Search

Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors. The main goal was to investigate the discordance between IHC and PCR/NGS for MSI testing in gastrointestinal cancers. Methods: Two series were analyzed through IHC for mismatch-repair-system proteins (MMRP) and PCR, with one series of 444 colorectal cancers (CRC) and the other of 176 gastric cancers (GC). All cases with discordant results between IHC and PCR were analyzed by NGS. IHC staining was evaluated as follows: proficient MMR (pMMR), with all MMR positive; deficient MMR (dMMR), with the loss of one heterodimer; and cases with the loss/patchy expression of one MMR (lo-paMMR). Cases with instability in at least two markers by PCR were MSI-high (MSI-H) and with instability in one marker, MSI-low (MSI-L). Cases without instability were evaluated as microsatellite-stable (MSS). Results: In the CRC cohort, 15 out of 444 cases were dMMR and 46 lo-paMMR. Among the 15 dMMR, 13 were MSI-H and 2 MSS. Among the 46 lo-paMMR, 13 were MSI-H and 33 were MSS. In the GC cohort, 13 out of 176 cases were dMMR and 6 cases lo-paMMR. Among the 13 dMMR, 12 were MSI-H and only 1 was MSS. All six lo-paMMR cases were MSS. All NGS results were in agreement with PCR. Conclusions: In clinical practice, MMR–IHC could be used as a screening test and additional molecular analysis is mandatory exclusively in cases carrying loss/patchy MMR-IHC.

Purpose ATTRACTION-2 trial assessed the role of Nivolumab as a new standard treatment for Asian patients with pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Nivolumab in a real-life Western population, considering the lack of evidence to date. Patients and methods Patients progressed after ≥2 chemotherapy regimens and able to receive Nivolumab (3 mg/kg q14) were eligible for the analysis. Results 16 patients received Nivolumab as third (81.3%) or fourth line (18.7%) from September 2017 to July 2019. The safety was in line with the literature and only one patient discontinued treatment due to persistent hematological toxicity. Overall response rate and disease control rate were 18.7% and 31.2%, respectively. Median duration of response was 5 months. With a median follow-up of 21 months, median OS was 6 months (7, 21 and 22 months in the responders) and median PFS 3 months. PD-L1 and microsatellite status were retrospectively collected in 12 patients. All the major responders were MSI, although no statistically significant difference in OS or PFS was observed according to molecular analysis. Conclusion Nivolumab is feasible and effective in Western patients with mGC. Further investigation is urgently needed also in non-Asians.

Muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a widespread malignancy with a worse prognosis often related to a late diagnosis. For early-stage MIBC pts, a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory to evaluate the timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery. The current standard therapy is platinum-based NAC (MVAC-methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin or Platinum–Gemcitabine regimens) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) with lymphadenectomy. However, preliminary data from Vesper trial highlighted that dose-dense NAC MVAC is endowed with a good pathological response but shows low tolerability. In the last few years, translational-based research approaches have identified several candidate biomarkers of NAC esponsiveness, such as ERCC2, ERBB2, or DNA damage response (DDR) gene alterations. Moreover, the recent consensus MIBC molecular classification identified six molecular subtypes, characterized by different sensitivity to chemo- or targeted or immunotherapy, that could open a novel procedure for patient selection and also for neoadjuvant therapies. The Italian PURE-01 phase II Trial extended data on efficacy and resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in this setting. In this review, we summarize the most relevant literature data supporting NAC use in MIBC, focusing on novel therapeutic strategies such as immunotherapy, considering the better patient stratification and selection emerging from novel molecular classification.

