Maciej Pach, Kamil Bielak, Xavier Morin, Hervé Jactel, Rafael Calama, Antonio Tomao, M. del Río, Marta Pardos, Quentin Ponette, Arne Nothdurft, L. Jansone, Kristoffel Jacobs, José Riofrío, Loredana Oreti, Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado, Markus Engel, Enno Uhl, Aris Jansons, Felipe Bravo, Hans Pretzsch, Kšištof Godvod, Gediminas Brazaitis, Emmanuel Defossez, Centro de Investigacion Forestal (INIA-CIFOR), Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria = National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA), Universidad de Valladolid [Valladolid] (UVa), Technische Universität München [München] (TUM), Biodiversité, Gènes & Communautés (BioGeCo), Université de Bordeaux (UB)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Higher Technical School of Agricultural Engineering, Technical University of Madrid, Vytautas Magnus University - Vytauto Didziojo Universitetas (VDU), Institute of Biology of the University of Neuchâtel, Université de Neuchâtel (UNINE), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Université Catholique de Louvain = Catholic University of Louvain (UCL), Latvian State Forest Research Institute 'Silava', Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Department for Innovation in Biological Agrofood and Forest Systems (DiBAF), Tuscia University, AGH University of Science and Technology [Krakow, PL] (AGH UST), Technical University of Munich (TUM), Bayerische Landesanstalt für Wald und Forstwirtschaft - Bavarian State Institute of Forestry (LWF), Technische Universität Munchen - Université Technique de Munich [Munich, Allemagne] (TUM), European Commission, Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Poland), Pardos, M. [0000-0002-5567-5406], del Río, M. [0000-0001-7496-3713], Pretzsch, H. [0000-0002-4958-1868], Jactel, H. [0000-0002-8106-5310], Bielak, K. [0000-0002-1327-4911], Bravo, F. [0000-0001-7348-6695], Brazaitis, G. [0000-0003-0234-9292], Defossez, E. [0000-0002-3279-9190], Godvod, K. [0000-0002-9736-1544], Jacobs, K. [0000-0002-9693-729X], Jansons, A. [0000-0001-7981-4346], Nothdurft, A. [0000-0002-7065-7601], Ponette, Q. [0000-0002-2726-7392], Pach, M. [0000-0002-9833-867X], Ruíz-Peinado, R. [0000-0003-0126-1651], Calama, R. [0000-0002-2598-9594], Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Universität für Bodenkultur Wien = University of Natural Resources and Life [Vienne, Autriche] (BOKU), Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro - Montpellier SupAgro, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), Università degli studi della Tuscia [Viterbo], UCL - SST/ELI/ELIE - Environmental Sciences, Pardos, M., del Río, M., Pretzsch, H., Jactel, H., Bielak, K., Bravo, F., Brazaitis, G., Defossez, E., Godvod, K., Jacobs, K., Jansons, A., Nothdurft, A., Ponette, Q., Pach, M., Ruíz-Peinado, R., and Calama, R.
Centro de Investigación Forestal (CIFOR), Despite growing evidence that diverse forests play an important role in ecosystem functioning, ensuring the provision of different ecosystem services, whether such diversity improves their response to drought events remains unclear. In this study, we use a large tree-ring database from thirty case studies across nine European countries and eleven species, covering from Mediterranean to hemiboreal forests, to test if the growth response to site specific drought events that occurred between 1975 and 2015 varied between mixed and monospecific stands. In particular, we quantify how stands resist those specific drought events and recover after them, thus analyzing their resilience. For each drought event and forest stand we calculated resistance, recovery, resilience and relative resilience and we related the variation in these indices between monospecific and mixed stands with type of admixture, tree species identity, site aridity gradient, stand basal area and stand age. We found a large variability among case studies, even for those that share similar species composition and have similar climates. On average, mixed stands showed higher resistance, resilience and relative resilience to drought events than monospecific stands. However, the beneficial effect of mixtures could not be generalized, being greatly modulated by the type of admixture and tree species identity, and depending on site water supply and stand characteristics, such as basal area and age. The increase in resilience in mixtures compared with monocultures was greater on the conifer-broadleaved admixtures, and to a lesser extent in the broadleaved-broadleaved combinations. The observed response patterns to drought largely varied among the eleven studied species, thus revealing the importance of functional traits for understanding a species’ response to drought across its distribution range. Along the site aridity gradient, resilience and relative resilience to drought increased in drier sites for both monospecific and mixed stands, with an observed trend towards higher resilience in mixed stands in the drier and hotter sites. Our results confirm the complexity of the relationships found of resistance, recovery, resilience and relative resilience with drought when comparing pure vs mixed stands., The study was supported by the ERA-Net SUMFOREST project REFORM “Mixed species forest management. Lowering risk, increasing resilience” (PCIN2017-026) and Marie Sklodowska Curie Actions-RISE , CARE4C . Special thankW117/H2020/2018s to Nuria Simón and Guillermo Madrigal for their assistance building up the common database. All coauthors thank their national funding institutions for supporting the establishment, measure and analysis of core data in the studied plots. Research at the Polish case studies was additionally supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland (No W117/H2020/2018 )., 15 Pág.