Search

The article explores the challenges and risk for the potential development of a new public health system in England in 2011. It says that the decision to implement a radical change in the system is due to several indicators and facts such as the dependency of 1.6 million people on alcohol. It also mentions that the change is in line with the aim of government to address the problems regarding long-term poor mental health in the country. According to the author, the improved health system is expected to enhanced the lifestyle of families in the poorest areas.

The 1944 Wartime Coalition White Paper, "A National Health Service" is unlikely to be celebrated among the spate of golden anniversaries of welfare reforms in the 1990s. However, a study of this document may be of interest for two main reasons. First, it has some parallels with the reformed National Health Service of the 1990s and, second, there have been recent calls for a local government-based health service, as was envisaged in 1944. The White Paper is examined in the context of evolving plans for the NHS, and is compared with the actual shape of the NHS as introduced by the Labour Minister of Health, Aneurin Bevan, in 1948. Four themes are drawn out. First, the White Paper should not be seen as the embodiment of a political consensus. Second, a Conservative Health Service would have differed from the NHS in fundamental aspects. Third, the conceptual advantages of a local government-based health service were outweighed by practical politics. Fourth, although the Labour Party made a difference to the shape of the NHS, that shape did not simply follow from party policy. This implies that medical pressure was successful, to some extent, in defining the limits of the new service. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper summarises and discusses some of the aspects of the Public Health White Paper, Healthy Lives, Healthy People, published for consultation at the end of 2010, and the framework of the Public Health Responsibility Deal, published in March 2011 by the UK government. Healthy Lives, Healthy People emphasises that a one-size-fits-all approach to public health improvement has been shown not to work as challenges vary from one neighbourhood to the next, and a new approach that empowers individuals to make healthy choices and gives communities the tools to address their own needs is required. It highlights the government's intention to shift power and decision making on public health matters to local authorities, with ring fenced budgets. A feature of the document that has proved controversial is the proposal to work collaboratively with business and the voluntary sector to deliver the government's ambition, through the Public Health Responsibility Deal, launched on 15 March, which comprises a series of 5 networks on food, alcohol, physical activity, health at work, and behaviour change, and the associated pledges. The initial pledges for the food network focus on salt and trans fatty acid reduction, and out-of-home calorie labelling of foods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reports on the joint campaign launched by British trade unions including Unison, Unite and the GMB, in September 2010 to block the coalition government's health white paper "Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS." The campaign aims to encourage National Health Service (NHS) staff and patients against the white paper. Further, the unions argue that all hospitals are being turned into independent businesses, and that the scheme will revert back wealth-based healthcare. The Royal College of General Practitioners also raised concerns.

The article explores the advantages and disadvantages of the white paper on primary care released by the British government in 2006. The white paper entitled, Our Health Our Care Our Say: A New Direction for Community Services, could create opportunities for nurses to ape community health and social care services. However, nursing leaders fear that primary care nurses may be overlooked as additional provider enter the National Health Services with new facilities.

The article presents developments in the healthcare sector in Great Britain in the past 20 years as of December 2016. Also cited are the thee white papers released under Prime Minister John Major in 1996, the enactment of the National Health Service (NHS) Primary Care Act in 1997, and the approval of the Health and Social Care Act of 2001.

Focuses on Great Britain's White Paper on Public Health document entitled "Choosing Health White Paper," led by Health Secretary for England John Reid. Focus of the document; Opinion of the mental health organizations on the subject of the document; Statement of Angela Greatley, chief executive at the Sainsbury Center for Mental health on the prevalence of the document.

The article suggests that the efforts of the British government to reform the National Health Service (NHS) are under threat from other factors that aim to hasten competition in the health service, according to the British Medical Association (BMA) in October 2010. As mentioned in the government's White Paper "Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS," reform efforts will allow more control to patients and frontline clinicians and promote stronger attention on public health. The other arguments of BMA are further explained by chairman Hamish Meldrum.

Reports on the statement issued by practice nurses to express support to the government's white paper on public health in Great Britain. List of policies that would reinforce health promotion; Role of nurses in providing sexual health programs in primary care; Advantage of the creation of a national taskforce to increase the effectiveness of the British National Health Service Stop Smoking Services.

Provides information on the strategy of the National Health Service of Great Britain to manage its paperworks. Role of nurse managers in paperwork management; Practices that contributed to paper load in the agency.

The article discusses the cost and effectiveness of in vitro fertilization (IVF) technique in Great Britain. The development of IVF presents the providers of health care with several problems. Inequality of distribution will become a problem if the new technique would be taken up by the private sector. In the present financial climate of the country it appears that National Health Service funding will be available to meet the demand for IVF.

The article discusses the campaign of Unite unions against the White Paper National Health Services (NHS) reforms. It mentions that the proposed reforms on the NHS White Paper are geared towards privatization, increased competition, and exclusion of health services to communities. Details on the concerns of Unite members on the terms and conditions of the White Paper reforms are discussed. According to Unite, the effect of reforms could result into inequalities among patients needing service.

Generating negative news coverage of state welfare provision has been identified as a strategy designed to create public support for radical policies aimed to reduce such provision. To date, research of this kind has focused on scandals and crises. However, little is known about the complex relationship between media representations of specific events, and those of media representations in the lead up to these events, what we refer to as periphery representations. Employing a content and frame analysis, this paper analyses the frequency and intensity of peripheral representations of the National Health Service (NHS) in the British print media for 1 week a month before and for 1 week during three key events in recent NHS history: the official consultation period for the Health and Social Care Act; the publication of Five-Year Forward View, and the first Junior Doctor Strike. This article finds that negative NHS representations in articles that are peripheral to particular topical issues of controversy evidence fluctuations, amplifications and intensities across time periods, depending on the particular context. The paper concludes by arguing that repetition of negative themes in news helps to build a sensibility of 'inadequacy' of vital services. We hope that this focus on the ways in which amplifications and de-amplifications in negative intensity of peripheral NHS representations across time and content, helps to contribute to debate about the complex interplay between public health services, media representation and policy consent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the White Paper on community care titled "Caring for People" in relation to the 1990 National Health Service and Community Care Bill pending in the House of Lords. Criticisms levelled against the White Paper, particularly the issue of grant aid, are misplaced. The White Paper's outstanding value is that it outlines a clear structure and a set of general principles which should grant local authorities greater autonomy, authority and responsibility in healthcare administration.

The author examines the implications of the white paper "Transparency in Outcomes--A Framework for the NHS" for hospital consultants. He discusses four broad themes of the white paper released by the coalition government of Great Britain which are important in addressing issues concerning hospital consultants and their patients. He describes changes in the country's health system under the proposals from the white paper.

The introduction of a market mechanism into the National Health service in the UK was underpinned by the belief that decentralised purchasing would both improve the quality of health care provision and restrain spiralling costs, through purchasers exercising their ability to choose between alternative providers. Focusing on budget holding General Practitioners, that is those practices responsible for purchasing hospital services for their practice populations, this paper explores the evolving purchasing behaviour of these professional intermediaries. Drawing on empirical evidence gathered as part of a broader study of the purchasing behaviour of GP Fundholders in Scotland, specifically it examines the key information sources and decisional criteria utilised by these professional intermediaries in selecting health care providers for their practice population. Utilising relational models of market behaviour, it addresses both the contextually specific issue of whether the market mechanism within the NHS is achieving the twin objectives of improving health care provision and restraining cost pressures, and the broader conceptual issue of the purchasing behaviour of professional intermediaries within a service sector environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author weighs the possible impact of the proposal by the new British coalition government to restructure the National Health Service (NHS) in 2010. Particular focus was given by the author on the new NHS Outcomes Framework. He notes that such framework will center on three themes of quality, namely, the effectiveness of treatment and its effect on both clinical and patient-reported outcomes, the safety of the provided treatment and patients' broader experience of health care. He points out some loopholes in the proposals.

The author argues that the National Health Service (NHS) in Great Britain needs general practitioners (GP) who are focused on patient-centered values. He emphasizes the role of GP in providing high quality care. He claims that the GP leaders needed by the NHS are those who are motivated to improve patient care and those who are committed to care for individual patients. The author also suggests ways in which GP can perform their commissioning responsibility under the British government's practice-based commissioning scheme.

This paper examines the development of electronic health records within the National Health Service (NHS) by an analysis of a series of pilot projects funded by the Electronic Record Development and Implementation Project (ERDIP), one aspect of the work of the NHS Information Authority (NHSIA) (As of 1 April 2005, the NHSIA ceased to operate. Much of its work is continued by Connecting for Health and the Health and Social Care Information Centre.) The focus of the analysis is on the extent to which identifying and correcting error within health records was explored through these projects. The inherent potential for error and resultant impact on patient safety is highlighted, by considering the context of the record, the content of the record and the process of change from paper-based or piecemeal electronic health records to integrated electronic health records. While the process of change highlights issues of data security and access, it is the variability in starting points for different organizations that possibly poses most risk to patient safety. Issues relating to the content of the record can to some extent be minimized by the effective use of technology, but the tension between coding and qualitative data requires further consideration in terms of its impact on patient safety. This paper concludes that the development of electronic health records has to be viewed within the context of governance and patient safety, and the implications articulated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical governance has been acknowledged as the driving force behind National Health Service (NHS) reform since the government white paper outlined a new style of NHS in the UK in 1997. The framework of clinical governance ensures that NHS organizations are accountable for continually improving the quality of their services and safeguarding high standards of care by creating an environment in which excellence in clinical care will develop. A major component of a clinical governance framework requires utilizing audit procedures, which assess the effectiveness of current systems and ultimately direct continual quality improvement. This paper describes the audit component of a local clinical governance framework designed for a unit based within an NHS trust, which has utilized a multidisciplinary approach to assess the effectiveness of a newly commissioned service and its impact on the residents and staff. The unit is a 12-bedded, low-secure-intensive rehabilitation unit for clients with severe and enduring mental illness. Using recognized and standardized psychometric outcome measures, information was collected on clinical symptoms, social functioning, social behaviour, quality of life, relationship quality with named nurses and medication side-effects. Additionally, confidential staff measures were included to assess levels of burnout, identify expressed emotion and assess staff perception of models of illness. The paper includes a comprehensive account of how managerial commitment, teaching processes and application of technology ensured prompt data collection and maintained the momentum through the audit timescale. Data analysis and presentation of data in both clinical reviews and in senior management meetings within the unit are discussed. Findings highlight the full integration of the audit system into the processes of the unit. Clinically, the paper highlights the enhancement of the knowledge base of the client group and the influence on clinical decision-making processes and care delivery as a result of the audit. Brief clinical examples are given. In conclusion, the impact of the audit on unit strategy and organizational efficiency are discussed to highlight the importance of closing the audit loop and completing the cycle of clinical governance. The audit system has positive implications for replication in other services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that includes symptoms such as inattentiveness, hyperactivity and impulsiveness. It is considered as an important public health issue, and prevalence of diagnosis has increased as awareness of the disease grew over the past years. Supply of specialist medical experts has not kept pace with the increasing demand for assessment, both due to financial pressures on health systems and the difficulty to train new experts, resulting in growing waiting lists. Patients are not being treated quickly enough causing problems in other areas of health systems (e.g. increased GP visits, increased risk of self-harm and accidents) and more broadly (e.g. time off work, relationship problems). Advances in machine learning make it possible to attempt to diagnose ADHD based on the analysis of relevant data, and this could inform clinical practice. This paper reports on findings related to the mental health services of a specialist Trust within the UK's National Health Service (NHS). The analysis studied data of adult patients who underwent diagnosis over the past few years, and developed a diagnostic model for ADHD in adults. The results demonstrate that it is indeed possible to correctly diagnose ADHD patients with promising statistical accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to highlight the strategic role of housing for older people and how it can address some of the key challenges facing politicians. The paper aims to encourage decision-makers and service providers to collaborate in new ways locally. Design/methodology/approach - The paper seeks to highlight the strategic role of housing for older people and how it can address some of the key challenges facing politicians. It aims to encourage decision makers and service providers to collaborate in new ways