ISSN 1918-5227 Pages 7779 Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei This Article is brought to you by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Exceptionality Education International by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact jspecht@uwo.ca. Recommended Citation Porath, M., & Richardson, P. (2009) Outside the Lines: Innovations in Researching Giftedness. Exceptionality Education International, 19, 77-79. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/eei/vol19/iss3/2 Exceptionality Education International 2009, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 77–79 ISSN 1918-5227 77 Outside the Lines: Innovations in Researching Giftedness Guest Editors Marion Porath and Pamela Richardson The University of British Columbia This special issue focuses on the reconceptualization of giftedness. Five papers explore how we define, identify, research, and support gifts and talents. As guest editors, this has been a very exciting project. It began as a symposium at the Canadian Society for the Study of Education in 2008. Our passion for challenging the status quo, questioning what is „inside the lines‟ of current definitions of and research into giftedness, and doing so in forms that are themselves „outside the lines‟ prompted further exploration and writing. The papers highlight the possibilities of plurality in how we approach research and represent knowledge (Eisner, 1997; Shore & Friedman, 2000) both in their form and their content. In hand with this, we resist, as Cross (2003) cautioned, the “correct” conception of giftedness and instead support “understanding of the various ways people think about inquiry or research and how this relates” (p. 77) to our conceptualizations and understandings of giftedness. Present in these papers are poetic analysis; children‟s perceptions of learning identities expressed in drawings, poems, and music; narrative; metaphors; and pedagogical analysis via documentation of learning, all of which provoke thinking about research and education that promote the realization of all children‟s potential. The last two decades of the 20 th century were characterized by efforts designed to encourage the reconsideration and expansion of our definitions of giftedness to allow for the multiple ways in which one can be competent (e.g., Gardner, 1983). As we enter the 21 st century, these efforts have broadened to include „gift creation‟ rather than identification (Hymer, 2009; Hymer, Whitehead, & Huxtable, 2009); the role of the learner in defining directions for education (Hymer et al., 2009); questions about the construct of „giftedness‟ (Balchin, Hymer, & Matthews, 2009; Borland, 2003; Horowitz, Subotnik, & Matthews, 2009); and the role of the learning environment in provoking and realizing potential (Barab & Plucker, 2002; Borland, 2003; Hymer et al., 2009). Now, more attention is directed to cultural influences on valued competencies (Sternberg & Grigorenko, 2004), factors important to extraordinary competence that move “beyond knowledge” (Shavinina & Ferrari, 2004), and the role of rich, complex environments in the determination and support of competent behaviours (Barab & Plucker, 2002). Intelligence is situated in context, demanding multiple views of giftedness consonant with our pluralistic society and global community, recognition and support of “nontraditional” talents, and multiple representations of what it means to realize and understand competence. Porath and Lupart‟s paper presents gifted children‟s perceptions of themselves as readers, writers, mathematicians, and other identities of their choice (e.g., artist, athlete). These perceptions of learning identities are represented in a variety of forms, highlighting the multiple ways in