reported association of SCAF4 , SQSTM1 , and STMN2 short SVs with ALS in a small South African sample. In addition, we found no link between SMN1 and SMN2 copy numbers and susceptibility to ALS in this South African sample, which is similar to the conclusion of a recent meta-analysis of European studies. However, the SMN gene region findings in Africans replicate previous results from East and West Africa and highlight the importance of including diverse population groups in disease gene discovery efforts. The clinically relevant differences in the SMN gene architecture between African and non-African populations may affect the effectiveness of targeted SMN2 gene therapy for related diseases such as spinal muscular atrophy., Competing Interests: J.P. Taylor is a consultant for Nido Biosciences; M. Benatar serves on the ALS Association Board of Trustees and holds grants from NIH (R01-NS105479, U01-NS107027, U54-NS092091) and the Muscular Dystrophy Association (645863), intellectual property from the University of Miami licensed to Biogen (IP-142A), a provisional patent related to determining the onset of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and consults for Alector, Annexon, Arrowhead, Biogen, Denali, Novartis, Orphazyme, Roche, Sanofi and UniQure; J.M. Heckmann holds a seed grant from the ALSA (23-SGP-626), serves on the scientific advisory committee for the International ALS MND Alliance and consults for Merck. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests. Go to Neurology.org/NG for full disclosures., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: Lead exposure has been hypothesized to increase the risk of ALS, but only two studies have examined the association with ALS survival, and with inconsistent results. The use of occupational history to assess lead exposure can avoid reverse causation that may occur in epidemiologic analyses that use biomarkers of lead exposure collected after ALS onset. Methods: We evaluated the relationship of occupational lead exposure to ALS survival among 135 cases from an international ALS cohort that included deep phenotyping, careful follow-up, and questionnaires to quantify participants' occupation history. ALS patients were recruited in 2015-2019. We determined occupational lead exposure using a job-exposure matrix. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for survival using Cox proportional hazard analysis with adjustment for covariates. Results: A total of 135 ALS patients completed the environmental questionnaires, among whom 38 reached a survival endpoint (death or permanent assisted ventilation). The median survival was 48.3 months (25 th -75 th percentile, 30.9-74.1). Older patients and those with initial symptom other than limb onset had shorter survival time. There were 36 ALS cases with occupational lead exposure. After adjusting for age, sex, site of onset, smoking, and military service, lead exposure was associated with an HR of 3.26 (95%CI 1.28-8.28). Results with adjustment for subsets of these covariates were similar. Conclusions: These results suggest that lead exposure prior to onset of ALS is associated with shorter survival following onset of ALS, and this association is independent of other prognostic factors.

Background: As novel therapeutic interventions are being developed and tested in the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) population, there is a need to better understand the symptoms and issues that have the greatest impact on the lives of individuals with ALS. We aimed to determine the frequency and relative importance of symptoms experienced by adults in a national ALS sample and to identify factors that are associated with the greatest disease burden in this population., Methods: We conducted 15 qualitative interviews of individuals with varied ALS phenotypes and analyzed 732 quotes regarding the symptomatic disease burden of ALS between August 2018 and March 2019. We subsequently conducted a national, cross-sectional study of 497 participants with ALS and ALS variants through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National ALS Registry between July 2019 and December 2019. Participants reported on the prevalence and relative importance of 189 symptomatic questions representing 17 symptomatic themes that were previously identified through qualitative interviews. Analysis was performed to determine how age, sex, education, employment, time since onset of symptoms, location of symptom onset, feeding tube status, breathing status and speech status relate to symptom and symptomatic theme prevalence., Findings: Symptomatic themes with the highest prevalence in our sample were an inability to do activities (93.8%), fatigue (92.6%), problems with hands or fingers (87.7%), limitations with mobility or walking (86.7%), and a decreased performance in social situations (85.7%). Participants identified inability to do activities and limitations with mobility or walking as having the greatest overall effect on their lives., Interpretation: Individuals with ALS experience a variety of symptoms that affect their lives. The prevalence and importance of these symptoms differ among the ALS population. The