locally. Findings - The paper argues that: Housing for older people is rising up the political agenda, but as a niche issue rather than one of strategic and economic importance. A multi-agency and outcomes-based approach to the wellbeing of older people, based on place-shaping principles, needs to be mainstreamed locally. Older people have not escaped the impact of austerity measures and this has heightened the need for a range of high quality housing options, in supportive communities, in later life. Good housing options for older people could address the key issues vexing politicians, but there are obstacles to older people accessing such options. Originality/value - The paper suggests a radical, systemic approach is required to ensure better outcomes for older people and, in turn, to generate savings for the public purse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dementia is a common diagnosis in older people. It is important to identify and record dementia on emergency call-outs, as it impacts on subsequent care decisions. Ambulance services are changing from paper to electronic patient records, but there are limited data on how frequently and in which sections of the electronic patient record dementia is being recorded. Aims: To audit the proportion of ambulance electronic patient records where dementia is recorded for patients aged (i) 65 and above and (ii) 75 and above, and to describe the sections in the electronic patient record in which dementia is recorded, as there is currently no standardised button or field available. Results: A total of 314,786 electronic patient records were included in the audit, over a one-year period. The proportion of attended calls with 'dementia' recorded in the electronic patient record in patients aged 65+ was 13.5%, increasing to 16.5% in patients aged 75+, which is similar to that recorded in previous literature. For patients aged 75+ conveyed to hospital, 15.2% had 'dementia' recorded in the electronic patient record, which may indicate under-recording. Recording of dementia between Clinical Commissioning Groups varied between 11.0% and 15.3%. Dementia was recorded in 16 different free-text fields, and 38.4% of records had dementia recorded in more than one field. Conclusion: This audit demonstrates high variability in both the frequency of recording dementia and also the location in the electronic patient record. To ensure consistent recording and ease of retrieval to inform patient care and handover, we propose that the electronic patient record should be modified to reflect paramedics' needs, and those of the healthcare staff who receive and act on the report. Enhanced training for paramedics in the importance and method of recording dementia is required. Future data will enable accurate monitoring of trends in conveyance, and inform justifications for alternative services and novel referral pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The reforms to the NHS following the White Paper, Working for Patients, were presented by the Conservative government as promoting devolution, defined as "decisions … taken at the lowest possible level" by Douglas Hurd (1991) -- reflecting a senior Minister's interpretation of the overall policy agenda, including health. It was further claimed that such policies ("reforms in hospitals, in schools and in housing") were a way to "empower citizens". This approach was naturally an attempt to present the Conservatives' policy as pro-community and 'practical' rather than 'ideological' or free-market obsessed. It is worth renewing the debate about whether power and/or responsibility were devolved in the NHS -- or, indeed, to the NHS from the Department of Health. Rudolf Klein, in the first edition of his The Politics of the National Health Service (1983), had no sooner pointed to the 'devolution' inherent in the 1982 reorganization of the NHS (based on the document Patients First (HMSO, 1981) when the Griffiths Inquiry recommendations were accepted. As a result, he was soon to observe that the pendulum -- at that time -- had quickly swung back to centralism, an observation reiterated after a few years when The Politics of the National Health Service came out in its second edition (Klein, 1989). In other words, there may be a cycle from centralism to devolution and back, or at least an interpretation of events as such in health policy, which makes a current reassessment timely. Which direction did the NHS Act of 1990 and related initiatives embody? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the debate on the White Paper, "The New NHS--Modern--Dependable" which bears the hallmarks of pragmatism which have characterized many of the Labour Government's initiatives in Great Britain. The National Health Service (NHS) presented Prime Minister Tony Blair's government with a considerable challenge. Labour in opposition had opposed the Conservative Government's health reforms and continued to campaign against bureaucracy and yet some aspects of the reforms seemed to work. Labour had opposed GP fundholding because it seemed to increase inequity, and yet fundholding had been adopted by many doctors and more than half of the population were served by fundholding practices. Labour had promised improvements in the NHS and yet had accepted tough public spending limits. The White Paper seems to have steered the new Government through the first and second of the challenges, the third will only be addressed if the NHS is a clear winner in the Comprehensive Spending Review. The dilemma of the Conservative health reforms is tackled head on by declaring that what counts is what works. The White Paper retains many of the key features of the previous Government's reforms.

