Search

Background: The European Renal Association (ERA) Registry collects data on kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This paper is a summary of the ERA Registry Annual Report 2021, including a comparison across treatment modalities., Methods: Data was collected from 54 national and regional registries from 36 countries, of which 35 registries from 18 countries contributed individual patient data and 19 registries from 19 countries contributed aggregated data. Using this data, incidence and prevalence of KRT, kidney transplantation rates, survival probabilities and expected remaining lifetimes were calculated., Result: In 2021, 533.2 million people in the general population were covered by the ERA Registry. The incidence of KRT was 145 per million population (pmp). In incident patients, 55% were 65 years or older, 64% were male, and the most common primary renal disease (PRD) was diabetes (22%). The prevalence of KRT was 1040 pmp. In prevalent patients, 47% were 65 years or older, 62% were male, and the most common PRDs were diabetes and glomerulonephritis/sclerosis (both 16%). On 31 December 2021, 56% of patients received haemodialysis, 5% received peritoneal dialysis, and 39% were living with a functioning graft. The kidney transplantation rate in 2021 was 37 pmp, a majority coming from deceased donors (66%). For patients initiating KRT between 2012-2016, 5-year survival probability was 52%. Compared to the general population, life expectancy was 65% and 68% shorter for males and females receiving dialysis, and 40% and 43% shorter for males and females living with a functioning graft., Competing Interests: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background: The aim of this study was to identify trends in total, deceased donor (DD) and living donor (LD) kidney transplantation (KT) rates in European countries., Methods: The European Renal Association (ERA) Registry and the Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation (GODT) databases were used to obtain the number of KTs in individual European countries between 2010 and 2018. General population counts were obtained from Eurostat or the national bureaus of statistics. The KT rate per million population (p.m.p.) and the average annual percentage change (APC) were calculated., Results: The total KT rate in the 40 participating countries increased with 1.9% annually  [95%  confidence  interval  (CI) 1.5, 2.2] from 29.6 p.m.p. in 2010 to 34.7 p.m.p. in 2018, reflecting an increase of 3.4 p.m.p. in the DD-KT rate (from 21.6 p.m.p. to 25.0 p.m.p.; APC 1.9%; 95% CI 1.3, 2.4) and of 1.5 p.m.p. in the LD-KT rate (from 8.1 p.m.p. to 9.6 p.m.p.; APC 1.6%; 95% CI 1.0, 2.3). The trends in KT rate varied widely across European countries. An East-West gradient was observed for DD-KT rate, with Western European countries performing more KTs. In addition, most countries performed fewer LD-KTs. In 2018, Spain had the highest DD-KT rate (64.6 p.m.p.) and Turkey the highest LD-KT rate (37.0 p.m.p.)., Conclusions: The total KT rate increased due to a rise in the KT rate from DDs and to a lesser extent from LDs, with large differences between individual European countries., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background: Data on renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease were collected by the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry via national and regional renal registries in Europe and countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea. This article provides a summary of the 2019 ERA Registry Annual Report, including data from 34 countries and additional age comparisons., Methods: Individual patient data for 2019 were provided by 35 registries and aggregated data by 17 registries. Using these data, the incidence and prevalence of RRT, the kidney transplantation activity and the survival probabilities were calculated., Results: In 2019, a general population of 680.8 million people was covered by the ERA Registry. Overall, the incidence of RRT was 132 per million population (p.m.p.). Of these patients, 62% were men, 54% were ≥65 years of age and 21% had diabetes mellitus as primary renal disease (PRD), and 84% had haemodialysis (HD), 11% had peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 5% had pre-emptive kidney transplantation as an initial treatment modality. The overall prevalence of RRT on 31 December 2019 was 893 p.m.p., with 58% of patients on HD, 5% on PD and 37% living with a kidney transplant. The overall kidney transplant rate was 35 p.m.p. and 29% of the kidney grafts were from a living donor. The unadjusted 5-year survival probability was 42.3% for patients commencing dialysis, 86.6% for recipients of deceased donor grafts and 94.4% for recipients of living donor grafts in the period 2010-14. When comparing age categories, there were substantial differences in the distribution of PRD, treatment modality and kidney donor type, and in the survival probabilities., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Purpose: Although a population's senescence rate is classically measured as the increase in mortality