Search

Objective: To characterize changes in body composition following cytotoxic chemotherapy for germ cell carcinoma of the testis (GCT) and quantify associations between body composition metrics and chemotherapy-associated adverse events (AEs) and post-retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) complications., Materials and Methods: This retrospective multi-center study included 216 men with GCT treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or RPLND (2005-2020). We measured body composition including skeletal muscle (SMI), visceral adipose (VAI,), subcutaneous adipose (SAI), and fat mass (FMI) indices on computed tomography. We quantified chemotherapy-associated changes in body composition and evaluated associations between body composition and incidence of grade 3 + AEs and post-RPLND complications on multivariable logistic regression analyses., Results: One hundred and eighty-two men received a median of 3 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Following chemotherapy, median change in SMI was -6% (P = <.0001), while VAI, SAI, and FMI increased by +13% (P = <.0001), +11% (P = <.0001), and +6% (P = <.0001), respectively. Seventy-nine patients (43%) experienced at least one grade 3 + AE. A decrease in SMI following chemotherapy was associated with increased risk of grade 3 + AEs (P = .047). One hundred and 3 men with a median age of 28.5 years (IQR 23-35.5) underwent RPLND of whom 22 (21.3%) experienced at least 1 grade 3 + post-RPLND complication. No baseline body composition metrics were associated with post-RPLND complications., Conclusion: In men with GCT of the testis, chemotherapy was associated with 6% loss of lean muscle mass and gains in adiposity. Lower skeletal muscle was associated with a higher incidence of chemotherapy-associated AEs. Body composition was not associated with the incidence of post-RPLND complications., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Sarah Psutka serves on an advisory board for Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, Immunity Bio, CG Oncology, Merck; Research funded by the National Institute on Aging, the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network; Global PI for SunRISE-4; Janssen; Florian Fintelmann receives research support from Pfizer, serves as a consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, and has a patent for “patient risk stratification based on body composition derived from computed tomography images sing machine learning” (patent number: WO2019051358A1). The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Small cell bladder cancer (SCBC) is a rare histologic subtype with relative paucity of data regarding treatment response and outcomes. We reviewed 2 databases to compare outcomes in patients with localized SCBC treated with cystectomy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). We hypothesized that survival would be similar with these therapy approaches., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional and SEER-Medicare databases to identify patients with SCBC. Overall survival (OS) was determined from the date of diagnosis to last follow-up/death. For those with nonmetastatic disease, a multivariate Cox analysis was used to compare locoregional therapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) + cystectomy versus CCRT., Results: We identified 53 patients in our institutional database and 1166 patients in SEER-Medicare with localized SCBC. Median OS (mOS) with NAC + cystectomy was 46 months (95% CI, 21-72) and 45 months (95% CI, 0-104) in the institutional and SEER-Medicare databases, respectively, whereas mOS with CCRT was 26 months (95% CI, 5-47) and 23 months (95% CI, 18-28) in the 2 series, respectively. In multivariate analysis, NAC followed by cystectomy was associated with an approximately 30% reduction in mortality compared to CCRT in both institutional and national databases but did not reach statistical significance (Institution HR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.22-2.4, P = .58; SEER HR 0.73, 95% CI, 0.49-1.08; P = .11)., Conclusions: SCBC is very aggressive with limited survival observed in our institutional and SEER-Medicare datasets regardless of locoregional therapy used. There is an unmet need to define the optimal locoregional therapy for nonmetastatic stage and identify novel therapeutic targets., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dimitra Rafailia Bakaloudi: no conflicts to disclose. Elizabeth L. Koehne: no conflicts to disclose. Leonidas N. Diamantopoulos: no conflicts to disclose. Sarah K. Holt: no conflicts to disclose. Rishi R. Sekar: no conflicts to disclose. Fady Ghali: Consulting: Immunitybio Funda Vakar-Lopez: no conflicts to disclose. Yaw A. Nyame: no conflicts to disclose. Sarah P. Psutka: Research Funding: National