Search

Accurate estimation of tumor mutational burden (TMB) as a predictor of responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors in gene panel assays requires an adequate panel size. The current calculations of TMB only consider coding regions, while most of gene panel assays interrogate non-coding regions. Leveraging the non-coding regions is a potential solution to address this panel size limitation. However, the impact of including non-coding regions on the accuracy of TMB estimates remains unclear. This study investigated the validity of leveraging non-coding regions to supplement panel size using the OncoGuide NCC Oncopanel System (NOP). The aim of this study was to evaluate test performance against orthogonal assays and the association with responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors was not included in the evaluation. We compared TMB status and values between TMB calculated only from coding regions (NOP-coding) and from both coding and non-coding regions (NOP-overall) using whole exome sequencing (WES) and FoundationOne®CDx (F1CDx) assay. Our findings revealed that NOP-overall significantly improved the overall percent agreement (OPA) with TMB status compared with NOP-coding for both WES (OPA: 96.7% vs. 73.3%, n = 30) and F1CDx (OPA: 90.0% vs. 73.3%). Additionally, the mean difference in TMB values compared with WES was lower for NOP-overall (3.55 [95% CI: 0.98-6.13]) than for NOP-coding (6.22 [95% CI: 3.73-8.70]). These results exemplify the utility of incorporating non-coding regions to maintain accurate TMB estimates in small-sized panels., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Even with recent advances in pathobiology and treatment options, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality. To develop new ways of combating this disease, breakthroughs in our understanding of its mechanisms are sorely needed. Investigating the involvement of underanalyzed lung cell types, such as endothelial cells (ECs), is one way to further our understanding of COPD. JCAD is a junctional protein in endothelial cells (ECs) arising from the KIAA1462 gene, and a mutation in this gene has been implicated in the risk of developing COPD. In our study, we induced inflammation and emphysema in mice via the global knockout of KIAA1462/JCAD (JCAD-KO) and confirmed it in HPMECs and A549 to examine how the loss of JCAD could affect COPD development. We found that KIAA1462/JCAD loss reduced acute lung inflammation after elastase treatment. Even after 3 weeks of elastase, JCAD-KO mice demonstrated a preserved lung parenchymal structure and vasculature. In vitro, after KIAA1462 expression is silenced, both endothelial and epithelial cells showed alterations in pro-inflammatory gene expression after TNF-α treatment. We concluded that JCAD loss could ameliorate COPD through its anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic effects, and that KIAA1462/JCAD could be a novel target for COPD therapy.

High-flow nasal cannulas (HFNCs) have become common devices for patients with respiratory failure who are treated in general wards. Few reports have been published on in-hospital mortality associated with the ratio of oxygen saturation (ROX) index, measured by pulse oximetry/fraction of inspired oxygen to respiratory rate, in patients treated with HFNCs. We aimed to examine in-hospital mortality and associated factors in patients who initiated HFNC use in a general ward. Sixty patients who initiated HFNC use in general wards at Kobe University Hospital between December 2016 and October 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. We assessed in-hospital mortality, comorbidities, and ROX index. The in-hospital mortality was 48.3%, and ROX index values were significantly lower in patients who died than in those who did not (at HFNC oxygen therapy initiation; 6.93 [2.73-18.5] vs. 9.01 [4.62-18.1], p = 0.00861). Although the difference was not statistically significant, the change in ROX index values between HFNC initiation and 12 hours after initiation tended to be greater in the patients who died in the hospital (0.732 [-2.84-3.5] vs. -0.35[-4.3-2.6], p = 0.0536). Lower ROX index values may be associated with the in-hospital death of patients who are treated with HFNCs in general wards.

Background: Bronchoscopy can be a distress for the patient. There have been few studies on the combination of sedatives and opioids. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness and safety of administration of the combination of midazolam and pethidine during bronchoscopy., Methods: In this prospective randomized single (patient)-blind study, we randomly assigned 100 patients who were scheduled to undergo bronchoscopy biopsy to receive treatment with either the midazolam/pethidine combination (combination group) or midazolam alone (midazolam group) during examinations. After the end of bronchoscopy, patients completed a questionnaire and the visual analogue scale was measured. The primary outcome was the patients' acceptance of re-examination assessed by visual analogue scale. We also assessed pain levels, vital signs, midazolam use, xylocaine use, and adverse events. Univariate analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test for categorical data, and the t-test or Mann-Whitney test was carried out for analysis of numeric data. All P-values were two-sided, and values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant., Results: We analyzed 47 patients in the combination group and 49 patients in the midazolam group. The primary outcome was a good trend in the combination group, but not significantly different (3.82 ± 2.3 in combination group versus 4.17 ± 2.75 in midazolam alone, P = 0.400). In the combination group, the visual analog scale score for pain during bronchoscopy was significantly lower (1.10 ± 1.88 versus 2.13 ± 2.42, P = 0.022), and the sedation level score per the modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale was significantly deeper (3.49 ± 0.98 versus 3.94 ± 1.03, P = 0.031). Maximal systolic blood pressure during testing was significantly lower (162.39 ± 23.45 mmHg versus 178.24 ± 30.24 mmHg, P = 0.005), and the number of additional administrations of midazolam was significantly lower (2.06 ± 1.45 versus 2.63 ± 1.35, P = 0.049). There were also significantly fewer adverse events (30 versus 41, P = 0.036)., Conclusions: The combination uses of midazolam and pethidine for sedation resulted in significant improvements in the pain, blood pressure, additional use of midazolam, and safety during bronchoscopy among patients., Trial Registration: This study was registered in the University Medical Hospital Information Network in Japan (UMINCTR Registration number: UMIN000032230 , Registered: 13/April/2018)., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background/aim: Annexin A10 (ANXA10) is a member of the annexin family and a calcium-dependent phospholipid-binding protein. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical significance of ANXA10 expression in lung adenocarcinoma., Materials and Methods: ANXA10 expression was immunohistochemically examined in surgical specimens of lung adenocarcinoma obtained from 74 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection from January 2014 to December 2014. Expression of ANXA10 was down-regulated in A549 cells via siRNA transfection and the effect of ANXA10 on cell migration was assessed by the wound healing assay. Expression of ANXA10 was examined by immunocytochemistry and polymerase chain reaction., Results: High ANXA10 expression was significantly correlated with poor overall survival (p=0.00705). Multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated that ANXA10 expression was an independent prognostic factor. Cell migration was suppressed in ANXA10-down-regulated A549 cell lines., Conclusion: ANXA10 has a role in cancer cell migration and high ANXA10 expression is a novel prognostic marker in lung adenocarcinoma., (Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)