rate with age on a logarithmic scale, it may be more accurately measured as the increase on a linear scale. Patients on dialysis, who suffer from accelerated senescence, exhibit a smaller increase in their mortality rate on a logarithmic scale, but a larger increase on a linear scale than patients with a functioning kidney transplant. However, this comparison may be biased by population heterogeneity., Methods: Follow-up data on 323,308 patients on dialysis and 91,679 patients with a functioning kidney transplant were derived from the ERA-EDTA Registry. We measured the increases in their mortality rates using Gompertz frailty models that allow individual variation in this increase., Results: According to these models, the senescence rate measured as the increase in mortality rate on a logarithmic scale was smaller in patients on dialysis, while the senescence rate measured as the increase on a linear scale was larger in patients on dialysis than patients with a functioning kidney transplant., Conclusions: Also when accounting for population heterogeneity, a population's senescence rate is more accurately measured as the increase in mortality rate on a linear scale than a logarithmic scale., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The rate of senescence can be inferred from the acceleration by which mortality rates increase over age. Such a senescence rate is generally estimated from parameters of a mathematical model fitted to these mortality rates. However, such models have limitations and underlying assumptions. Notably, they do not fit mortality rates at young and old ages. Therefore, we developed a method to calculate senescence rates from the acceleration of mortality directly without modeling the mortality rates. We applied the different methods to age group-specific mortality data from the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry, including patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis, who are known to suffer from increased senescence rates (n = 302,455), and patients with a functioning kidney transplant (n = 74,490). From age 20 to 70, senescence rates were comparable when calculated with or without a model. However, when using non-modeled mortality rates, senescence rates were yielded at young and old ages that remained concealed when using modeled mortality rates. At young ages senescence rates were negative, while senescence rates declined at old ages. In conclusion, the rate of senescence can be calculated directly from non-modeled mortality rates, overcoming the disadvantages of an indirect estimation based on modeled mortality rates., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The most frequently used model to describe the exponential increase in mortality rate over age is the Gompertz equation. Logarithmically transformed, the equation conforms to a straight line, of which the slope has been interpreted as the rate of senescence. Earlier, we proposed the derivative function of the Gompertz equation as a superior descriptor of senescence rate. Here, we tested both measures of the rate of senescence in a population of patients with end-stage renal disease. It is clinical dogma that patients on dialysis experience accelerated senescence, whereas those with a functional kidney transplant have mortality rates comparable to the general population. Therefore, we calculated the age-specific mortality rates for European patients on dialysis (n=274 221; follow-up=594 767 person-years), for European patients with a functioning kidney transplant (n=61 286; follow-up=345 024 person-years), and for the general European population. We found higher mortality rates, but a smaller slope of logarithmic mortality curve for patients on dialysis compared with both patients with a functioning kidney transplant and the general population (P<0.001). A classical interpretation of the Gompertz model would imply that the rate of senescence in patients on dialysis is lower than in patients with a functioning transplant and lower than in the general population. In contrast, the derivative function of the Gompertz equation yielded the highest senescence rates for patients on dialysis, whereas the rate was similar in patients with a functioning transplant and the general population. We conclude that the rate of senescence is better described by the derivative function of the Gompertz equation., (© 2010 The Authors. Aging Cell © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Background: Anemia is common among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, and most patients require erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) to maintain their hemoglobin concentrations within current guideline recommendations. Darbepoetin alfa is an ESA with a 3-fold longer half-life and greater in vivo biological activity than recombinant human erythropoietin, allowing less frequent dosing that may simplify anemia management in these patients, providing benefits to patients, care givers and health care providers. Clinical studies have confirmed the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa administered at extended