Search

Your search keyword '"Houmes, Margreet"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Houmes, Margreet" Publication Year Range Last 50 years
3 results on '"Houmes, Margreet"'

1. Light Therapy for Cancer-Related Fatigue in (Non-)Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Author

Starreveld, Daniëlle EJ, Daniels, Laurien A, Kieffer, Jacobien M, Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis B, de Geus, Jessie, Lanfermeijer, Mirthe, van Someren, Eus JW, Habers, G Esther A, Bosch, Jos A, Janus, Cécile PM, van Spronsen, Dick Johan, de Weijer, Roel J, Marijt, Erik WA, de Jongh, Eva, Zijlstra, Josée M, Böhmer, Lara H, Houmes, Margreet, Kersten, Marie José, Korse, Catharina M, van Rossum, Huub H, Redd, William H, Lutgendorf, Susan K, Ancoli-Israel, Sonia, van Leeuwen, Flora E, and Bleiker, Eveline MA

Subjects
cancer-related fatigue, circadian rhythms, light therapy, randomized controlled trial, sleep, Clinical Research, Depression, Rehabilitation, Rare Diseases, Lymphoma, Cancer, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Behavioral and Social Science, Sleep Research, Hematology, Mental Health, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the short- and long-term effects of light therapy on fatigue (primary outcome) and sleep quality, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and circadian rhythms (secondary outcomes) in survivors of (non-)Hodgkin lymphoma presenting with chronic cancer-related fatigue.MethodsWe randomly assigned 166 survivors (mean survival 13 years) to a bright white light intervention (BWL) or dim white light comparison (DWL) group. Measurements were completed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), at three (T2), and nine (T3) months follow-up. A mixed-effect modeling approach was used to compare linear and non-linear effects of time between groups.ResultsThere were no significant differences between BWL and DWL in the reduction in fatigue over time. Both BWL and DWL significantly (p < 0.001) improved fatigue levels during the intervention followed by a slight reduction in this effect during follow-up (EST0-T1 = -0.71; EST1-T3 = 0.15). Similar results were found for depression, sleep quality, and some aspects of quality of life. Light therapy had no effect on circadian rhythms.ConclusionsBWL was not superior in reducing fatigue compared to DWL in HL and DLBCL survivors. Remarkably, the total sample showed clinically relevant and persistent improvements on fatigue not commonly seen in longitudinal observational studies in these survivors.

Published
2021

2. Light Therapy for Cancer-Related Fatigue in (Non-)Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Starreveld, Daniëlle E J, Daniels, Laurien A, Kieffer, Jacobien M, Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis B, de Geus, Jessie, Lanfermeijer, Mirthe, van Someren, Eus J W, Habers, G Esther A, Bosch, Jos A, Janus, Cécile P M, van Spronsen, Dick Johan, de Weijer, Roel J, Marijt, Erik W A, de Jongh, Eva, Zijlstra, Josée M, Böhmer, Lara H, Houmes, Margreet, Kersten, Marie José, Korse, Catharina M, van Rossum, Huub H, Redd, William H, Lutgendorf, Susan K, Ancoli-Israel, Sonia, van Leeuwen, Flora E, Bleiker, Eveline M A, Starreveld, Daniëlle E J, Daniels, Laurien A, Kieffer, Jacobien M, Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis B, de Geus, Jessie, Lanfermeijer, Mirthe, van Someren, Eus J W, Habers, G Esther A, Bosch, Jos A, Janus, Cécile P M, van Spronsen, Dick Johan, de Weijer, Roel J, Marijt, Erik W A, de Jongh, Eva, Zijlstra, Josée M, Böhmer, Lara H, Houmes, Margreet, Kersten, Marie José, Korse, Catharina M, van Rossum, Huub H, Redd, William H, Lutgendorf, Susan K, Ancoli-Israel, Sonia, van Leeuwen, Flora E, and Bleiker, Eveline M A