Background: It is widely acknowledged that adverse lifestyle behaviours in the population now will place an unsustainable burden on health service resources in the future. It has been estimated that the combined cost to the NHS in Wales of overweight and obesity, alcohol and tobacco is in excess of £540 million. In the current climate of financial austerity, there can be a tendency for the case for prevention efforts to be judged on the basis of their scope for cost savings. This paper was prompted by discussion in Wales about the evidence for the cost savings from prevention and early intervention and a resulting concern that these programmes were thus being evaluated in policy terms using an incorrect metric. Following a review of the literature, this paper contributes to the discussion of the potential role that economics can play in informing decisions in this area. Discussion: This paper argues that whilst studies of the economic burden of diseases provide information about the magnitude of the problem faced, they should not be used as a means of priority setting. Similarly, studies discussing the likelihood of savings as a result of prevention programmes may be distorting the arguments for public health. Prevention spend needs to be considered purposefully, resulting in a strategic commitment to spending. The role of economics in this process is to provide evidence demonstrating that information and support can be provided cost effectively to individuals to change their lifestyles thus avoiding lifestyle related morbidity and mortality. There is growing evidence that prevention programmes represent value for money using the currently accepted techniques and decision making metrics such as those advocated by NICE. Summary: The issue here is not one of arguing that the economic evaluation of prevention and early intervention should be treated differently, although in some instances that may be appropriate, rather it is about making the case for these interventions to be treated and evaluated to the same standard. The difficulty arises when a higher standard of cost saving may be expected from prevention and public health programmes. The paper concludes that it is of vital importance that during times of budget constraints, as currently faced, the public health budgets are not eroded to fund secondary care budget shortfalls, which are more easily identifiable. To do so would diminish any possibility of reducing the future burden faced by the NHS of lifestyle-related illnesses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A wide ranging set of reforms is being introduced into the English National Health Service (NHS). They are designed to increase the market-like behaviour of providers of care with a view to improving efficiency, quality and responsiveness of services. This paper is concerned with one aspect of those reforms: namely the policy to increase the diversity of types of providers of care to NHS patients. In this context, increasing diversity means that providers will not all be standard publicly owned NHS organizations. They can be publicly owned but autonomous, or independent (both in for-profit and not for profit). The paper discusses the wide range of organizational forms available, analyzing their governance structures It then discusses the small amount of evidence currently available about the performance of diverse providers of health care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Commentators have argued that we have entered a new era of migration described by Vertovec as a ‘transformative diversification of diversity’. Multiple variables of difference in the ethnicity, immigration status, rights and entitlements, age and gender profiles and patterns of distribution, of new migrants mean that the UK, and many other EU countries, are now home to the most diverse population ever experienced. The onset of super-diversity challenges traditional multicultural models of welfare provision originally based upon an understanding of migrants as large and geographically contained clusters of predominantly postcolonial migrants. These changes are occurring at a time when migration has become highly politicized, multiculturalism is being questioned, a shift is under way towards assimilation and welfare provision has become re-racialized. This paper argues that models of welfare provision need to be rethought to take into account the new reality of super-diversity in a way that is affordable, politically acceptable and meets the needs of all. Using data from research undertaken from studies of health service provision in the West Midlands the paper explores the challenges of meeting the needs of new migrants under existing provision, the costs of failing to adapt to super-diversity and the reasons why provision has failed to adapt. The paper concludes by arguing the need for different approaches to provision, and suggesting some new ways forward. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Despite a sizeable literature on the evolution of health insurance in Britain and Canada, there is virtually no research on the transnational migration of physicians between these countries in the immediate postwar period. This article hopes to address this neglected subject. Three inter-related topics will be examined. First, the paper will summarize the debate over physician emigration from the National Health Service (NHS) in postwar Britain. It will demonstrate how British social scientists and politicians began to come to grips with a major demographic exodus of British-trained doctors in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Second, it will analyze the changing health human resource situation in 1960s Canada, which focused, for practical and cultural reasons, on General Medical Council of Britain licensed practitioners. Third, through oral interviews of British-trained physicians who settled in Canada during the 1960s, it will examine the professional and personal reasons why physicians left Britain for Canada. It reveals that, among a myriad of personal issues that motivated a physician to leave the NHS, the inflexibility and hierarchical nature of British medicine loomed very large. The paper will conclude by reflecting on the contemporary significance of this fascinating historical phenomenon. