Search

Objective: Because elderly patients with ovarian cancer are underrepresented in randomized studies, this study aimed to expand our knowledge on the safety and effectiveness of frontline treatment with bevacizumab in combination with standard carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in patients aged 70 years and older with a diagnosis of Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV ovarian cancer in routine clinical practice in Belgium., Methods: Patients aged 70 years and older with FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer were included in a multicenter, non-interventional prospective studyto evaluate the safety and effectiveness of treatment with bevacizumab in combination with frontline carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. Comprehensive geriatric assessments were performed at baseline and during treatment., Results: The most frequently reported adverse events for bevacizumab were hypertension (55%), epistaxis (32%) and proteinuria (21%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of progression-free survival was 14.5 months. The results of the comprehensive geriatric assessments during treatment indicated a slight improvement in the geriatric eight health status screening tool score for general health status and the mini-nutritional assessment score for nutritional status. The median change from baseline score was close to zero for the instruments measuring independency, activity of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living, and for the mobility-tiredness test measuring self-perceived fatigue., Conclusions: No new safety signals were registered in this study in patients aged 70 years and older treated with bevacizumab and frontline carboplatin and paclitaxel for FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer. Elderly patients should not be excluded from treatment for advanced ovarian cancer based on age alone., Eu Pas Register: ENCEPP/SDPP/13849., Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier: NCT02393898., Competing Interests: Competing interests: IV reports consulting: for Agenus (2021), Aksebio (2021), Amgen (Europe) GmbH (2019), AstraZeneca (2019-2022), Bristol Myers Squibb (2021), Clovis Oncology Inc. (2019-2019), Carrick Therapeutics (2019), Deciphera Pharmaceuticals (2020-2021), Eisai (2021), Elevar Therapeutics (2020), F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (2019-2021), Genmab (2019-2021), GSK (2019-2021), Immunogen Inc. (2019-2022), Jazzpharma (2021-2022), Karyopharm (2021), Mersana (2020), Millennium Pharmaceuticals (2019), MSD (2019-2022), Novocure (2020-2022), Novartis (2021), Octimet Oncology NV (2019), Oncoinvent AS (2019-2022), Seagen (2021), Sotio a.s. (2019-2022), Verastem Oncology (2020), Zentalis (2020); Contracted Research (via KU Leuven) from Oncoinvent AS (2019-2020) and Genmab (2019); Grant or corporate sponsored research from Amgen (2019-2020) and Roche (2019); Accomodations, travel expenses (2019-2020) from Amgen, MSD, Tesaro, AstraZeneca and Roche. CV reports for the present publication study funding from Roche and support from Lutgart Opstaele from ANZ Medical Writing; Institutional Grant from MSD/Merck, Consultancy for Janssen-Cilag, Roche, GSK, Atheneum Partners, Astellas Pharma, MSD, BMS and Leo-Pharma, Presentation and advisory Boards: Janssens Cilag, Leo Pharma, Presentation: Bayer; Advisory Board: Merck MSD, GSK, Astrazeneca; Travel support from Roche and Pfizer. PV reports for the present publication support from Roche (medical writing and article processing charges; consulting fees from Astrazeneca and Roche, Participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board: Astrazeneca and Roche; unpaid leadership or fiduciary role: BSMO president 2019. MVS is employee of Roche NV. All other authors declared no conflicts of interest., (© IGCS and ESGO 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Late recurrences in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancers remain an important challenge. Avoidance or delayed development of resistance represents the main objective in extended endocrine therapy (ET). In animal models, resistance was reversed with restoration of circulating estrogen levels during interruption of letrozole treatment. This phase III, randomized, open-label Study of Letrozole Extension (SOLE) studied the effect of extended intermittent letrozole treatment in comparison with continuous letrozole. In parallel, the SOLE estrogen substudy (SOLE-EST) analyzed the levels of estrogen during the interruption of treatment., Patients and Methods: SOLE enrolled 4884 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-positive, operable breast cancer between December 2007 and October 2012 and among them, 104 patients were enrolled in SOLE-EST. They must have undergone local treatment and have completed 4-6 years of adjuvant ET. Patients were randomized between continuous letrozole (2.5 mg/day orally for 5 years) and intermittent letrozole treatment (2.5 mg/day for 9 months followed by a 3-month interruption in years 1-4 and then 2.5 mg/day during all of year 5)., Results: Intention-to-treat population included 4851 women in SOLE (n = 2425 in the intermittent and n = 2426 in the continuous letrozole groups) and 103 women in SOLE-EST (n = 78 in the intermittent and n = 25 in the continuous letrozole groups). After a median follow-up of 84 months, 7-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 81.4% in the intermittent group and 81.5% in the continuous group (hazard ratio: 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 0.91-1.17). Reported adverse events were similar in both groups. Circulating estrogen recovery