4 results on '"*NATURAL language processing"'
Search Results
2. Will code one day run a code? Performance of language models on ACEM primary examinations and implications.
- Author
-
Smith, Jesse, Choi, Philip MC, and Buntine, Paul
- Subjects
- *
NATIONAL competency-based educational tests , *NATURAL language processing , *COMPUTER assisted testing (Education) , *ARTIFICIAL intelligence , *COMPARATIVE studies , *PHILOSOPHY of education , *CLINICAL competence , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *EMERGENCY medicine , *MEDICAL education - Abstract
Objective: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated mixed results in their ability to pass various specialist medical examination and their performance within the field of emergency medicine remains unknown. Methods: We explored the performance of three prevalent LLMs (OpenAI's GPT series, Google's Bard, and Microsoft's Bing Chat) on a practice ACEM primary examination. Results: All LLMs achieved a passing score, with scores with GPT 4.0 outperforming the average candidate. Conclusion: Large language models, by passing the ACEM primary examination, show potential as tools for medical education and practice. However, limitations exist and are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Can We Geographically Validate a Natural Language Processing Algorithm for Automated Detection of Incidental Durotomy Across Three Independent Cohorts From Two Continents?
- Author
-
Karhade, Aditya V., Oosterhoff, Jacobien H. F., Groot, Olivier Q., Agaronnik, Nicole, Ehresman, Jeffrey, Bongers, Michiel E. R., Jaarsma, Ruurd L., Poonnoose, Santosh I., Sciubba, Daniel M., Tobert, Daniel G., Doornberg, Job N., and Schwab, Joseph H.
- Subjects
- *
FERRANS & Powers Quality of Life Index , *NATURAL language processing , *ARTIFICIAL intelligence , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *ALGORITHMS ,RESEARCH evaluation - Abstract
Background: Incidental durotomy is an intraoperative complication in spine surgery that can lead to postoperative complications, increased length of stay, and higher healthcare costs. Natural language processing (NLP) is an artificial intelligence method that assists in understanding free-text notes that may be useful in the automated surveillance of adverse events in orthopaedic surgery. A previously developed NLP algorithm is highly accurate in the detection of incidental durotomy on internal validation and external validation in an independent cohort from the same country. External validation in a cohort with linguistic differences is required to assess the transportability of the developed algorithm, referred to geographical validation. Ideally, the performance of a prediction model, the NLP algorithm, is constant across geographic regions to ensure reproducibility and model validity.Question/purpose: Can we geographically validate an NLP algorithm for the automated detection of incidental durotomy across three independent cohorts from two continents?Methods: Patients 18 years or older undergoing a primary procedure of (thoraco)lumbar spine surgery were included. In Massachusetts, between January 2000 and June 2018, 1000 patients were included from two academic and three community medical centers. In Maryland, between July 2016 and November 2018, 1279 patients were included from one academic center, and in Australia, between January 2010 and December 2019, 944 patients were included from one academic center. The authors retrospectively studied the free-text operative notes of included patients for the primary outcome that was defined as intraoperative durotomy. Incidental durotomy occurred in 9% (93 of 1000), 8% (108 of 1279), and 6% (58 of 944) of the patients, respectively, in the Massachusetts, Maryland, and Australia cohorts. No missing reports were observed. Three datasets (Massachusetts, Australian, and combined Massachusetts and Australian) were divided into training and holdout test sets in an 80:20 ratio. An extreme gradient boosting (an efficient and flexible tree-based algorithm) NLP algorithm was individually trained on each training set, and the performance of the three NLP algorithms (respectively American, Australian, and combined) was assessed by discrimination via area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC-ROC; this measures the model's ability to distinguish patients who obtained the outcomes from those who did not), calibration metrics (which plot the predicted and the observed probabilities) and Brier score (a composite of discrimination and calibration). In addition, the sensitivity (true positives, recall), specificity (true negatives), positive predictive value (also known as precision), negative predictive value, F1-score (composite of precision and recall), positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were calculated.Results: The combined NLP algorithm (the combined Massachusetts and Australian data) achieved excellent performance on independent testing data from Australia (AUC-ROC 0.97 [95% confidence interval 0.87 to 0.99]), Massachusetts (AUC-ROC 0.99 [95% CI 0.80 to 0.99]) and Maryland (AUC-ROC 0.95 [95% CI 0.93 to 0.97]). The NLP developed based on the Massachusetts cohort had excellent performance in the Maryland cohort (AUC-ROC 0.97 [95% CI 0.95 to 0.99]) but worse performance in the Australian cohort (AUC-ROC 0.74 [95% CI 0.70 to 0.77]).Conclusion: We demonstrated the clinical utility and reproducibility of an NLP algorithm with combined datasets retaining excellent performance in individual countries relative to algorithms developed in the same country alone for detection of incidental durotomy. Further multi-institutional, international collaborations can facilitate the creation of universal NLP algorithms that improve the quality and safety of orthopaedic surgery globally. The combined NLP algorithm has been incorporated into a freely accessible web application that can be found at https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/nlp_incidental_durotomy/ . Clinicians and researchers can use the tool to help incorporate the model in evaluating spine registries or quality and safety departments to automate detection of incidental durotomy and optimize prevention efforts.Level Of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. More time per patient or more patients per unit time?
- Author
-
Tan, Sheryn, Stretton, Brandon, Lee, Yong Min, Gupta, Aashray, Kovoor, Joshua, and Bacchi, Stephen
- Subjects
- *
NATURAL language processing , *MACHINE learning , *ARTIFICIAL intelligence , *AUSTRALASIANS , *EMERGENCY medicine , *PROFESSIONAL licensure examinations - Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.