1. How Long Should Patients Be Treated With Postcardiotomy Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation? Individual Patient Data Pooled Analysis.
- Author
-
Biancari F, Mäkikallio T, L'Acqua C, Ruggieri VG, Cho SM, Dalén M, Welp H, Jónsson K, Ragnarsson S, Hernández Pérez FJ, Gatti G, Alkhamees K, Loforte A, Lechiancole A, D'Errigo P, Rosato S, Spadaccio C, Pettinari M, Fiore A, Mariscalco G, Perrotti A, Arafat AA, Albabtain MA, AlBarak MM, Laimoud M, Djordjevic I, Samalavicius R, Alonso-Fernandez-Gatta M, Wilhelm MJ, Kaserer A, Bonalumi G, Juvonen T, and Polvani G
- Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the optimal duration of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for cardiogenic shock refractory to medical therapies after cardiac surgery and whether its prolonged use is justified., Data Sources: Previously published articles on postcardiotomy venoarterial ECMO., Study Selection: Articles reporting on the early outcome after postcardiotomy venoarterial ECMO in adult patients were identified through a systematic review of the literature., Data Extraction: Data on prespecified patients' characteristics, operative variables, and outcomes were provided by the authors of previous studies on this topic., Data Synthesis: Individual data of 1267 patients treated at 25 hospitals from ten studies were included in this meta-analysis. In-hospital mortality rates were lowest among patients treated 3-6 days with venoarterial ECMO. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression considering the cluster effect of the participating hospitals adjusted for individual patient's risk profile and operative variables showed that the risk in-hospital mortality did not significantly increase in patients treated more than 6 days up to 20 days., Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that prolonged venoarterial ECMO support after adult cardiac surgery may be justified. However, the analysis was limited by the knowledge of only those circumstances known at the start of ECMO., Competing Interests: Dr. Biancari’s institution received funding from the Italian Ministry of Health—Ricerca Corrente to Centro Cardiologico Monzino (IRCCS). Drs. Biancari and Polvani received support for article research form the IRCCS. Dr. Cho received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute K23HL157610 and Hyperfine for Safe and Feasibility (SAFE) MRI Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation study. Dr. Pérez received funding from Abbott and Abiomed. Dr. Kaserer received funding from Bayer AG (Switzerland), CSL Behring GmbH, AstraZeneca AG, and Pharmacosmos. Dr. Bonalumi received funding from the IRCCS. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2025 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF