Search

The presence of myositis-specific antibodies (MSA), was recently reported in healthy individuals, cancer patients without myopathy and paraneoplastic rheumatic syndromes. We sought to analyze the frequency of MSA, myositis-associated antibodies (MAA) and autoantibodies related to systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) in breast cancer patients. One hundred fifty-two breast cancer patients were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Clinical information was collected, and autoantibodies tested by immunoprecipitation of an 35S-methionine-labeled K562 cell extract, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot when indicated. All statistical tests were performed using the software statistical package for the social science (SPSS) ver. 19.0 (IBM Inc., NYSE, USA). Autoantibodies associated with SARD: anti-52 kD ribonucleoprotein/tripartite motif-containing 21 (anti-Ro52/TRIM21) was found in 5.9% (9/152), anti-Sjögren syndrome-related antigen A/60 kD ribonucleoprotein antibody (anti-SSA/Ro60) in 3.9% (6/152) and anti-Su antigen/Argonaute 2 antibody (anti-Su/Ago2) in 2.6% (4/152). Meanwhile, anti-transcription intermediary factor-1γ (anti-TIF-1γ, p155/140) antibody was positive in 2 cases and anti-polymyositis/scleroderma antibody was detected in one case. As a whole, 14.47% (22/152) of breast cancer patients showed autoantibodies associated with SARD. These specific autoantibodies were not associated with the presence of rheumatic diseases except one rheumatoid arthritis patient positive for anti-Ro52/TRIM21. Autoantibodies to TIF-1γ were found in two patients with breast cancer without dermatomyositis (DM). More common specificities were autoantibodies anti-SSA/Ro60, anti-Ro52/TRIM21 and anti-Su/Ago2. More studies are needed in order to establish the biological meaning of the presence of SARD-associated autoantibodies in breast cancer.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., In January 2020, a global pandemic was declared by the World Health Organization authorities for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since then, we have looked for ways to avoid transmission with mitigation measures and social distancing. However, areas with a high incidence of COVID-19 have struggled to maintain adequate supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE) essential for health workers. Many innovations have been proposed to assist providers including barriers to use during airway management. We present adaptations to previously described intubation or “aerosol” boxes.