Search

Showing total 5 results
Start Over Topic justice administration Topic tribunal constitucional Publication Year Range Last 50 years
5 results

1. UN TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL PARA EL SIGLO XXI: LOS RETOS DE LA JURISDICCIÓN CONSTITUCIONAL EN ESPAÑA.

Author

FONDEVILA MARÓN, MANUEL

Subjects
LEGAL procedure, CONSTITUTIONAL courts, JUSTICE administration, CONSTITUTIONAL law, LEGITIMACY of governments, ARBITRATORS, PROCEDURAL justice, LEGAL positivism
Abstract

Copyright of Revista de Derecho Politico is the property of Editorial UNED and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. INTERPRETACIÓN EVOLUTIVA DE LA CONSTITUCIÓN Y LEGITIMIDAD DEL MATRIMONIO FORMADO POR PERSONAS DEL MISMO SEXO.

Author

JAVIER MATIA PORTILLA, FRANCISCO

Subjects
LEGISLATION, JUSTICE administration, SAME-sex marriage policy, MARRIAGE policy, ADOPTION laws, CONSTITUTIONAL courts, CONSTITUTIONS, ILLEGITIMACY
Abstract

Copyright of Teoria y Realidad Constitucional is the property of Editorial UNED and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. DE ENMIENDAS HOMOGÉNEAS, LEYES HETEROGÉNEAS Y PRECEPTOS INTRUSOS. ¿ES CONTRADICTORIA LA NUEVA DOCTRINA DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL SOBRE LA ELABORACIóN DE LAS LEYES?

Author

GARCÍA-ESCUDERO MÁRQUEZ, PIEDAD

Subjects
CONSTITUTIONAL courts, CONSTITUTIONAL amendments, JUSTICE administration, RELEVANCE, SPANISH law
Abstract

Copyright of Teoria y Realidad Constitucional is the property of Editorial UNED and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Published
2013

4. ¿INTERPRETACIONES NO VINCULANTES DE UN "SUPREMO INTÉRPRETE"? REFLEXIONES SOBRE EL ROL DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL PERUANO A PROPÓSITO DE UNA RECIENTE MODIFICACIÓN DE SU REGLAMENTO NORMATIVO.

Author

López Flores, Luciano

Subjects
*CONSTITUTIONAL courts, *CONSTITUTIONAL law, *STATUTORY interpretation, *JURISPRUDENCE, *LEGAL judgments, *JUSTICE administration
Abstract

This paper builds on the amendment of Article 10 of the Normative of the Peruvian Constitutional Court to analyze a problem: the distinctions between the types of decisions handed down by the Constitutional Court (binding precedent, constitutional jurisprudence, interpretative rulings). It is held that this distinction undermines the status and role of Supreme Interpreter of the Constitution which currently holds the Constitutional Court. And it is argued that the type of decisions is inconsistent with that role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2016

5. LA AUTONOMÍA PROCESAL DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL.

Author

Rivera Tirado, María Verónica

Subjects
*CONSTITUTIONAL courts, *CONSTITUTIONAL law, *LEGAL procedure, *CONSTITUTIONS, *JUDGES, *JUSTICE administration
Abstract

The present paper will analyze the procedural autonomy that the Constitutional Court has in order to solve the causes that are put under it knowledge. As it is observed, there are two theses; one of them totally denies the procedural autonomy to the Constitutional Court, but the other one agrees about the procedural autonomy of the Constitutional Court. From my point of view I consider that the Constitutional Court has procedural autonomy, which will be sustained throughout the present investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2012