Background: Neoangiogenesis has proven to be a relevant pathogenetic mechanism in gastric cancer (GC) and lymphatic spread represents an important well-known prognostic factor. Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) plays a key role in lymphangiogenesis and its blood levels in GC patients are easily measurable. This analysis aimed to investigate the prognostic role of preoperative VEGF-C blood levels.Methods: VEGF-C serum levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay (ELISA) in 186 patients observed at our institution from January 2004 until December 2009 and 82 healthy subjects. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0.Results: VEGF-C levels were significantly higher in GC patients (median: 287.4 pg/mL; range, 76.2-865.2 pg/mL) than in the control group (median VEGF-C: 31 pg/mL; range, 12-97 pg/mL). A significant correlation between VEGF-C levels, T, N and tumor stage has been described. The median overall survival (OS) was statistically significantly higher in pts with low serum VEGF-C levels [median: not reached (NR) vs. 26 months; P

Simple Summary Management of gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains challenging, because of the heterogeneity in tumor biology within the upper gastrointestinal tract. This manuscript is the product of a formal consensus process conducted in three Delphi rounds and a consensus meeting by the GAIN (GAstric cancer Italian Network) group. The goal of this document is to present a synthesis of available evidence and, where this is lacking, to provide expert opinion directed at prevention, diagnosis, and proper management of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma, and in particular aspects of practical management not fully supported by guidelines. Abstract Background: Management of gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains challenging, because of the heterogeneity in tumor biology within the upper gastrointestinal tract. Daily clinical practice is full of grey areas regarding the complexity of diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic procedures. The aim of this paper is to provide a guide for clinicians facing challenging situations in routine practice, taking a multidisciplinary consensus approach based on available literature. Methods: The GAIN (GAstric cancer Italian Network) group was established with the aims of reviewing literature evidence, discussing key issues in prevention, diagnosis, and management of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma, and offering a summary of statements. A Delphi consensus method was used to obtain opinions from the expert panel of specialists. Results: Forty-nine clinical questions were identified in six areas of interest: role of multidisciplinary team; risk factors; diagnosis; management of early gastric cancer and multimodal approach to localized gastric cancer; treatment of elderly patients with locally advanced resectable disease; and treatment of locally advanced and metastatic cancer. Conclusions: The statements presented may guide clinicians in practical management of this disease.

Gastric cancer represents today the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths: in fact, its diagnosis usually occurs in later stages due to the lack of specific and early symptoms. Palliative chemotherapy is the only therapeutic option for advanced disease, but the prognosis remains overall poor despite treatments available. According to international guidelines, a doublet or triplet fluoropyrimidine-/platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced unresectable/metastatic gastric cancer, while for HER2-positive cases, trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy represents the treatment of choice as first line. To note, many biological agents, studied in several clinical trials, such as pertuzumab, TDM-1, cetuximab, panitumumab, onartuzumab, rilotumumab, and others, did not show benefit for this malignancy. Instead, promising results are deriving from immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 agents such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, although we are only starting to understand the predictive factors of response to these immune checkpoint agents (e.g., MSI status and EBV status). Finally, recent positive results of TAGS trial with trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line setting pointed out the establishment of “continuum of care” concept even in this hard-to-treat disease: indeed, the presence of robust first-, second-, and even third-line therapies has greatly expanded therapeutic opportunities for GC patients nowadays, increasing quality and quantity of life. This chapter reports the most relevant clinical, molecular, and translational information about GC, leading to a more modern and multidisciplinary therapeutic approach for this awful disease.

Background Perioperative FLOT (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) has recently become the gold standard treatment for fit patients with operable gastric (GC) or gastroesophageal (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, getting a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 45%, over 23% with surgery alone. Methods RealFLOT is an Italian, multicentric, observational trial, collecting data from patients with resectable GC or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative FLOT. Aim of the study was to describe feasibility and safety of FLOT, pathological complete response rate (pCR), surgical outcomes and overall response rate (ORR) in an unselected real-world population. Additional analyses evaluated the correlation between pCR and survival and the prognostic role of microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Results Of 206 patients enrolled that received perioperative FLOT at 15 Italian centers, 124 (60.2%) received at least 4 full-dose cycles, 190 (92.2%) underwent surgery, and 142 (68.9%) started the postoperative phase. Among patients who started the postoperative phase, 105 (51.0%) received FLOT, while 37 (18%) received de-intensified regimens, depending on clinical condition or previous toxicities. pCR was achieved in 7.3% of cases. Safety profile was consistent with literature. Neutropenia was the most common G 3–4 adverse event (AE): 19.9% in the preoperative phase and 16.9% in the postoperative phase. No toxic death was observed and 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.0%. ORR was 45.6% and disease control rate (DCR) was 94.2%. Disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were significantly longer in case of pCR (p = 0.009 and p = 0.023, respectively). A trend towards better DFS was observed among MSI-H patients. Conclusions These real-world data confirm the feasibility of FLOT in an unselected population, representative of the clinical practice. pCR rate was lower than expected, nevertheless we confirm pCR as a predictive parameter of survival. In addition, MSI-H status seems to be a positive prognostic marker also in patients treated with taxane-containing triplets.