was demonstrated within 6 weeks after the stop of letrozole treatment., Conclusions: Extended adjuvant ET by intermittent administration of letrozole did not improve DFS compared with continuous use, despite the recovery of circulating estrogen levels. The similar DFS coupled with previously reported quality-of-life advantages suggest intermittent extended treatment is a valid option for patients who require or prefer a treatment interruption., Competing Interests: Disclosure GJ reported receiving contracted research support from Novartis within the submitted work; personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo and Abbvie; non-financial support from Medimmune and Merck KGaA; personal fees and non-financial support from Lilly, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), AstraZeneca; and grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis, Roche, and Pfizer from outside submitted work. PK reported receiving non-financial support from PFS Genomics; and honoraria from Prelude Dx and Roche (all outside the submitted work). PN reported receiving institutional payments or non-financial support from Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Amgen, and Roche. ES reported receiving advisory fees and a traveling grant from Pfizer, Genomic Health, Lilly, and Novartis. CK reported receiving consulting or advisory fees from Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Daiichi-Sankyo. SL reported receiving salary from GBG Forschungs GmbH; consulting fees (to institution) from BMS, Roche, Puma, Seattle Genetics, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Daiichi, EirGenix, and Samsung; contracted research support from Austrian Breast & Colorectal Study Group, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi, Immunomedics, NSABP Foundation, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. KK reported receiving honoraria from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eisai, and Chugai Pharmaceutical. CM reported receiving honoraria from Novartis. SOR reported receiving honoraria from Novartis. TR reported receiving consulting fees/honoraria from Roche–Genentech, Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer. GV reported receiving consulting or advisory fees from Novartis, Roche-Genentech, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. RDG reported receiving research funding (to institution) from Novartis, Pfizer, Ipsen, Merck, Celgene, Ferring, Roche, and AstraZeneca to partially support his salary. SL reported receiving research funding (to institution) from Novartis, BMS, Merck, Roche–Genentech, Puma Biotechnology, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Nektar Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, and Seattle Genetics; serving as a consultant (not compensated) for Seattle Genetics, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Merck, AstraZeneca, and Roche–Genentech; serving as a consultant (paid to institution) for Aduro Biotech, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche–Genentech, Puma Biotechnology, AstraZeneca, Silverback Therapeutics, and G1 Therapeutics; serving as a Scientific Advisory Board Member of Akamara Therapeutics; and receiving support from the National Breast Cancer Foundation of Australia Endowed Chair and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, New York. MMR reported receiving research funding (to institution) from Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, TerSera, Pierre Fabre, Merck, Roche, BMS, and Bayer, consulting fees (to institution) from BMS, Ipsen; and consulting fees/honoraria from BMS, Tolmar Pharmaceuticals. MC reported receiving research funding (to institution) from Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Androgen receptor (AR) expression occurs in up to 86% of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers. In vitro, AR inhibitors enhance antitumor activity of trastuzumab, an anti-HER2 antibody, in trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ cell lines. This open-label, single-arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide, an AR-signaling inhibitor, in patients with advanced HER2+ AR+ breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab., Methods: Eligible patients had measurable or non-measurable evaluable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status ≤ 1, no history of brain metastases, and previously received ≥ 1 anti-HER2 regimen for advanced disease. Patients received 160 mg oral enzalutamide daily and 6 mg/kg intravenous trastuzumab every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety., Results: Overall, 103 women were enrolled [median age 60 years (range 34-83)]; 62% had received ≥ 3 lines of prior anti-HER2 therapy. CBR24, comprising patients with confirmed partial responses (5%) and durable stable disease at 24 weeks (19%), was 24% in the efficacy evaluable set (n = 89). CBR24 did not seem related to AR-expression levels or hormone receptor status. Median PFS was 3.4 months (95% confidence interval 2.0-3.8). Overall, 97 (94%) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with fatigue most common (34%). Dyspnea (4%) and malignant neoplasm progression (3%) were the only TEAEs grade ≥ 3 reported in ≥ 3 patients. 22 patients (21%) reported serious TEAEs. Four patients (4%) experienced fatal, non-drug-related TEAEs., Conclusions: Enzalutamide plus trastuzumab was well tolerated, and a subset of patients in this heavily pretreated population had durable disease control. Determination of biomarkers is needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from this combination. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Number: NCT02091960.