most prevalent and important symptoms offer potential targets for improvements in future therapeutic interventions., Funding: Research funding was provided by ALS Association., Competing Interests: CZ has previously provided consultation to Recursion Pharmaceuticals and reports no other disclosures. RB receives grants or contracts from the 10.13039/100000971ALS Association, Medicinova, Healey Center, and Orion with payments through 10.13039/100006510Duke University for various ALS projects and ALS trials. He receives book royalities through Demos Publishing. He provides consultation to ALS Association, Alexion, Amylyx, Apellis, Black Swan, Corcept, Cytokinetics, GenieUS, Guidepoint, ITF Pharma, New Biotic, Shinkei, and Woolsey Pharma. He has received payments for speaking on ALS from Amylyx. He has received payments for developing education materials on ALS from Projects in Knowledge and Medscape. He has participated on Data Safety Monitoring Boards for AB Science, Biogen, Brainstorm, Neurosense, and PTC. He has served on the scientific advisory board at GenieUS. VG is an employee of Biohaven Pharmaceuticals (his contribution to this work was done as part of his role at the University of Miami). He has received consultation/advisory board fees from Amylyx Pharmacuticals. JS has received grants or contracts from 10.13039/100000065NINDS (U01 ReSolve U01NS101944), NINDS (R21 CAPN3 R21TR003184), FSHD Canada (MOVE + FSHD), FSHD Society (MOVE FSHD), 10.13039/100004952MDA (MD CRNG), 10.13039/100012644Friends of FSH Research (MOVE FSHD). He has provided consultation and served on SAB with Avidity, Dyne, Fulcrum, Arrowhead, ML Bio, and Sarepta. He has provided consultation to MT Pharma, He has provided consultation and served on the advisory board for Amylyx. He has served on the steering committee at Roche. MB reports grants from 10.13039/100000971ALS Association (16-TACL-242 and 17-LGCA-331), 10.13039/100000002NIH (U54-NS092091, R01-NS105479 and U01- NS107027), and 10.13039/100005202Muscular Dystrophy Association (645863). He has received consulting fees from Alector, Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, UniQure. The University of Miami has licensed intellectual property to Biogen to support design of the ATLAS study (UMIP142-A.) In addition, he has a provisional patent pending entitled ‘Determining Onset of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.’ He serves on the Board of Trustees for the ALS Association (unpaid). CH receives royalty payments through the University of Rochester for copyrighted patient reported outcome measures including one for ALS. He has provided consultation to Biogen Idec, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, aTyr Pharma, AMO Pharma, Acceleron Pharma, Cytokinetics, Expansion Therapeutics, Harmony Biosciences, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharmaceuticals, AveXis, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, IRIS Medicine, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Scholar Rock, Avidity Biosciences, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, SwanBio Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, and the Marigold Foundation. He is scheduled to have travel reimbursement to present at the upcoming Muscle Study Group Meeting. JS, SR, DA, EW, JSW, AV, ND, JH, JW, JC, and PM report no disclosures., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Objective : Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a multi-system disorder characterized primarily by motor neuron degeneration, but may be accompanied by cognitive dysfunction. Statistically appropriate criteria for establishing cognitive impairment (CI) in ALS are lacking. We evaluate quantile regression (QR), that accounts for age and education, relative to a traditional two standard deviation (SD) cutoff for defining CI. Methods : QR of cross-sectional data from a multi-center North American Control (NAC) cohort of 269 healthy adults was used to model the 5 th percentile of cognitive scores on the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). The QR approach was compared to traditional two SD cutoff approach using the same NAC cohort (2SD-NAC) and to existing UK-based normative data derived using the 2SD approach (2SD-UK) to assess the impact of cohort selection and statistical model in identifying CI in 182 ALS patients. Results : QR-NAC models revealed that age and education impact cognitive performance on the ECAS. Based on QR-NAC normative cutoffs, the frequency of CI in the 182 PENN ALS patients was 15.9% for ALS specific, 12.6% for ALS nonspecific, and 15.4% for ECAS total. This frequency of CI is substantially more conservative in comparison to the 2SD-UK (20.3%-34.6%) and modestly more conservative to the 2SD-NAC (14.3%-16.5%) approaches for estimating CI. Conclusions : The choice of normative cohort has a substantial impact and choice of statistical method a modest impact on defining CI in ALS. This report establishes normative ECAS thresholds to identify whether ALS patients in the North American population have CI.