e16068 Background: The FLOT4-AIO phase II/III trial established perioperative FLOT regimen as the new standard in Western countries for patients (pts) with locally advanced resectable gastric (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC). Microsatellite instability (MSI-H) showed a favorable prognostic role and a concomitant negative predictive impact on the benefit of adjuvant and neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based doublets, but its prognostic and predictive role in pts receiving perioperative FLOT treatment still remains unclear. Our study aims to explore the real-world efficacy of FLOT regimen and to describe histopathological features and clinical outcomes in the MSI-H subgroup population. Methods: This is a retrospective multi-center analysis including pts with GC and GEJC, treated with perioperative FLOT regimen in clinical practice and whose microsatellite status and survival data were available. The association of baseline characteristics, biomolecular and pathological features and overall survival (OS) were firstly assessed in univariate analyses by means of log-rank test, and significantly prognostic variables (p < .05) were included in a multivariable COX proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 250 pts (median age, 62, range 37-81, male 71.6%, ECOG PS 0, 82%) were treated at 11 Italian Oncology Units from January 2017 to June 2021. At a median follow-up time of 22.5 months (mos) (2.3 - 66.7 mos), 123/250 (49.2%) patients relapsed and 77/250 (30.8 %) died. In the global population the median disease-free survival (DFS) was 16,7 mos (95% CI 13,8–21,2) and the median OS 34,9 mos [95% confidence interval (CI) 28–NA]. MSI-H phenotype was found in 26 (10.4%) out of 250 analyzed tumors. Compared to MSS cases, MSI-H were more frequently identified in female (50% vs 25.9%, p = .001), elderly pts (age ≥ 70 years, 76.9% vs 9.4%, p = .003), Laurens’s intestinal type (54% vs 12%, p = .0076) and in pts with primary location tumor in antrum (38.5% vs 13.8%, p = .0004). No relevant differences have been noticed in R0 resections (88% and 96%, p = .06) and pathological complete responses (4.9 % and 3.8%, p = .718), however a statistically significant difference in the rate of pathological negative lymph-nodes between MSS and MSI-H cohort emerged (29.3% vs 65.4%, p = .0004). Compared to MSS tumor population, MSI-H subgroup has a tendency to better DFS (median not reached (NR) vs 15.7, p = .06), metastasis free survival (MFS, median NR vs 17.2 mos, p = .06) and OS (median 41 vs 34 mos, p = .07). Conclusions: These real-world data confirm the efficacy of FLOT perioperative regimen in pts with locally advanced GC/GEJC, maintained also in the MSI-H pts. Our study suggests a better outcome of MSI-H GC and GECJ pts treated with FLOT in comparison to MSS, due to increased rate of nodal status downstaging and despite a poor histological response in the resected tumor tissue of MSI-H pts.

Background: The prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer remains overall poor despite some recent innovations and the development of new therapeutic approaches. Current European guidelines do not recommend any specific treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to two or more previous chemotherapy regimens, making this setting “orphan.” Immunotherapy is quickly evolving also for this malignancy even if with controversial results and the correct patient selection is still debated, especially for Western patients. The phase III ONO-4538-12 “ATTRACTION-2” represents the current landmark trial for the development of immunotherapy for pretreated Asian patients and led to the approval of Nivolumab in some Asian countries, while only previous phase trials are available for Caucasians. Complete radiological response is anecdotic and has never been described both in the pivotal trial both in the others with Western patients enrolled. Case presentation: We report two cases of heavily pretreated Western elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer who experienced durable complete radiological response to Nivolumab “off label” (more than 20 months to date) in a clinical practice context. Molecular analysis of potential predictive factors has been performed (PD-L1, EBV, MSI, and TMB) on primary tumor sample. Conclusions: Despite the lack of evidence for Western patients and the controversial outcome with the use of checkpoint inhibitors in previous settings, immunotherapy may dramatically change the prognosis and the natural history of pretreated Western metastatic gastric cancer, in a correctly selected population. Microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden may be reliable predictive factors also for Caucasians. There is an urgent need for a change in clinical practice also for this “orphan” patients and more efforts are needed in order to clarify the role of predictive factors for a correct patient selection and better chances of survival for this awful malignancy.

