Search

: Treatment of hypertension in hemodialysis (HD) patients is characterised by lack of evidence for both the blood pressure (BP) target goal and the recommended drug class to use. Telmisartan, an Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) that is metabolised in the liver and not excreted via HD extracorporeal circuit might be particularly suitable for HD patients. We designed and conducted a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind and cross-over trial for treatment of dialysis–associated hypertension with telmisartan 80 mg once daily or placebo on top of standard antihypertensive treatment excluding other Renin-Angiotensin-System (RAS) blockers. In 29 patients after randomization we analysed BP after a treatment period of 8 weeks, while 13 started with telmisartan and 16 with placebo; after 8 weeks 11 continued with telmisartan and 12 with placebo after cross-over, respectively. Patients exhibited a significant reduction of systolic pre-HD BP from 141.9±21.8 before to 131.3±17.3 mmHg after the first treatment period with telmisartan or placebo. However, no average significant influence of telmisartan was observed compared to placebo. The latter may be due to a large inter-individual variability of BP responses reaching from a 40 mmHg decrease under placebo to 40 mmHg increase under telmisartan. Antihypertensive co-medication was changed for clinical reasons in 7 out of 21 patients with no significant difference between telmisartan and placebo groups. Our starting hypothesis, that telmisartan on top of standard therapy lowers systolic office BP in HD patients could not be confirmed. In conclusion, this small trial indicates that testing antihypertensive drug efficacy in HD patients is challenging due to complicated standardization of concomitant medication and other confounding factors, e.g. volume status, salt load and neurohormonal activation, that influence BP control in HD patients. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrialsregister.eu 2005-005021-60 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Melatonin exerts multiple biological effects with potential impact on human diseases. This is underscored by genetic studies that demonstrated associations between melatonin receptor type 2 gene (MTNR1B) polymorphisms and characteristics of type 2 diabetes. We set out to test the hypothesis whether genetic variants at MTNR1B are also relevant for other disease phenotypes within the cardiovascular continuum. We thus investigated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of MTNR1B in relation to blood pressure (BP) and cardiac parameters in hypertensive patients. Methods: Patients (n=605, mean age 56.2±9.4years, 82.3% male) with arterial hypertension and cardiac ejection fraction (EF) ≥40% were studied. Cardiac parameters were assessed by echocardiography. Results: The cohort comprised subjects with coronary heart disease (73.1%) and myocardial infarction (48.1%) with a mean EF of 63.7±8.9%. Analysis of SNPs rs10830962, rs4753426, rs12804291, rs10830963, and rs3781638 revealed two haplotypes 1 and 2 with frequencies of 0.402 and 0.277, respectively. Carriers with haplotype 1 (CTCCC) showed compared to non-carriers a higher mean 24-hour systolic BP (difference BP: 2.4mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3 to 4.5mmHg, p=0.023). Haplotype 2 (GCCGA) was significantly related to EF with an absolute increase of 1.8% (CI: 0.45 to 3.14%) in carriers versus non-carriers (p=0.009). Conclusion: Genetics of MTNR1B point to impact of the melatonin signalling pathway for BP and left ventricular function. This may support the importance of the melatonin system as a potential therapeutic target. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To investigate the pharmacokinetic interactions, safety, and tolerability of the combination of olmesartan medoxomil with glibenclamide. Methods. In an open, three-way crossover, phase I trial, 18 healthy adults entered three randomly ordered, seven-day treatment periods. The three treatments comprised once daily administration of (1) olmesartan 20 mg, (2) olmesartan 20 mg plus glibenclamide 3.5 mg, or (3) glibenclamide 3.5 mg. Results. The combination of olmesartan with glibenclamide did not influence the bioequivalence of the area under the plasma-concentration time curve at steady state during one dosing interval 0 to τ = 24 hours (AUCss,τ) or the maximum steady-state concentration (Css,max) of both substances. Mean AUCss,τ values for olmesartan were 2594.8 ng h/ml for olmesartan alone and 2443.7 ng h/ml in combination with glibenclamide; the corresponding Css,max values were 479.3 ng/ml and 462.7 ng/ml, respectively. For glibenclamide, the mean AUCss,τ values were 525.7 ng·h/ml for monotherapy and 518.7 ng·h/ml for its combination with olmesartan. The median time to reach Css,max (tmax) for glibenclamide was shifted from 2.0 h to 1.0 h when combined with olmesartan, whereas the median tmax values for olmesartan remained unchanged at 1.5 h. During combined treatment with olmesartan plus glibenclamide, no adverse event occurred, and the medications were well tolerated. Conclusion. With the exception of a slight shift of tmax values for glibenclamide, the concomitant administration of olmesartan medoxomil with glibenclamide had no significant effects on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of either agent. This provides the pharmacokinetic rationale for clinical studies to test the combination therapy of patients with hypertension and type-2 diabetes mellitus with both compounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]