Institute on Aging; Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network; PRIME Education, Inc; Guidelines Committee: American Urological Association: Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Guidelines 2023 Advisory/Consultancy: Janssen (SunRise-4 Global Co-PI), Immunity Bio, Merck, CG Oncology John L. Gore: Research Grant funding from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Claire de la Calle: no conflicts to disclose. Daniel W. Lin: DSMB for the POTOMAC study with AstraZeneca; Consulting or Advisory Role—Astellas Pharma, Clovis Oncology, Janssen Oncology, and Lantheus, Research Funding –Veracyte; MDxHealth. George R. Schade: Advisor ImmunityBio, Consultant EDAP. Intellectual property licensed to Petal Surgical. Jay Liao: no conflicts to disclose. Andrew C. Hsieh: Honoraria—Hotspot Therapeutics; Research Funding—eFFECTOR Inc; Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property—MTOR modulators and uses thereof Patent number: 9629843; Use Of Translational Profiling To Identify Target Molecules For Therapeutic Treatment, Publication number: 20140288097. Todd Yezefski: Institutional research funding from AstraZeneca, Astellas, participation in educational programs for Dendreon Jessica E. Hawley: consulting for Seagen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Immunity Bio; institutional research support from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Crescendo Biologics, Macrogenics, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, PromiCell, Amgen, and Vaccitech. Evan Y. Yu: consulting for Aadi Bioscience, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Lantheus, Loxo, Merck, Oncternal; institutional research support from Bayer, Blue Earth, Daiichi-Sankyo, Dendreon, Lantheus, Merck, Oncternal, Seagen, Surface, Taiho, Tyra. Robert B. Montgomery: Research Funding—AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clovis, Janssen Oncology. Petros Grivas (unrelated to this manuscript in the last 2 years): consulting for MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, Seagen, Pfizer, Janssen, Roche, Astellas Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Silverback Therapeutics, BostonGene, Fresenius Kabi, Lucence Health, PureTech, G1 Therapeutics, Aadi Biosciences, CG Oncology, Strata Oncology, ImmunityBio, Asieris Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie; Institutional research funding: Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, QED Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Mirati Therapeutics, EMD Serono, G1 Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Acrivon Therapeutics, ALX Oncology, Genentech. Jonathan L. Wright: Royalties—UpToDate; Clinical Trials/Research—Merck, Nucleix, Altor Biosciences, Pacific Edge, Seagen, Janssen, Veracyte; Consulting—ImmunityBio; Pacific Edge., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: While 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) is an effective therapy for many patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), biomarkers associated with outcomes are not well defined. We hypothesized that prostate cancer mutational profile may associate with clinical activity of LuPSMA. We devised a study to evaluate associations between mCRPC mutational profile with LuPSMA clinical outcomes., Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with mCRPC with next-generation sequencing (NGS) who received LuPSMA. PSA 50 response (ie, ≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) rate, PSA progression free survival (PSA PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between genetically defined subgroups., Results: One hundred twenty-six patients with NGS results who received at least one cycle of LuPSMA were identified. The median age was 73 (IQR, 68-78) years, 124 (98.4%) received ≥1 prior androgen receptor-signaling inhibitor, and 121 (96%) received ≥1 taxane-based chemotherapy regimen. Fifty-eight (46%) patients with a DNA damage repair gene mutation (DNA damage response group) and 59 (46.8%) with a mutation in TP53 , RB1 , or PTEN tumor suppressor genes (TSG group) were identified. After adjusting for relevant confounders, the presence of ≥1 TSG mutation was associated with shorter PSA PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.93 [95% CI, 1.05 to 3.54]; P = .034) and OS (HR, 2.65 [95% CI, 1.15 to 6.11]; P = .023). There was improved OS favoring the DNA damage response group (HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.97]; P = .044) on multivariable analysis. Univariate analysis of patients with ATM mutations had significantly higher rates of PSA 50 response, PSA PFS, and OS., Conclusion: Outcomes on LuPSMA varied on the basis of mutational profile. Prospective studies to define the clinical activity of LuPSMA in predefined genomic subgroups are justified.