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal human malignancies: novel therapeutic approaches beyond conventional chemotherapy are still lacking and prognosis remains poor, even for resectable patients (pts). Furthermore, there is an almost complete absence of validated predictive factors. Consequently, robust biomarkers for the early diagnosis and the prognostic stratification are urgently needed in clinical practice, especially in the context of neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. In the last years, evidence revealed the crucial role of miRNAs in cancer initiation and progression, as well as in the chemo-resistance mechanisms, suggesting their use as clinical biomarkers. Material and methods: In this pilot study, we performed a microarray analysis to characterize global miRNA expression profile from surgical tissue samples collected from 20 resected PDAC pts pooled into 4 groups according to different clinico-pathological features: nodal metastases (N+/N-) and tumor grading (G2/G3). Results: According to expression patterns, we identified, among 384 miRNAs, a significant different modulation for 11 miRNAs associated to G2 vs G3 and for 7 miRNAs in N+ vs N- disease, suggesting a possible specific signature reflecting histological grade and nodal metastasis occurrence, respectively. We focused on 2 up-regulated (miR-138-5p and miR-518-3p) and 3 down-regulated (miR-215-5p, miR-519a-3p and miR-576-5p) miRNAs in N+ pts, and on 3 up-regulated (miR-1-3p, miR-31-5p and miR-205-5p) in G3 pts, in order to verify their possible implication in the molecular changes behind tumor differentiation and spread, as well as their potential use for prognostic and therapeutic purpose. A bio-informatic analysis was also performed, using different in silico tools, to study both high affinity miRNA targets and cross-regulated pathways among the upand down-regulated miRNAs. The results identified several associated targets involved in multiple signaling pathways commonly dysregulated in cancer. Finally, BRCA1/2 and RB1 miRNAs-mediated-modulation is actually ongoing, considering the pivotal role of these genes in some PDAC pts. Conclusion: These preliminary data provide a strong rationale to further investigate miRNAs expression in larger cohorts of PDAC pts, possibly integrating validated tissue miRNAs data with circulating miRNAs, in order to identify strong (and easily accessible) potential biomarker(s) with prognostic and/or predictive significance. Citation Format: Luca Pompella, Michela Falco, Carlo Caputo, Anna Grimaldi, Giuseppe Tirino, Severo Campione, Francesca Sparano, Maria Lucia Iacovino, Chiara Carmen Miceli, Carlo Molino, Marco Montella, Renato Franco, Gennaro Galizia, Giovanni Conzo, Vincenzo Napolitano, Annamaria Auricchio, Francesca Cardella, Fortunato Ciardiello, Michele Caraglia, Angela Lombardi, Gabriella Misso, Ferdinando De Vita. A pilot study of miRNA expression profile in surgically resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Initial report from a bi-institutional cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2021 Sep 29-30. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(22 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-052.

