Search

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes a spectrum of respiratory illnesses in infants and young children that may lead to hospitalizations and a substantial number of outpatient visits, which result in a huge economic and healthcare burden. Most hospitalizations happen in otherwise healthy infants, highlighting the need to protect all infants against RSV. Moreover, there is evidence on the association between early-life RSV respiratory illness and recurrent wheezing/asthma-like symptoms As such, RSV is considered a global health priority. However, despite this, the only prevention strategy currently available is palivizumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) indicated in a subset of preterm infants or those with comorbidities, hence leaving the majority of the infant population unprotected against this virus. Therefore, development of prevention strategies against RSV for all infants entering their first RSV season constitutes a large unmet medical need. The aim of this review is to explore different immunization approaches to protect all infants against RSV. Prevention strategies include maternal immunization, immunization of infants with vaccines, immunization of infants with licensed mAbs (palivizumab), and immunization of infants with long-acting mAbs (e.g., nirsevimab, MK-1654). Of these, palivizumab use is restricted to a small population of infants and does not offer a solution for all-infant protection, whereas vaccine development in infants has encountered various challenges, including the immaturity of the infant immune system, highlighting that future pediatric vaccines will most likely be used in older infants (>6 months of age) and children. Consequently, maternal immunization and immunization of infants with long-acting mAbs represent the two feasible strategies for protection of all infants against RSV. Here, we present considerations regarding these two strategies covering key areas which include mechanism of action, "consistency" of protection, RSV variability, duration of protection, flexibility and optimal timing of immunization, benefit for the mother, programmatic implementation, and acceptance of each strategy by key stakeholders. We conclude that, based on current data, immunization of infants with long-acting mAbs might represent the most effective approach for protecting all infants entering their first RSV season. Copyright © 2022 Esposito, Abu Raya, Baraldi, Flanagan, Martinon Torres, Tsolia and Zielen.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is the most widely used antibiotic for neonatal Gram-positive sepsis, but clinical outcome data of dosing strategies are scarce. The NeoVanc programme comprised extensive preclinical studies to inform a randomised controlled trial to assess optimised vancomycin dosing. We compared the efficacy of an optimised regimen to a standard regimen in infants with late onset sepsis that was known or suspected to be caused by Gram-positive microorganisms. METHODS: NeoVanc was an open-label, multicentre, phase 2b, parallel-group, randomised, non-inferiority trial comparing the efficacy and toxicity of an optimised regimen of vancomycin to a standard regimen in infants aged 90 days or younger. Infants with at least three clinical or laboratory sepsis criteria or confirmed Gram-positive sepsis with at least one clinical or laboratory criterion were enrolled from 22 neonatal intensive care units in Greece, Italy, Estonia, Spain, and the UK. Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the optimised regimen (25 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 15 mg/kg every 12 h or 8 h dependent on postmenstrual age, for 5 ± 1 days) or the standard regimen (no loading dose; 15 mg/kg every 24 h, 12 h, or 8 h dependent on postmenstrual age for 10 ± 2 days). Vancomycin was administered intravenously via 60 min infusion. Group allocation was not masked to local investigators or parents. The primary endpoint was success at the test of cure visit (10 ± 1 days after the end of actual vancomycin therapy) in the per-protocol population, where success was defined as the participant being alive at the test of cure visit, having a successful outcome at the end of actual vancomycin therapy, and not having a clinically or microbiologically significant relapse or new infection requiring antistaphylococcal antibiotics for more than 24 h within 10 days of the end of actual vancomycin therapy. The non-inferiority margin was -10%. Safety was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02790996). FINDINGS: Between March 3, 2017, and July 29, 2019, 242 infants were randomly assigned to the standard regimen group (n=122) or the optimised regimen group (n=120). Primary outcome data in the per-protocol population were available for 90 infants in the optimised group and 92 in the standard group. 64 (71%) of 90 infants in the optimised group and 73 (79%) of 92 in the standard group had success at test of cure visit; non-inferiority was not confirmed (adjusted risk difference -7% [95% CI -15 to 2]). Incomplete resolution of clinical or laboratory signs after 5 ± 1 days of vancomycin therapy was the main factor contributing to clinical failure in the optimised group. Abnormal hearing test results were recorded in 25 (30%) of 84 infants in the optimised group and 12 (15%) of 79 in the standard group (adjusted risk ratio 1·96 [95% CI 1·07 to 3·59], p=0·030). There were six vancomycin-related adverse events in the optimised group (one serious adverse event) and four in the standard group (two serious adverse events). 11 infants in the intention-to-treat population died (six [6%] of 102 infants in the optimised group and five [5%] of 98 in the standard group). INTERPRETATION: In the largest neonatal vancomycin efficacy trial yet conducted, no clear clinical impact of a shorter duration of treatment with a loading dose was demonstrated. The use of the optimised regimen cannot be recommended because a potential hearing safety signal was identified; long-term follow-up is being done. These results emphasise the importance of robust clinical safety assessments of novel antibiotic dosing regimens in infants. FUNDING: EU Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration.

Colletotrichum is a fungal genus (Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Glomerellaceae) that includes many economically important plant pathogens that cause devastating diseases of a wide range of plants. In this work, using a combination of long- and short-read sequencing technologies, we sequenced the genome of Colletotrichum lupini RB221, isolated from white lupin (Lupinus albus) in France during a survey in 2014. The genome was assembled into 11 nuclear chromosomes and a mitochondrial genome with a total assembly size of 63.41 Mb and 36.55 kb, respectively. In total, 18,324 protein-encoding genes have been predicted, of which only 39 are specific to C. lupini. This resource will provide insight into pathogenicity factors and will help provide a better understanding of the evolution and genome structure of this important plant pathogen.

