Search

Abstract Background Stickler syndrome is a connective tissue disorder characterized by ocular, skeletal, orofacial and auditory defects. It is caused by mutations in different collagen genes, namely COL2A1, COL11A1 and COL11A2 (autosomal dominant inheritance), and COL9A1 and COL9A2 (autosomal recessive inheritance). The auditory phenotype in Stickler syndrome is inconsistently reported. Therefore we performed a systematic review of the literature to give an up-to-date overview of hearing loss in Stickler syndrome, and correlated it with the genotype. Methods English-language literature was reviewed through searches of PubMed and Web of Science, in order to find relevant articles describing auditory features in Stickler patients, along with genotype. Prevalences of hearing loss are calculated and correlated with the different affected genes and type of mutation. Results 313 patients (102 families) individually described in 46 articles were included. Hearing loss was found in 62.9%, mostly mild to moderate when reported. Hearing impairment was predominantly sensorineural (67.8%). Conductive (14.1%) and mixed (18.1%) hearing loss was primarily found in young patients or patients with a palatal defect. Overall, mutations in COL11A1 (82.5%) and COL11A2 (94.1%) seem to be more frequently associated with hearing impairment than mutations in COL2A1 (52.2%). Conclusions Hearing impairment in patients with Stickler syndrome is common. Sensorineural hearing loss predominates, but also conductive hearing loss, especially in children and patients with a palatal defect, may occur. The distinct disease-causing collagen genes are associated with a different prevalence of hearing impairment, but still large phenotypic variation exists. Regular auditory follow-up is strongly advised, particularly because many Stickler patients are visually impaired.

Hearing loss in Stickler syndrome has received little attention due to the often more disabling ocular, orofacial and skeletal manifestations. Estimates suggest a global prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) ranging from 50 % to about 100 % though, depending on the underlying Stickler genotype. By performing extensive audiometric analysis in Stickler patients, we aimed to further elucidate the auditory phenotype. Twenty molecularly confirmed Stickler patients (age 10-62 year), of whom sixteen with type 1 Stickler syndrome (COL2A1 mutation) and four with type 2 Stickler syndrome (COL11A1 mutation) underwent an otological questionnaire, clinical examination, pure tone and speech audiometry, tympanometry and otoacoustic emission testing. Cross-sectional and longitudinal regression analysis of the audiograms was performed to assess progression. In type 1 Stickler syndrome, 75 % demonstrated hearing loss, predominantly in the high frequencies. No significant progression beyond presbyacusis was observed. All type 2 Stickler patients exhibited mild-to-moderate low- and mid-frequency SNHL and moderate-to-severe high-frequency SNHL. In both types, hearing loss was observed in childhood. Otoacoustic emissions were only detectable in 7/40 ears and had very low amplitudes, even in frequency bands with normal hearing on pure tone audiometry. Type 1 Stickler syndrome is characterized by a mild high-frequency SNHL, emerging in childhood and non-progressive. Absent otoacoustic emissions are a frequent finding. Patients with type 2 Stickler syndrome exhibit early-onset moderate SNHL affecting all frequencies with a sloping audiogram. Taking into account the visual impairment in many patients, we recommend regular auditory follow-up in patients with Stickler syndrome, especially in childhood.