Despite recent progresses, locally advanced gastric cancer remains a daunting challenge to embrace. Perioperative chemotherapy and D2-gastrectomy depict multimodal treatment of gastric cancer in Europe, shows better results than curative surgery alone in terms of downstaging, micrometastases elimination, and improved long-term survival. Unfortunately, preoperative chemotherapy is useless in about 50% of cases of non-responder patients, in which no effect is registered. Tumor regression grade (TRG) is directly related to chemotherapy effectiveness, but its understanding is achieved only after surgical operation, accordingly, preoperative chemotherapy is given indiscriminately. Conversely, Naples Prognostic Score (NPS), related to patient immune-nutritional status and easily obtained before taking any therapeutic decision, appeared an independent prognostic variable of TRG. NPS was calculated in 59 consecutive surgically treated gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant FLOT4-based chemotherapy. 42.2% of positive responses were observed: all normal NPS and half mild/moderate NPS showed significant responses to chemotherapy with TRG 1–3, while only 20% of the worst NPS showed some related benefits. Evaluation of NPS in gastric cancer patients undergoing multimodal treatment may be useful both in selecting patients who will benefit from preoperative chemotherapy and for changing immune-nutritional conditions in order to improve patient’s reaction against the tumor.

Background: Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine represents one of the standard regimens for first line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). Few data are available on nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in geriatric population. Our study aims to show whether this schedule can be feasible in the elderly as first-line treatment for mPC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 64 mPC patients (>= 65 years old) treated according to the MPACT schedule. Results: Median age was 69.5 years (range, 65-80 years); after a median of 5 cycles administered (range, 1-12), the most common adverse events (AEs) were grade 2 alopecia (46.9%), anemia (17.2%) and hypertransaminasemia (10.9%); all grades neutropenia occurred in 20.3% of pts. Global incidence of grade 3 and 4 toxicities were 26.5% and 0%, respectively, and no patients stopped treatment due to unacceptable toxicity. Stable disease (SI)) was observed in 31.2% of patients, with a disease control rate (DCR) and overall response rate of 57.8% and 26.6%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 18 months, median progression free survival (PFS) was 8 months (95% CI: 6.3-9.6) and median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI: 8.4-15.6). The univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) showed that only ECOG performance status was an independent prognostic factor for survival. Conclusions: Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine schedule is feasible and effective in the "daily clinical practice" geriatric population.

Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (Nab-Gem) represents one of the standard regimen for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). However, few data are available in mPDAC relapsed after gemcitabine as adjuvant treatment. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of Nab-Gem as first-line treatment for mPDAC patients previously treated with adjuvant treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy data of 36 patients, who received first-line Nab-Gem after gemcitabine as adjuvant treatment. All patients received gemcitabine after radical surgery. Median disease-free survival was 12 months (95% CI 9.7-14.3); at relapse, all patients received Nab-Gem. We observed an objective response rate and disease control rate of 11.1% and 63.9%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 47 months, median progression-free survival was 5 months (95% CI 1.0-9.0), whereas median overall survival (OS) was 13 months (95% CI 5.5-20.5). Median OS was higher in patients with a relapse >= 7 months after the end of adjuvant treatment than in patients relapsed < 7 months (14 vs. 8 months, respectively, p: 0.52). Our results show that first-line Nab-Gem is feasible and effective in patients previously treated with gemcitabine as adjuvant treatment.

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth-most common cancer worldwide and an important cause of cancer-related-death. The growing knowledge of its molecular pathogenesis has shown that GC is not a single entity, but a constellation of different diseases, each with its own molecular and clinical characteristics. Currently, surgery represents the only curative approach for localized GC, but only 20% of patients (pts) showed resectable disease at diagnosis and, even in case of curative resection, the prognosis remains poor due to the high rate of disease relapse. In this context, multimodal perioperative approaches were developed in western and eastern countries in order to decrease relapse rates and improve survival. However, there is little consensus about the optimal treatment for non-metastatic GC. In this review, we summarize the current status and future developments of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable GC, attempting to find clear answers to the real problems in clinical practice.