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Although the National Health Service was created to achieve equity of access to health care in 1948, over twenty years later an ‘inverse care law’ was seen to operate. The 1976 Report of the Resource Allocation Working Party laid the principles of formula funding to achieve an equitable distribution of resources, to move, over time, towards the operation of a proportionate care law. These principles have been applied ever since in England. This paper describes the context, governance and subsequent development of formulas and three persistent problems: accounting for populations, their needs and variations in the unavoidable costs of providers. The paper concludes by outlining continuing problems from the past and new challenges of formula funding in England to reduce ‘avoidable’ inequalities in health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The application of concepts, theories and methods from systems ergonomics within patient safety has proved to be an expanding area of research and application in the last decade. This paper aims to take a step back and examine what types of research have been conducted so far and use the results to suggest new ways forward. An analysis of a selection of the patient safety literature suggests that research has so far focused on human error, frameworks for safety and risk and incident reporting. The majority of studies have addressed system concerns at an individual level of analysis with only a few analysing systems across multiple system boundaries. Based on the findings, it is argued that future research needs to move away from a concentration on errors and towards an examination of the connections between systems levels. Examples of how this could be achieved are described in the paper. The outcomes from the review of the systems approach within patient safety provide practitioners and researchers within health care (e.g. the UK National Health Service) with a picture of what types of research are currently being investigated, gaps in understanding and possible future ways forward. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper outlines the way in which professional self regulation of quality of healthcare was integral to the creation of the National Health Service (NHS) in 1948, and to the way the NHS was organized for the next 50 years. It describes the crisis in quality that emerged in the late 1990s. It describes the government's initial responses to that crisis, which were to require NHS organizations to implement systems of clinical governance, and create the Commission for Health Improvement (CHI) to inspect its implementation through visits to each NHS organization. The paper discusses Reports from Inquiries into three scandals, and considers the further changes made to governance and regulation of quality with the abolition of CHI and the National Care Standards Commission, which inspected the private sector, to be succeeded by the Healthcare Commission with a new approach to regulation. It examines three promises of that new approach: the use of national standards; being 'light touch' and proportionate using 'intelligent' (or 'smart') information, as opposed to being organized on a comprehensive programme of visits; and developing a common approach to the NHS and private sectors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper reviews previous cost studies of overweight and obesity in the UK. It proposes a method for estimating the economic and health costs of overweight and obesity in the UK which could also be used in other countries. Costs of obesity studies were identified via a systematic search of electronic databases. Information from the WHO Burden of Disease Project was used to calculate the mortality and morbidity cost of overweight and obesity. Population attributable fractions for diseases attributable to overweight and obesity were applied to National Health Service (NHS) cost data to estimate direct financial costs. We estimate the direct cost of overweight and obesity to the NHS at £3.2 billion. Other estimates of the cost of obesity range between £480 million in 1998 and £1.1 billion in 2004 [Correction added after online publication 11 June 2007: ‘of the cost of obesity’ added after ‘Other estimates’]. There is wide variation in methods and estimates for the cost of overweight and obesity to the health systems of developed countries. The method presented here could be used to calculate the costs of overweight and obesity in other countries. Public health initiatives are required to address the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity and reduce associated healthcare costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Countries differ markedly in their approach towards healthcare systems. There are variations in how much is spent, how funding is organised (taxation or mandatory insurance premiums), who delivers care (the mix of public and private providers), and where care is delivered (the mix of at home, community, primary and secondary care). Almost all developed countries aim to have universal access to high-quality healthcare, but in most cases systems are struggling with the financial burden of meeting these aspirations. The competing pressures are obvious - the drivers of healthcare demand (changes in medical technology, increases in unit costs and rising patient expectations) are outpacing healthcare funding. This paper explores whether it is possible to satisfy the objectives of keeping pace with healthcare demand and providing access to health services in line with conventional views of equity, within public spending constraints. The paper draws on examples from the UK's National Health Service in particular, but also from other countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Health systems delivery systems can be divided into two broad categories: National Health Services (NHS) on the one hand and Social Security (based) Health care systems (SSH) on the other hand. Existing literature is inconclusive about which system performs best. In this paper we would like to improve the evidence-base for discussion about pros and cons of NHS-systems versus SSH-system for health outcomes, expenditure and population satisfaction. Methods: In this study we used time series data for 17 European countries, that were characterized as either NHS or SSH country. We used the following performance indicators: For health outcome: overall mortality rate, infant mortality rate and life expectancy at birth. For health care costs: health care expenditure per capita in pppUS$ and health expenditure as percentage of GDP. Time series dated from 1970 until 2003 or 2004, depending on availability. Sources were OECD