Search

Some provisions of our Civil Code are clear regarding their content and others are somewhat vague and questionable. A regulation that generates controversy in terms of its concept and use is the one referring to the legal acts or business that has led the Supreme Judges to issue contradictory and erroneous sentences based on the outdated notion or out of context. The aim of this paper is to analyze the methodology used by the Supreme Court in the IX Civil Cassation Plenary for the argumentation of the scope that it has given to the notion of manifest nullity, as a cause of nullity that can be easily noticed in the same contract or through other evidence. It is extremely important to establish the methodological errors incurred by the Supreme Court when improperly using what is treated in the doctrine, laws and national and international jurisprudence, to later contrast its limitations and propose its correction, in a way that is useful to our legal system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper builds on the amendment of Article 10 of the Normative of the Peruvian Constitutional Court to analyze a problem: the distinctions between the types of decisions handed down by the Constitutional Court (binding precedent, constitutional jurisprudence, interpretative rulings). It is held that this distinction undermines the status and role of Supreme Interpreter of the Constitution which currently holds the Constitutional Court. And it is argued that the type of decisions is inconsistent with that role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper an account of the issues discussed at the full calendar quarter related to Eviction casatorio Precarious, their problematic situations and is pending problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present paper will analyze the procedural autonomy that the Constitutional Court has in order to solve the causes that are put under it knowledge. As it is observed, there are two theses; one of them totally denies the procedural autonomy to the Constitutional Court, but the other one agrees about the procedural autonomy of the Constitutional Court. From my point of view I consider that the Constitutional Court has procedural autonomy, which will be sustained throughout the present investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The termination of the process is a mechanism for procedural simplification has been fully regulated by the Criminal Procedure Code of 2004, but that is not new to our legal system and applied it to certain crimes-money launder in gand customs-. His addition to our criminal justice system responds to achieve greater speeding solving criminal cases because of the crisis being experienced by our justice system that results in an excessive increase in the caseload and criminal political guide lines from reforms Latin American process are from the 90'SA trend in the region. The incorporation of early termination should not only beseen from the dogmatic frame work but also from the practical, which is why we must pay attention to the numbers in the districts whereit has been applied and there by contribute to solutions that are not only in the paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]