1. Prediction of MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in Lynch syndrome
- Author
-
Elena M. Stoffel, Lynn Anne Burbidge, David H. Stockwell, Brant C. Hendrickson, John Tazelaar, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Amie M. Deffenbaugh, Thomas Scholl, J. Balmaña, Sapna Syngal, Julia Reid, Brian E. Ward, and Public Health
- Subjects
Proband ,Oncology ,Adult ,Male ,congenital, hereditary, and neonatal diseases and abnormalities ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pathology ,Adolescent ,Cohort Studies ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Genetic Testing ,Family history ,neoplasms ,Genetic testing ,Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing ,Aged ,Probability ,Aged, 80 and over ,Internet ,Likelihood Functions ,Models, Statistical ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Endometrial cancer ,nutritional and metabolic diseases ,Nuclear Proteins ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis ,digestive system diseases ,Lynch syndrome ,Logistic Models ,MutS Homolog 2 Protein ,MSH2 ,Cohort ,Multivariate Analysis ,Mutation ,Female ,business ,Carrier Proteins ,MutL Protein Homolog 1 ,Cohort study - Abstract
textabstractContext: Lynch syndrome is caused primarily by mutations in the mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2. Objectives: To analyze MLH1/MSH2 mutation prevalence in a large cohort of patients undergoing genetic testing and to develop a clinical model to predict the likelihood of finding a mutation in at-risk patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: Personal and family history were obtained for 1914 unrelated probands who submitted blood samples starting in the year 2000 for full gene sequencing of MLH1/MSH2. Genetic analysis was performed using a combination of sequence analysis and Southern blotting. A multivariable model was developed using logistic regression in an initial cohort of 898 individuals and subsequently prospectively validated in 1016 patients. The complex model that we have named PREMM1,2 (Prediction of Mutations in MLH1 and MSH2) was developed into a Webbased tool that incorporates personal and family history of cancer and adenomas. Main Outcome Measure: Deleterious mutations in MLH1/MSH2 genes. Results: Overall, 14.5% of the probands (130/898) carried a pathogenic mutation (MLH1, 6.5%; MSH2, 8.0%) in the development cohort and 15.3% (155/1016) in the validation cohort, with 42 (27%) of the latter being large rearrangements. Strong predictors of mutations included proband characteristics (presence of colorectal cancer, especially ≥2 separate diagnoses, or endometrial cancer) and family history (especially the number of first-degree relatives with colorectal or endometrial cancer). Age at diagnosis was particularly important for colorectal cancer. The multivariable model discriminated well at external validation, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.84). Conclusions: Personal and family history characteristics can accurately predict the outcome of genetic testing in a large population at risk of Lynch syndrome. The PREMM1,2 model provides clinicians with an objective, easy-to-use tool to estimate the likelihood of finding mutations in the MLH1/MSH2 genes and may guide the strategy for molecular evaluation.
- Published
- 2006