Search

This work considers the task of finding an ac-feasible operating point of a severely damaged transmission network while ensuring that a maximal amount of active power loads can be delivered. This AC maximal load delivery (AC-MLD) task is a nonconvex nonlinear optimization problem that is incredibly challenging to solve on large-scale transmission system data sets. This work demonstrates that convex relaxations of the AC-MLD problem provide a reliable and scalable method for finding high-quality bounds on the amount of active power that can be delivered in the AC-MLD problem. To demonstrate their effectiveness, the solution methods proposed in this work are rigorously evaluated on 1000 $N$ - $k$ scenarios on seven power networks ranging in size from 70 to 6000 buses. The most effective relaxation of the AC-MLD problem converges in less than 20 seconds on commodity computing hardware for all 7000 of the scenarios considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, there have been increasing concerns about how geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs) impact electrical power systems. Geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) can saturate transformers, induce hot spot heating, and increase reactive power losses. These effects can potentially cause catastrophic damage to transformers and severely impact the ability of a power system to deliver power. To address this problem, we develop a model of GIC impacts to power systems that includes 1) GIC thermal capacity of transformers as a function of normal alternating current (AC), and 2) reactive power losses as a function of GIC. We use this model to derive an optimization problem that protects power systems from GIC impacts through line switching, generator redispatch, and load shedding. We employ state-of-the-art convex relaxations of AC power flow equations to lower bound the objective. We demonstrate the approach on a modified RTS96 system and the UIUC 150-bus system and show that line switching is an effective means to mitigate GIC impacts. We also provide a sensitivity analysis of optimal switching decisions with respect to GMD direction. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]