Introduction: To examine oncologic outcomes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma (SUC) treated with radical cystectomy (RC)., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively queried our institutional database (2003-18) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare (2004-2015) for patients with cT2-4, N0-2, M0 SUC and conventional UC (CUC) treated with RC. Clinicopathologic characteristics were described using descriptive statistics (t test, χ2-test and log-rank-test for group comparison). Overall (OS) and recurrence-free-survival (RFS) after RC were estimated with the Kaplan Meier method and associations with OS were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards models., Results: We identified 38 patients with SUC and 287 patients with CUC in our database, and 190 patients with SUC in SEER-Medicare. In the institutional cohort, patients with SUC versus CUC had higher rates of pT3/4 stage (66% vs. 35%, P < 0.001), lower rates of ypT0N0 (6% vs. 35%, P = .02), and worse median OS (17.5 vs. 120 months, P < .001). Further, patients with SUC in the institutional versus SEER-Medicare cohort had similar median OS (17.5 vs. 21 months). In both cohorts, OS was comparable between patients with SUC undergoing NAC+RC vs. RC alone (17.5 vs. 18.4 months, P = .98, institutional cohort; 24 vs. 20 months, P = .56, SEER cohort). In Cox proportional hazards models for the institutional RC cohort, SUC was independently associated with worse OS (HR 2.3, CI 1.4-3.8, P = .001)., Conclusion: SUC demonstrates poor pathologic response to NAC and worse OS compared with CUC, with no OS benefit associated with NAC. A unique pattern of rapid abdominopelvic cystic recurrence was identified., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) results in rapid fluctuation of testosterone (T) between near-castrate and supraphysiological levels and has shown promise in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Its clinical effects may be mediated through induction of DNA damage, and preclinical studies suggest synergy with PARP inhibitors., Patients and Methods: This was a single-center, Phase II trial testing olaparib plus BAT (T cypionate/enanthate 400 mg every 28 days) with ongoing androgen deprivation. Planned recruitment was 30 subjects (equal proportions with/without homologous recombination repair [HRR] gene mutations) with mCRPC post abiraterone and/or enzalutamide. The primary objective was to determine PSA 50 response (PSA decline ≥50% from baseline) rate at 12-weeks. The primary analysis utilized the entire (intent-to-treat [ITT]) cohort, with those dropping out early counted as non-responders. Secondary/exploratory analyses were in those treated beyond 12-weeks (response-evaluable cohort)., Results: Thirty-six patients enrolled and 6 discontinued prior to response assessment. In the ITT cohort, PSA 50 response rate at 12-weeks was 11/36 (31%; 95% CI 17-48%), and 16/36 (44%, 95% CI 28-62%) had a PSA50 response at any time on-study. After a median follow-up of 19 months, the median clinical/radiographic progression-free survival in the ITT cohort was 13.0 months (95% CI 7-17). Clinical outcomes were similar regardless of HRR gene mutational status., Conclusions: BAT plus olaparib is associated with high response rates and long PFS. Clinical benefit was observed regardless of HRR gene mutational status., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Purpose: Germline mutations in DNA repair genes are present in approximately 10% of men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC), and guidelines recommend genetic germline testing. Notable barriers exist, including access to genetic counseling, insurance coverage, and out-of-pocket costs. The GENTleMEN study was designed to determine the feasibility of an Internet-based, patient-driven germline genetic testing approach for men with mPC., Patients and Methods: In this prospective cohort study, men with mPC provided informed consent via an Internet-based platform and completed a questionnaire including demographics and family cancer history. Supporting medical data were also collected. Genetic testing was performed using the Color Genomics 30-gene targeted panel of cancer predisposition genes on a mailed saliva sample. Men whose test results identified a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant received results by phone or telehealth genetic counseling; other participants received results by email with an option for phone-based or telehealth genetic counseling., Results: As of August 18, 2021, 816 eligible men were consented, of whom 68% (551) completed genetic testing, and 8.7% (48 of 551) were found to carry a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a germline DNA repair gene: CHEK2 (17), BRCA2 (15), ATM (6), NBN1 (3), BRCA1 (2), PALB2 (2), PMS2 (2), and MSH6 (1). Participants were more likely to complete the testing process if they were non-Hispanic White, married, highly educated, or from a higher-income bracket., Conclusion: Here, we show the feasibility of delivering germline (inherited) genetic testing by a voluntary, patient-driven, Internet-based platform to men with mPC. Preliminary results show rates of germline DNA repair mutations, consistent with other cohorts. Although feasible for some, reduced steps for participation, more dedicated diverse outreach and participant support, and identification and addressing of additional barriers is needed to ensure equitable access and optimization.

