Search

Background: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines added thyroid lobectomy (TL) as the appropriate treatment for low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). We aimed to investigate the population-level factors that influence the utilization of TL. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried for all DTC patients fitting low-risk criteria as defined by the ATA. Trends in total thyroidectomy (TT) and TL were identified using a Cochrane– Armitage test. Multivariable logistic regression identified patient and socioeconomic characteristics associated with TL, and difference-in-difference analysis was used to control for secular trends over time. Results: A total of 43,526 patients with low-risk DTC were identified in the SEER database; 39,411 pre-2015 and 4115 post-2015. After 2015, TT continued to outnumber TL (76.2% vs 23.8%), although the rate of TL increased significantly (11.6% to 23.8%, P < 0.001). However, difference-in-difference analysis found that age > 55 (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01–1.19, P < 0.001) and rurality (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05–1.28, P < 0.001) were independently associated with TT. TL was associated with T1 disease (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04–1.19, P = 0.001). Conclusion: Although the 2015 ATA guideline update led to an increase in TL for low-risk DTC, most patients still underwent TT. Age and neighborhood significantly impact the odds of receiving guideline-appropriate TL for low-risk DTC, especially for T2 disease.

Objective:. Our aim was to assess whether complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) impact long-term quality of life (QoL) and functional outcomes. Background:. There is an increasing number of long-term post-PD survivors, but few studies have evaluated long-term QoL outcomes. Methods:. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 questionnaires were administered to patients who survived >5 years post-PD. Clinical relevance (CR) was scored as small (5–10), moderate (10–20), or large (>20). Patients were stratified based on whether they experienced a complication during the index hospitalization. Results:. Of 305 patients >5 years post-PD survivors, with valid contact information, 248 completed the questionnaires, and 231 had complication data available. Twenty-nine percent of patients experienced a complication, of which 17 (7.4%) were grade 1, 27 (11.7%) were grade 2, and 25 (10.8%) were grade 3. Global health status and functional domain scores were similar between both groups. Patients experiencing complications reported lower fatigue (21.4 vs 28.1, P < 0.05, CR small) and diarrhea (15.9 vs 23.1, P < 0.05, CR small) symptom scores when compared to patients without complications. Patients experiencing complications also reported lower pancreatic pain (38.2 vs 43.4, P < 0.05, CR small) and altered bowel habits (30.1 vs 40.7, P < 0.01, CR moderate) symptom scores. There was a lower prevalence of worrying (36.2% vs 60.5%, P < 0.05) and bloating (42.0% vs 56.2%, P < 0.05) among PD survivors with complications. Conclusions:. Post-PD complication rates were not associated with long-term global QoL or functionality, and may be associated with less severe pancreas-specific symptoms.

The incidence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is on the rise primarily due to the increasing use of cross-sectional imaging. Most of these incidentally detected lesions are non-functional PNETs with a small proportion of lesions being hormone-secreting, functional neoplasms. With recent advances in surgical approaches and systemic therapies, the management of PNETs have undergone a paradigm shift towards a more individualized approach. In this manuscript, we review the histologic classification and diagnostic approaches to both functional and non-functional PNETs. Additionally, we detail multidisciplinary approaches and surgical considerations tailored to the tumor’s biology, location, and functionality based on recent evidence. We also discuss the complexities of metastatic disease, exploring liver-directed therapies and the evolving landscape of minimally invasive surgical techniques.

Background:. A potential downside of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is the lack of tactile feedback when tying sutures, which could be especially perilous during pancreatic anastomosis. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (NIRF-ICG) could detect transpancreatic-suture-induced hypoperfusion of the pancreatic stump during RPD, which may be related to postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade B/C, but studies are lacking. Methods:. This prospective study included 37 patients undergoing RPD to assess the relation between pancreatic stump hypoperfusion as objectified with NIRF-ICG using Firefly and the rate of POPF grade B/C. In 27 patients, NIRF-ICG was performed after tying down the transpancreatic U-sutures. In 10 ‘negative control’ patients, NIRF-ICG was performed before tying these sutures. Results:. Pancreatic stump hypoperfusion was detected using NIRF-ICG in 9/27 patients (33%) during RPD. Hypoperfusion was associated with POPF grade B/C (67% [6/9 patients] versus 17% [3/18 patients], P = 0.026). No hypoperfusion was objectified in 10 ‘negative controls’. Conclusions:. Transpancreatic-suture-induced pancreatic stump hypoperfusion can be detected using NIRF-ICG during RPD and was associated with POPF grade B/C. Surgeons could use NIRF-ICG to adapt their suturing approach during robotic pancreatico-jejunostomy. Further larger prospective studies are needed to validate the association between transpancreatic-suture-induced hypoperfusion and POPF.