health data base 2006 and WHO health for all database 2006. For satisfaction we used the Eurobarometer studies from 1996, 1998 and 1999. Results: SSH systems perform slightly better on overall mortality rates and life expectancy (after 1980). For infant mortality the rates converged between the two types of systems and since 1980 no differences ceased to exist. SSH systems are more expensive and NHS systems have a better cost containment. Inhabitants of countries with SSH-systems are on average substantially more satisfied than those in NHS countries. Conclusion: We concluded that the question 'which type of system performs best' can be answered empirically as far as health outcomes, health care expenditures and patient satisfaction are concerned. Whether this selection of indicators covers all or even most relevant aspects of health system comparison remains to be seen. Perhaps further and more conclusive research into health system related differences in, for instance, equity should be completed before the leading question of this paper can be answered. We do think, however, that this study can form a base for a policy debate on the pros and cons of the existing health care systems in Europe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This brief paper contextualises the reform of health care in the UK National Health Service, before introducing the papers in this special edition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are substantial inequities within the current National Health Service (NHS), with people in lower socioeconomic groups (SEGs) using a wide range of services less relative to their needs than people in higher SEGs. These inequities are likely to arise due to factors on both the demand and the supply side of the system. On the demand side, they could arise from differences in patients' beliefs, knowledge, costs, resources and capabilities. On the supply side, professional beliefs and attitudes, and risk selection or cream-skimming by providers may result in inequities. This paper discusses whether these factors are at play within the English NHS and analyses whether current policy to extend patient choice of provider is likely to reduce or increase these inequities. It shows that extending patient choice may leave unchanged inequity due to differences in health beliefs (because choice does not affect these directly), increase inequity due to unequal resources (because patients may have to travel further), and decrease inequity due to unequal capabilities (because the poor will have access to a new and, for them a more effective, source of leverage over health service professionals). On the supply side, there will be little change. The paper then discusses policy options for dealing with factors that contribute to greater inequity on the demand side. It proposes a package of supported choice whereby individuals from lower SEGs would receive assistance in making choices, including an identified key worker to act as patient care adviser and help with transport costs. The paper concludes that policies for extending patient choice can enhance equity – so long as they are properly designed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines how responsibility for the planning of state-funded HIV prevention services shifted from UK central government to local commissioners during the 'era of normalization' in the 1990s. It explores whether according to literature from the period these changes experienced were those that would be predicted by theories of 'advanced liberalism', i.e. delegation of operational planning, centralization of strategic target setting, and increased scrutiny of 'expert' providers. The paper examines the changes that were described in power relations among key players, using advanced liberalism to structure this examination. The paper concludes that many but not all of the reported changes conformed to these predictions. Although the government did set targets, these targets did not function as effective levers on local activity. Although delegation of planning to local commissioners did occur, their authority was restrained by the retention of specific earmarked HIV prevention funding. Although scrutiny was applied to those with expert status providing services, some—especially those in the voluntary sector—appear to have been scrutinized more than others, such as various clinical practitioners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives This article considers evidence regarding lay involvement in the NHS, following the White Paper’s commitment to rebuild public confidence in an NHS ‘accountable to patients and open to the public and shaped by their views’. It looks at two aspects of lay involvement: the lay board member’s involvement in primary care group (PCG) decision-making and the engagement of the PCG with the wider public. Methods The paper analyses data from the first sweep of the annual Tracker Survey of a sample of PCGs in England, led by the National Primary Care Research and Development Centre in collaboration with the King’s Fund between September and December 1999. It draws specifically from the postal questionnaires sent to lay members. Firstly, however, it contextualizes this data by reviewing the history of lay involvement before 1997 in the NHS and particularly in primary care. Conclusions The paper concludes that, during the first 6 months of their operation, the lay voice was faintly heard in PCGs. The lay member’s role in decision-making at board-level was peripheral. The majority rated their involvement in key aspects of decision-making as low and their influence on decision-making below that of other board members including the Chief Officer, the chair and the GP board members. Beyond the arena of the board, what little contact there was with the lay voice has taken the shape of informing rather than consulting. Mitigating factors include the early stage at which the survey was completed and the lack of precedents for lay involvement in primary care in a broad sense on which PCGs can draw. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents information on various issues published in the September 2006 issue of the "British Journal of Leadership in Public Services," which deals with leadership in the public sector. An article questions the primacy of transformational leadership as a way to lead in periods of significant change. Another paper describes the Leadership Qualities Framework that has been developed by the National Health Service Leadership Centre.