Objectives: To quantify changes in body composition during cytotoxic chemotherapy for germ cell carcinoma of the testis (GCT) and evaluate associations between change in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue and chemotherapy-associated adverse events., Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-institution study evaluated men with GCT treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy from 2005 to 2018. We measured skeletal muscle index (SMI [cm 2 /m 2 ]), skeletal muscle density (SMD [Hounsfield Units (HU)]), skeletal muscle gauge (SMG [cm²*HU/m²]), fat mass index (FMI [kg/m 2 ]), visceral adipose index (VAI [cm 2 /m 2 ]), and subcutaneous adipose index (SAI [cm 2 /m 2 ]) on axial computed tomography images at the level of the third lumbar vertebra within 75 days before and after chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-associated adverse events (AE) were graded based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0.) Changes in body composition were quantified. Predictors of change in body composition were evaluated with multivariable linear regression. Associations between baseline or change in body composition and AEs were estimated with multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, comorbidity, performance status, stage, and number/type of chemotherapy cycles., Results: 141 patients (median age, 30 years [IQR 25-39]) including 86 patients (61%) with non-seminomatous GCT were included. Patients received a median of 3 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and 124 patients (88%) completed planned chemotherapy. Median observed changes in SMI, SMD, and SMG were -6% (P<0.0001), -2% (P=0.07), and -7% (P<0.0001), respectively, while FMI increased 5.3% (P<0.0001). Overall, 120 patients (85%) experienced at least one AE including one or more ≥grade 3 AE in 57 patients (48%). Decrease in SMI (OR: 0.89, P=0.02), decrease in SMG (OR: 0.88, P=0.01,) and post-chemotherapy SMG (OR: 0.94, P=0.05) were independently associated with higher incidence of AEs, while pre-chemotherapy skeletal muscle parameters and post-chemotherapy SMI and SMD were not associated with AEs (P>0.05 for all). Preoperative adipose tissue or change in adiposity was not associated with incidence of AEs., Conclusions: In men with GCT receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, a decrease in skeletal muscle mass and quality during chemotherapy were associated with a higher incidence of chemotherapy-associated AEs. Adipose tissue was not associated with the incidence of AEs., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr. P Grivas (all unrelated COI in the last 3 years): Consulting: AstraZeneca; Astellas Pharma; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Clovis Oncology; Dyania Health, EMD Serono; Exelixis; Foundation Medicine; Genentech/Roche; Genzyme; GlaxoSmithKline; Immunomedics/Gilead, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen; Merck; Mirati Therapeutics; Pfizer; Seattle Genetics, QED Therapeutics; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; 4D Pharma PLC; UroGen. Research Funding to Institution: Merck; Mirati Therapeutics; Pfizer, Clovis Oncology, Bavarian Nordic, Immunomedics/Gilead, Debiopharm, Bristol-Myers Squibb, QED Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline,G1 Therapeutics. Dr. S. Psutka:Consulting: Merck, Research Funding: Prime Education Inc.; Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Dr. F. J. Fintelmann, Related patent pending Dr. T. Yezefski, Consulting: Dendreon, Pfizer Dr. M. T. Schweizer, Paid consultant and/or received Honoria from Sanofi, AstraZeneca, PharmaIn and Resverlogix. He has received research funding to his institution from Zenith Epigenetics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Immunomedics, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Madison Vaccines, Hoffman-La Roche, Tmunity, SignalOne Bio and Ambrx, Inc. Dr. E. Yu: (all unrelated COI in the last 3 years):Consulting: Abbvie, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Bayer, Clovis, Exelixis, Janssen, Merck, Sanofi, Research Funding to Institution: Bayer, Blue Earth, Daiichi-Sankyo, Dendreon, Lantheus, Merck, Seagen, Taiho Dr. B. Montgomery: (all unrelated COI in the last 3 years):Consulting (uncompensated): Propella, Strandsmart, Research Funding to Institution: Astellas, AstraZeneca, Beigene, ESSA, Janssen, Clovis, (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)