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, when viewed as a biological entity rather than a clinical syndrome, probably evolves along a continuum, with the initial clinically silent phase eventually evolving into clinically manifest amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Since motor neuron degeneration is incremental and cumulative over time, it stands to reason that the clinical syndrome of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is probably preceded by a prodromal state characterized by minor motor abnormalities that are initially insufficient to permit a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. This prodromal period, however, is usually missed, given the invariably long delays between symptom onset and diagnostic evaluation. The Pre-Symptomatic Familial ALS Study, a cohort study of pre-symptomatic gene mutation carriers, offers a unique opportunity to observe what is typically unseen. Here we describe the clinical characterization of 20 pre-symptomatic mutation carriers (in SOD1, FUS and C9orf72) whose phenoconversion to clinically manifest disease has been prospectively studied. In so doing, we observed a prodromal phase of mild motor impairment in 11 of 20 phenoconverters. Among the n = 12 SOD1 A4V mutation carriers, phenoconversion was characterized by abrupt onset of weakness, with a short (1-3.5 months) prodromal period observable in a small minority (n = 3); the observable prodrome invariably involved the lower motor neuron axis. By contrast, in all n = 3 SOD1 I113T mutation carriers, diffuse lower motor neuron and upper motor neuron signs evolved insidiously during a prodromal period that extended over a period of many years; prodromal manifestations eventually coalesced into a clinical syndrome that is recognizable as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Similarly, in all n = 3 C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion mutation carriers, focal or multifocal manifestations of disease evolved gradually over a prodromal period of 1-2 years. Clinically manifest ALS also emerged following a prodromal period of mild motor impairment, lasting >4 years and ∼9 months, respectively, in n = 2 with other gene mutations (SOD1 L106V and FUS c.521del6). On the basis of this empirical evidence, we conclude that mild motor impairment is an observable state that precedes clinically manifest disease in three of the most common genetic forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (SOD1, FUS, C9orf72), and perhaps in all genetic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; we also propose that this might be true of non-genetic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. As a diagnostic label, mild motor impairment provides the language to describe the indeterminate (and sometimes intermediate) transition between the unaffected state and clinically manifest amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Recognizing mild motor impairment as a distinct clinical entity should generate fresh urgency for developing biomarkers reflecting the earliest events in the degenerative cascade, with potential to reduce the diagnostic delay and to permit earlier therapeutic intervention., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Despite extensive research, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains a progressive and invariably fatal neurodegenerative disease. Limited knowledge of the underlying causes of ALS has made it difficult to target upstream biological mechanisms of disease, and therapeutic interventions are usually administered relatively late in the course of disease. Genetic forms of ALS offer a unique opportunity for therapeutic development, as genetic associations may reveal potential insights into disease etiology. Genetic ALS may also be amenable to investigating earlier intervention given the possibility of identifying clinically presymptomatic, at-risk individuals with causative genetic variants. There is increasing evidence for a presymptomatic phase of ALS, with biomarker data from the Pre-Symptomatic Familial ALS (Pre-fALS) study showing that an elevation in blood neurofilament light chain (NfL) precedes phenoconversion to clinically manifest disease. Tofersen is an investigational antisense oligonucleotide designed to reduce synthesis of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) protein through degradation of SOD1 mRNA. Informed by Pre-fALS and the tofersen clinical development program, the ATLAS study (NCT04856982) is designed to evaluate the impact of initiating tofersen in presymptomatic carriers of SOD1 variants associated with high or complete penetrance and rapid disease progression who also have biomarker evidence of disease activity (elevated plasma NfL). The ATLAS study will investigate whether tofersen can delay the emergence of clinically manifest ALS. To our knowledge, ATLAS is the first interventional trial in presymptomatic ALS and has the potential to yield important insights into the design and conduct of presymptomatic trials, identification, and monitoring of at-risk individuals, and future treatment paradigms in ALS., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: The aim was to evaluate urinary neopterin, a marker of pro-inflammatory state, as a potential biomarker of disease