Introduction: Stickler syndrome is a connective tissue disorder characterized by orofacial, ocular, skeletal and auditory symptoms. The orofacial phenotype mainly consists of midfacial hypoplasia, micrognathia and cleft palate. Large phenotypic variability is evident though. Few studies have tried to substantiate the typical facial appearance in Stickler syndrome patients., Methods: Molecularly confirmed Stickler patients were invited to undergo cephalometric analysis based on a lateral radiograph in standardized conditions. Angular and linear measurements were performed according to Steiner's and Sassouni's analysis and compared with age- and gender-matched reference values., Results: Thirteen patients aged 10-62y were included, twelve of whom had type 1 Stickler syndrome (COL2A1 mutation) and one type 2 Stickler syndrome (COL11A1 mutation). The position of maxilla and mandible relative to the cranial base was not significantly different from the reference population (S-N-A: p = 0.73, S-N-B: p = 0.43). The mandibular plane and y-axis showed an elevated angle with the cranial base in most patients, although not significant for the total group (S-N to Go-Me: p = 0.20, S-N to S-Gn: p = 0.18). Dental analysis was normal, except for a higher overjet value (p = 0.006) and a higher angle between occlusal plane and Frankfort plane (p = 0.022)., Conclusion: Cephalometric analysis was not able to thoroughly prove the abnormal facial appearance in Stickler syndrome. The majority of patients had normal dentofacial proportions. The most frequently observed anomaly in our series is a rather short and posteriorly rotated mandible, but clinical variability is high., (Copyright © 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Waardenburg syndrome (WS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by hearing loss (HL) and pigment disturbances of hair, skin and iris. Classifications exist based on phenotype and genotype. The auditory phenotype is inconsistently reported among the different Waardenburg types and causal genes, urging the need for an up-to-date literature overview on this particular topic. We performed a systematic review in search for articles describing auditory features in WS patients along with the associated genotype. Prevalences of HL were calculated and correlated with the different types and genes of WS. Seventy-three articles were included, describing 417 individual patients. HL was found in 71.0% and was predominantly bilateral and sensorineural. Prevalence of HL among the different clinical types significantly differed (WS1: 52.3%, WS2: 91.6%, WS3: 57.1%, WS4: 83.5%). Mutations in SOX10 (96.5%), MITF (89.6%) and SNAI2 (100%) are more frequently associated with hearing impairment than other mutations. Of interest, the distinct disease-causing genes are able to better predict the auditory phenotype compared with different clinical types of WS. Consequently, it is important to confirm the clinical diagnosis of WS with molecular analysis in order to optimally inform patients about the risk of HL., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: Etiological diagnosis of hearing impairment is of great importance to ensure early and adequate management. Even after thorough history taking, clinical and audiometric evaluation, the cause of hearing loss remains unclear in a majority of patients. Further examinations can imply imaging, ophthalmologic investigations, laboratory tests, electrocardiography and genetic testing. Lately, the latter has taken an increasingly prominent place within this diagnostic work-up. However, clear guidelines about optimal implementation and sequence of these tests are required., Methods: Records of patients who visited the consultation for otogenetics at Ghent University Hospital (Belgium) during the period 2006-2012 were retrospectively reviewed. In order to optimize the etiological-diagnostic work-up of unidentified hearing loss, application patterns and results of various diagnostic tests, audiometric and etiological data of each patient were collected and analyzed., Results: Data of 191 patients were analyzed. In 81.2% of the patients, a cause of hearing loss could be determined or suspected. In total, 65.4% had a (presumably) genetic etiology, with connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations as the leading cause. Inquiry of risk factors, associated with congenital hearing loss, and pedigree analysis were found to have the highest diagnostic gain (61.3% and 41.8%). Connexin 26 gene mutations were only present in bilateral hearing impairment, whereas CT abnormalities were related to unilateral (P=0.003), profound (P<0.001) hearing loss. An enlarged vestibular aqueduct was present in 42.9% of all CT abnormalities. Ophthalmologic anomalies were detected in 35.7% of the studied patients., Conclusions: A sequential approach for the etiological diagnosis of unidentified hearing loss could determine or suggest a cause in more than 80% of patients. The approach may vary based on the presenting phenotype., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Stickler syndrome is caused by mutations in genes encoding type II and type XI collagens. About 85% of the pathogenic variants is found in COL2A1 (Stickler type 1), whereas a minority of mutations has been reported in COL11A1 (Stickler type 2) and COL11A2 (Stickler type 3). Beside the typical skeletal and orofacial manifestations, ocular anomalies are predominantly present in type 1 and type 2, while hearing loss is more pronounced in type 2 and type 3., Methods: We performed COL11A1 mutation analysis for 40 type 2 Stickler patients and COL11A2 mutation analysis for five type 3 Stickler patients, previously all COL2A1 mutation-negative, using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) whereas whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed in parallel for two patients. Three patients were analyzed for both genes due to unclear ocular findings., Results: In total 14 COL11A1 and two COL11A2 mutations could be identified, seven of which are novel. Splice site alterations are the most frequent mutation type, followed by glycine substitutions. In addition, six variants of unknown significance (VUS) have been found. Identical mutations and variants were identified with both NGS techniques., Conclusion: We expand the mutation spectrum of COL11A1 and COL11A2 in Stickler syndrome patients and show that targeted NGS is an efficient and cost-effective molecular tool in the genetic diagnosis of Stickler syndrome, whereas the more standardized WES might be an alternative approach., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.)