Search

Emerging evidence on the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) points to the underlying risk and burden of infectious diseases (IDs) in this population. The objective of this study was to examine the risk of ID-related emergency department (ED) visits, subsequent hospitalizations, and hospital-based mortality during ID-related visits among adults with IDD compared to those without IDD. The authors conducted a retrospective study using data from the 2016 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. The sample included 94,928 adults with IDD identified using ICD-10-CM codes, and age- and sex-matched 284,763 non-IDD adults in a 1:3 case-control ratio. A Poisson regression model was used to compare the risk of ID-related ED visits, subsequent hospitalizations, and hospital-based mortality during ID-related visits between adults with and without IDD. Covariates included sociodemographic and hospital characteristics. Results showed that adults with IDD are at a higher risk for ID-related ED visits, subsequent hospitalization, and mortality during ID-related ED visits compared to non-IDD adults. Adults with IDD continued to experience higher risks even after accounting for sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics. Septicemia and respiratory tract infections are the leading causes of ED visits, hospitalization, and mortality. This study found substantial disparities in ID-related ED visits, subsequent hospitalization, and mortality among the burdens for adults with IDD. These observations underscore the importance of integrated strategies to reduce ID-related morbidity among adults with IDD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractPurposeMaterial and MethodsResultsConclusion\nIMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONTo explore the meaning of community reintegration and strategies for promoting community reintegration based on the lived experiences of individuals with spinal cord injury in northwest Nigeria.Using a qualitative description, we purposively recruited people with spinal cord injury residing in Kano, Nigeria. Eight focus groups were conducted to gather relevant information about the meaning and strategies for community reintegration, based on the lived experiences of the participants.A total of 64 people aged 18-60 years completed the study. Most of the participants had lived with spinal cord injury for more than five years. The individuals perceived community reintegration as a multi-dimensional concept reflected by five major themes namely: living life as usual, gainful engagement, a basket of opportunities, courage and support, and acceptance of destiny. Furthermore, the participants considered education and awareness about spinal cord injury, supportive and enabling environment, equal opportunities, care and moral support, and accessible health and rehabilitation services as critical for promoting community reintegration.Community reintegration is a multidimensional process, and its promotion in northwest Nigeria requires a multisectoral approach.People with spinal cord injury experience challenges when returning to their host communities following hospital-based rehabilitation, especially in low and middle-income countries.Promotion of community reintegration among people with spinal cord injury in low and middle-income settings requires intervention at the level of the individual, community, and the government.Accessibility to the physical environment and equal employment opportunities are paramount to successful community reintegration in low and middle-income countries.Future studies should consider assessing the coping strategies of individuals with spinal cord injury and their families in low and middle-income countries.People with spinal cord injury experience challenges when returning to their host communities following hospital-based rehabilitation, especially in low and middle-income countries.Promotion of community reintegration among people with spinal cord injury in low and middle-income settings requires intervention at the level of the individual, community, and the government.Accessibility to the physical environment and equal employment opportunities are paramount to successful community reintegration in low and middle-income countries.Future studies should consider assessing the coping strategies of individuals with spinal cord injury and their families in low and middle-income countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The study aims to examine the risk of multiple chronic condition (MCC)-related emergency department (ED) visits, MCC-related hospitalization following the ED visit, and mortality after MCC-related ED visits among adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), adults compared with nondisabled adults by race and ethnicity, using the 2020 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Sample., Methods: We identified IDD adults using ICD-10-CM codes, extracting 296,394 nondisabled adults and 99,538 IDD adults, of which 67,771 are white, 19,164 are black, 10,667 are Latinx, and 1936 are other race or multiple race. The control group of nondisabled adults was age-matched and sex-matched in a 1:3 case-control ratio. We conducted multilevel Poisson regression models for the binary-dependent variables and adjusted for covariates, including sociodemographic and hospital characteristics., Results: The results show that across all racial/ethnic groups, individuals with IDD have significantly higher rates of MCC-related ED visits, hospitalizations, and deaths compared with nondisabled. Moreover, the disparities are more pronounced for individuals from racial/ethnic minority groups. Black and Latinx individuals with IDD have significantly higher rates of MCC-related ED visits and poor outcomes than their white counterparts with and without IDD., Conclusions: The findings from this study highlight significant racial and ethnic disparities in the risk of MCC-related ED visits, hospitalization following the ED visit, and mortality through the ED among IDD adults. This underscores the importance of adopting a multifaceted approach that addresses the social determinants of health, enhances access to health care, improves quality of care, and enhances care coordination., Competing Interests: No competing financial interests exist., (© Hussaini Zandam et al., 2024; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.)