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short- and long-term effects of light therapy on fatigue (primary outcome) and sleep quality, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and circadian rhythms (secondary outcomes) in survivors of (non-)Hodgkin lymphoma presenting with chronic cancer-related fatigue.METHODS: We randomly assigned 166 survivors (mean survival 13 years) to a bright white light intervention (BWL) or dim white light comparison (DWL) group. Measurements were completed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), at three (T2), and nine (T3) months follow-up. A mixed-effect modeling approach was used to compare linear and non-linear effects of time between groups.RESULTS: There were no significant differences between BWL and DWL in the reduction in fatigue over time. Both BWL and DWL significantly (p < 0.001) improved fatigue levels during the intervention followed by a slight reduction in this effect during follow-up (EST0-T1 = -0.71; EST1-T3 = 0.15). Similar results were found for depression, sleep quality, and some aspects of quality of life. Light therapy had no effect on circadian rhythms.CONCLUSIONS: BWL was not superior in reducing fatigue compared to DWL in HL and DLBCL survivors. Remarkably, the total sample showed clinically relevant and persistent improvements on fatigue not commonly seen in longitudinal observational studies in these survivors.

Published
2021

3. Light Therapy for Cancer-Related Fatigue in (Non-)Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors:Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Starreveld, Daniëlle E J, Daniels, Laurien A, Kieffer, Jacobien M, Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis B, de Geus, Jessie, Lanfermeijer, Mirthe, van Someren, Eus J W, Habers, G Esther A, Bosch, Jos A, Janus, Cécile P M, van Spronsen, Dick Johan, de Weijer, Roel J, Marijt, Erik W A, de Jongh, Eva, Zijlstra, Josée M, Böhmer, Lara H, Houmes, Margreet, Kersten, Marie José, Korse, Catharina M, van Rossum, Huub H, Redd, William H, Lutgendorf, Susan K, Ancoli-Israel, Sonia, van Leeuwen, Flora E, Bleiker, Eveline M A, Starreveld, Daniëlle E J, Daniels, Laurien A, Kieffer, Jacobien M, Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis B, de Geus, Jessie, Lanfermeijer, Mirthe, van Someren, Eus J W, Habers, G Esther A, Bosch, Jos A, Janus, Cécile P M, van Spronsen, Dick Johan, de Weijer, Roel J, Marijt, Erik W A, de Jongh, Eva, Zijlstra, Josée M, Böhmer, Lara H, Houmes, Margreet, Kersten, Marie José, Korse, Catharina M, van Rossum, Huub H, Redd, William H, Lutgendorf, Susan K, Ancoli-Israel, Sonia, van Leeuwen, Flora E, and Bleiker, Eveline M A

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short- and long-term effects of light therapy on fatigue (primary outcome) and sleep quality, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and circadian rhythms (secondary outcomes) in survivors of (non-)Hodgkin lymphoma presenting with chronic cancer-related fatigue.METHODS: We randomly assigned 166 survivors (mean survival 13 years) to a bright white light intervention (BWL) or dim white light comparison (DWL) group. Measurements were completed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), at three (T2), and nine (T3) months follow-up. A mixed-effect modeling approach was used to compare linear and non-linear effects of time between groups.RESULTS: There were no significant differences between BWL and DWL in the reduction in fatigue over time. Both BWL and DWL significantly (p < 0.001) improved fatigue levels during the intervention followed by a slight reduction in this effect during follow-up (EST0-T1 = -0.71; EST1-T3 = 0.15). Similar results were found for depression, sleep quality, and some aspects of quality of life. Light therapy had no effect on circadian rhythms.CONCLUSIONS: BWL was not superior in reducing fatigue compared to DWL in HL and DLBCL survivors. Remarkably, the total sample showed clinically relevant and persistent improvements on fatigue not commonly seen in longitudinal observational studies in these survivors.

Published
2021

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results