Objectives : This study evaluated the effect of lipegfilgrastim, a glycopegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, used as primary (PP) or secondary prophylaxis (SP) on chemotherapy (CT) treatment modifications, as well as the incidence of CT-induced neutropenic events in adult patients receiving cytotoxic CT with or without biological therapy (BT) for solid and hematological tumors, in routine clinical practice. Other objectives were to characterize the population of lipegfilgrastim-treated cancer patients and safety assessment. Methods : This phase 4, prospective, observational study was conducted at 15 centers from Belgium and Luxembourg, between 2015 and 2017. Results : Of 139 patients, 82.7% had breast cancer and 54.7% were treated with dose-dense regimens. Most received lipegfilgrastim as PP (82.0%) and were at high-risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) (68.3%). FN and grade III/IV neutropenia were reported for 7.9% and 22.3% patients. Among 123 evaluated patients, CT/BT dose modifications were recorded for 33.3% (PP) and 52.4% (SP) of patients receiving lipegfilgrastim; dose reductions, followed by dose delays, were more frequent than omissions. Among 45 patients with dose modifications, FN was reported for 8.8% and 9.1% patients and grade IV neutropenia for 17.6% and 18.2% of patients when lipegfilgrastim was applied for PP and SP, respectively. Adverse events related to lipegfilgrastim occurred for 55 (39.6%) patients; bone pain and back pain were more frequent. Lipegfilgrastim-related serious adverse events were reported for 9 (6.5%) patients. Conclusion : Use of lipegfilgrastim in real-world settings resulted in limited CT dose modifications and low incidences of neutropenic events, with no new safety concerns arising.