AbstractThe introduction of total purchasing pilots (TPPs) into the National Health Service (NHS) gave general practitioners (GPs) significant new opportunities to take responsibility for the development of community and continuing care (CCC) services. Based on five case studies of TPPs involved in developing CCC this paper asks three questions: (1) to what extent were the TPP’s involvement in CCC informed by an awareness of CCC policy?; (2) were TPPs involved in joint commissioning to develop integrated purchasing or provision which was informed by population based needs assessment?; (3) were TPPs seeking to involve users, carers and voluntary agencies in their plans? The findings indicate that TPPs showed little awareness of national or local policy for CCC, although their project initiatives did address some of the policy issues (in particular a recognition of the need for joint working at the practice level). At the time of fieldwork, four of the case study TPPs had begun to investigate the potential for integrated purchasing, and three of them had relatively sophisticated models of both horizontally and vertically integrated provision of care. However, the TPPs developments were not based on systematic population based needs assessment. The paper concludes that there is potential for the primary care led groups proposed in the recent white papers in England, Scotland and Wales to improve integration of care both horizontally and vertically. However, they may need policy guidance and push to: encourage them to put CCC high on their agenda for action; to work with people with expertise in population based, prevention focused, needs assessment; and to find innovative ways to include users, carers and voluntary agencies. Incentives or levers (such as control over budgets) may be needed to promote joint working between staff in different agencies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractA number of policy initiatives over the last few years have encouraged general practitioners (GPs) to participate in commissioning, as opposed to simply purchasing, health care. This role was reinforced in the white paper, The New NHS. A qualitative study of GPs in two health authorities uncovered not only concerns about the reforms which have since emerged in the medical and general press, but other issues which have been less frequently articulated. There was also evidence of goodwill towards professional colleagues, including those in social services departments. The preference for professional, as opposed to market relationships may help to secure the collaborative ethos desired by government. However, if the concerns the study uncovered are indicative of a more widespread response to the white paper, they suggest the need for careful support of developing Primary Care Groups (PCGs). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents the findings of deconstructing a short extract from a report written by a National Health Service Trust chief executive. Changes in National Health Service management since the early 1980s are briefly discussed. This is followed by a theoretical discussion of deconstruction and metaphorization. The text is analysed focusing on the 'binary opposites' reason and emotion. It is argued that reason is given hierarchical pre-eminence and that emotion is hidden or marginalized but that both concepts are central in order to arrive at an understanding of the text. The chief executive appears to constitute his role in ways which might be characterized as engineering (reason) and as traditional fatherhood (emotion). Metaphors in the text are used in order to provide evidence to support these characterizations. One implication which is particularly highlighted is that management in this text is seen as a distinctively masculine practice – perhaps surprisingly within what is presumed to be the caring and supportive environment of a health care organization. The paper ends with some reflexive reflections on the analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 1990 National Health Service and Community Care Act appeared to herald a new dawn for social work with older people, which had previously been a relatively neglected and undervalued area of social work practice. The legislation proposed a new role for social workers as case managers', with considerable autonomy and flexibility about the way in which the 'case manager' responded to need. By the time community care policy was implemented, the role of 'case manager' had been transformed into that of 'care manager', with a focus which emphasized procedural and managerial requirements rather than a more flexible professional practice. This paper explores the extent to which this shift has substantively altered the nature of social work practice with older people. It outlines key theories of professions and their applicability to social work, and critically analyses the impact of the 'new managerialism' within social services departments. The paper also examines the nature of social workers' practice with older people following the impact of community care legislation, and concludes that the impact on the social work profession has been to locate an increasing control of practice with social work managers, with potentially serious consequences for the continuation of a distinctive social work role in relation to services for older people. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper offers an interpretation of contemporary developments in Britain's National Health Service which suggests that a major transformation is under way, the contours of which, while visible, are not yet fully appreciated or understood. The analysis is in sharp contrast with that recently proposed by Klein and deliberate comparisons are drawn. The paper is in three main sections. The first briefly summarises Klein's position. The second takes issue with certain of his views, notably those on structural change, but also to some extent those on the relevance of the private sector. Welfare pluralism is posited as the most plausible future for health care and as a phenomenon as yet not well understood in Britain's health care sector. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Research Highlights and Abstract The article investigates which of two competing accounts of contemporary British policy making better captures the nature of policy making during episodes of major reform of the English NHS., The analysis of the formulation of the English NHS Plan 2000 suggests that the Asymmetric Power Model better describes the reality of NHS policy making under New Labour than the Differentiated Polity Model., Although the process of developing the Plan showed signs of a more open policy process, it was tightly controlled and personally led by the Secretary of State for Health and his close advisers, reflecting an underlying British political tradition that emphasises the idea that the NHS has to be continuously improved with change led from above by central government., However, when compared to the processes underpinning Thatcher's Ministerial Review of the NHS and the 2010 Coalition government's White Paper, if ever NHS policy making in England were to have come close to the Differentiated Polity Model, it would have been during the formulation of the 2000 NHS Plan., Through a case study of the formulation of the English NHS Plan 2000, this article investigates which of two competing models of the British policy process-the Differentiated Polity and Asymmetric Power Models-better describes the reality of major NHS reform policy making under New Labour. The process of developing the Plan showed signs of a more open policy process, seemingly closer to the DPM. There was contestability of policy advice and limited involvement of the medical profession through its representative bodies. However, the process was tightly controlled and personally led by the Secretary of State and his advisers, with the direct involvement of the Prime Minister throughout. Two key moments of interest group involvement-the Modernisation Action Teams and the signing of the Plan by health sector organisations-were marked by power asymmetries. Overall, the APM better describes the reality of major reform policy making under New Labour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]