Although maternal antenatal transfer is the preferred option, some infants inevitably need urgent transport to a tertiary neonatal care facility after birth. This study aimed to investigate trends over time in patient characteristics and respiratory management in a large series of neonatal emergency transfers, in order to provide health caregivers an up-to-date profile of such patients and their therapeutic needs. Trends in patient characteristics and respiratory management were evaluated in 3337 transfers by the Eastern Veneto Neonatal Emergency Transport Service in 2000–2019. Joinpoint regression analysis was performed to evaluate trends and to estimate annual percentage changes (APCs). Proportions of preterm neonates increased (APC2000–2012 2.25%), then decreased (APC2012–2019 − 6.04%). Transfers at birth increased (APC2000–2013 2.69%), then decreased (APC2013–2019 − 5.76%). Proportion of neonates with cardiac and surgical diseases declined (APCs2000–2019 − 6.82% and − 3.32%), while proportion of neonates with neurologic diseases increased (APC2000–2019 8.62%). Use of nasal-continuous-positive-airway-pressure (APC2000–2019 9.72%) and high-flow-nasal-cannula (APC2007–2019 58.51%) at call, and nasal-continuous-positive-airway-pressure (APC2000–2019 13.87%) and nasal-intermittent-mandatory-ventilation (APC2000–2019 32.46%) during transfer increased. Mechanical ventilation during transfer decreased (APC2014–2019 − 10.77%). Use of oxygen concentrations at 21% increased at call and during transfer (APCs 2000–2019 2.24% and 2.44%), while oxygen concentrations above 40% decreased at call and during transfer (APCs 2000–2019 − 3.93% and − 5.12%). Conclusion: Our findings revealed a shift toward a more “gentle” approach and the reduced use of oxygen in respiratory management. Equipment and team expertise should meet the requirements of such changing patients and their therapeutic needs.

It has come to our attention that the PITER framework investigator, Alessandro Federico, was incorrectly listed as F. Alessandro in the original manuscript. Please note that the correct name of this author is Alessandro Federico (2nd University of Naples). The correct list of PITER investigators is in the footnote below.

According to the new EU Regulation (2017/2158), which has established new “mitigation measures and benchmark levels for the reduction of acrylamide in foods”, there is the necessity to adapt different process methods in order to reduce the acrylamide formation in deep-fat fried potato-based products, and at the same time to maintain the quality of final products acceptable. Among strategies suggested for the reduction of acrylamide in potato crisps, pulsed electric fields (PEF) represent a promising innovative technology with the potentiality to remove Maillard reaction substrates, such as reducing sugars and free asparagine, in raw potato tissues. Recently, it has been reported that the strain L1 of the yeast Aureobasidium pullulans has the ability to assimilate asparagine in food systems. On the basis of this consideration, the aim of the study was to evaluate the possibility of the reduction of acrylamide content in potato crisps, pre-treating the raw material using a combination of PEF treatment to enhance the extractability of asparagine and a subsequent treatment with aqueous suspension of the aforementioned yeast. Potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum, var. Lady Claire) were manually peeled and sliced and submitted to PEF pre-treatment using a lab-scale unit delivering rectangular shape pulses. An electric field strength of 1.5 kV/cm and 1000 pulses were used. Consequently, PEF-treated samples were soaked in 250 ml of L1 water suspension (108 cells/ml) for different times at 25 C. A commercial deep-fat fryer was used for the frying tests. Fried potato crisp samples were analysed for moisture, asparagine content, colour, texture, oil uptake and acrylamide content. Results showed a significant reduction of asparagine content and therefore of acrylamide formation after frying. PEF pre-treatment of raw potato slices allowed the cell de- compartmentalisation enhancing the sugars and asparagine availability and so their assimilability from yeasts.

Background Healthcare research funders may undertake various roles to facilitate implementation of research findings. Their ability to enact such roles depends on several factors, knowledge of implementation being one essential requirement. However, previous studies do not assess the type or level of knowledge about implementation that research funders possess. This paper therefore presents findings from a qualitative, inductive study of the implementation knowledge of research funders. Three aspects of this knowledge are explored, namely how research funders define implementation, their level of self-assessed implementation knowledge and the factors influencing their self-assessment of implementation knowledge. Methods Research funders (n = 18) were purposefully selected from a sample of research funding organisations in Sweden (n = 10). In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted, recorded and transcribed verbatim. An inductive method using a systematic coding procedure was employed to derive the findings. Results The research funders defined implementation as either an outcome or a process, with the majority believing that implementation of healthcare research results demands a process, although its complexity varied in the research funders’ view. They perceived their own level of implementation knowledge as either limited or substantial, with a majority regarding it as limited. Clinical research experience, clinical experience and task relevance were singled out as the clearest factors affecting the self-assessment of their own implementation knowledge. Conclusions This study, the first to focus on implementation knowledge of research funders, demonstrates that they are a category of policy-makers who may possess knowledge, based on their previous professional experience, that is comparable to some important findings from implementation research. Consequently, the findings not only pinpoint the relevance of professional experience, but also reveal a lack of awareness and knowledge of the results of implementation research among research funders in charge of healthcare research. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-019-0472-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.