Search

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a potential intervention for OHCA, but its effectiveness compared to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) needs further evaluation. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant studies from January 2010 to March 2023. Pooled meta-analysis was performed to investigate any potential association between ECPR and improved survival and neurological outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis included two randomized controlled trials enrolling 162 participants and 10 observational cohort studies enrolling 4507 participants. The pooled meta-analysis demonstrated that compared to CCRP, ECPR did not improve survival and neurological outcomes at 180 days following OHCA (RR: 3.39, 95% CI: 0.79 to 14.64; RR: 2.35, 95% CI: 0.97 to 5.67). While a beneficial effect of ECPR was obtained regarding 30-day survival and neurological outcomes. Furthermore, ECPR was associated with a higher risk of bleeding complications. Subgroup analysis showed that ECPR was prominently beneficial when exclusively initiated in the emergency department. Additional post-resuscitation treatments did not significantly impact the efficacy of ECPR on 180-day survival with favorable neurological outcomes. There is no high-quality evidence supporting the superiority of ECPR over CCPR in terms of survival and neurological outcomes in OHCA patients. However, due to the potential for bias, heterogeneity among studies, and inconsistency in practice, the non-significant results do not preclude the potential benefits of ECPR. Further high-quality research is warranted to optimize ECPR practice and provide more generalizable evidence. Clinical trial registration PROSPERO , https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , registry number: CRD42023402211. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the potential of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), compared with that of comprehensive conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) as a front-line diagnostic for immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia.Methods: Sixty critically ill immunocompromised patients undergoing both mNGS of BALF and CMTs for suspected pneumonia were retrospectively analysed. The diagnostic performance was compared between mNGS and CMTs, using the composite diagnosis as the reference standard.Results: Forty-nine patients were diagnosed with microbiologically confirmed pneumonia, with 55% having polymicrobial infections. There was no significant difference in the overall diagnostic accuracy between mNGS and CMTs (61.7% vs 76.7%; P = 0.11). mNGS and CMTs had comparable diagnostic accuracy for bacterial and viral infections. Although mNGS identified more viral pneumonia, it had a much lower diagnostic accuracy for fungal infections (76.7% vs 99.2%; P < 0.001), mainly due to the low sensitivity for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (45.5% vs 100%; P < 0.001).Conclusion: The overall diagnostic performance of BALF mNGS as a first-line diagnostic was similar to that of comprehensive CMTs, except in the case of a lack of consideration of potential pathogens or limited CMTs. The combination of mNGS and CMTs may be the best diagnostic strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• There are different mNGS criteria for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). • These criteria showed moderate diagnostic agreement in diagnosing IPA. • All mNGS-derived criteria showed low sensitivity but high specificity. • Despite using the optimal threshold, the sensitivity of mNGS is less than 50 %. To compare different criteria of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). We compared the diagnostic agreement and performances of six BALF mNGS-derived criteria (SDSMRN>1, SDSMRN≥3, SMRN≥10, SMRN≥50, RPM ratio≥10, and relative abundance of genus>30 %) in pneumonia patients. A total of 115 patients were analyzed, with 28 identified with IPA. Diagnostic agreement among the six mNGS-derived criteria was moderate, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.577(P < 0.001). mNGS-derived criteria had low sensitivity ranging from 21.4 % to 57.1 % and high specificity from 88 % to 92 %. The optimal threshold of SDSMRN, SMRN, RPM ratio, and relative abundance of genus for diagnosing IPA were 5, 0.25, 8, and 20 %, respectively. Although using the optimal threshold, the sensitivity of mNGS is lower than 50 %. All mNGS-derived criteria had low sensitivity for diagnosing IPA. A combination of mNGS and conventional mycological tests may be the best diagnostic strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]