Search

Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion are unfavorable prognostic factors in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the prevalence and prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in these patients remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed specimens of 321 patients with pathologically diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in our institution from 2017 to 2020. Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion were assessed by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Survival was analyzed using the log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression analysis. Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion were present in 12.5% (n = 40) and 17.8% (n = 57) of resection specimens, respectively. Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion were significantly more common in patients with advanced cancer (both P <.05). In the univariate analyses, lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion were associated with shorter overall survival and disease-free survival. Multivariable analysis revealed that lymphovascular invasion after neoadjuvant therapy was an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival and disease-free survival. Subgroup analyses showed that lymphovascular invasion could identify cases with worse overall survival or disease-free survival among node-negative patients, indicating the role of lymphovascular invasion in the precise staging of pN0 patients. Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion were significantly negatively correlated with overall survival and disease-free survival. Lymphovascular invasion was an independent prognostic predictor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion should be considered in the histopathology workup for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Currently, mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy (MAE) and thoracoscope-assisted esophagectomy (TAE) represent two prevalent forms of minimally invasive esophagectomy extensively employed in the management of esophageal cancer (EC). The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess and compare these two surgical approaches concerning perioperative outcomes and long-term survival, offering valuable insights for refining surgical strategies and enhancing patient outcomes in this field., Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CNKI databases until 1 March 2024, for studies comparing MAE and TAE. Outcomes of interest included perioperative outcomes (intraoperative outcomes, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications) and survival rates. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4, with heterogeneity dictating the use of fixed or random-effects models., Results: A total of 21 relevant studies were finally included. MAE was associated with significantly shorter operation times [mean difference (MD)=-59.58 min, 95% CI: -82.90 to -36.26] and less intraoperative blood loss (MD=-68.34 ml, 95% CI: -130.45 to -6.23). However, MAE resulted in fewer lymph nodes being dissected (MD=-3.50, 95% CI: -6.23 to -0.78). Postoperative recovery was enhanced following MAE, as evidenced by reduced hospital stays and tube times. MAE significantly reduced pulmonary complications [odds ratio (OR)=0.59, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.81] but increased the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.60). No significant differences were observed in anastomotic leakage, chylothorax, cardiac complications, wound infections, and gastric retention between MAE and TAE. The long-term survival outcomes showed no statistical difference [hazard ratio (HR)=1.05, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.54]., Conclusions: MAE offers advantages in reducing operation time, blood loss, and specific postoperative complications, particularly pulmonary complications, with a shorter recovery period compared to TAE. However, it poses a higher risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and results in fewer lymph nodes being dissected. No difference in long-term survival was observed, indicating that both techniques have distinct benefits and limitations. These findings underscore the need for personalized surgical approaches in EC treatment, considering individual patient characteristics and tumor specifics., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: A variety of nutritional evaluation parameters has been documented as prognostic indicators in some malignancies. However, the prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, as one of these nutritional indices, in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear and warrants investigation. Our study sought to elucidate the prognostic value of this nutritional index in ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy., Methods: This retrospective study encompassed 314 patients diagnosed with ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between August 2016 and August 2021. CONUT scores were computed at two specific time points: prior to neoadjuvant therapy initiation and before surgery, utilizing serum albumin, total lymphocyte, and cholesterol levels of ESCC patients. Furthermore, the delta CONUT (ΔCONUT) score was derived by subtracting the preoperative CONUT score from the pretreatment CONUT score. The associations between CONUT scores and various survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression analysis., Results: Patients with a high preoperative CONUT score demonstrated a higher postoperative complication rate [odds ratio (OR) =2.009, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.150-3.510, P=0.01] compared to those in the low CONUT group. Multivariate analysis revealed that a ΔCONUT score ≥0 served as an independent negative prognostic indicator for increased postoperative complications (OR =3.008, 95% CI: 1.509-5.999, P=0.002) and poorer overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) =2.388, 95% CI: 1.052-5.422, P=0.04] in ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy combined with esophagectomy., Conclusions: A high preoperative CONUT score and a ΔCONUT score ≥0 were indicative of a poor prognostic nutritional status in ESCC patients who had undergone neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-187/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Background: The therapeutic strategy for patients with spontaneous rupture of the esophagus includes surgical repair, endoscopic therapy, supportive care, and others. However, no evidence exists to direct clinical decision-making regarding the choice of operative and nonoperative management. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy of different therapeutic strategies in both general and stratified patients., Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 101 patients at nine tertiary referral hospital centers in China. Patients were divided into operative and nonoperative groups based on the initial treatment. Short-term outcomes, including 90-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and postoperative leakage were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed based on treatment timing and Pittsburgh perforation severity score (PSS)., Results: Of 101 patients, 60 (58.4%) underwent operative management. A significant difference of 90-day mortality between operative and nonoperative groups was observed (15.0% vs. 34.1%, P=0.031). Operative management tend to yield similar therapeutic benefits in timely (OR, 0.250; 95% CI, 0.05-1.14, P=0.073) and delayed (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.12-1.47, P=0.175) treatment groups. Based on PSS stratification, operative management significantly decreased the risk of 90-day mortality (OR, 0.211; 95% CI, 0.064-0.701; P=0.011) for patients in low- and moderate-risk groups but may be detrimental for patients in high-risk group (OR, 1.333; 95% CI, 0.233-7.626; P=0.746)., Conclusions: Operative management might be superior to nonoperative management for low- and moderate-risk patients with spontaneous rupture of the esophagus. However, for patients at high risks, operative management might not provide additional benefits compared with nonoperative management. Further research involving larger sample sizes is required for accurate patient stratification and conclusive evidence-based guideline., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: The application of liquid biopsy analysis utilizing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has gained prominence as a biomarker in specific cancer types. Nevertheless, the correlation between ctDNA and the prognostic outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) remains a subject of controversy. This meta-analysis aims to assess the correlation between ctDNA and the prognosis of EC patients., Methods: The authors systematically explored Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database to identify studies reporting on the prognostic value of ctDNA in EC patients before November 2023. The primary outcome involved the determine of associations between ctDNA with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well asprogression-free survival (PFS) among EC patients. Secondary outcomes encompassed a detailed subgroup analysis in the setting of EC, including parameters such as detection time, histological subtypes, treatment modalities, regions, anatomic locations, and detection methods. Publication bias was assessed utilizing Begg's test, Egger's test, and funnel plots. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by systematically excluding individual studies to evaluate the stability of the results., Results: A total of 1203 studies were initially screened, from which 13 studies underwent further analysis, encompassing 604 patients diagnosed with EC. The comprehensive pooled analysis indicated a significant association between the detection of ctDNA and poor OS (HR: 3.65; 95% CI: 1.97-6.75, P <0.001), DFS/RFS (HR: 6.08; 95% CI: 1.21-30.50, P <0.001), and PFS (HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 1.94-4.16, P <0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that ctDNA remained a consistent negative predictor of OS when stratified by different detection time, histological subtypes, regions, anatomic locations, and detection methods. Furthermore, subgroup analysis stratified by regions and study types demonstrated an association between ctDNA detection and poor PFS in EC patients., Conclusion: Our results indicate plasma ctDNA may serve as robust prognostic markers for OS, DFS/RFS, and PFS among EC patients. This finding suggests that plasma ctDNA could offer a highly effective approach for risk stratification and personalized medicine., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objectives: To assess the clinical relevance and prognostic value of changes in the Naples prognostic score (NPS) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR) among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients., Methods: We studied 232 locally advanced ESCC patients who received NACR before undergoing esophagectomy retrospectively. Categorizing individuals into the elevated NPS group and the non-elevated NPS group based on the change in NPS after NACR (ΔNPS > 0 or ∆NPS ≤ 0), we examined and compared the clinicopathological characteristics, survival rates, and postoperative complications between these 2 groups (∆NPS = post-NACR NPS - pre-NACR NPS)., Results: Results: Out of the 232 patients enrolled, 105 exhibited elevated NPS levels, while 127 showed non-elevated NPS levels. Survival analyses indicated inferior overall survival (OS) ( p =0.024) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) ( p =0.047) in the elevated NPS cohort compared to the non-elevated NPS cohort. Subsequent cox regression analyses identified the post-NACR change in NPS as an independent prognostic indicator for RFS ( p =0.029) and OS ( p =0.036)., Conclusion: Elevated NPS post-NACR emerged as a significant indicator of worse prognosis for locally advanced ESCC patients who underwent NACR. This finding has great potential to be useful for recognizing high-risk ESCC patients who received NACR before undergoing esophagectomy and making individualized subsequent therapeutic decisions in clinical practice., (Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal.)