Search

RPGR mutations are the most common cause of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP). High myopia has been described as a very frequent feature among affected female carriers of XLRP. However, the clinical phenotype of female patients presenting with X-linked RPGR-related high myopia has not been well described. Retrospective case series of four female patients with RPGR mutations and a diagnosis of high myopia, who presented to two academic eye centers. Clinical data, including age, family history, visual acuity, refractive error, dilated fundus exam, fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, electroretinography, and results of genetic testing, were collected. Three RPGR variants identified in the present study have not been previously associated with myopia in female carriers. One variant (c.2405_2406delAG, p.Glu802Glyfs *32) has been previously associated with a myopic phenotype in a female patient. Patients became symptomatic between the first and sixth decades of life. Myopia-associated tilted optic discs and posterior staphyloma were present in all patients. Two patients presented with intraretinal migration of the retinal pigment epithelium. RPGR-related high myopia has been associated with mutations in exons 1–14 and ORF15 in heterozygous females. There is a wide range of visual function among carriers. Although the exact mechanism of RPGR-related high myopia is still unclear, continued molecular diagnosis and description of phenotypes remain a crucial step in understanding the impact of RPGR mutations on visual function in female XLRP carriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to explore genetic variants that potentially lead to outer retinal tubulation (ORT), estimate the prevalence of ORT in these candidate genes, and investigate the clinical etiology of ORT in patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs), with respect to each gene., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional review was conducted on 565 patients with molecular diagnoses of IRD, confirming the presence of ORT as noted in each patient's respective spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging. Using SD-OCT imaging, the presence of ORT was analyzed in relation to specific genetic variants and phenotypic characteristics. Outcomes included the observed ORT frequencies across two gene-specific cohorts: non- retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-specific genes, and RPE-specific genes; and to investigate the analogous characteristics caused by variants in these genes., Results: Among the 565 patients included in this study, 104 exhibited ORT on SD-OCT. We observed ORT frequencies among the following genes from our patient cohort: 100% (23/23) forCHM, 100%(2/2) forPNPLA6, 100% (4/4) forRCBTB1, 100% formtDNA[100% (4/4) forMT-TL1and 100% (1/1) formtDNAdeletion], 100% (1/1) forOAT, 95.2% (20/21) forCYP4V2, 72.7% (8/11) forCHMfemale carriers, 66.7% (2/3) forC1QTNF5, 57.1% (8/14) forPROM1, 53.8% (7/13) forPRPH2, 42.9% (3/7) forCERKL, 28.6% (2/7) forCDHR1, 20% (1/5) forRPE65, 4% (18/445) forABCA4.In contrast, ORT was not observed in any patients with photoreceptor-specific gene variants, such asRHO(n=13),USH2A(n=118),EYS(n=70),PDE6B(n=10),PDE6A(n=4),and others., Conclusion: These results illustrate a compelling association between the presence of ORT and IRDs caused by variants in RPE-specific genes, as well as non-RPE-specific genes. In contrast, IRDs caused by photoreceptor-specific genes are typically not associated with ORT occurrence. Further analysis revealed that ORT tends to manifest in IRDs with milder intraretinal pigment migration (IPM), a finding that is typically associated with RPE-specific genes. These findings regarding ORT, genetic factors, atrophic patterns in the fundus, and IPM provide valuable insight into the complex etiology of IRDs. Future prospective studies are needed to further explore the association and underlying mechanisms of ORT in these contexts., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest and are alone responsible for the content and writing of this article., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)