Search

Introduction: During the severe acute respiratory syndrome-Coronavirus-2 pandemic, intensive care units (ICUs) were pivotal in treating severe cases. In the ICU, invasive procedures and the use of immunosuppressive drugs have been associated with an increased risk of infection. We aimed to compare the antibiotic use, infection types, culture positivity, and resistance patterns among patients in the ICU during and after the pandemic period. Materials and Methods: The patients who were followed up in the adult ICU at our hospital were retrospectively assessed after being divided into two groups. Group 1 included patients admitted between December 1, 2020, and May 5, 2021, (pandemic group). Group 2 consisted of patients admitted between June 1, 2021, and November 1, 2023 (post-pandemic). Results: Antibacterial (100% vs. 92.7%, p=0.003), and antifungal (33.3% vs. 10.7%, p

Introduction: The healthcare burden of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) infections is growing. The newly developed beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination, ceftazidime-avibactam, shows promise in the treatment of such infections. We aimed to explore the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates carrying the blaOXA-48 gene. Materials and Methods: The isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF MS (Brucker, USA). The isolates that were non-susceptible to imipenem, meropenem, or ertapenem by the disk diffusion method using the European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints were screenes. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined via broth microdilution according to the EUCAST criteria. A time-kill study was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Beta-lactamase genes were screened for using polymerase chain reaction with previously published primers. Results: A total of 129 K. pneumoniae isolated between April 2011 and February 2021 were studied. Of these, 98, 23, and eight isolates carried the blaOXA-48, blaNDM, and blaOXA-48 with blaNDM genes, respectively. All isolates carrying the blaNDM gene were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Approximately 79.6% of the blaOXA-48-positive isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. The time-kill study for ceftazidime-avibactam was performed with one blaOXA-48-positive isolate (MIC, 4 mg/l). Ceftazidime-avibactam time-kill kinetics were evaluated in multiples of MIC. There was a decrease of ≥3-log10 in CFU/ml count at a concentration of 8, 16, and 32 MIC at 6 hours. The minimum bactericidal concentration was 8 mg/l. Conclusion: Ceftazidime-avibactam is an important treatment alternative alternative for blaOXA-48 positive carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections. The most rational approach to the treatment of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections appears to be the initiatiion of targeted therapy according to culture antibiogram results or revision of the empirically initiated combination or monotherapy as early as possible according to culture antibiogram results.

Background: Broad-spectrum empirical antimicrobials are frequently prescribed for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) despite the lack of evidence for bacterial coinfection. Aims: We aimed to cross-sectionally determine the frequency of antibiotics use, type of antibiotics prescribed, and the factors influencing antibiotics use in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 confirmed by polymerase chain reaction. Study Design: The study was a national, multicenter, retrospective, and single-day point prevalence study. Methods: This was a national, multicenter, retrospective, and single-day point-prevalence study, conducted in the 24-h period between 00:00 and 24:00 on November 18, 2020, during the start of the second COVID-19 peak in Turkey. Results: A total of 1500 patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were included in the study. The mean age ± standard deviation of the patients was 65.0 ± 15.5, and 56.2% (n = 843) of these patients were men. Of these hospitalized patients, 11.9% (n = 178) were undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO. It was observed that 1118 (74.5%) patients were receiving antibiotics, of which 416 (37.2%) were prescribed a combination of antibiotics. In total, 71.2% of the patients had neither a clinical diagnosis nor microbiological evidence for prescribing antibiotics. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, hospitalization in a state hospital (p < 0.001), requiring any supplemental oxygen (p = 0.005), presence of moderate/diffuse lung involvement (p < 0.001), C-reactive protein > 10 ULT coefficient (p < 0.001), lymphocyte count < 800 (p = 0.007), and clinical diagnosis and/or confirmation by culture (p < 0.001) were found to be independent factors associated with increased antibiotic use. Conclusion: The necessity of empirical antibiotics use in patients with COVID-19 should be reconsidered according to their clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings.

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic assessment tools such as pulmonary embolism severity ındex (PESI) and simplified PESI (sPESI) are used to predict the mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. The aim of this study is to assess PESI and sPESI accuracy for the prediction of the prognostic outcomes in coronavirus disease (COVID). METHODS: This retrospective single-center was done as a cohort study. Data on hospital admission obtained from medical records were used to calculate PESI and sPESI. All the consecutive patients were assigned to low risk and high-risk groups using of PESI and sPESI. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Accuracy of the models was assessed to predict mortality by calculating specificity, predictive values, and sensitivity of the patients at low to high risk. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was calculated to compare the discriminative power of the models. RESULTS: The PESI and sPESI had similar sensitivities (82.1% vs. 84.6%), negative predictive values (96.7% vs. 97%) for predicting mortality. The area under the ROC curve for predicting mortality was 0.82 (p

Background: Blood culture-negative endocarditis (BCNE) is a diagnostic challenge, therefore our objective was to pinpoint high-risk cohorts for BCNE. Methods: The study included adult patients with definite endocarditis. Data were collected via the Infectious Diseases International Research Initiative (ID-IRI). The study analysing one of the largest case series ever reported was conducted across 41 centers in 13 countries. We analysed the database to determine the predictors of BCNE using univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results: Blood cultures were negative in 101 (11.65 %) of 867 patients. We disclosed that as patients age, the likelihood of a negative blood culture significantly decreases (OR 0.975, 95 % CI 0.963–0.987, p

