Search

Introduction: Periodontal pain caused by elastomeric separators is a very common problem in the commencement of orthodontic treatment. Previous studies have shown good results in reducing this pain by Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and different protocols of application have been suggested in the literature. Aim: This trial aimed to evaluate LLLT on managing orthodontic pain caused by elastomeric separators and to compare single versus double irradiation in possible pain reduction. Materials and Methods: A clinical randomized compound (parallel-group and split-mouth design) trial was conducted on 36 patients between 12 and 26 years of age. Elastomeric separators were placed at the mesial and distal surfaces of the first molars in one jaw (upper or lower) for each patient and in only one side of the mouth (the other side served as the placebo side).The trial had two groups: the first group received single irradiation of LLLT [Gallium Aluminum Arsenide (GaAlAs): 830 nm, 4J/cm2, 100mW] immediately after separators insertion, where as the second group received double irradiation immediately after separators insertion and after 24hours. All patients were instructed to rate the level of pain at 1, 6, 24, 48, 96 hours on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The student 't' tests, repeated measures ANOVA and LSD post-hoc tests were employed. Results: LLLT was successful in reducing post-separation pain when the experimental side was compared to the placebo side at all assessment times in each group (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between single and double irradiation groups in terms of pain reduction (p>0.05). Conclusion: GaAlAs LLLT application reduced early orthodontic pain caused by elastomeric separators by single or double irradiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The frenum is a mucous membrane fold that attaches the lip and the cheek to the alveolar mucosa, the gingiva, and the underlying periosteum. Frenectomy is the surgical removal of the whole frenum, including the area connected to the bones. The purpose of this study was to compare the healing period and postsurgical pain experienced by patients operated with diode and Er:YAG lasers., Method and Materials: Twenty referred patients requiring excision of the abnormal upper labial frenum were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: diode group (810 nm, 2W, continuous emission, initiated tip) and Er:YAG group (2,940 nm, 2W, 200 mJ, 10 Hz). Both lasers were applied in contact mode. Postoperative pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale at 3 hours postoperatively and every day during the first postoperative week. The epithelialization process of the wound surface was evaluated using hydrogen peroxide solution applied to the wound on postoperative days 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90., Results: The results showed the mean values of Pain Index after 3 hours (diode group 2.1 ± 2.0, Er:YAG group 2.6 ± 1.4), day 1 (diode group 1.1 ± 1.1, Er:YAG group 1.9 ± 1.4), and day 2 (diode group 0.0 ± 0.0, Er:YAG group 0.9 ± 1.1), with no significant difference after 3 to 7 days (P &#61; 1.00). For the Healing Index there was a significant difference between the diode group and the Er:YAG group (7 days, P &#61; .029; 14 days, P &#61; .001), with no significant difference after 30/60/90 days (P &#61; 1.00)., Conclusions: The Er:YAG laser had better clinical results in healing wounds, whereas the diode laser resulted in better decreasing pain levels after frenectomy during the follow-up periods.