Search

This paper compares three modern and two classical multiobjective optimizers (MOOs) as applied to real-world problems in electromagnetics. The behavior of sophisticated optimizers on simple test functions has been studied exhaustively. In contrast, the algorithms here are tested on practical applications, where the function evaluations are computationally expensive, making the convergence rate a crucial factor. The examples considered include the optimization of a narrowband slot antenna, a mushroom-type electromagnetic bandgap structure, and an ultrawideband Vivaldi antenna. Another popular topic in the literature is in comparing classical MOOs on electromagnetics problems. The modern optimizers chosen in this paper are state of the art and each has a distinct design philosophy. This paper introduces two unique MOOs to the electromagnetics community: BORG, an auto-adaptive genetic algorithm and the Multi-Objective Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolutionary Strategy (MO-CMA-ES), an extension of the popular single-objective CMA-ES. These algorithms are compared to the Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOEA/D), a Chebysheff scalarization algorithm, and two classical MOOs. This paper will study the behavior of these algorithms on problems in electromagnetics with a limited number of function evaluations using five distinct metrics and will provide useful guidelines and recommended optimizer settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have proven their effectiveness and efficiency in solving problems with two or three objectives. However, recent studies show that MOEAs face many difficulties when tackling problems involving a larger number of objectives as their behavior becomes similar to a random walk in the search space since most individuals are nondominated with respect to each other. Motivated by the interesting results of decomposition-based approaches and preference-based ones, we propose in this paper a new decomposition-based dominance relation to deal with many-objective optimization problems and a new diversity factor based on the penalty-based boundary intersection method. Our reference point-based dominance (RP-dominance), has the ability to create a strict partial order on the set of nondominated solutions using a set of well-distributed reference points. The RP-dominance is subsequently used to substitute the Pareto dominance in nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II). The augmented MOEA, labeled as RP-dominance-based NSGA-II, has been statistically demonstrated to provide competitive and oftentimes better results when compared against four recently proposed decomposition-based MOEAs on commonly-used benchmark problems involving up to 20 objectives. In addition, the efficacy of the algorithm on a realistic water management problem is showcased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There have been few researches on solving multimodal multiobjective optimization problems, whereas they are commonly seen in real-world applications but difficult for the existing evolutionary optimizers. In this paper, we propose a novel multimodal multiobjective evolutionary algorithm using two-archive and recombination strategies. In the proposed algorithm, the properties of decision variables and the relationships among them are analyzed at first to guide the evolutionary search. Then, a general framework using two archives, i.e., the convergence and the diversity archives, is adopted to cooperatively solve these problems. Moreover, the diversity archive simultaneously employs a clustering strategy to guarantee diversity in the objective space and a niche-based clearing strategy to promote the same in the decision space. At the end of evolution process, solutions in the convergence and the diversity archives are recombined to obtain a large number of multiple Pareto optimal solutions. In addition, a set of benchmark test functions and a performance metric are designed for multimodal multiobjective optimization. The proposed algorithm is empirically compared with two state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms on these test functions. The comparative results demonstrate that the overall performance of the proposed algorithm is significantly superior to the competing algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the increase in the number of optimization objectives, balancing the convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization becomes more intractable. So far, a variety of evolutionary algorithms have been proposed to solve many-objective optimization problems (MaOPs) with more than three objectives. Most of the existing algorithms, however, find difficulties in simultaneously counterpoising convergence and diversity during the whole evolutionary process. To address the issue, this paper proposes to solve MaOPs via multistage evolutionary search. To be specific, a two-stage evolutionary algorithm is developed, where the convergence and diversity are highlighted during different search stages to avoid the interferences between them. The first stage pushes multiple subpopulations with different weight vectors to converge to different areas of the Pareto front. After that, the nondominated solutions coming from each subpopulation are selected for generating a new population for the second stage. Moreover, a new environmental selection strategy is designed for the second stage to balance the convergence and diversity close to the Pareto front. This selection strategy evenly divides each objective dimension into a number of intervals, and then one solution having the best convergence in each interval will be retained. To assess the performance of the proposed algorithm, 48 benchmark functions with 7, 10, and 15 objectives are used to make comparisons with five representative many-objective optimization algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In evolutionary multiobjective optimization, maintaining a good balance between convergence and diversity is particularly crucial to the performance of the evolutionary algorithms (EAs). In addition, it becomes increasingly important to incorporate user preferences because it will be less likely to achieve a representative subset of the Pareto-optimal solutions using a limited population size as the number of objectives increases. This paper proposes a reference vector-guided EA for many-objective optimization. The reference vectors can be used not only to decompose the original multiobjective optimization problem into a number of single-objective subproblems, but also to elucidate user preferences to target a preferred subset of the whole Pareto front (PF). In the proposed algorithm, a scalarization approach, termed angle-penalized distance, is adopted to balance convergence and diversity of the solutions in the high-dimensional objective space. An adaptation strategy is proposed to dynamically adjust the distribution of the reference vectors according to the scales of the objective functions. Our experimental results on a variety of benchmark test problems show that the proposed algorithm is highly competitive in comparison with five state-of-the-art EAs for many-objective optimization. In addition, we show that reference vectors are effective and cost-efficient for preference articulation, which is particularly desirable for many-objective optimization. Furthermore, a reference vector regeneration strategy is proposed for handling irregular PFs. Finally, the proposed algorithm is extended for solving constrained many-objective optimization problems. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have shown to be promising in solving many-objective optimization problems (MaOPs), where the performance of these algorithms heavily depends on whether solutions that can accelerate convergence toward the Pareto front and maintaining a high degree of diversity will be selected from a set of nondominated solutions. In this paper, we propose a knee point-driven EA to solve MaOPs. Our basic idea is that knee points are naturally most preferred among nondominated solutions if no explicit user preferences are given. A bias toward the knee points in the nondominated solutions in the current population is shown to be an approximation of a bias toward a large hypervolume, thereby enhancing the convergence performance in many-objective optimization. In addition, as at most one solution will be identified as a knee point inside the neighborhood of each solution in the nondominated front, no additional diversity maintenance mechanisms need to be introduced in the proposed algorithm, considerably reducing the computational complexity compared to many existing multiobjective EAs for many-objective optimization. Experimental results on 16 test problems demonstrate the competitiveness of the proposed algorithm in terms of both solution quality and computational efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper develops a decomposition-based coevolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization, which evolves a number of subpopulations in parallel for approaching the set of Pareto optimal solutions. The many-objective problem is decomposed into a number of subproblems using a set of well-distributed weight vectors. Accordingly, each subpopulation of the algorithm is associated with a weight vector and is responsible for solving the corresponding subproblem. The exploration ability of the algorithm is improved by using a mating pool that collects elite individuals from the cooperative subpopulations for breeding the offspring. In the subsequent environmental selection, the top-ranked individuals in each subpopulation, which are appraised by aggregation functions, survive for the next iteration. Two new aggregation functions with distinct characteristics are designed in this paper to enhance the population diversity and accelerate the convergence speed. The proposed algorithm is compared with several state-of-the-art many-objective evolutionary algorithms on a large number of benchmark instances, as well as on a real-world design problem. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm is very competitive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most existing multiobjective evolutionary algorithms experience difficulties in solving many-objective optimization problems due to their incapability to balance convergence and diversity in the high-dimensional objective space. In this paper, we propose a novel many-objective evolutionary algorithm using a one-by-one selection strategy. The main idea is that in the environmental selection, offspring individuals are selected one by one based on a computationally efficient convergence indicator to increase the selection pressure toward the Pareto optimal front. In the one-by-one selection, once an individual is selected, its neighbors are de-emphasized using a niche technique to guarantee the diversity of the population, in which the similarity between individuals is evaluated by means of a distribution indicator. In addition, different methods for calculating the convergence indicator are examined and an angle-based similarity measure is adopted for effective evaluations of the distribution of solutions in the high-dimensional objective space. Moreover, corner solutions are utilized to enhance the spread of the solutions and to deal with scaled optimization problems. The proposed algorithm is empirically compared with eight state-of-the-art many-objective evolutionary algorithms on 80 instances of 16 benchmark problems. The comparative results demonstrate that the overall performance of the proposed algorithm is superior to the compared algorithms on the optimization problems studied in this paper. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

A variety of evolutionary algorithms have been proposed for many-objective optimization in recent years. However, the difficulties in balancing the convergence and diversity of the population and selecting promising parents for offspring reproduction remain. In this paper, we propose a subregion division-based evolutionary algorithm with an effective mating selection strategy, termed SdEA, for many-objective optimization. In SdEA, a subregion division approach is proposed to divide the objective space into different subregions for balancing the diversity and convergence of the population. Besides, an effective mating selection strategy is proposed to enhance the diversity of the mating pool solutions, aimed at enhancing the selection probability of solutions in the sparse subregions. The proposed SdEA is compared with five state-of-the-art many-objective evolutionary algorithms on 23 test problems from DTLZ, WFG, and MaF test suites. Experimental results on these problems demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is competitive in solving many-objective problems. Furthermore, the proposed mating selection strategy is embedded in several evolutionary algorithms and experimental results demonstrate its effectiveness on improving the performance of the embedded algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Existing multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) perform well on multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) with regular Pareto fronts in which the Pareto optimal solutions distribute continuously over the objective space. When the Pareto front is discontinuous or degenerated, most existing algorithms cannot achieve good results. To remedy this issue, a clustering-based adaptive MOEA (CA-MOEA) is proposed in this paper for solving MOPs with irregular Pareto fronts. The main idea is to adaptively generate a set of cluster centers for guiding selection at each generation to maintain diversity and accelerate convergence. We investigate the performance of CA-MOEA on 18 widely used benchmark problems. Our results demonstrate the competitiveness of CA-MOEA for multiobjective optimization, especially for problems with irregular Pareto fronts. In addition, CA-MOEA is shown to perform well on the optimization of the stretching parameters in the carbon fiber formation process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Offspring generation plays an important role in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. However, generating promising candidate solutions effectively in high-dimensional spaces is particularly challenging. To address this issue, we propose an adaptive offspring generation method for large-scale multiobjective optimization. First, a preselection strategy is proposed to select a balanced parent population, and then these parent solutions are used to construct direction vectors in the decision spaces for reproducing promising offspring solutions. Specifically, two kinds of direction vectors are adaptively used to generate offspring solutions. The first kind takes advantage of the dominated solutions to generate offspring solutions toward the Pareto optimal set (PS) for convergence enhancement, while the other kind uses those nondominated solutions to spread the solutions over the PS for diversity maintenance. The proposed offspring generation method can be embedded in many existing multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (EAs) for large-scale multiobjective optimization. Experiments are conducted to reveal the mechanism of our proposed adaptive reproduction strategy and validate its effectiveness. Experimental results on some large-scale multiobjective optimization problems have demonstrated the competitive performance of our proposed algorithm in comparison with five state-of-the-art large-scale EAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]