Purpose: Women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancers have a persistent risk of relapse and biomarkers for late recurrence are needed. We sought to identify tumor genomic aberrations associated with increased late-recurrence risk., Experimental Design: In a secondary analysis of Study of Letrozole Extension trial, a case-cohort-like sampling selected 598 primary breast cancers for targeted next-generation sequencing analysis of gene mutations and copy-number gains (CNGs). Correlations of genomic aberrations with clinicopathologic factors and breast and distant recurrence-free intervals (BCFIs and DRFIs) were analyzed using weighted Cox models., Results: Analysis of mutations and CNGs was successfully performed for 403 and 350 samples, including 148 and 134 patients with breast cancer recurrences (median follow-up time, 5.2 years), respectively. The most frequent alterations were PIK3CA mutations (42%) and CNGs of CCND1 (15%), ERBB2 (10%), FGFR1 (8%), and MYC (8%). PIK3CA mutations and MYC CNGs were associated with lower ( P = 0.03) and higher ( P = 0.004) tumor grade, respectively; a higher Ki-67 was seen in tumor with CCND1, ERBB2 , and MYC CNGs ( P = 0.01, P < 0.001, and P = 0.03, respectively). FGFR1 CNG was associated with an increased risk of late events in univariate analyses [17/29 patients; BCFI: HR, 3.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.48-6.92; P = 0.003 and DRFI: HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.61-7.75; P = 0.002) and in multivariable models adjusted for clinicopathologic factors., Conclusions: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer harboring FGFR1 CNG had an increased risk of late recurrence despite extended therapy. FGFR1 CNG may represent a useful prognostic biomarker for late recurrence and a therapeutic target., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background/aim: A prospective non-randomized study was performed on 68 women who had recently undergone curative treatment (surgery +/- adjuvant radio/chemotherapy) for breast cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients were distributed into 2 subgroups, control (C) group (n=21) and experimental (E) group (n=47). The last group participated in a 12-week rehabilitation program associating physical activity and psychoeducational workshops, including management of stress, diet, and sleep disorders., Results: Despite the initial imbalance between the groups (patients from C group were older and had received less chemotherapy than those from the E group), at the end of the rehabilitation program, we observed a significant improvement in global health feeling and in objective physical tests (distance covered in 6 min and objective measures of ergospirometry), and a decrease in pathological fatigue, while these different items remained quite stable over time in the control group., Conclusion: It is suggested to recommend structured rehabilitation to any patient who does not have a contraindication to it. In addition, the scientific literature encourages us to extend the spectrum of oncological rehabilitation to pathologies other than breast cancer., (Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: In the phase III SOLE trial, the extended use of intermittent versus continuous letrozole for 5 years did not improve disease-free survival in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Intermittent therapy with 3-month breaks may be beneficial for patients' quality of life (QoL)., Methods: In the SOLE QoL sub-study, 956 patients completed the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) symptom and further QoL scales up to 24 months after randomisation. Differences in change of QoL from baseline between the two administration schedules were tested at 12 and 24 months using repeated measures mixed-models. The primary outcome was change in hot flushes at 12 months., Results: There was no difference in hot flushes at 12 months between the two schedules, but patients receiving intermittent letrozole reported significantly more improvement at 24 months. They also indicated less worsening in vaginal problems, musculoskeletal pain, sleep disturbance, physical well-being and mood at 12 months. Overall, 25-30% of patients reported a clinically relevant worsening in key symptoms and global QoL., Conclusion: Less symptom worsening was observed during the first year of extended treatment with the intermittent administration. For women experiencing an increased symptom burden of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy, an intermittent administration is a safe alternative., Clinical Trial Information: Clinical trial information: NCT00651456.

A 65-year old woman presents with a Demons-Meigs syndrome characterized by dyspnea resulting from a transsudative pleural effusion, an important unilateral right ovarian mass and ascites. The diagnosis of a Brenner type histology was obtained after complete surgical removal of ovarian tumor. After discharge the patient entered in a sustained complete response and thus potential cure. Brenner tumor is a rare and often benign ovarian affection. The clinical signs aren't generally much specific: pelvic pain or heaviness, metrorrhagia and menstrual irregularity may be observed. Brenner tumor may exceptionally induce a Demons-Meigs's syndrome. This syndrome associates one or more benign tumors of the female reproductive tract with pleural and peritoneal effusions. This could depict a rich but disturbing clinical picture. The prognosis and the regression of the symptomatology are nevertheless excellent after tumor surgical resection.

