1. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
- Author
-
Leitao MM Jr, Zhou QC, Brandt B, Iasonos A, Sioulas V, Lavigne Mager K, Shahin M, Bruce S, Black DR, Kay CG, Gandhi M, Qayyum M, Scalici J, Jones NL, Paladugu R, Brown J, Naumann RW, Levine MD, Mendivil A, Lim PC, Kang E, Cantrell LA, Sullivan MW, Martino MA, Kratz MK, Kolev V, Tomita S, Leath CA 3rd, Boitano TKL, Doo DW, Feltmate C, Sugrue R, Olawaiye AB, Goldfeld E, Ferguson SE, Suhner J, and Abu-Rustum NR
- Subjects
- Disease-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy methods, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures methods, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies, Laparoscopy methods, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Objective: The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial found that minimally invasive radical hysterectomy compared to open radical hysterectomy compromised oncologic outcomes and was associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in early-stage cervical carcinoma. We sought to assess oncologic outcomes at multiple centers between minimally invasive (MIS) radical hysterectomy and OPEN radical hysterectomy., Methods: This is a multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study of patients with 2009 FIGO stage IA1 (with lymphovascular space invasion) to IB1 cervical carcinoma from 1/2007-12/2016. Patients who underwent preoperative therapy were excluded. Squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinomas were included. Appropriate statistical tests were used., Results: We identified 1093 cases for analysis-715 MIS (558 robotic [78%]) and 378. OPEN procedures. The OPEN cohort had more patients with tumors >2 cm, residual disease in the hysterectomy specimen, and more likely to have had adjuvant therapy. Median follow-up for the MIS and OPEN cohorts were 38.5 months (range, 0.03-149.51) and 54.98 months (range, 0.03-145.20), respectively. Three-year PFS rates were 87.9% (95% CI: 84.9-90.4%) and 89% (95% CI: 84.9-92%), respectively (P = 0.6). On multivariate analysis, the adjusted HR for recurrence/death was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.47-1.03; P = 0.07). Three-year OS rates were 95.8% (95% CI: 93.6-97.2%) and 96.6% (95% CI: 93.8-98.2%), respectively (P = 0.8). On multivariate analysis, the adjusted HR for death was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.43-1.52; P = 0.5)., Conclusion: This multi-institutional analysis showed that an MIS compared to OPEN radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer did not appear to compromise oncologic outcomes, with similar PFS and OS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Leitao is an ad hoc speaker for Intuitive Surgical, Inc.; outside the submitted work, he is on the Advisory Board of Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson and Takeda; and reports grants paid to the institution by KCI/Acelity. Dr. Martino is a patient safety consultant for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Medtronic. Outside the submitted work, Dr. Iasonos reports consulting fees from Mylan; Dr. Abu-Rustum reports institutional grants from GRAIL; Dr. Shahin is a speaker/consultant for GSK/Tesaro, AstraZeneca, and Merck, and consultant for Biom'up and Aspira. All other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF