Search

Adolescents with autism spectrum disorder are less physically active compared with their age-related peers. Despite the many benefits of physical activity, little is known about why they are predominantly inactive. To date, research has rarely included adolescent's perspectives, and little is known about how wider social, systemic, and policy forces shape physical activity. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions, meanings, and role of physical activity in the lives of adolescents with autism spectrum disorder, and draw on their experiences to examine how social and cultural processes shaped their participation. Ten adolescent boys with autism spectrum disorder created individual digital stories, and participated in two interviews. Thematic analysis was informed by a critical social science approach. The results highlight that bullying, challenges in community programs, and the prioritization of therapeutic interventions limited participation. Participation was maximized when physical activity generated meaning, purpose, a sense of identity, and affective pleasures. The study findings illuminate the complexity of physical activity participation which has not previously been described in the literature. The findings suggest potential value in promoting the affective pleasures of movement, along with facilitating social and systemic pathways to enhance physical activity participation.

Amongst the impacts of growing up with a parent with mental health challenges is the experience of stigma‐by‐association, in which children and young people experience impacts of stigmatisation due to their parent's devalued identity. This article seeks to expand our understanding of this issue through an abductive analysis of qualitative data collected through a codesign process with young people. Results indicate that young people's experiences of stigmatisation can be effectively understood as experiences of epistemic injustice. Participants expressed that their experiences comprised 'more than' stigma, and their responses suggest the centrality to their experiences of being diminished and dismissed in respect of their capacity to provide accurate accounts of their experiences of marginalisation and distress. Importantly, this diminishment stems not only from their status as children, and as children of parents with mental health challenges but operates through a range of stigmatised identities and devalued statuses, including their own mental health status, sexual minoritisation, disability and social class. Forms of epistemic injustice thus play out across the social and institutional settings they engage with. The psychological and social impacts of this injustice are explored, and the implications for our understanding of stigma around family mental health discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Little is known about the experience and impact of intersectional stigma experienced by rural young people (15–25 years) who have a parent with mental health challenges. The StigmaBeat project employed a co-design approach to create short films to identify and challenge mental health stigma from the perspective of young people who have experienced this phenomenon. The aim of this paper is to describe the co-design methodological approach used in StigmaBeat, as an example of a novel participatory project. We describe one way that co-design can be employed by researchers in collaboration with marginalised young people to produce films aimed at reducing mental health stigma in the community. Through describing the processes undertaken in this project, the opportunities, challenges, and tensions of combining community development methods with research methods will be explored. Co-design with young people is a dynamic and engaging method of collaborative research practice capable of harnessing lived experience expertise to intervene in social issues and redesign or redevelop health services and policies. The participatory approach involved trusting and implementing the suggestions of young people in designing and developing the films and involved creating the physical and social environment to enable this, including embedding creativity, a critical element to the project's methodological success. Intensive time and resource investment are needed to engage a population that is often marginalised in relation to stigma discourse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the field of pediatric concussion, little to no scholarship has examined how clinical practice is shaped by patterned ways of thinking, talking about, and coming to understand concussion and young people (or "discourses of concussion in young people"). In this paper, we examine the ways in which one such discourse, the Pediatric Concussion Discourse (PCD), shapes how young people with concussion, their parents, and clinicians can think about, act in relation to, and experience concussion. This critical rehabilitation research is informed by the post-structuralist theory of Michel Foucault (1926-1984), and the key concepts of power/knowledge, discourse, and the subject. Circulating through clinical guidelines for the management of pediatric concussion, the PCD re/produces the expectation that young people with concussion and their parents will behave as "responsible" subjects who follow the recommendations of so-called experts without question. If recommendations are not implemented, the PCD has the potential to constitute these same groups as "nonadherent", re/producing problematic discourses of medical compliance. By examining the effects of the PCD, it becomes possible to imagine how clinical practice and research might evolve in new ways that respect the knowledges and experiences of young people with concussion and their parents. Engaging in critical examination of clinical