dosing intervals. However, there are limited data on the management of anemia with ESAs in PD patients in routine clinical practice. The aim of this multicenter observational study in European and Australian dialysis patients was to evaluate darbepoetin alfa administered once every 2 weeks (Q2W) in routine clinical practice for 12 months., Methods: PD patients ≥18 years old and converting to treatment with darbepoetin alfa Q2W were eligible for enrollment regardless of previous or current ESA use. Patients enrolled in the study were treated according to local usual clinical practice. Data were collected up to 6 months prior to and 12 months after conversion to darbepoetin alfa Q2W. The primary endpoint was hemoglobin concentration 12 months after conversion to darbepoetin alfa Q2W., Results: Of the 741 eligible PD patients (mean age, 61 years; male, 57%), 640 (86%) completed the study. Mean hemoglobin concentration (g/dL) was 11.69 (95% CI, 11.53-11.86) 6 months before the conversion, 12.25 (95% CI, 12.13-12.38) at conversion, and 11.88 (95% CI, 11.74-12.02) 12 months after conversion to darbepoetin alfa Q2W. The weekly equivalent ESA dose (μg/wk) was a geometric mean of 25.24 (95% CI, 23.46-27.15) 6 months before conversion, 20.90 (95% CI, 19.13-22.83) immediately before conversion, 18.89 (95% CI, 18.13-19.68) at conversion and 19.04 (95% CI, 17.69-20.49) 12 months after conversion. Twelve months after conversion, 70% of patients were receiving darbepoetin alfa Q2W and 73% had hemoglobin concentrations >11.0 g/dL., Conclusion: In this large observational study, PD patients were able to maintain mean hemoglobin concentrations >11.0 g/dL after conversion to extended dosing of darbepoetin alfa Q2W, with no mean dose increase.

Aims: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are recommended for managing renal anemia. ALTERNATE is an observational study in European and Australian dialysis patients evaluating darbepoetin a (DA) once every 2 weeks (Q2W) in clinical practice., Methods: Adult dialysis patients initiating treatment with DA Q2W were eligible regardless of previous/current ESA use. Data were collected 6 months before and 12 months after Q2W initiation. The primary endpoint was hemoglobin (Hb) concentration 12 months after initiation., Results: A total of 6,112 patients were enrolled; 6,104 were eligible (87% hemodialysis, 12% peritoneal dialysis). Before initiation, 77.3%, 8.8%, and 7.8% of patients were receiving DA, epoetin beta, and epoetin alpha, respectively; 6% were ESA naïve. Mean (95% CI) Hb (g/dl) was 11.68 (11.63-11.72) 6 months before initiation, 12.00 (11.97-12.04) at initiation, and 11.62 (11.58-11.66) 12 months after initiation. Geometric mean (95% CI) weekly ESA dose (µg/wk) was 27.27 (26.62-27.93) immediately before initiation, 23.69 (23.28 - 24.10) at initiation, and 26.80 (26.12-27.49) 12 months after initiation. At month 12, 77.3% of patients were receiving DA Q2W., Conclusions: This large observational study demonstrates that Hb concentrations can be effectively maintained over 12 months in a general dialysis population with DA Q2W without an increase in ESA dose.

Background: Long-term survivors of heart transplantation are often confronted with chronic kidney disease, by definition related to the intake of calcineurin-inhibitors. Sirolimus is increasingly proposed as an alternative immunosuppressive agent due to its absence of nephrotoxicity., Methods: Between November 2002 and November 2003, 9 adult heart transplant candidates with moderate to severe chronic renal disease were switched from cyclosporine to sirolimus. The conversion scheme consisted of an immediate stop of cyclosporine and an 8-mg loading dose of sirolimus, followed by 3 mg/d; after 1 week, the sirolimus dose was adjusted to maintain trough levels between 5 and 15 microg/L. The majority of patients were on corticosteroids, and on either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. At conversion, the mean serum creatinine level was 2.11 (+/-0.4) mg/dL and the mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 32 (+/-7) mL/min/1.73 m(2). Prior to conversion, the renal dysfunction was predominantly stable., Results: After conversion, there were 7 dropouts (75%) due to several side effects related to sirolimus: edema (n = 2), general discomfort (n = 2), delayed wound healing (n = 1), cardiac thrombus (n = 1), and diarrhea (n = 1). The median treatment time with Sirolimus, therefore, was only 4.0 months. While on sirolimus, the renal function of all patients remained unchanged or showed even some improvement. Retrospective nephrological review revealed severe renal artery stenoses in 2 patients and serious generalized abdominal and renal atheromatosis in 7 patients. No cardiac dysfunction was seen., Conclusion: Conversion from cyclosporine to sirolimus was problematic due to sirolimus side effects, occurring at any time after the switch. One should also question whether chronic kidney disease after heart transplantation is routinely caused by the administration of calcineurin-inhibitors, in view of the generalized renal and abdominal atheromatosis.