4548 Background: The treatment strategy for patients with resectable gastric cancer changed in the last few years with perioperative treatments. FLOT regimen (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) turned out to be feasible and effective, offering significant improvement in survival outcomes. However, the safety profile of triplet therapies for elderly patients deserves a special attention and, consequently, the best treatment strategy for these patients is still debated. Methods: Focusing on the elderly patient population (age ≥65 years), real-world data from patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma (T≥2 and/or N+) enrolled in the observational RealFLOT study were collected. Results: A total of 206 patients with resectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma received perioperative FLOT at 15 Italian centers in routine clinical practice, between September 2016 and September 2019. The median age was 63 years (range 36-77) and 43% of patients enrolled (n = 89) were ≥65 years. Among elderly patients, 46 (52%) received FLOT for at least 4 full-dose cycles in the preoperative phase, 82 (92%) underwent surgery, and 56 (62%) started the postoperative phase. The primary end point of the study, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, was similar among patients aged ≥65 and < 65 (6.7% vs 7.7%, respectively). The distribution of pathological stages did not differ according to age (p = 0.473), and disease-free survival (DFS) is unrelated to the age of patients (log-rank 0.57; p = 0.89). The incidence of grade (G) 3-4 adverse events (AEs) was similar in the two age groups (Table) and the 30-day mortality rates after surgery did not differ according to age. Conclusions: FLOT regimen demonstrated to be feasible and safe in elderly patients since no differences were observed in terms of pCR, DFS and safety profile according to age. [Table: see text]

300 Background: Perioperative treatments have significantly improved survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer, increasing 5-year overall survival from 23% with surgery alone to 45% with FLOT (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel). Pathological regression is a prognostic marker of better survival. Methods: In this observational, retro- and prospective study we collected data from patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma treated, as clinical practice, with perioperative FLOT. All patients had clinical T2 or higher and/or nodal involvement, according to FLOT4-AIO trial. Results: A total of 206 patients received perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT at 15 Italian centres, between September 2016 and September 2019. Overall, 186 (90.3%) patients completed the preoperative phase, 190 (92%) underwent surgery, and 142 (68.9%) started the postoperative phase. Among patients who started the postoperative phase, 105 (51.0%) received FLOT, while 37 (18%) received less intensive regimens (e.g. FOLFOX or De Gramont), depending on performance status after surgery or toxicity in the preoperative phase. Pathological complete response (pCR) was obtained in 7.3% of cases. In the preoperative phase, grade (G) 3-4 hematological and gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) were reported in 42 (20.4%) and 13 (6.3%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: These real data confirmed the feasibility of perioperative FLOT in a less-selected population, representative of the clinical practice. The pCR rate was lower than in the FLOT4-AIO trial. The survival outcomes, potential predictive or prognostic factors and comprehensive safety data will be included in the final analysis. [Table: see text]

Background. High neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has shown to be a predictor of poor outcomes in various malignancies, including pancreatic cancer. Methods. We assessed 70 consecutive pts with histologically confirmed mPC who received chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine at two different European oncologic centers between January 2012 and November 2015. Variables assessed for prognostic correlations included age ≥ 66, sex, Karnofsky PS score, primary tumor site, baseline CA19.9 level ≥ 59xULN, 12-week decrease of the CA19.9 level ≥ 50% from baseline, basal bilirubin level, baseline NLR, biliary stent implantation, and liver metastasis. Survival analyses were generated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by a Cox proportional hazard model. Results. According to NLR values, the patients were divided into two groups: high and low. Low group patients showed a better median PFS (7 months versus 5 months) and median OS (13 months versus 7 months) in respect to high group patients. At multivariate analysis, Karnofsky PS Conclusions. Baseline NLR is an independent predictor of survival of patients with mPC receiving palliative chemotherapy and could be useful to develop a simple clinical score to identify a subgroup of patients with a low chance to benefit from chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab-alone or combined with paclitaxel-represents one of the main options for patients failing first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. OBJECTIVE: The RAMoss study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of ramucirumab in the "real-life setting". PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients from 25 Italian hospitals started therapy consisting of ramucirumab 8 mg/kg i.v. d1,15q28 with or without paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 i.v. d1,8,15q28. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients with disease progression on first-line therapy received ramucirumab as monotherapy (10%) or combined with paclitaxel (90%). Median treatment duration was 4 months (1-17 months). Global incidence of grade (G) 3-4 toxicity was 9.6%, and for neutropenia 5.4%; treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 3% of patients. The most frequent adverse events (AE) were G1-2 fatigue (27.5%), G1-2 neuropathy (26.3%), and G1-2 neutropenia (14.9%). ORR was 20.2%. Stable disease was observed in 39.2% of patients, with a disease control rate of 59.4%. With a median follow-up of 11 months, median PFS was 4.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-4.7), whereas median OS was 8.0 months (95% CI: 7.09-8.9). In a multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status