Background:. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) with involvement of the main pancreatic duct usually requires surgical resection. Consensus is lacking whether to partially or completely resect the pancreatic portion with a dilated main pancreatic duct. Intraoperative pancreatoscopy may be useful to determine the extent of IPMN to tailor surgical resection and was recently studied in a large prospective international study. IPMN is increasingly utilized using a robotic approach. Studies describing the technical approach to intraoperative pancreatoscopy in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy and robotic distal pancreatectomy are lacking. Methods:. During robotic pancreatoduodenectomy, pancreatoscopy is performed once the pancreas neck is transected. The scope is advanced via a laparoscopic port into the left and right-sided pancreatic duct, guided by robotic graspers. During robotic distal pancreatectomy, pancreatoscopy is performed before complete parenchymal transection. The scope is advanced through an anterior ductotomy to examine the duct and guide the pancreatic transection line. Tips and tricks how to perform the procedure efficiently without complications are detailed. Results:. In total, 28 robot-assisted pancreatoscopies were performed during robotic pancreatoduodenectomy and robotic distal pancreatectomy. No intraoperative complications resulting from the intraoperative pancreatoscopy were noted. In the 2 described procedures, the added time required to perform the pancreatoscopy was 6 and 17 minutes, respectively. Both patients recovered without complication and were discharged on postoperative day 5 for the robotic pancreatoduodenectomy and day 6 for the robotic distal pancreatectomy. Conclusions:. Intraoperative pancreatoscopy can be safely performed during both robotic pancreatoduodenectomy and robotic distal pancreatectomy for IPMN with the involvement of the main pancreatic duct. An international prospective study has recently been completed with this technique.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), followed by surgical resection in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) aged ≥75 years. Background: Whether administration of NAT, followed by surgical resection in elderly patients with PDAC is safe and effective is unknown. Methods: The present study is a three-part comparison of older (≥ 75 years) versus younger (< 75 years) patients in different settings throughout the continuum of PDAC care. The first analysis was a comparison of older versus younger consecutive patients with nonmetastatic PDAC who were initiated on FOLFIRINOX. The second was a comparison of older versus younger patients who underwent NAT, followed by surgical resection, and the third and final analysis was a comparison of older patients who underwent either NAT, followed by surgical resection versus upfront surgical resection. Postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), and time to recurrence (TTR) were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounders. Results: In the first analysis, a lower proportion of older patients (n = 40) were able to complete the intended neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (8) cycles compared with younger patients (n = 214; 65.0% vs 81.4%, P = 0.021). However, older patients were just as likely to undergo surgical exploration as younger patients (77.5% vs 78.5%, P = 0.89), as well as surgical resection (57.5% vs 55.6%, P = 0.70). In the second analysis, PSM was conducted to compare older (n = 54) versus younger patients (n = 54) who underwent NAT, followed by surgical resection. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the matched groups. While there was a significant difference in OS between older and younger patients (median OS: 16.43 vs 30.83 months, P = 0.002), importantly, there was no significant difference in TTR (median: 7.65 vs 11.83 months, P = 0.215). In the third analysis, older patients who underwent NAT, followed by surgical resection (n = 48) were compared with similar older patients who underwent upfront surgical resection (n = 48). After PSM, there was a significant difference in OS (median OS: 15.78 months vs 11.51 months, P = 0.037), as well as TTR (median TTR: 8.81 vs 7.10 months, P = 0.046) representing an association with improved outcomes that favored the neoadjuvant approach among older patients alone. Conclusions: This comprehensive three-part study showed that administration of NAT, followed by surgical resection, seems to be safe and effective among patients ≥75 years of age. An aggressive approach should be offered to older adults undergoing multimodal treatment of PDAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the prevalence of clinical significance reporting in contemporary comparative effectiveness research (CER). Background: In CER, a statistically significant difference between study groups may or may not be clinically significant. Misinterpreting statistically significant results could lead to inappropriate recommendations that increase health care costs and treatment toxicity. Methods: CER studies from 2022 issues of the Annals of Surgery, Journal of the American Medical Association, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Surgical Research, and Journal of the American College of Surgeons were systematically reviewed by 2 different investigators. The primary outcome of interest was whether the authors specified what they considered to be a clinically significant difference in the “Methods.” Results: Of 307 reviewed studies, 162 were clinical trials and 145 were observational studies. Authors specified what they considered to be a clinically significant difference in 26 studies (8.5%). Clinical significance was defined using clinically validated standards in 25 studies and subjectively in 1 study. Seven studies (2.3%) recommended a change in clinical decision-making, all with primary outcomes achieving statistical significance. Five (71.4%) of these studies did not have clinical significance defined in their methods. In randomized controlled trials with statistically significant results, sample size was inversely correlated with effect size (r = −0.30, P = 0.038). Conclusions: In contemporary CER, most authors do not specify what they consider to be a clinically significant difference in study outcome. Most studies recommending a change in clinical decision-making did so based on statistical significance alone, and clinical significance was usually defined with clinically validated standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: FOLFIRINOX is increasingly used in the management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, neoadjuvant therapy is associated with toxicity, possible disease progression, and biopsy-related and biliary complications that may preclude operative exploration. Data on the true attrition rate outside of clinical trials or resected surgical series are lacking. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with nonmetastatic PDAC who initiated FOLFIRINOX from 2015 to 2020 were identified from our institution’s pharmacy records. Multivariable regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used for adjusted analyses of categorical and survival outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: Of 254 patients who initiated first-line neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, 199 (78.3%) underwent exploration, and 54 (21.3%) did not complete their chemotherapy cycles due to poor tolerability (46.3%), poor response (31.5%), or disease progression (14.8%), among other causes (7.4%). A total of 109 (42.9%) patients experienced grade 3/4 FOLFIRINOX-related toxicity, of whom 73 (28.7%) and 100 (39.4%) required an emergency department visit or inpatient admission, respectively. Finally, not undergoing surgical exploration was associated with impaired overall survival (hazard ratio 7.0; 95% CI 3.8 to 12.8; p < 0.001). Independent predictors of not undergoing exploration were remote history of chemotherapy receipt (odds ratio [OR] 0.06; p = 0.02), inability to complete FOLFIRINOX cycles (OR 0.2, p = 0.003), increase in ECOG score (OR 0.2, p < 0.001), and being single or divorced (OR 0.3, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Among 254 patients with nonmetastatic PDAC initiated on FOLFIRINOX, of whom 52% were locally advanced, a total of 199 (78.3%) were explored, 142 (71.4%) underwent successful resection, and 129 (90.8%) were resected with negative margins. Despite 109 (42.9)% of patients experiencing significant toxicity, most patients could be managed through treatment- related complications to complete planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy and undergo planned surgical exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors offer observation on achieving equity in cancer clinical trials. Topics discussed include importance of clinical trial participation in equitable cancer care delivery, evaluation of the utility and feasibility of an implicit bias training curriculum intended for all members of a cancer clinical trial research team, and significant reason for the imbalanced representation of minority patients in clinical trials.