Unlabelled: BACKGROUND; No significant improvement of overall graft survival in cardiac transplantation has occurred during the past decade, notwithstanding the identification of several prognostic donor and recipient risk factors. By translating multivariate results into iso-risk curves plots, stratified for medical urgency, we attempt to present results in a more practical manner, to be used as guidelines at the time of donor heart offer and of allocation., Methods: We analyzed all first heart-only transplants performed in adults and carried out between January 1, 1997, and June 30, 1998 (N = 1120). Before transplant, 687 patients were at home, 233 on hospital wards, and 200 on the intensive care unit. The overall Cox model yielded 5 independent factors associated with 1-year graft outcome: donor age, donor:recipient weight ratio, medical urgency, end-stage heart disease, and transplant country. We used the significant donor variables of donor age and donor:recipient weight ratio for the iso-risk curves; we calculated relative risks for all combinations of donor age and donor:recipient weight ratio. We obtained iso-risk curves by linking equal relative risks., Results: All iso-risk curves showed that with older donor age, the donor:recipient weight ratio must be higher to obtain the same relative risk for all 3 medical urgency groups. The more urgent the heart transplant candidate, the higher the course of the iso-risk curve for all donor ages., Conclusions: Iso-risk curve is an elegant tool for presenting multivariate analyses in a more practical and patient-oriented manner. The more understandable prognostic factors become the more likely we are to achieve better results in cardiac transplantation and to use more optimally donor hearts. As an example, we have demonstrated the interaction between donor age, donor:recipient size ratio, and medical urgency.

Objective: To determine whether there is a survival benefit associated with cardiac transplantation in Germany., Design: Prospective observational cohort study., Setting: All 889 adult patients listed for a first heart transplant in Germany in 1997., Main Outcome Measure: Mortality, stratified by heart failure severity., Results: Within 1 year after listing, patients with a predicted high risk had the highest global death rate (51% v 32% and 29% for medium and low risk patients respectively; P<0.0001), had the highest risk of dying on the waiting list (32% v 20% and 20%; P=0.0003), and were more likely to receive a transplant (48% v 45% and 41%; P=0.01). Differences between the risk groups in outcome after transplantation did not reach significance (P=0.2). Transplantation was not associated with a reduction in mortality risk for the total cohort, but it did provide a survival benefit for the high risk group., Conclusion: Cardiac transplantation in Germany is currently associated with a survival benefit only in patients with a predicted high risk of dying on the waiting list. Patients with a predicted low or medium risk have no reduction in mortality risk associated with transplantation; they should be managed with organ saving approaches rather than transplantation.

The main problem in organ transplantation is the continuing shortage of organ donors. Despite all efforts no major significant increases in organ availability are observed during the year 1996 in the participating Eurotransplant counties, while the demand i.e. the waiting lists are still increasing. Shortage of organs will also have its effects and constraints on the distribution i.e. the allocation of scarce organs. To meet the demand of the renal transplantation programs a special kidney allocation system was designed based upon many simulation studies. Already a few months after implementation of the new system very promising results were observed i.e. the discrepancies between the different countries in terms of kidney procurement and transplantation frequencies disappeared. Furthermore, twice as much long waiting kidney patients have been transplanted as previously and the percentage of well matched HLA donor-recipient combinations remained surprisingly high, nearly 24%.