Purpose: Abiraterone may suppress androgens that stimulate breast cancer growth. We conducted a biomarker analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPETs), and serum samples from postmenopausal estrogen receptor (ER) + breast cancer patients to identify subgroups with differential abiraterone sensitivity., Methods: Patients (randomized 1:1:1) were treated with 1,000 mg/d abiraterone acetate + 5 mg/d prednisone (AA), AA + 25 mg/d exemestane (AAE), or exemestane. The biomarker population included treated patients (n = 293). The CTC population included patients with ≥3 baseline CTCs (n = 104). Biomarker [e.g., androgen receptor (AR), ER, Ki-67, CYP17] expression was evaluated. Cox regression stratified by prior therapies in the metastatic setting (0/1 vs. 2) and setting of letrozole/anastrozole (adjuvant vs. metastatic) was used to assess biomarker associations with progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Serum testosterone and estrogen levels were lowered and progesterone increased with AA. Baseline AR or ER expression was not associated with PFS in CTCs or FFPETs for AAE versus exemestane, but dual positivity of AR and ER expression was associated with improved PFS [HR, 0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16-1.07; P = 0.070]. For AR expression in FFPETs obtained <1 year prior to first dose (n = 67), a trend for improved PFS was noted for AAE versus exemestane (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.24-1.33; P = 0.19)., Conclusions: An AA pharmacodynamic effect was shown by decreased serum androgen and estrogen levels and increased progesterone. AR and ER dual expression in CTCs and newly obtained FFPETs may predict AA sensitivity. Clin Cancer Res; 22(24); 6002-9. ©2016 AACR., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Aim: To determine if actively-treated cancer patients developing cachexia could benefit from participation to mindfulness workshops., Patients and Methods: Subjects developing cachexia signs while treated for cancer were randomized in a trial aiming to compare an experimental group that would participate to specific workshops based on mindfulness alternating dietetic and psychological approaches, and a control group managed in accordance to usual practice., Results: The recruitment was difficult (12% of the approached population). Finally 53 patients accepted to participate. Despite an unpredictable compliance of workshop participants, the final satisfaction score attained 75%. In comparison with the control group, patients randomized to the experimental group showed a significant benefit with an increase of their body weight and an improvement of their WHO status score. They also experienced an improvement of emotional function and observation faculty as well as a relief of fatigue and some digestive disorders., Conclusion: Selected cachectic cancer patients may benefit from this experimental approach. This approach may, however, be difficult to implement on a large scale., (Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

We report a case of pericarditis supervening after 5-fluorouracil infusion in a 52-year-old patient suffering from metastatic rectal cancer. Besides its well-known side-effects (mucitis, diarrhea, nausea, hematotoxicity), this molecule sometimes induces cardio-toxicity, which can take different clinical forms, pericarditis being one of the most uncommon. Several risk factors have been described and have to be kept in mind when initiating this therapy. Prevention may consist of close monitoring of patients considered at risk. Treatment of 5-FU induced cardiotoxicity basically consists in stopping the use of this drug and replacing it with another chemotherapy agent.

Objectives: Afatinib, an oral irreversible ErbB family blocker, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Other potential biomarkers predicting response to afatinib, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) mutations and EGFR gene amplification, have not been validated yet. This phase II study investigated whether afatinib conferred clinical benefit in cohorts of adenocarcinoma patients with: (1) EGFR mutation and failing on erlotinib/gefitinib; or (2) increased copy number of EGFR by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); or (3) HER2 mutation., Materials and Methods: Patients started daily afatinib 50mg monotherapy. Upon disease progression, patients could continue, at the investigator's discretion, afatinib (40mg) with the addition of paclitaxel (80mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks/4-week cycle). Endpoints included confirmed objective response (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control, and safety., Results: Of 41 patients treated (cohort 1: n=32; cohort 2: n=2; cohort 3: n=7), 33 received afatinib monotherapy; eight subsequently received afatinib plus paclitaxel. With afatinib monotherapy, one patient achieved a confirmed OR (partial response [PR]; cohort 2). Two further patients achieved unconfirmed PRs (one each in cohort 1 and cohort 3). Disease control was achieved by 17/32 (53%), 2/2 (100%) and 5/7 (71%) patients in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In patients receiving combination therapy (median PFS: 6.7 weeks), one (cohort 3) had confirmed PR of 41.9 weeks. The most common afatinib-related adverse events were diarrhea (95%) and rash/acne (80%)., Conclusion: Afatinib demonstrated signs of clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with activating HER2 or EGFR mutations or EGFR FISH-positive tumors., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The development of pulmonary nodules or lymph nodes in the course of a malignancy, in particular breast cancer, can sometimes correspond to the onset of sarcoidosis. Osteolytic lesions can simultaneously occur which further strengthens the impression of a metastatic disease. No particular test, biological markers or imaging technique, has a satisfactory discriminating power and a biopsy is needed to establish the correct diagnosis and decide on the adequate treatment. The concomitance of sarcoidosis and cancer raises the possibility of a granolumatous disease.

One hundred and ten consecutive patients suffering from a colorectal cancer received chronotherapy infused over two days every two weeks. Each course comported 5 FU 3g/m(2), folinic acid (600 mg/m(2) - l. form or 1200 mg/m(2)--racemic form) and oxaliplatin (85/mg/m(2)--adjuvant indication or 100mg/m(2)--palliative indication). According to chronobiological concepts, 5 FU and folinic acid were infused from 10 pm to 10 am with a peak at 4 am while oxaliplatin was delivered from 10 am to 10 pm with a peak at 4 pm. The overall tolerance was excellent with a maximum of 17% patients experiencing a grade 3 toxicity. The toxicity was higher in women, in older patients (>=70) or in case of flat infusion. In adjuvant situation (60 cases), progression free and overall survivals established respectively at 76% (42+months) and 88% (45+months). Fifty-two percent response rate were recorded within the palliative group (50 cases) with an overall 68% disease control. Median progression free survival was seven months but median survival was not attained at 31+ months. Thirty percent patients could benefit from a curative surgery after chemotherapy. Older patients (>=70) experienced worsened survival. In conclusion, we think that our chrono-FOLFOX 2-12 should be proposed as standard treatment for colorectal cancer patients., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor is overexpressed in metastatic triple-negative breast cancers (mTNBCs), an aggressive subtype of breast cancer. Our randomized phase II study investigated cisplatin with or without cetuximab in this setting., Patients and Methods: Patients who had received no more than one previous chemotherapy regimen were randomly assigned on a 2:1 schedule to receive no more than six cycles of cisplatin plus cetuximab or cisplatin alone. Patients receiving cisplatin alone could switch to cisplatin plus cetuximab or cetuximab alone on disease progression. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points studied included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles. Analyses included a significance level of α = .10 with no adjustments for multiplicity., Results: The full analysis set comprised 115 patients receiving cisplatin plus cetuximab and 58 receiving cisplatin alone; 31 patients whose disease progressed on cisplatin alone switched to cetuximab-containing therapy. The ORR was 20% (95% CI, 13 to 29) with cisplatin plus cetuximab and 10% (95% CI, 4 to 21) with cisplatin alone (odds ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 0.81 to 5.59; P = .11). Cisplatin plus cetuximab resulted in longer PFS compared with cisplatin alone (median, 3.7 v 1.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.97; P = .032). Corresponding median OS was 12.9 versus 9.4 months (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.20; P = .31). Common grade 3/4 adverse events included acne-like rash, neutropenia, and fatigue., Conclusion: While the primary study end point was not met, adding cetuximab to cisplatin doubled the ORR and appeared to prolong PFS and OS, warranting further investigation in mTNBC.

Thirty-six metastatic colorectal cancer patients received every 2 weeks, as first- (17) or second-line (19) treatment a combined chronotherapy with CPT-11 (infused at day 1 from 2 to 8 a.m.; peak at 5 a.m.), given with 5FU (700 mg/m(2) per day; days 2-5) and folinic acid (300 mg/m(2) per day; days 2-5) both infused from 10 p.m. to 10 a.m. with a peak at 4 a.m., and carboplatin (40 mg/m(2) per day; days 2-5; infused from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m.; peak at 4 p.m.). The doses of CPT11 could be easily pushed from 120 to 180 mg/m(2) in successive cohorts in the phase I part of the study (11 cases). Twenty-five patients were then treated in the phase II of the trial. The overall toxicity was mild leading to dose-reductions in only 11-13% courses. The tumoral activity was interesting with 81% responses and 94% tumour control. Also prolonged survivals were recorded with 8.8 months of progression free and 15.6 months overall survivals. More prolonged survivals were observed in chemotherapy naive patients. Seven patients (19%) could be reoperated from their residual disease., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The authors offered to 296 consecutive cancer patients aged > or = 70 to undergo a joint comprehensive geriatric and oncological assessment. After pluridisciplinary discussion, several reflections have emerged: the need in 15 - 32% of cases to reinforce the role of the paramedical staff; the correlation between age, low clinical indices, alteration of renal function as well as geriatric characteristics; 67% of evaluated cases presented a significant geriatric profile; recommendations for patients' management in relation to their pattern of frailty and health aging (standard, adapted or palliative treatment).

This report is concerned with the development of an hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in 6 patients (3 males, 3 females, aged 53 to 73) suffering from an advanced cancer and treated by protracted (>= 4 months) infusions of gemcitabine. Over 4 to 14 months, the patients received 13-34 infusions delivering a cumulative dose oscillating between 9 and 29 g/m2. A progressive alteration of renal function preceeded the acute syndrome. After interruption of gemcitabine and symptomatic treatment, the evolution of haemolytic anemia was generally favourable. This was not the case for renal dysfunction: 2 complete and 1 partial resolution of renal insufficiency were noted, but 1 case required chronic dialysis. Based on the authors experience, the frequency of an HUS complication after protracted gemcitabine treatment could be as high as 2.7 %.

The authors evaluated the impact of a chronotherapy with 5-FU, folinic acid and carboplatine (chronomodulated infusions by ambulatory pumps; 5/21 days) for the management of oesophagus (52 cases) and gastric (56 cases) cancer patients. The overall tolerance of treatment was gauged excellent (grade 3-4; % patients: mucitis: 11-23%; leucopenia 6-19%; thrombopenia 18-50%; almost no digestive disturbances nor alopecia). Also tumor outcome was considered interesting with major responses rate in 61% (gastric) to 79% (oesophagus) of patients. The median survival of oesophageal cancer was limited to 9.2 months; the one of disseminated gastric cancer was 12.7 months but 72% of curatively resected patients were alive at 5+ years.

Seventy-two patients suffering from a metastatic colorectal cancer received, as first line treatment, a combination chronotherapy with 5-FU and folinic acid (infused from 10 pm to 10 am with a peak at 4 am, respectively at doses of 700 and 300 mg/m2 per day) and carboplatin (infused at the dose of 40 mg/m2 per day from 10 am to 10 pm with a peak at 4 pm). The courses of four days were repeated every two weeks. A major tumoral response was observed in 60% cases (68% in those not previously treated with adjuvant chemotherapy). The median times to progression and overall survival established at 11 and 27 months. The clinical (grades 3-4 in maximum 5% cases) and hematological (grades 3-4 in maximum 10-29% cases) toxicities were quite limited. Our observations suggest the interest to incorporate carboplatin in the combined infusional treatment of colorectal cancer.

Thirty-seven patients operated from a Dukes B2-C colon cancer were randomised to receive as adjuvant infusional chemotherapy, nine 5 FU and folinic acid courses with or without carboplatin, as standard (de Gramont; 2 days every 2 weeks) or chronomodulated administration (4 days every 2 weeks). The overall tolerance was judged excellent with less than 7% courses with dose-adaptations. The two carboplatin arms presented an enhanced haematological toxicity, while some more cutaneous toxicity was observed in the chronomodulated arm with the three drugs.

Seventeen colorectal cancer patients received as first (12 cases) or second line (5 cases) treatment a combined chronotherapy with CPT 11 (infused at day 1 from 2 to 8 am; peak at 5 am), given with 5 FU (700 mg/m2 per day ; days 2-5) and folinic acid (300 mg/m2 per day, days 2-5) both infused from 10 pm to 10 am with a peak at 4 am, and carboplatin (40 mg/m3/day - days 2-5 ; infused from 10 am to 10 pm - peak at 4 pm). The doses of CPT 11 could be easily increased from 120 up to 180 mg/m2 in successive cohorts of four patients through acceptable toxicity. Thus, five patients have already been treated in the phase II part of the trial. An interesting tumoral outcome has been observed: 88% major responses with no progression; median time to progression: nine months and median survival: 19.7 months.

