Search

The Above Ground Biomass (AGB) is an essential component of the Earth carbon cycle. Yet, large uncertainties remain on its spatial distribution and temporal evolution. Improving the accuracy of the AGB estimates requires precise and regular monitoring. Satellite remote sensing offers such capabilities. In particular, the L-Band (1.41 GHz) Vegetation Optical Depth (VOD) derived from the SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity mission) multi-angle brightness temperatures is a good AGB proxy. Averaging the SMOS L-VOD over a year and linking it to a pre-existing AGB map is a well-established method to derive a spatial relationship between both quantities. After temporal extrapolation of this relation, global AGB time series are derived from the L-VOD, allowing to retrieve vegetation biomass values up to 300 Mg ha-1 from 2011 onwards. This study focuses on this protocol to produce a harmonized AGB dataset from the L-VOD and analyses the impact of three factors on the AGB/VOD calibration. First, the influence of the orbit type (ascending or descending) on the estimation is quantified. Second, the relevance of using a single global spatial calibration or several regional ones is thoroughly discussed for the first time. Third, the AGB time series from this new dataset are compared against other published AGB time series to assess the validity of extrapolating a spatial relationship over time. These comparisons highlight that the produced dataset has more inter-annual variability than the other available time series and presents globally lower AGB estimates, particularly over the equatorial part of Africa. These two limitations are inherent to the input data and method used. Overall, the resulting AGB is coherent with the AGB map from the CCI Biomass version 4 and can be used in AGB studies. The freely accessible AGB dataset has been produced from the level 2 SMOS products, mixing ascending and descending orbits altogether and using a single global relationship between the AGB and the VOD. The spatial bias associated with the AGB estimates is also provided in the files. The AGB dataset is open access and the NetCDF files are available at: https://doi.org/10.12770/95f76ff0-5d89-430d-80db-95fbdd77f543 (Boitard et al., 2024). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The two vegetation transfer parameters of $\tau $ τ (Vegetation Optical Depth,VOD) and $\omega $ ω (Omega) could vary significantly across microwave channels in terms of frequencies, polarizations, and incidence angles, and their channel-dependent characteristics have not yet been fully investigated. In this study, we investigate the channel dependence of vegetation effects on microwave emissions from soils using a higher-order vegetation radiative transfer model of Tor Vergata. Corn was selected as the subject of investigation, and a corn growth model was developed utilizing field data collected from the multifrequency and multi-angular ground-based microwave radiation experiment from the Soil Moisture Experiment in the Luan River (SMELR). Upon compilation of the simulation dataset of microwave emissions of the corn field, the effective scattering albedo across different channels were calculated using the Tor Vergata model. Results show that vertical polarization of the vegetation optical depth is more affected by incidence angle changes, while horizontal polarization exhibits lower variations in vegetation optical depth due to incidence angle adjustments. The channel dependence of vegetation optical depth can be described as the polarization dependence parameter (${C_P}$ C P ) and the frequency dependence parameter (${C_f}$ C f ). These two parameters enable the calculation of vegetation optical depth at any channel under three adjacent frequencies (L-band, C-band and X-band). The effective scattering albedo of vegetation does not vary significantly with vegetation height or angle. It primarily depends on frequency and polarization, showing an overall increasing trend with increasing frequency. The effective scattering albedo with vertical polarization is slightly higher than that with horizontal polarization at higher frequencies, while both are lower in the L-band. This investigation is helpful for understanding the vegetation effects on microwave emissions from soils, ultimately advancing the accuracy of large-scale soil moisture retrieval in vegetated areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

P-band radiometry has been demonstrated to have a deeper sensing depth than L-band, making the consideration of multilayer microwave interactions necessary. In addition, the scattering and phase interference effects are different at the P-band, requiring a reconsideration of the need for coherent models. However, the impact remains to be clarified, and understanding the validity and limitations of these models at both L- and P-bands is crucial for their refinement and application. Therefore, two general categories of microwave emission models, including two stratified coherent models (Njoku and Wilhite) and four incoherent models (conventional tau-omega model and three multilayer models being zero-order, first-order, and incoherent solution), were intercompared for the first time on the same dataset. This evaluation utilized observations of L- and P-bands radiometry under different land cover conditions from a tower-based experiment in Victoria, Australia. Model estimations of brightness temperature (TB) were consistent with measurements, with the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) at P-band V-polarization under corn (2 K) and the highest RMSE at L-band H-polarization under bare soil (13 K). Coherent models performed slightly better than incoherent models under bare soil (3 K less RMSE), while the opposite was true under vegetated soil conditions (1 K less RMSE). Coherent and incoherent models showed maximum differences (3 K at P-band and 2 K at L-band), correlating strongly with soil moisture variations at 0–10 cm. Findings suggest that coherent and incoherent models performed similarly; thus, incoherent models may be preferable for estimating TB at L- and P-bands due to reduced computational complexity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]