prognosis and progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); and to compare its utility to urinary neurotrophin receptor p75 extracellular domain (p75 ECD )., Methods: This was an observational study including 21 healthy controls and 46 people with ALS, 29 of whom were sampled longitudinally. Neopterin and p75 ECD were measured using enzyme-linked immunoassays. Baseline and longitudinal changes in clinical measures, neopterin and urinary p75 ECD were examined, and prognostic utility was explored by survival analysis., Results: At baseline, urinary neopterin was higher in ALS compared to controls (181.7 ± 78.9 μmol/mol creatinine vs. 120.4 ± 60.8 μmol/mol creatinine, p = 0.002, Welch's t test) and correlated with the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (r = -0.36, p = 0.01). Combining previously published urinary p75 ECD results from 22 ALS patients with a further 24 ALS patients, baseline urinary p75 ECD was also higher compared to healthy controls (6.0 ± 2.7 vs. 3.2 ± 1.0 ng/mg creatinine, p < 0.0001) and correlated with the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (r = -0.36, p = 0.01). Urinary neopterin and p75 ECD correlated with each other at baseline (r = 0.38, p = 0.009). In longitudinal analysis, urinary neopterin increased on average (±SE) by 6.8 ± 1.1 µmol/mol creatinine per month (p < 0.0001) and p75 ECD by 0.19 ± 0.02 ng/mg creatinine per month (p < 0.0001) from diagnosis in 29 ALS patients., Conclusion: Urinary neopterin holds promise as marker of disease progression in ALS and is worthy of future evaluation for its potential to predict response to anti-inflammatory therapies., (© 2021 European Academy of Neurology.)

Significant progress has been made in understanding the pre-symptomatic phase of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. While much is still unknown, advances in other neurodegenerative diseases offer valuable insights. Indeed, it is increasingly clear that the well-recognized clinical syndromes of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, spinal muscular atrophy and frontotemporal dementia are also each preceded by a pre-symptomatic or prodromal period of varying duration, during which the underlying disease process unfolds, with associated compensatory changes and loss of inherent system redundancy. Key insights from these diseases highlight opportunities for discovery in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The development of biomarkers reflecting amyloid and tau has led to a shift in defining Alzheimer's disease based on inferred underlying histopathology. Parkinson's disease is unique among neurodegenerative diseases in the number and diversity of non-genetic biomarkers of pre-symptomatic disease, most notably REM sleep behaviour disorder. Huntington's disease benefits from an ability to predict the likely timing of clinically manifest disease based on age and CAG-repeat length alongside reliable neuroimaging markers of atrophy. Spinal muscular atrophy clinical trials have highlighted the transformational value of early therapeutic intervention, and studies in frontotemporal dementia illustrate the differential role of biomarkers based on genotype. Similar advances in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis would transform our understanding of key events in pathogenesis, thereby dramatically accelerating progress towards disease prevention. Deciphering the biology of pre-symptomatic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis relies on a clear conceptual framework for defining the earliest stages of disease. Clinically manifest amyotrophic lateral sclerosis may emerge abruptly, especially among those who harbour genetic mutations associated with rapidly progressive amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. However, the disease may also evolve more gradually, revealing a prodromal period of mild motor impairment preceding phenoconversion to clinically manifest disease. Similarly, cognitive and behavioural impairment, when present, may emerge gradually, evolving through a prodromal period of mild cognitive impairment or mild behavioural impairment before progression to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biomarkers are critically important to studying pre-symptomatic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and essential to efforts to intervene therapeutically before clinically manifest disease emerges. The use of non-genetic biomarkers, however, presents challenges related to counselling, informed consent, communication of results and limited protections afforded by existing legislation. Experiences from pre-symptomatic genetic testing and counselling, and the legal protections against discrimination based on genetic data, may serve as a guide. Building on what we have learned-more broadly from other pre-symptomatic neurodegenerative diseases and specifically from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis gene mutation carriers-we present a road map to early intervention, and perhaps even disease prevention, for all forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis., (© The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)