rehabilitative practice creates opportunity to imagine how we might approach commonly adopted clinical approaches, including the delivery of health education, differently. Implications for clinical rehabilitation practice include delivering health education in the context of supportive therapeutic relationships that respect the knowledges and experience of young people with concussion and their parents. Implications for rehabilitation research include engaging with critical scholarship within and beyond field and disciplinary boundaries, engaging in formal educational opportunities, and connecting with less formal but invaluable communities of practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: As rates of pediatric concussion have steadily risen, and concerns regarding its consequences have emerged, pediatric concussion has received increased attention in research and clinical spheres. Accordingly, there has been a commitment to determine how best to prevent and manage this injury that so commonly affects young people. Despite this increased attention, and proliferation of research, pediatric concussion as a concept has rarely, if ever, been taken up and questioned. That is, little attention has been directed toward understanding what concussion 'is', or how young people are regarded in relation to it. As a result, pediatric concussion is understood in decidedly narrow terms, constructed as such by a biomedical way of knowing. Aim: We aim to demonstrate how conceptualizing concussion, and young people, 'otherwise', enabled the co-production of a more nuanced and complex understanding of the experience of pediatric concussion from the perspective of young people. Approach: Drawing on an illustrative case example from a critical qualitative arts-based study, we demonstrate how bringing young people into research as 'knowers' enabled us to generate much-needed knowledge about concussion in young people. Implications: The critical thinking put forward in this paper suggests a different approach to pediatric concussion, which is shared in the form of implications for clinical and research practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Children whose parents have mental illnesses are among the most vulnerable in our communities. There is however, much that can be done to prevent or mitigate the impact of a parent's illness on children. Notwithstanding the availability of several evidence‐based interventions, efforts to support these children have been limited by a lack of adequate support structures. Major service reorientation is required to better meet the needs of these children and their families. This editorial provides recommendations for practice, organisational, and systems change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.038 Byline: Brenda McConnell Gladstone (a)(b), Katherine M. Boydell (a)(c), Patricia McKeever (d) Keywords: Sociology of childhood; Risk; Parental mental illness Abstract: Children who live with a mentally ill parent are viewed primarily as being 'at risk' of developing a mental illness themselves and those who remain well are considered extraordinarily resilient. This particular risk/resilience discourse is embedded within larger contemporary discourses about risk and childhood. Childhood is seen as a critical period of development during which children need protection due to their physical and psychological vulnerabilities. In this paper, the implications of this dominant casting of children are explored and it is argued that the conceptual repertoire about those living with a mentally ill parent should be expanded. A critique of the literature that established the risk/resilience discourse is followed by a discussion of research about parenting with a mental illness within which children are surprisingly absent. Recent thinking about children arising out of the 'new' social studies of childhood is summarized to illustrate its resistance to the hegemonic image of children as passive, developing, 'unfinished' persons. A recasting of children as complex young persons who have competencies as well as vulnerabilities linked to their developmental stages, would lead to different lines of inquiry about children's experiences of mental illness in a parent. Author Affiliation: (a) The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto, Ontario, Canada (b) Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Canada (c) Departments of Psychiatry and Public Health Science, University of Toronto, Canada (d) Faculty of Nursing and Department of Public Health Science, University of Toronto, Canada

Trauma is a factor impacting the lives of many people experiencing psychiatric disorders. Trauma affects people's responses to illness as well as their interactions with services. This study aimed to explore the understandings and experiences of psychiatrists of working with trauma and emerging models of Trauma-Informed Care. An interpretive qualitative inquiry was undertaken using semi-structured in-depth interviews with psychiatrists. Four themes were identified: Making sense of trauma; A contentious relationship between trauma and mental illness; Treatment made more challenging by trauma; Trauma-Informed Care highlights tensions. Psychiatrists are familiar with the concept of trauma but there are differences in beliefs about its relationship to mental illness that are consequential for practice. Trauma-Informed Care is seen as an effort to humanise mental health services, but with perceived limited impact on psychiatrists' roles. Findings indicate need for further consultation and collaboration with psychiatrists around trauma-informed care implementation; as well as consideration of what is required to develop professional consensus on trauma and its relationship to illness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]