Background: Fever of unknown origin (FUO) in developing countries is an important dilemma and further research is needed to elucidate the infectious causes of FUO. Methods: A multi-center study for infectious causes of FUO in lower middle-income countries (LMIC) and low-income countries (LIC) was conducted between January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2023. In total, 15 participating centers from seven different countries provided the data, which were collected through the Infectious Diseases-International Research Initiative platform. Only adult patients with confirmed infection as the cause of FUO were included in the study. The severity parameters were quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) ≥2, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, vasopressor use, and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Results: A total of 160 patients with infectious FUO were included in the study. Overall, 148 (92.5%) patients had community-acquired infections and 12 (7.5%) had hospital-acquired infections. The most common infectious syndromes were tuberculosis (TB) (n=27, 16.9%), infective endocarditis (n=25, 15.6%), malaria (n=21, 13.1%), brucellosis (n=15, 9.4%), and typhoid fever (n=9, 5.6%). Plasmodium falciparum, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Brucellae, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi, and Rickettsiae were the leading infectious agents in this study. A total of 56 (35.0%) cases had invasive procedures for diagnosis. The mean qSOFA score was 0.76±0.94 {median (interquartile range [IQR]): 0 (0–1)}. ICU admission (n=26, 16.2%), vasopressor use (n=14, 8.8%), and IMV (n=10, 6.3%) were not rare. Overall, 38 (23.8%) patients had at least one of the severity parameters. The mortality rate was 15 (9.4%), and the mortality was attributable to the infection causing FUO in 12 (7.5%) patients. Conclusions: In LMIC and LIC, tuberculosis and cardiac infections were the most severe and the leading infections causing FUO.

Abstract Background The core components (CCs) of infection prevention and control (IPC) from World Health Organization (WHO) are crucial for the safety and quality of health care. Our objective was to examine the level of implementation of WHO infection prevention and control core components (IPC CC) in a developing country. We also aimed to evaluate health care-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in intensive care units (ICUs) in association with implemented IPC CCs. Methods Members of the Turkish Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Specialization Association (EKMUD) were invited to the study via e-mail. Volunteer members of any healt care facilities (HCFs) participated in the study. The investigating doctor of each HCF filled out a questionnaire to collect data on IPC implementations, including the Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) and HAIs/AMR in ICUs in 2021. Results A total of 68 HCFs from seven regions in Türkiye and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus participated while 85% of these were tertiary care hospitals. Fifty (73.5%) HCFs had advanced IPC level, whereas 16 (23.5%) of the 68 hospitals had intermediate IPC levels. The hospitals’ median (IQR) IPCAF score was 668.8 (125.0) points. Workload, staffing and occupancy (CC7; median 70 points) and multimodal strategies (CC5; median 75 points) had the lowest scores. The limited number of nurses were the most important problems. Hospitals with a bed capacity of > 1000 beds had higher rates of HAIs. Certified IPC specialists, frequent feedback, and enough nurses reduced HAIs. The most common HAIs were central line-associated blood stream infections. Most HAIs were caused by gram negative bacteria, which have a high AMR. Conclusions Most HCFs had an advanced level of IPC implementation, for which staffing was an important driver. To further improve care quality and ensure everyone has access to safe care, it is a key element to have enough staff, the availability of certified IPC specialists, and frequent feedback. Although there is a significant decrease in HAI rates compared to previous years, HAI rates are still high and AMR is an important problem. Increasing nurses and reducing workload can prevent HAIs and AMR. Nationwide “Antibiotic Stewardship Programme” should be initiated.

We explored the self-reported antibiotic stewardship (AS), and infection prevention and control (IPC) activities in intensive care units (ICUs) of different income settings. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire to collect data about IPC and AS measures in participating ICUs. The study participants were Infectious Diseases–International Research Initiative (IDI-IR) members, committed as per their institutional agreement form. We analyzed responses from 57 ICUs in 24 countries (Lower-middle income (LMI), n = 13; Upper-middle income (UMI), n = 33; High-income (HI), n = 11). This represented (~5%) of centers represented in the ID-IRI. Surveillance programs were implemented in (76.9%−90.9%) of ICUs with fewer contact precaution measures in LMI ones (p = 0.02); (LMI:69.2%, UMI:97%, HI:100%). Participation in regional antimicrobial resistance programs was more significantly applied in HI (p = 0.02) (LMI:38.4%,UMI:81.8%,HI:72.2%). AS programs are implemented in 77.2% of institutions with AS champions in 66.7%. Infectious diseases physicians and microbiologists are members of many AS teams (59%&50%) respectively. Unqualified healthcare professionals(42.1%), and deficient incentives(28.1%) are the main barriers to implementing AS. We underscore the existing differences in IPC and AS programs’ implementation, team composition, and faced barriers. Continuous collaboration and sharing best practices on APM is needed. The role of regional and international organizations should be encouraged. Global support for capacity building of healthcare practitioners is warranted.

Background: Mpox is a rare zoonotic disease caused by the Mpox virus. On May 21, 2022, WHO announced the emergence of confirmed Mpox cases in countries outside the endemic areas in Central and West Africa. Methods: This multicentre study was performed through the Infectious Diseases International Research Initiative network. Nineteen collaborating centres in 16 countries participated in the study. Consecutive cases with positive Mpoxv-DNA results by the polymerase chain reaction test were included in the study. Results: The mean age of 647 patients included in the study was 34.5.98.6% of cases were males, 95.3% were homosexual-bisexual, and 92.2% had a history of sexual contact. History of smallpox vaccination was present in 3.4% of cases. The median incubation period was 7.0 days. The most common symptoms and signs were rashes in 99.5%, lymphadenopathy in 65.1%, and fever in 54.9%. HIV infection was present in 93.8% of cases, and 17.8% were followed up in the hospital for further treatment. In the two weeks before the rash, prodromal symptoms occurred in 52.8% of cases. The incubation period was 3.5 days shorter in HIV-infected Mpox cases with CD4 count