Aim: Systemic inflammatory response affects survival of gastric cancer (GC) patients. This study was carried out to create a prognostic inflammatory-based score to predict survival in metastatic GC (mGC) before first-line chemotherapy. Materials & methods: We studied the prognostic value of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet–lymphocyte ratio in 151 patients with mGC at the diagnosis. Results: Median overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in patients with high NLR. Performance status 1–2 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale and NLR were predictors of shorter OS at multivariate analysis. Based on these results, we defined a prognostic OS score, showing a better median OS in favorable risk group. Conclusion: Elevated pretreatment NLR and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group are independent predictors of shorter OS in mGC patients before first-line chemotherapy.

Despite some remarkable innovations and the advent of novel molecular classifications the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) remains overall poor and current clinical application of new advances is disappointing. During the last years only Trastuzumab and Ramucirumab have been approved and currently used as standard of care targeted therapies, but the systemic management of advanced disease did not radically change in contrast with the high number of molecular drivers identified. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) classifications paved the way, also for GC, to that more contemporary therapeutic approach called "precision medicine" even if tumor heterogeneity and a complex genetic landscape still represent a strong barrier. The identification of specific cancer subgroups is also making possible a better selection of patients that are most likely to respond to immunotherapy. This review aims to critically overview the available molecular classifications summarizing the main druggable molecular drivers and their possible therapeutic implications also taking advantage of new technologies and acquisitions. Despite some remarkable innovations and the advent of novel molecular classifications the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) remains overall poor and current clinical application of new advances is disappointing. During the last years only Trastuzumab and Ramucirumab have been approved and currently used as standard of care targeted therapies, but the systemic management of advanced disease did not radically change in contrast with the high number of molecular drivers identified. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) classifications paved the way, also for GC, to that more contemporary therapeutic approach called "precision medicine" even if tumor heterogeneity and a complex genetic landscape still represent a strong barrier. The identification of specific cancer subgroups is also making possible a better selection of patients that are most likely to respond to immunotherapy. This review aims to critically overview the available molecular classifications summarizing the main druggable molecular drivers and their possible therapeutic implications also taking advantage of new technologies and acquisitions.

The best choice of chemotherapy regimen for patients with metastatic gastric cancer is still debated. Although several studies support a superior efficacy of a triplet chemotherapy regimen over a doublet-based regimen, the magnitude of this benefit appears small and accompanied by an increased toxicity. Based on this background, we evaluated the outcome of patients with HER2-negative metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) who received in the clinical practice a triplet or doublet regimen as first-line therapy. A total of 165 patients (pts) with HER2-negative mGC treated outside of clinical trials at our department with FOLFOX-4 or ECX from 2012 and 2015 were included in our retrospective analysis: FOLFOX-4: 86 pts; ECX: 79 pts. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months for FOLFOX-4 and 5.6 months for ECX regimen, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 10.3 months for FOLFOX-4 and 10.9 months for ECX regimens. Toxicity: grade 3–4 vomiting (12.6%), neutropenia (31.6%), mucositis (11.3%) and fatigue (22.7%) occurred more frequently in ECX regimen, while grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy was more common with FOLFOX-4 (19.7%). Both evaluated regimens are active and safe in the palliation of HER2-negative mGC in the first-line setting: Three-drug chemotherapy regimen appear more active but offer only a slight improvement in OS with an increased G3–G4 toxicity. Our data suggest that a doublet therapy should be preferred in the clinical practice, preferentially reserving a three-drug combination to pts with bulky disease and/or to pts with initially unresectable locally advanced disease.

e15737Background: Pancreatic cancer is the ninth most common cancer and the forth cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. New regimens have increased overall survival, but it still remains ext...

e15224 Background: A high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a strong predictor of poor survival in many tumors.Therefore in our study we have valuated the prognostic value of pretreatment NLR...

e15018 Background: A high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in peripheral blood has been shown to be a strong negative prognostic factor in several types of tumors, such as colorectal, breast, panc...