Forty-six previously untreated patients with advanced breast cancer were eligible for the present randomised phase I study. It aimed to evaluate the toxicity and activity of a therapeutic sequence with epirubicin on day 1 followed by paclitaxel on day 2 (sequence A) or the reverse sequence, ie., paclitaxel on day 1 followed by epirubicin on day 2 (sequence B). The starting doses of epirubicin and paclitaxel, administered either according to sequence A or B, (level 1 cohort) were 90 mg/m2 and 175 mg/m2, respectively. Per cohort of 3 patients, the dose of paclitaxel was increased by 25 mg/m2 (levels 2 and 4) and of epirubicin by 10 mg/m2 (levels 3 and 5). Treatment was repeated with 3-week intervals. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was achieved at level 1 in sequence B (paclitaxel first) and level 3 (epirubicin 100 mg/m2 followed by paclitaxel 200 mg m2) in sequence A. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia (+/- febrile) in both sequences. Cardiac events occurred in 28% of the patients; significant decrease in left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) was observed in 8/33 and in 2/13 patients in sequence A and B, respectively. This was associated with 5 and 1 cardiac heart failure (CHF), respectively. In 43 evaluable patients, 10 CR and 25 PR were observed (overall response rate 81%). In the 20 patients with locally advanced disease (LABC), the respective numbers were 7 CR and 11 PR; in the 23 metastatic (MBC) patients, 3 CR and 14 PR were recorded. The median survival of the both groups was not reached at 33 + months. In conclusion , the combination of epirubicin and paclitaxel has significant activity in breast cancer. The recommended sequence of both drugs in combination therapy, mainly to avoid neutropenia, is epirubicin day 1 followed by paclitaxel on day 2. Cardiac toxicity remains problematic in either sequence of administration.

Objective: To evaluate the possibility and accuracy of this new diagnostic approach to the breast cancer disease in our centre., Material and Methods: Since March 1999, every patient presenting with a cT1-T2 N0 breast carcinoma was scheduled for a sentinel lymph node search. An injection of Tc-99 labelled nanocolloïd with a dose of 1 mCu was injected either intramammary or intradermally. The patients have been divided into two groups: in group I, they received their injection intramammarily the day before the operation; because of several failures in identifying the sentinel lymph node (SLN), the protocol was modified, the patients receiving their injection the day of operation, intradermally (group II). Once a lymphoscintigraphy done, the SLN was identified at operation using a detection probe, after the primary tumour had been removed. A routine axillary dissection was then performed to remove the rest of the lymph nodes. All the nodes were then checked routinely for metastatic cells. The SLN was also screened by semi-serial slides and by immuno-assay., Results: From March 1999 till March 2001, sixty patients presented consecutively with a T1 or T2 biopsy proven breast carcinoma with no clinical lymph nodes. They were all scheduled for a sentinel lymph node search according to the protocol. Mean tumour size was 9.9 mm (ranging from 4 to 23 mm). Fourteen patients (group I) received their injection intramammarily but we failed to identify the sentinel node in five patients (35%). The remaining forty-two patients (group II) received their injection intradermally. Sentinel nodes were then identified in forty-three patients (93%). Positive SLN were discovered in eleven cases by routine examination (13 positive nodes among 104 harvested sentinel nodes, i.e. 13%). Micro metastases were discovered in three other SLN by immunohistology. In total, 605 lymph nodes were evaluated through the axillary dissection, representing a mean number of 10.08 lymph nodes per patient. For four patients, positive lymph node were discovered in the axillary dissection while SLN were negative (6.6% of false negative)., Conclusions: During this learning curve period, it appears that the method for screening the SLN is reliable, since the figures encountered are similar to those of the literature. By adding a perioperative blue dye injection, it might be possible to reduce the percentage of false negative results. It is difficult to assess, at present, the impact SLN could have on survival.

The authors describe a case of metastatic endocarditis associated with a gastric carcinoma. The diagnosis was made early and the treatment by surgery and chemotherapy allowed a survival of 18 months, which is unusually long. The differential diagnosis is discussed and includes nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis, infectious endocarditis and primary tumors of the heart.