Search

STUDY QUESTION Is endometrial thickness (EMT) a biomarker to select between women who should switch to gonadotropins and those who could continue clomiphene citrate (CC) after six failed ovulatory cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER Using a cut-off of 7 mm for EMT, we can distinguish between women who are better off switching to gonadotropins and those who could continue CC after six earlier failed ovulatory CC cycles. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN For women with normogonadotropic anovulation, CC has been a long-standing first-line treatment in conjunction with intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI). We recently showed that a switch to gonadotropins increases the chance of live birth by 11% in these women over continued treatment with CC after six failed ovulatory cycles, at a cost of €15 258 per additional live birth. It is unclear whether EMT can be used to identify women who can continue on CC with similar live birth rates without the extra costs of gonadotropins. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Between 8 December 2008 and 16 December 2015, 666 women with CC failure were randomly assigned to receive an additional six cycles with a change to gonadotropins (n = 331) or an additional six cycles continuing with CC (n = 335), both in conjunction with intercourse or IUI. The primary outcome was conception leading to live birth within 8 months after randomisation. EMT was measured mid-cycle before randomisation during their sixth ovulatory CC cycle. The EMT was available in 380 women, of whom 190 were allocated to gonadotropins and 190 were allocated to CC. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS EMT was determined in the sixth CC cycle prior to randomisation. We tested for interaction of EMT with the treatment effect using logistic regression. We performed a spline analysis to evaluate the association of EMT with chance to pregnancy leading to a live birth in the next cycles and to determine the best cut-off point. On the basis of the resulting cut-off point, we calculated the relative risk and 95% CI of live birth for gonadotropins versus CC at EMT values below and above this cut-off point. Finally, we calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Mid-cycle EMT in the sixth cycle interacted with treatment effect (P 7 mm. Among the women with EMT ≤ 7 mm, gonadotropins resulted in a live birth in 44 of 79 women (56%), while CC resulted in a live birth in 28 of 83 women (34%) (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13–2.19). Per additional live birth with gonadotropins, the ICER was €9709 (95% CI: €5117 to €25 302). Among the women with EMT > 7 mm, gonadotropins resulted in a live birth in 53 of 111 women (48%) while CC resulted in a live birth in 52 of 107 women (49%) (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.75–1.29). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This was a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and therefore mid-cycle EMT measurements before randomisation during their sixth ovulatory CC cycle were not available for all included women. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS In women with six failed ovulatory cycles on CC and an EMT ≤ 7 mm in the sixth cycle, we advise switching to gonadotropins, since it improves live birth rate over continuing treatment with CC at an extra cost of €9709 to achieve one additional live birth. If the EMT > 7 mm, we advise to continue treatment with CC, since live birth rates are similar to those with gonadotropins, without the extra costs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The original MOVIN trial received funding from the Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw number: 80-82310-97-12067). C.B.L.A. reports unrestricted grant support from Merck and Ferring. B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548) and reports consultancy for Merck, ObsEva, IGENOMIX and Guerbet. All other authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR1449

Please cite this paper as: Tajik P, van der Tuuk K, Koopmans C, Groen H, van Pampus M, van der Berg P, van der Post J, van Loon A, de Groot C, Kwee A, Huisjes A, van Beek E, Papatsonis D, Bloemenkamp K, van Unnik G, Porath M, Rijnders R, Stigter R, de Boer K, Scheepers H, Zwinderman A, Bossuyt P, Mol B. Should cervical favourability play a role in the decision for labour induction in gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term? An exploratory analysis of the HYPITAT trial. BJOG 2012;119:11231130. Objective To examine whether cervical favourability (measured by cervical length and the Bishop score) should inform obstetricians decision regarding labour induction for women with gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term. Design A post hoc analysis of the Hypertension and Pre-eclampsia Intervention Trial At Term (HYPITAT). Setting Obstetric departments of six university and 32 teaching and district hospitals in the Netherlands. Population A total of 756 women diagnosed with gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia between 36 + 0 and 41 + 0 weeks of gestation randomly allocated to induction of labour or expectant management. Methods Data were analysed using logistic regression modelling. Main outcome measures The occurrence of a high-risk maternal situation defined as either maternal complications or progression to severe disease. Secondary outcomes were caesarean delivery and adverse neonatal outcomes. Results The superiority of labour induction in preventing high-risk situations in women with gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term varied significantly according to cervical favourability. In women who were managed expectantly, the longer the cervix the higher the risk of developing maternal high-risk situations, whereas in women in whom labour was induced, cervical length was not associated with a higher probability of maternal high-risk situations (test of interaction P = 0.03). Similarly, the beneficial effect of labour induction on reducing the caesarean section rate was stronger in women with an unfavourable cervix. Conclusion Against widely held opinion, our exploratory analysis showed that women with gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term who have an unfavourable cervix benefited more from labour induction than other women. Trial registration The trial has been registered in the clinical trial register as ISRCTN08132825.

Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations highly increase the risk of breast and female adnexal cancer. The role of these genes in the tumorigenesis of other malignancies is still under debate. Borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) are occasionally found in families with a strong history of breast and/or female adnexal cancer with or without proven germline mutations. We investigated whether a BOT arising in a germline BRCA2 mutation carrier could be attributed to this mutation, in which case BOT should be added to the BRCA2 related tumor spectrum. Tumor DNA of a serous borderline ovarian tumor (sBOT) of a 55-year-old female carrier of a pathogenic BRCA2 mutation (6085G>T) was analyzed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of BRCA2. The sBOT cells, unexpectedly, revealed loss of the mutant allele of BRCA2, while ovarian stroma cells and peripheral blood lymphocytes contained both wild-type and mutant allele of BRCA2. The finding that no loss of the wild-type BRCA2 allele was found in the tumor tissue but loss of the mutant allele was seen suggests that sBOT are not part of the BRCA2 related tumor spectrum. In the literature BOT's in germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are described incidentally, while in patients with a BOT a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation is rarely found. Therefore, we conclude that borderline ovarian tumors are neither part of the BRCA1- nor the BRCA2- related tumor spectrum.

Improving access to quality care in family planning, a recent document of the World Health Organization, reviews the epidemiological and clinical evidence relevant to medical eligibility of well established contraceptive methods. Breastfeeding is widely regarded as unreliable for individual contraception. The document, however, argues that the lactational amenorrhoea method (LAM) is a safe and effective family planning method. Worldwide, LAM is the most important way of fertility regulation and its efficacy is confirmed in many studies, with a 2% risk of pregnancy in the first six months after birth. Taking into account certain well defined conditions (frequent feedings, no supplementary feeding before 4-6 months, method only to be used in the absence of menstruation), LAM can be relied on for contraceptive protection for up to 1 year post partum.In 1966 WHO published a document on improving access to quality care in family planning, which who pronounced to be a fundamental human right. According to this document, despite the assortment of reliable contraceptives worldwide 350 million people have unmet need for contraception because of lack of access or availability. Adequate reproductive health depends not only access to contraceptives, but also on adequate screening and treatment of anemia, sexually transmitted diseases, and cervical carcinoma. Among 8 groups of birth control methods studied, the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) was dealt with in detail. The underlying mechanism lies in the stimulation that breastfeeding brings about and in breastfeeding's suppression of the release of gonadotropin- releasing hormone and of dopamine (the prolactin inhibiting factor). A 1974 investigation in Rwanda demonstrated that 50% of rural women who breast fed their children frequently got pregnant within 23 months of childbirth and that 50% of city women became pregnant 9 months postpartum. The Bellagio consensus has stated that LAM provides 98% protection against pregnancy in the first 6 months postpartum as long as breast feeding is the exclusive feeding method practiced. A 1992 analysis of 9 prospective studies reported that 6 months postpartum only 0.7% of the women using LAM became pregnant. LAM still plays a crucial role in Africa, where the average number of children per woman is 6. Without breastfeeding the estimated figure would be 10.