PURPOSE Preoperative therapy for pancreatic cancer represents a new treatment option with the potential to improve outcomes for patients, yet with complex risks. By not discussing the potential risks and benefits of new treatment options, clinicians may hinder patients from making informed decisions. METHODS From 2017 to 2019, we conducted a mixed-methods study. First, we elicited clinicians’ (n 5 13 medical, radiation, and surgery clinicians), patients’ (n 5 18), and caregivers’ (n 5 14) perceptions of information needed for decision making regarding preoperative therapy and generated a list of key elements. Next, we audio-recorded patients’ (n 5 20) initial multidisciplinary oncology visits and used qualitative content analyses to describe how clinicians discussed this information and surveyed patients to ask if they heard each key element. RESULTS We identified 13 key elements of information patients need when making decisions regarding preoperative therapy, including treatment complications, alternatives, logistics, and potential outcomes. Patients reported hearing infrequently about complications (eg, hospitalizations [n 5 3 of 20]) and alternatives (n 5 8 of 20) but frequently recalled logistics and potential outcomes (eg, likelihood of surgery [n 5 19 of 20]). Clinicians infrequently discussed complications (eg, hospitalizations [n 5 7 of 20]), but frequently discussed alternatives, logistics, and potential outcomes (eg, likelihood of surgery [n 5 20 of 20]). No overarching differences in clinician discussion content emerged to explain why patients did or did not hear about each key element. CONCLUSION We identified key elements of information patients with pancreatic cancer need when considering preoperative therapy. Patients infrequently heard about treatment complications and alternatives, while frequently hearing about logistics and potential outcomes, underscoring areas for improvement in educating patients about new treatment options in oncology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]